Shoulder arthroplasty has experienced exponential growth in the past 10–15 years, largely due to improvements in anatomical design, increased application of technology to address various clinical pathology, and improved access to experienced shoulder surgeons. Glenohumeral arthritis has historically been the most common indication for a shoulder replacement, and glenoid wear has been the main concern with regards to longevity of the prosthesis. Attempts to improve glenoid components involve alterations in peg or keel configuration, as well as the introduction of metal backed constructs. Early experience with metal backed components led to very poor results with often catastrophic loosening and destruction of glenoid bone. Proximal humerus fractures are another common indication for a shoulder arthroplasty, and in these cases, tuberosity fixation and healing are the challenge precluding a consistently successful result. More recently, base plate fixation in the setting of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty has come to the forefront as a significant factor. Trabecular metal technology has emerged as a compelling method of enabling powerful bone ingrowth to the surfaces of arthroplasty components. Trabecular metal is composed of tantalum. It is used to form a carbon scaffold which has a modulus between that of cancellous and cortical bone, thus has some flexibility when made into an independent construct. Vapor deposition onto arthroplasty surfaces provides a bone ingrowth surface. There is interest in utilizing trabecular metal for glenoid and tuberosity fixation in particular. Trabecular metal proximal coated stems provide an ingrowth surface for tuberosity fixation in the setting of proximal humerus fractures. Long term results are still pending. Because the metal is much less stiff then other metals, trabecular metal has recently been used along the back of polyethylene glenoids. The original design had a problem with fracture at the base of the pegs. A redesigned component instituting a cruciate design was implemented, and is currently available on a limited release basis with promising early results. The use of trabecular metal on the deep surface of the reverse arthroplasty baseplate and the proximal aspect of the reverse stem has led to successful fixation, allowing cementless fixation of both the humeral and glenoid components. Learning objectives of this presentation include:. Understand the mechanical characteristics of trabecular metal and its bone ingrowth characteristics. Familiarize with currently available prosthetics incorporating trabecular metal technology. Case presentations utilizing trabecular metal coated components

The indications for cementless acetabular fixation have been broadened because our data supports the use of trabecular metal cups even when there's limited bleeding host bone contact. Trabecular metal augments have allowed us to use cementless cups when there is segmental loss of bone. Surgical Technique: The acetabular bed is prepared. If there is less medial bone stock than 2 mm, then morselised allograft is impacted by reverse reaming. When reaming is complete and less than 50% bleeding host bone is available for cup stabilization, then a trabecular metal cup is indicated. Trabecular augments are used if the trabecular cup trial is not stable, or if it is uncovered by 40% or more. The conventional augments come in different sizes to accommodate the diameter of the cup and the size of the defect. Larger defects are addressed with anterior and posterior column augments, and superior defects with figure of seven augments. Augments are fixed with at least two screws. The interface between the cup and the augments should be stable, but some surgeons place a very thin layer of cement between the augment and cup so micromotion does not occur while ingrowth is occurring. We have used trabecular metal augments in 46 acetabular revisions in conjunction with a trabecular metal cup. Thirty-four cases have at least 2 years follow-up with an average of 64.5 months. There has been 4 cup loosenings with 3 re-revisions

Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the revision TKA in which trabecular metal cones and femoral head allografts were used for large bone defect. Method. Total 53 patients who have undergone revision TKA from July 2013 to March 2017 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 24 patients used trabecular metal cones, and 29 patients used femoral head allografts for large bone defect. There were 3 males and 21 females in the metal cone group, while there were 4 males and 25 females in the allograft group. The mean age was 70.2 years (range, 51–80) in the femoral head allograft group, while it was 79.1 years (range, 73–85) in the metal cone group. Bone defect is classified according to the AORI classification and clinical outcomes were evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Hospital Special Surgery-score (HSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and ROM. Operation time was also evaluated. We used radiographs to check complications such as migration or loosening. We took follow-up x-rays and 3D CT of the patients, to assess the mean bone union period. Shapiro-Wilk test was done to check normality and Student T-test and Mann Whitney U-test were done for comparison between two groups. Result. The mean follow-up period was 3 .75 years (Range; 2.1 ∼ 5.75). The pre-op scores did not show significant difference. The mean VAS in the allograft and trabecular metal cone groups was 2.1 ± 0.87 and 1.8 ± 0.53, respectively (p = 0.16). The mean HSS score were 76.3 ± 5.51 and 79.2 ± 4.12 respectively (p = 0.13) and the mean WOMAC scores were 15.1 ± 3.25 and 14.8 ± 3.31 respectively (p = 0.06), and the mean KOOS scores were 27.8 ± 4.77 and 25.5 ± 4.84, respectively (p = 0.07). The mean ROM ranges were 100.6 ± 17.54 and 101.3 ± 19.22, respectively (p = 0.09). But the mean operation time of the allograft and trabecular metal cone groups was 137 minutes (Range; 111–198) and 102minutes (Range; 93 −133) (p=0.02) respectively, which showed statistical significance. In follow-up x-rays, no migration or loosening of the implants, osteolysis and other complications were found in both groups. In follow-up 3D CT, osteointegration was seen at the trabecular metal cone site, host bone being interpreted to the host bone. The allograft group showed fibrous and stable union in follow-up 3D CT. Conclusion. According to this study, in case of revision TKA with large bone defect, using whether allograft or trabecular metal cones did not affect the clinical outcomes. However, operation time was significantly shorter in trabecular metal cone group, therefore, in patients with poor general condition along with severe underlying diseases, usage of trabecular metal cone would be a better choice to shorten operation time and ease postoperative care. Keywords. Revision TKA, metal cone, allograft, bone defect. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The indications for cementless acetabular fixation have been broadened because our data supports the use of trabecular metal cups even when there's limited bleeding host bone contact. Trabecular metal augments have allowed us to use cementless cups when there is segmental loss of bone. Surgical Technique: The acetabular bed is prepared. If there is less medial bone stock than 2mm, then morselised allograft is impacted by reverse reaming. When reaming is complete and less than 50% bleeding host bone is available for cup stabilisation, then a trabecular metal cup is indicated. Trabecular augments are used if the trabecular cup trial is not stable, or if it is uncovered by 40% or more. The conventional augments come in different sizes to accommodate the diameter of the cup and the size of the defect. Larger defects are addressed with anterior and posterior column augments, and superior defects with figure of seven augments. Augments are fixed with at least two screws. The interface between the cup and the augments should be stable, but some surgeons place a very thin layer of cement between the augment and cup so micromotion does not occur while ingrowth is occurring. We have used trabecular metal augments in 46 acetabular revisions in conjunction with a trabecular metal cup. Thirty-four cases have at least 2 years follow-up with an average of 64.5 months. There have been 4 cup loosenings with 3 re-revisions

The indications for cementless acetabular fixation have been broadened because our data supports the use of trabecular metal cups even when there's limited bleeding host bone contact. Trabecular metal augments have allowed us to use cementless cups when there is segmental loss of bone. Surgical Technique: The acetabular bed is prepared. If there is less medial bone stock than 2 mm, then morselised allograft is impacted by reverse reaming. When reaming is complete and less than 50% bleeding host bone is available for cup stabilization, then a trabecular metal cup is indicated. Trabecular augments are used if the trabecular cup trial is not stable, or if it is uncovered by 40% or more. The conventional augments come in different sizes to accommodate the diameter of the cup and the size of the defect. Larger defects are addressed with anterior and posterior column augments, and superior defects with figure of seven augments. Augments are fixed with at least two screws. The interface between the cup and the augments should be stable, but some surgeons place a very thin layer of cement between the augment and cup so micromotion does not occur while ingrowth is occurring. We have used trabecular metal augments in 46 acetabular revisions in conjunction with a trabecular metal cup. Thirty-four cases have at least 2 years follow-up with an average of 64.5 months. There has been 4 cup loosenings with 3 re-revisions. Our most up to date data is 101 cases with an average follow-up of 3 years. There has been one infection that underwent a two stage revision. There are 4 loose cups – 3 revised

