A COMPARISON OF PATELLAR TENDON AND FOUR-STRAND HAMSTRING TENDON GRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONS. THE RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AT FIVE YEARS

Abstract

Aim: To compare, in a longitudinal study, the clinical outcomes of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either a four-strand hamstring tendon (HT) or a patellar tendon (PT) autograft over a five-year period, when a similar operative procedure is followed for both groups.

Method: Ninety patients with isolated ACL ruptures who had received PT autografts and another 90 who had received HT autografts were studied annually for five years. Fifty patients were randomised as a subgroup. The assessments included the IKDC Knee Ligament Evaluation, KT1000, Lysholm Knee Score, thigh atrophy, kneeling pain, hamstring pain and radiographs.

Results: The median Lysholm Knee Score was 96 for the PT group and 95 for the HT group. No significant difference was found for subjective knee function, overall IKDC assessment, X-ray findings, manual ligament KT1000 instrumented testing, graft rupture or contra-lateral ACL rupture. There was an increasing incidence of fixed flexion deformity seen in the PT group. There was no difference in the requirement for subsequent surgery. The incidence of kneeling pain at five years was significantly higher in the PT group. The results of the randomised patients were identical to the sequential patients.

Conclusions: Endoscopic reconstruction of the ACL utilizing either type of autograft restored knee stability and was protective of the meniscus despite a high level of sporting activity. We found a worrying trend towards an increasing incidence of fixed flexion deformity with time in the PT group. Pain when kneeling also remained a persistent problem in this subgroup. PT grafts appeared tighter clinically and, with the KT 1000, when assessed up to three years post operatively, compared with HT grafts. Thereafter the results were similar.