Summary Statement. In the most recent type of highly cross-linked UHMWPE, stabilised by
Introduction. Highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is the most common bearing surface used in total joint arthroplasty due to its excellent wear resistance. While radiation cross-linking is currently used, cross-linking using a cross-linking agent such as a peroxide can also be effective with improved oxidative stability, which can be achived by an antioxidant such as
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has been successfully used as a bearing material in total joint arthroplasty. However, longevity of these implants has been compromised by wear and fatigue damage of the polyethylene. The addition of
Aim: Wear of the UHMWPE component is responsible for many TJR failures. It is now well known that oxidation of UHMWPE, induced by radiation sterilisation in the presence of oxygen, dramatically increases the wear rate.
Introduction.
Introduction. Wear of the UHMWPE component is responsible for many TJR failures. It is now well known that oxidation of UHMWPE, induced by radiation sterilisation in air, dramatically increases the wear rate. ASTM regulations for orthopaedic UHMWPE forbids the addiction of any antioxidant to the polymer powder or to fabricated forms.
Concerns about reduced strength, fatigue resistance, and oxidative stability of highly crosslinked UHMWPE have limited the acceptance of these materials for TKR. It was hypothesized that a new crosslinked UHMWPE stabilized with
INTRODUCTION. Electron-beam-irradiated dl-α-Tocopherol (Vitamin E)-blended UHMWPE is now being considered as a potential new bearing surface material for hip prosthesis [1]. However,
The addition of
Summary Statement. In the present hip simulator studies, bearings with the newest generation of HXLPE, stabilised with
INTRODUCTION. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) inserts have shown significant improvements in decreasing wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty [1]. In contrast to that, XLPE has not shown to reduce wear or aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty [2,3,4]. One major limitation is that current wear testing in vitro is mainly focused on abrasive-adhesive wear due to level walking test conditions and does not reflect “delamination” as an essential clinical failure mode [5,6]. The objective of our study was to use a highly demanding daily activities wear simulation to evaluate the delamination risk of polyethylene materials with and without
Recent findings about UHMWPE oxidation from in vivo stresses lead to the need of a better understanding of which anti-oxidant additivation method is the best option for the use in orthopaedic field. A GUR 1050 crosslinked
The aim of this study was to report a 3 year follow up of
Introduction. In vitro studies showed that the anti-oxidative properties of
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has been the gold standard material of choice for the load-bearing articulating surface in knee joint prostheses. However, the application of joint replacements to younger (aged < 64 years) and more active people plus the general increase in life expectancy results in an urgent need for a longer lasting material with better in-use performance. There are three major material related causes that can lead to joint failure in UHMWPE knee joint replacements: free radical induced chemical degradation; mechanical degradation through wear and delamination; and UHMWPE micron and submicron wear debris induced osteolysis. As a potential solution to these problems, highly crosslinked UHMWPE stabilised with infused antioxidant
Introduction. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has been used successfully as a bearing material in hip, knee, and shoulder joint replacements. However, there are problems to cause a failure in UHMWPE component, which are wear behavior and creep deformation. Continuous bearing motion and dynamic load have occurred to UHMWPE wear debris caused osteolysis in periprosthetic tissue and to plastic deformation of joint component, and subsequent aseptic loosening of components. Therefore, many studies have being carried out in order to reduce wear debris and to improve mechanical strength from UHMWPE, and there is tremendous improvement of mechanical property in UHMWPE from gamma irradiated conventional UHMWPE (GIPE), highly crosslinked PE (XLPE), and XLPE with vitamin E1, 2. Friction has a significant one of the factors effect on the wear and creep deformation. In this study, the short-term frictional behaviors of three typical types of GIPE, remelted XLPE (R-XLPE), and s annealed XLPE (A-XLPE), and XLPE with
Introduction. Increased oxidative stability of orthopedic implants can be achieved by adding an antioxidant, such as
Background. dl-α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) blended ultra-high molecular weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) was originally developed as a bearing material for use in knee prostheses . (1). The reduced biological response observed for
Introduction. We have previously demonstrated that peroxide crosslinked vitamin E-blended UHMWPE maintains its clinically-required wear and mechanical properties [1]. This material can potentially be used as an irradiation-free bearing surface for TJA. However, using organic peroxides in medical devices requires a thorough examination of tissues in contact with the implant. For this study we crosslinked polyethylene using five times the needed concentration of peroxide (2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)-hexyne-3 or P130), followed by implantation to determine implant biocompatibility, and pre and post implant peroxide residual contents. Methods. The study was performed after institutional approval following ISO standard 10993–6. Study groups: not crosslinked (0.2 (1050) VE), crosslinked (0.2 VE (1050)/5% P130) and crosslinked-high temperature melted (HTM) (0.2 VE (1050)/5% P130). Materials were blended and consolidated, machined (2.5 diameter × 2.5 cm height), sterilized and implanted in the dorsum New Zealand white rabbits. Pre and post implantation FTIR was performed. Two samples were implanted in each rabbit; n=6 samples were included for each group. After 4 weeks, samples were explanted, analyzed using FTIR, and subcutaneous tissues processed for histological analysis. Results. FTIR absorbances at 914cm. −1. , 1169cm. −1. , and the OH absorbance at 3450cm. −1. showed differences between materials (Fig 1A). There was a significant increase in the absorbance at 914 for the non-crosslinked and crosslinked samples after explantation (p = 2.77E–17, p = 4.22E–23, Fig 1B). There was a significant decrease in all peroxide related absorbances after explantation for the crosslinked and HTM samples (p < 0.05, Fig 1B). Before implantation, these absorbances were significantly higher in the crosslinked and crosslinked/HTM samples than those in the non crosslinked sample (p<0.05, Fig 2A). Peroxide related absorbances of the crosslinked sample were also significantly higher than those of the crosslinked/HTM sample (p<0.05, Fig 2A). After explantation, the crosslinked samples had significantly higher absorbances than both the non crosslinked and crosslinked/HTM samples (p < 0.05, Fig 2A). All peroxide related absorbances of the crosslinked/HTM samples were significantly higher than those of the non crosslinked sample (p < 0.05, Fig 2A). The non crosslinked sample showed no significant differential between these absorbances at implantation and after retrieval. The crosslinked sample had the largest differential between the total peak absorbances before implantation and retrieval at 914cm. −1. The crosslinked/HTM samples had the largest differential between the total peak absorbances before and after implantation for both 1169cm. −1. and the OH absorbances (Fig 2B). All explants were recovered after four weeks in vivo (Fig 3A). No difference was found in the histological analysis of the tissue characterized by a synovial-like lining with signs of fibrosis around the implants (Fig 3B). Discussion. The main challenge of this study was identifying pre and postoperative implant peroxide residual peaks via FTIR. We wanted to ensure that peroxide was present in implants before implantation, to ensure their elution into tissues. Conclusions. Peroxide crosslinked polyethylene stabilized with