The indications for cementless acetabular fixation have been broadened because our data supports the use of trabecular metal cups even when there's limited bleeding host bone contact. Trabecular metal augments have allowed us to use cementless cups when there is segmental loss of bone. Surgical Technique:. The acetabular bed is prepared. If there is less medial bone stock than 2mm, then morselised allograft is impacted by reverse reaming. When reaming is complete and less than 50% bleeding host bone is available for cup stabilization, then a trabecular metal cup is indicated. Trabecular augments are used if the trabecular cup trial is not stable, or if it is uncovered by 40% or more. The conventional augments come in different sizes to accommodate the diameter of the cup and the size of the defect. Larger defects are addressed with anterior and posterior column augments, and superior defects with figure of seven augments. Augments are fixed with at least two screws. The interface between the cup and the augments should be stable, but some surgeons place a very thin layer of cement between the augment and cup so micromotion does not occur while ingrowth is occurring. We have used trabecular metal augments in 46 acetabular revisions in conjunction with a TM cup. Thirty-four cases have at least 2 years follow-up with an average of 64.5 months. There has been 4 cup loosenings with 3 re-revisions

The authors studied the short-term results following patellar resurfacing using trabecular metal patella. Ten patients underwent primary (2 cases) or revision (8 cases) TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella and were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months. All patients had marked patellar bone deficiency or patellar absence precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. The all polyethylene patella was cemented into the trabecular metal base and the remaining patella bone stock; additional fixation was provided by non-adsorbable sutures through the peripheral holes on the metal shell. No intraoperative complications occurred. There was no displacement of any trabecular metal patellar component and no patellar fractures. The fixation appeared excellent at three to six months radiographic evaluation with uniform bone contact in the peripheral regions in both lateral an Merchant radiographic views. The mean Knee Society scores improved in all patients

Purpose. A Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) is a peripheral rim expansion (elliptical) cup, i.e. a non-hemispherical cup. Radiologically a non-hemispherical cup may be deferent from other conventional hemispherical cups. We reviewed radiological findings of a Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System chronologically. Methods. Twenty six patients with osteoarthritis underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System from 2011 to April 2013. Twenty five patients (follow-up rate: 96.2%) 31 hips could be followed-up over a year were registered. In common, the diameter of every femoral head was 32 mm. We planned the acetabular cup inclination angle to be 45-degree, the cup coverage with host-bone (cup-CE angle) to be over 10-degree, and high hip center was allowed up to 20mm. In case of the cup-CE angle under 10-degree, an acetabular cup was placed medially using Dorr's medial protrusio technique. We established the medial protrusion angle indicating the degree of medial protrusion of an acetabular cup over the pelvic internal wall. The medial protrusion angle was defined by the center point of THA (C) and the 2 cross-points (X. 1. , X. 2. ) which the outline of an acetabular cup crosses the Kohler's line (Figure 1). The cup anteversion angle was measured by the method of Lewinnek, and the cup fixation was evaluated according to the Tompkin's classification. Results. The average follow-up period was 1 year and 3 months (1y1m to 2y8m). The mean diameter of the cup was 54 (48 to 56) mm. Seven high-hip center joints were recognized (2 to 11 mm). The average of cup inclination angle was 42 (32 to 52) degree, of cup anteversion angle was 14 (5 to 36) degree, and of cup CE angle was 25 (−14 to 45) degree. Dorr's medial protrusio technique was necessary in 18 hips. In these 18 hips, the average of medial protrusion angle was 57 (24 to 70) degree. In 4 hips of cup-CE angle less than 10 degree, acetabular bulky bone graft was added. All 31 hips showed the stable fixation, even in 18 hips undergone medial protrusio technique. There was none of hips with migration and/or rotation of an acetabular cup. Radiolucent zone was found in the zone-C of 8 hips. The width of radiolucent zone of all 8 hips was less than 2mm. In these 8 hips, medial protrusio technique was done in 5 hips, and high hip center was found in 3 hips. The radiolucency appeared at postoperatively 2–3 months and disappeared by postoperatively 12 months. Conclusions. All hips showed rigid fixation of a Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System in short-term observation. Even in the hips performed Dorr's medial protrusio technique, a Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System reached the stable fixation. Radiolucent zone was found transiently in the zone-C of 8 hips (25.8%) and disappeared by postoperatively 12 months. However our series was small and the observation period was short, our results implied that the fixation of a Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System was not affected adversely from Dorr's medial protrusio technique

