Aims. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients report exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion. However, the exact impingement location in deep flexion is unknown. The aim was to investigate impingement-free maximal flexion, impingement location, and if cam deformity causes hip impingement in flexion in FAI patients. Methods. A retrospective study involving 24 patients (37 hips) with FAI and femoral retroversion (femoral version (FV) < 5° per Murphy method) was performed. All patients were symptomatic (mean age 28 years (SD 9)) and had anterior hip/groin pain and a positive anterior impingement test. Cam- and pincer-type subgroups were analyzed. Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (26 hips). All patients underwent pelvic CT scans to generate personalized CT-based 3D models and validated software for patient-specific impingement simulation (equidistant method). Results. Mean impingement-free flexion of patients with mixed-type FAI (110° (SD 8°)) and patients with pincer-type FAI (112° (SD 8°)) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower compared to the control group (125° (SD 13°)). The frequency of extra-articular subspine impingement was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in patients with pincer-type FAI (57%) compared to cam-type FAI (22%) in 125° flexion. Bony impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior at femoral four and five o’clock position in patients with cam-type FAI (63% (10 of 16 hips) and 37% (6 of 10 hips)), and did not involve the cam deformity. The cam deformity did not cause impingement in maximal flexion. Conclusion. Femoral impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior-inferior distal to the cam deformity. This differs to previous studies, a finding which could be important for FAI patients in order to avoid exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion (e.g. during squats) and for hip arthroscopy (hip-preservation surgery) for planning of bone resection. Hip impingement in flexion has implications for daily activities (e.g. putting on shoes), sports, and sex. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):22–32

Aims. The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes. Methods. A retrospective institutional review board-approved observational study was performed with 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) with hip pain due to FAI evaluated for hip preservation surgery. Overall, 142 patients (165 hips) had cam-type FAI, while 118 patients (137 hips) had mixed-type FAI. The allocation to each subgroup was based on reference values calculated on anteroposterior radiographs. CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and AV were retrospectively compared among five FAI subgroups. Frequency of decreased FV < 10°, severely decreased FV < 5°, and absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was analyzed. Results. A significantly (p < 0.001) lower mean FV was found in patients with cam-type FAI (15° (SD 10°)), and in patients with mixed-type FAI (17° (SD 11°)) compared to severe over-coverage (20° (SD 12°). Frequency of decreased FV < 10° was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients with cam-type FAI (28%, 46 hips) and in patients with over-coverage (29%, 11 hips) compared to severe over-coverage (12%, 5 hips). Absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was found in 13% (5 hips) of patients with over-coverage, 6% (10 hips) of patients with cam-type FAI, and 5% (7 hips) of patients with mixed-type FAI. The frequency of decreased FV< 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°) was 6% (8 hips) in patients with mixed-type FAI and 5% (20 hips) in all FAI patients. Of patients with over-coverage, 11% (4 hips) had decreased FV < 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°). Conclusion. Patients with cam-type FAI had a considerable proportion (28%) of decreased FV < 10° and 6% had absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°), even more for patients with pincer-type FAI due to over-coverage (29% and 13%). This could be important for patients evaluated for open hip preservation surgery or hip arthroscopy, and each patient requires careful personalized evaluation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):557–565

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the main causes of hip osteoarthritis. Femoral retroversion has been reported as a cause of FAI and it is well established that a retroverted femur produces hip pain and alterations in the external and internal rotation balance. However, no studies of femoral retroversion in patients with FAI have been reported. Furthermore, since the lack of internal rotation is a common feature in patients with FAI, it could be possible that femoral version abnormalities are present in these patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the femoral version in a group of patients with FAI and to assess its relation in the development of hip osteoarthritis. Methods: The history, x-rays and hip CT scans of 142 patients with FAI were reviewed. All patients presented persistent hip pain and were evaluated clinically between January 2006 and July 2008. We defined FAI when at least one of the following features were present:. an abnormal alpha angle (> 49°) measured on the elongated femoral neck x-ray,. a positive cross-over sign or pro-trusio acetabuli in the AP pelvis x-ray,. the presence of diminished anteversion in the femur (< 10°) or a retroverted femur (< 0°) in the CT scan, associated with a positive hip impingement test and lack of internal rotation at 90 degrees of flexion. We documented the type of FAI, the presence of acetabular dysplasia, coxa valga, coxa vara and the femoral version measured on the CT scan. The degree of osteoarthritis of the hip using the Tönnis classification was documented as well. Results: Two hundred and sixty-five FAI hips from 142 patients (73 females and 69 males) were analyzed. The average age was 36.7 years. The mean femoral version was 11.4 ° (−14.1° to 47°). We found 43 hips (16.6%) of the femora were retroverted and 133 hips (50%) had either diminished anteversion (< 10°) or were retroverted. In 12 hips (0.05%) the only cause of FAI was the presence of a diminished anteversion or retroverted femur. The statistical analysis using the generalized estimating equations method including the right and left hips, shown that among these six predictors, both femoral retroversion (p=0.046) and coxa vara (p< 0.001) were statistically significant for the presence of osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The presence of a retroverted femur seems to be a cofactor in the development of hip osteoarthritis in patients with FAI. The orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the high frequency of femoral retroversion when evaluating patients with hip impingement, in order to make the right diagnosis and treatment. It might be possible that this association between FAI and femoral retroversion is due to a common hip disease during skeletal maturation (i.e. SCFE) leading to two anatomical alterations at the proximal femur: reduced head-neck offset and retroverted femur