Introduction. Acetabular component loosening with associated bone loss is a challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Trabecular Metal (TM) by Zimmer Biomet has been shown to have greater implant survivorship for all-cause acetabular revision in small cohort retrospective studies. Our study aims to review outcomes of acetabular TM implants locally. Method. This is a retrospective observational study using data from Auckland City and North Shore Hospitals from 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2020. Primary outcome is implant survivorship (re-revision acetabular surgery for any cause) demonstrated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary outcome is indication for index revision and re-revision surgery. Multivariate analysis used to identify statistically significant factors for re-revision surgery. Results. 225 cases used acetabular TM implants (shells and/or augments) over 10 years. Indications include aseptic loosening (63%), instability (15%) and infection (13%). Of these, 12% (n=28) had further re-revision for infection (54%) and instability (21%). Median time to re-revision was 156 days (range 11 – 2022). No cases of re-revision were due to failure of bony ingrowth or acetabular component loosening. Ethnicity, smoking status, and age were not risk factors for re-revision procedures. Additionally, previous prosthetic joint infection, ethnicity, sex and age were not significant risk factors for re-revision due to infection. Implant survivorship was 80% at 1 year, 71% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. Discussion. Main indications for re-revision were infection and instability. Demographic factors and co-morbidities did not correlate with increased re-revision risk. Survivorship is poorer compared to cumulative survivorship reported by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Explanations are multifactorial and possibly contributed by underestimation of true revision rates by registry data. Conclusions. We need to identify alternate causes for poorer survivorship and review the role of TM implants in acetabular revision within our specified population

Although total hip arthroplasty is highly successful for treatment of osteoarthrosis of hip joint, it is skill demanding surgery to perform and even more challenging in case of revision with bone defects. There are many options available for reconstruction of acetabular bony defects. Here, we evaluate the outcome of acetabular bony defect reconstructed with trabecular metal augments in short term. We performed, 22 revision total hip arthroplasties and 6 primary total hip arthroplasties (total 28 in 28 patients) using trabecular metal augments to reconstruct acetabular defect between 2011 to 2015. Out of these 28 patients, 18 were males and 10 were females. Mean age of these patients was 61.2 years (range: 46 years to 79 years). Pre-operative templating was done for all cases and need for trabecular metal augments was anticipated in all cases. All cases were classified according to Paprosky classification for acetabular bone defects. Out of 28 patients, 3 had type 2B, 1 had type 2C, 18 had type 3A and 6 had type 3B acetabular defects. Post operatively, all patients were followed at regular interval for their clinical and radiological outcome. An average follow up was 20.1 months (range: 6 months to 42.5 months). We assessed clinical outcome in the form of Herris hip score (HHS) and radiological outcomes in form of osteolysis in acetabular zones and osseointegration, according to the criteria of Moore. The average Harris hip score (HHS) was improved from 58.0 preoperatively to 87.2 postoperatively. The average degree of cup abduction at the final follow up was 44.29. The centre of rotation of the hip joint was corrected from average 38.90mm (range: 22.15mm to 66.35mm) above the inter-teardrop line preoperatively to average 23.85mm (range: 11.82mm to 37.69mm) above the inter-teardrop line postoperatively. Out of 28 patients, 18 patients had three or more signs of osseointegration, according to the criteria of Moore, at the time of final follow up. Rest of patients, had one or two signs of osseointegration (5 patients had one sign and 5 patients had two signs). We had no patient with migration or loosening of acetabular components. No patient has osteolysis of acetabulum in any zone. Trabecular metal augments provide good initial stability to acetabular cup as well as helpful to bring down the centre of rotation of the hip joint within limit of 35mm above the inter-teardrop line. They also facilitate osseointegration. Our study showed that the results of the trabecular metal augments in reconstruction of acetabular bony defects were successful even in short term. However, long term study is required for better evaluation

Introduction: It is desirable to delay or avoid total joint replacement in young patients who have osteonecrosis of femoral head. There are some head preserving surgical procedures that attempt this including osteotomy, core decompression, and bone grafting. The vascularized fibular graft has been reported to be a reliable procedure, but unfortunately it has donor site morbidity and is considered technically demanding. Therefore, materials have been developed to substitute for structural fibular graft. New trabecular metal has been developed to be used for osteonecrosis of femoral head. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of trabecular metal as a treatment intervention method for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Materials and Methods: Seven patients (8 hips) with osteonecrosis of femoral head received core decompression and a trabecular metal implant, beginning in March 2003. The stage of osteonecrosis was I or II according to Ficat and Arlet except for one case (stage III). The procedure consists of a core decompression and insertion of trabecular metal rod (porous tantalum, Zimmer Inc./ Implex Incorporation). A Harris Hip Score was obtained pre-operatively, and at three and at three and six months. Radiographic data was collected at the same time of clinical follow-up. Results: All 7 patients are doing well. Radiographic review shows no evidence of further femoral head collapse. Discussion: Even though this is short term follow-up, the authors propose that the use of trabecular metal in osteonecrosis patients is simple, safe, and effective for the salvage of the hip

Compromised patellar bone stock poses significant the chnical problems in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. In these situations, traditional approaches have included: non resurfacing, patellectomy, patellar bone grafting, ‘Gull-Wing’ osteotomy. A new material (Trabecular Metal) fabricated using a tantalum metal and vapor deposition techhnique that create a metallic strut configuration with 80%porosity, and physical and mechanical properties similar to bone has been introduced. The authors studied the short-term results following patellar resurfacing using trabecular metal patella in primary and revision total knee arhroplasty (TKA). Nine patients undergoing primary (2 cases) or revision (7 cases) TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella were evaluated at a mean of 16 months follow-up. All patients had marked patellar bone deficiency precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. The all polyethylene patela was cemented into the trabecular metal base and the remaining patella bone stock; additional fixation was provided by # 2 non absorbable sutures through the peripheral holes on the metal shell. Revision TKA may be complicated by severe patellar bone loss that preclude implantantion of a standard cemented patellar component. Several options including patellectomy, non resurfacing and osteotomy or grafting of remaining bony shell have been proposed. It is rare in primary knee arthroplasty that the patella has been so eroded that resurfacing is not feasible. Trabecular metall patella may be indicate in the complex revision or even primary knee arthroplasty in which all that remains of the patella is a thin shell of anterior cortical. The short-term results of patellar resurfacing with trabecular metal have demonstrated favorable results

Background. Synthetic interbody spinal fusion devices are used to restore and maintain disc height and ensure proper vertebral alignment. These devices are often filled with autograft bone to facilitate bone bridging through the device while providing mechanical stability. Nonporous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) devices are widely used clinically for such procedures. 1. Trabecular Metal devices are an alternative, fabricated from porous tantalum. It was hypothesized that the porous Trabecular Metal device would better maintain autograft viability through the center of the device, the ‘graft hole’ (GH). Methods. Twenty-five goats underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a Trabecular Metal or PEEK device for 6, 12 or 26 weeks. The GH of each device was filled with autograft bone morsels harvested from the animal at implantation. Fluorochrome labeling oxytetracycline was administered to the animals and used to determine bone viability in the device regions. Following necropsy, the vertebral segments were embedded in poly(methyl methacrylate) sectioned and analyzed using fluorescence and backscatter electron (BSE) imaging. The percent of bone tissue present within the GH was measured as a volume percent using BSE images (Fig. 1). Results. Bone percent analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in volume of bone tissue within the GH of the two devices at 6 and 26 weeks (Fig. 2). At 12 weeks the animals implanted with the Trabecular Metal device had significantly greater volumes of bone within the GH region. Viable bone was observed in the host bone region and periprosthetic to the implant of all PEEK (n=12) and Trabecular Metal (n=12) animals within the study, determined by the presence of fluorescent labels (Fig. 3). Viable bone was also observed in the GH region of all animals with a Trabecular Metal device. However, only 5 of 12 PEEK animals showed bone viability within the GH (2 at 12 weeks and 3 at 26 weeks). A Fisher's exact comparison of the number of animals with viable bone in the GH showed a significant difference between the two devices, p<0.05. Conclusion. Autograft viability was better maintained within the GH for the porous Trabecular Metal device compared to the PEEK device. Although the amount of bone tissue within the GH of the PEEK devices was determined to have no significant difference compared to the Trabecular Metal devices at 6 and 26 weeks, the GH bone tissue was not viable in a number of the PEEK animals at each time point. The interconnected network and high volume porosity of the Trabecular Metal device may have allowed for fluid exchange, angiogenesis and increased blood supply to the autograft morsels. The viability of the autograft morsels also played an important role in the success of bone bridging through the GH between the vertebral endplates. In this animal model it was demonstrated that the autograft bone placed within the PEEK spinal fusion device did not always remain viable after implantation, but sometimes only filled the GH and did not necessarily facilitate fusion between the vertebrae as intended