Aims. To evaluate how abnormal proximal femoral anatomy affects different femoral version measurements in young patients with hip pain. Methods. First, femoral version was measured in 50 hips of symptomatic consecutively selected patients with hip pain (mean age 20 years (SD 6), 60% (n = 25) females) on preoperative CT scans using different measurement methods: Lee et al, Reikerås et al, Tomczak et al, and Murphy et al. Neck-shaft angle (NSA) and α angle were measured on coronal and radial CT images. Second, CT scans from three patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and anteversion were used to create 3D femur models, which were manipulated to generate models with different NSAs and different cam lesions, resulting in eight models per patient. Femoral version measurements were repeated on manipulated femora. Results. Comparing the different measurement methods for femoral version resulted in a maximum mean difference of 18° (95% CI 16 to 20) between the most proximal (Lee et al) and most distal (Murphy et al) methods. Higher differences in proximal and distal femoral version measurement techniques were seen in femora with greater femoral version (r > 0.46; p < 0.001) and greater NSA (r > 0.37; p = 0.008) between all measurement methods. In the parametric 3D manipulation analysis, differences in femoral version increased 11° and 9° in patients with high and normal femoral version, respectively, with increasing NSA (110° to 150°). Conclusion. Measurement of femoral version angles differ depending on the method used to almost 20°, which is in the range of the aimed surgical correction in derotational femoral osteotomy and thus can be considered clinically relevant. Differences between proximal and distal measurement methods further increase by increasing femoral version and NSA. Measurement methods that take the entire proximal femur into account by using distal landmarks may produce more sensitive measurements of these differences. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):759–766

Aims

Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters.

Introduction. The posterior condylar axis of the knee is the most common reference for femoral anteversion. However, the posterior condyles, nor the transepicondylar axis, provide a functional description of femoral anteversion, and their appropriateness as the ideal reference has been questioned. In a natural standing positon, the femur can be internally or externally rotated, altering the functional anteversion of the native femoral neck or prosthetic stem. Uemura et al. found that the femur internally rotates by 0.4° as femoral anteversion increases every 1°. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between femoral anteversion and the axial rotation of the femur before and after total hip replacement (THR). Method. Fifty-nine patients had a pre-operative CT scan as part of their routine planning for THR. The patients were asked to lie in a comfortable position in the CT scanner. The internal/external rotation of the femur, described as the angle between the posterior condyles and the CT coronal plane, was measured. The native femoral neck anteversion, relative to the posterior condyles, was also determined. Identical measurements were performed at one-week post-op using the same CT methodology. The relationship between femoral IR/ER and femoral anteversion was studied pre- and post-op. Additionally, the effect of changing anteversion on the axial rotation of the femur was investigated. Results. There was a strong correlation between axial rotation of the femur and femoral anteversion, both pre-and post-operatively. Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.64 and 0.66 respectively. This supported Uemura et al.'s findings that internal rotation of the femur increases with increasing anteversion. Additionally, there was a moderate correlation, r = 0.56, between the change in axial rotation of the femur and change in anteversion. This trend suggested that external rotation of the leg would increase, if stem anteversion was decreased from the native. Conclusions. Patients with high femoral anteversion may have a natural mechanism of “correction” with femoral internal rotation. Equally, patients with femoral retroversion tend to naturally externally rotate their leg. Decreasing stem anteversion from native, trended toward an increase in external rotation of the femur. This finding is supported by the clinical observation of patients with high anteversion and compensatory in-toe, who have normal foot progression angle post-operatively after having their anteversion decreased. These findings have implications when planning implant alignment in THR