The introduction of porous tantalum metal (Trabecular Metal; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) for acetabular component fixation in total hip arthroplasty has shown optimum fixation qualities and “gap filling” effect. Recently, trabecular metal was introduced in tibial component for total knee prosthesis, however its effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) was not reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the BMD of proximal part of the tibia between trabecular metal and another cemented tibial component. 31 knees receiving trabecular metal tibial component and 33 knees receiving cemented tibial component (PFC Sigma RP, Depuy, Warsaw, IN) had dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans at preoperatively and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post-operatively. To assess peri-prosthetic BMD, three regions of interest (ROI) were measured for each case. They were medial aspect (ROI 1), center aspect (ROI 2) and lateral aspect (ROI 3) of tibia. Average follow up period was 1.8 (range: 1.5 to 2) years. In both groups, BMD in tibia decrease postoperatively. Comparing postoperative decrease of BMD in lateral aspect of tibia (ROI 3) between both groups, it was significantly less in trabecular metal component (−0.09 g/cm2 +/−0.27) than cemented tibial component (−0.31 g/cm2 +/− 0.21) (p=0.0007). We conclude that trabecular metal tibial component showed a favorable effect on BMD of proximal part of the tibia after total knee arthroplsaty

Introduction: Porous Tantalum has been used in a variety of clinical settings since 1997. The use of trabecular metal backed prostheses and augments in the revision hip scenario is attractive due to the higher propensity of bony ingrowth than traditional porous coatings, and also the high coefficient of friction with bone leads to excellent press fit. We describe the early results of twenty trabecular metal backed acetabular components in the revision setting. Methods: From 2004, 20 patients received trabecular metal backed acetabular components as a revision hip procedure. The average age of the patients was 69 (42–84) yrs at the time of surgery. 4 patients had trabecular metal shells with cemented liners, 16 patients had modular trabecular metal implants. Structural allograft was used in 2 cases, trabcular metal augment in 1. Revision was for aseptic loosening in 17 cases, infection in 3. Acetabular defects were graded according to Paprosky as 2A(10), 2B(1), 2C(1), 3A(6) and 3B(2). Fixation was augmented in all cups with at least one screw. Patients were evaluated with standard x-rays for osteolysis and migration, Harris hip score, SF 36 and Oxford hip score. Results: Average follow up was 12 months (24–5). 100% follow up was achieved. There were no complications directly related to the acetabular surgery. There were no revisions. There are no progressive radiolucencies or detectable migration in any of the cups. There were no dislocations. Conclusion: These early results suggest that trabecular metal backed acetabular components may be confidently used in the setting of hip revision surgery and show promise for the more severe defects for which a reliably reproducible solution has yet to be proven

Purpose. To evaluate the five year Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) results of the NexGen LPS Trabecular Metal Tibial Monoblock component (TM) and the NexGen Option Stemmed cemented component (Cemented), (Zimmer, Warsaw IN). Method. 70 patients with osteoarthritis were included in a randomized series to receive either the TM implant or the cemented NG component. Surgery was performed by high volume arthoplasty specialists using standardized procedure. RSA exams were obtained postoperatively, at six months, one year, two years and five years. RSA outcomes were translations, rotations and maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the components. MTPM values were used to classify implants as ‘at risk’ or ‘stable’. Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were gathered at all follow-ups. An analysis of variance was used to test for differences in age, body mass index (BMI), and subjective measures between implant groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to investigate differences in maximum total point motion between implant groups. An analysis of variance was used to test for differences in translations and rotations between groups. Fishers exact test was used to investigate differences in proportions of implants found to be at risk between groups. Results. At the five year follow-up, 43 patients were able to be reached and were willing to participate in the follow-up exam. There were 25 in the trabecular metal group and 18 in the cemented group. There were no differences in subjective measures (WOMAC) between implant groups at any follow-up. At the five year follow-up there was no difference in MTPM between the cemented and trabecular metal groups (p=0.94) Compared to the cemented components, the trabecular metal tibial components had significantly higher subsidence than the cemented components (p=0.001). There were no other significant differences. The proportion of at risk components at five years was 2 of 16 (0.11, 95% CI, 0.03–0.33) in the cemented group and was 0 of 25 (0.0, 95% CI, 0.0–0.13) in the trabecular metal group (p=0.17). Conclusion. In the two year report on this cohort of patients, we indicated our uncertainty concerning the long term stability of the Trabecular Metal tibial implant due to the high initial migration seen in some cases. In this report we have seen stability of this implant out to five years and migrations in this period below the level of detection of our system in all cases. Given these results it is with increased confidence that we can state that this implant appears to achieve solid fixation despite high initial levels of migration

The trabecular metal Monoblock TKR is comprised of a porous tantalum base plate with the polyethylene liner embedded directly in the porous metal. An alternative design, the trabecular metal Modular TKR, allows polyethylene liner insertion into the locking base plate after base plate implantation, but removes the low modulus of elasticity that was inherent in the Monoblock design. The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation of the Monoblock and Modular trabeucular metal base plates in a randomised controlled trial. Fifty subjects (30 female) were randomly assigned to receive the uncemented trabecular metal Monoblock or uncemented trabecular metal Modular knee replacement. A standard procedure of tantalum marker insertion in the proximal tibial and polyethylene liner was followed with uniplanar radiostereometric analysis (RSA) examinations immediately post-operatively and at 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, and 12 month follow-ups. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board and all subjects signed an Informed Consent Form. Twenty-one subjects received Monoblock components and 20 received Modular components. An intra-operative decision to use cemented implants occurred in 5 cases and 4 subjects did not proceed to surgery after enrollment. The clinical precision of implant migration measured as maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.13 mm (upper limit of 95% confidence interval of double exams). Implant migration at 12 months was 0.88 ± 0.64 mm (mean and standard deviation; range 0.21 – 2.84 mm) for the Monoblock group and 1.60 ± 1.51 mm (mean and standard deviation; range 0.27 – 6.23 mm) for the Modular group. Group differences in 12 month migration approached clinical significance (p = 0.052, Mann Whitney U-test). High early implant migration is associated with an increased risk for late aseptic loosening. Although not statistically significant, the mean migration for the Modular component group was nearly twice that of the Monoblock, which places it at the 1.6 mm threshold for “unacceptable” early migration (Pijls et al 2012). This finding is concerning in light of the recent recall of a similar trabecular metal modular knee replacement and adds validity to the use of RSA in the introduction of new or modified implant designs. Reference: Pijls, B.G., et al., Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop, 2012. 83(6): p. 614–24