Introduction. Version abnormalities of the femur, either retroversion or excessive anteversion, cause pain and hip joint damage due to impingement or instability respectively. A retrospective clinical review was conducted on patients undergoing a subtrochanteric derotation osteotomy for either excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur. Methods. A total of 49 derotation osteotomies were performed in 39 patients. There were 32 females and 7 males. Average age was 29 years (range 14 to 59 years). Osteotomies were performed closed with an intramedullary saw (Figure 1). Fixation was performed with a variety of intramedullary nails. Patients requiring a varus or valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy were excluded. Pure rotational corrections only were performed. Twenty-four percent of patients had a retroversion deformity (average −8° retroversion, range +1 to −23°), 76% had excessive anteversion of the femur (average +36° anteversion, range +22° to +53°). Etiology was post-traumatic in 5 (10%), diplegic cerebral palsy in 4 (8%), fibrous dysplasia in 2 (4%), Prader-Willi Syndrome in 1 (2%) and idiopathic in 37 (76%). Previous surgery had been performed in 51% of hips. Fifty-seven percent underwent concomitant surgery with the index femoral derotation osteotomy, including hip arthroscopy in 39% (labral debridement alone or with femoral neck osteochondroplasty), a tibial derotation osteotomy in 12% and periacetabular osteotomy in 6%. Concomitant tibial osteotomies were performed to correct a compensatory excessive external tibial torsion that would be exacerbated in the correction of excessive femoral anteversion. The modified Harris Hip Score was used to assess the results in patients with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. Results. There were no non-unions. Average time to union was 3.3 months. One late infection occurred 10 months after surgery, treated successfully with hardware removal and antibiotics. Two patients, one with Prader-Willi syndrome and one with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, were converted to total hip replacement. At an average follow-up of 6.1 years (range 2 to 19.1 years), the modified Harris Hip Score improved by 26 points (p< 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). The results were rated as excellent in 71%, good in 22%, fair in 5% and poor in 3%. Subsequent surgery was required in 73%, 93% of which were hardware removals. Discussion and Conclusion. A closed, subtrochanteric derotation osteotomy of the femur is a safe and effective procedure to treat either femoral retroversion or excessive anteversion. Excellent or good results were obtained in 93%, despite the need for subsequent hardware removal in more than two-thirds of the patients. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction: Obligatory external rotation during flexion is well recognised as a cardinal feature of Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphyses (SUFE). We have evaluated the significance of acetabular version in contributing to the external rotational deformity that is seen in otherwise normal hips. We present a small case series focussing on the characteristics of this pathology, highlighting its significance and outlining a treatment strategy. Method: Five patients (eight hips) presented with disabling hip pain during non-sporting activities. All their hip radiographs had been reported as normal. The rotational profile of both acetabulum and femur in these patients was evaluated by MRI and CT scans. Results: Clinical examination revealed otherwise normal hips but for an external rotation deformity which got worse on hip flexion. The average external rotation deformity with the hip in extension was 60 degrees, which worsened to 90 degrees during hip flexion. Three of these hips had been previously treated with in situ pinning for SUFE. Other hips were in patients who were either skeletally mature or close to skeletal maturity. We found that all were “profunda hips” with severe acetabular retroversion. The abnormality in acetabular version was best defined on axial imaging. Conclusions: The femoral head is a spherical conchoid. The concept of version of the hip (both femoral and acetabular) as described by McKibbin, Tonnis and Ganz is reviewed. Femoral retroversion is common in patients with SUFE, but the addition of acetabular retroversion makes these hips disproportionately symptomatic. This deformity causes a combination of pincer and cam impingement, which is responsible for the marked disability. SUFE alone causes cam impingement, whilst a corresponding degree of slip without retroversion and profunda of the acetabulum is not that disabling

Aims

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements.

The June 2015 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: neuraxial anaesthesia and large joint arthroplasty; revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery; acetabular version and clinical outcomes in impingement surgery; hip precautions may be ineffective; implant selection and cost effectiveness; femoroacetabular impingement in the older age group; multiple revision in hip arthroplasty

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes pain and chondrolabral damage via mechanical overload during movement of the hip. It is caused by many different types of pathoanatomy, including the cam ‘bump’, decreased head–neck offset, acetabular retroversion, global acetabular overcoverage, prominent anterior–inferior iliac spine, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and the sequelae of childhood Perthes’ disease.

Both evolutionary and developmental factors may cause FAI. Prevalence studies show that anatomic variations that cause FAI are common in the asymptomatic population. Young athletes may be predisposed to FAI because of the stress on the physis during development. Other factors, including the soft tissues, may also influence symptoms and chondrolabral damage.

FAI and the resultant chondrolabral pathology are often treated arthroscopically. Although the results are favourable, morphologies can be complex, patient expectations are high and the surgery is challenging. The long-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy are still forthcoming and it is unknown if treatment of FAI will prevent arthrosis.