Management of severe bone loss in total knee arthroplasty presents a formidable challenge. This situation may arise in neglected primary knee arthroplasty with large deformities and attritional bone loss, in revision situations where osteolysis and loosening have caused large areas of bone loss and in tumor situations. Another area of large bone loss is frequently seen in periprosthetic fractures. Trabecular metal (TM) with its dodecahedron configuration and modulus of elasticity between cortical and cancellous bone offers an excellent bail out option in the management of these very difficult situations. Severe bone loss in the distal femur and proximal tibia lend themselves to receiving the TM cones. The host bone surfaces need to be prepared to receive these cones using a high speed burr. The cones acts as a filler with an interference fit through which the stemmed implant can be introduced and cemented. All areas of bone void is filled with morselised cancellous bone fragments. We present our experience of 64 TM cones (28 femoral, 36 tibial cones) over a 10-year period and our results and outcomes for the same. We have had to revise only one patient for recurrence of the tumor for which the cone was implanted in the first place. We also describe our technique of using two stacked cones for massive distal femoral bone loss and its outcomes. We found excellent osteointegration and new host bone formation around the TM construct. The purported role of possible resistance to infection in situations using the TM cones is also discussed. In summary we believe that the use of the TM cones offers an excellent alternative to massive allografts, custom and/or tumor implants in the management of massive bone loss situations

Introduction: Trabecular Metal (Tantalum) has been successfully used in Neurosurgery for many years. Acetabular components have only been available in the UK since 2004. The metal’s properties of porosity and a high friction coefficient are attractive, particularly in complex primary and revision hip arthroplasty when surgical challenges include abnormal, deficient or limited bone. Methods: Two year results of 110 consecutive acetabular reconstructions are presented. The age range was between 27 and 95 years with a predominance of females. The indication in 75 primary hip replacements included, Destructive Osteoarthritis, Dysplasia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget’s and AVN. 35 revisions were performed either two-component or single acetabular exchanges. Clinical results have been obtained using the Merle d’Aubigne score and bone deficiencies were classified according to the AAOS system. Results: There have been no failures and radiologically, serial X-rays demonstrate osseo-integration at an early stage. We have had no cases of deep infection but there have been 3 femoral peri-prosthetic fractures, (1 late) and 2 dislocations. All patients have been allowed early weight bearing and those patients with over 12 months follow up have an improved Merle d’Aubigne score. Discussion: The biomechanical properties of Trabecular metal and a modular design permit a press fit technique supplemented by dome screws combined with the possibility of using varying sizes of liner to minimise dislocation or to retain well fixed femoral stems in revision surgery. The ease of use of the implant has now led to us largely abandoning other reconstructive techniques such as impaction allo-grafting or cages in revision or complex primary hip surgery. We consider Trabecular metal to be a major advance in acetabular reconstruction on the basis of our initial experience

The best treatment method of large acetabular bone defects at revision THR remains controversial. Some of the factors that need consideration are the amount of residual pelvic bone removed during revision; the contact area between the residual pelvic bone and the new implant; and the influence of the new acetabular construct on the centre of rotation of the hip. The purpose of this study was to compare these variables in two of the most used surgical techniques used to reconstruct severe acetabular defects: the trabecular metal acetabular revision system (TMARS) and a custom triflanged acetabular component (CTAC). Pre- and post-operative CT-scans were acquired from 11 patients who underwent revision THR with a TMARS construct for a Paprosky IIIB defect, 10 with pelvic discontinuity, at Royal Adelaide Hospital. The CT scans were used to generate computer models to virtually compare the TMARS and CTAC constructs using a semi-automated method. The TMARS construct model was calculated using postoperative CT scans while the CTAC constructs using the preoperative CT scans. The bone contact, centre of rotation, inclination, anteversion and reamed bone differences were calculated for both models. There was a significant difference in the mean amount of bone reamed for the TMARS reconstructions (15,997 mm. 3. ) compared to the CTAC reconstructions (2292 mm. 3. , p>0.01). There was no significant difference between overall implant bone contact (TMARS 5760mm. 2. vs CTAC 5447mm. 2. , p=0.63). However, there was a significant difference for both cancellous (TMARS 4966mm. 2. vs CTAC 2887mm. 2. , p=0.008) and cortical bone contact (TMARS 795mm. 2. vs CTAC 2560mm. 2. , p=0.001). There was no difference in inclination and anteversion achieved. TMARS constructs resulted on average in a centre of rotations 7.4mm more lateral and 4.0mm more posterior. Modelling of two different reconstructions of Paprosky IIIB defects demonstrated potential important differences between all variables investigated