Aims. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed effectively with non-surgical interventions when diagnosed early. However, the likelihood of surgical intervention increases with a late presentation. Therefore, an effective screening programme is essential to prevent late diagnosis and reduce surgical morbidity in the population. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological literature from the last 25 years in the UK. Articles were selected from databases searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane; 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results. The incidence of DDH within the UK over the last 25 years is 7.3/1,000 live births with females making up 86% of the DDH population (odds ratio 6.14 (95% confidence interval 3.3 to 11.5); p < 0.001). The incidence of DDH significantly increased following the change in the Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) guidance from 6.5/1,000 to 9.4/1,000 live births (p < 0.001). The rate of late presentation also increased following the changes to the NIPE guidance, rising from 0.7/1,000 to 1.2/1,000 live births (p < 0.001). However, despite this increase in late-presenting cases, there was no change in the rates of surgical intervention (0.8/1,000 live births; p = 0.940). Conclusion. The literature demonstrates that the implementation of a selective screening programme increased the incidence of DDH diagnosis in the UK while subsequently increasing the rates of late presentation and failing in its goal of reducing the rates of surgical intervention for DDH. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):635–642

Introduction: There is some debate about the pros and cons of selective screening of DDH in neonates as opposed to general screening. General screening puts a lot of stress on the resources available, especially in the modern day NHS, but the advocates state that this minimises the cost incurred in treating a missed DDH (by selective screening) with surgery later on. Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to find out the effectiveness of the Southampton selective screening of babies with risk factors for DDH by finding out the number of patients presenting late with an established DDH. Materials And Methods: 6116 babies out of 26,932 live births (22.7%) in Southampton were screened between 1998 and 2003. The details of the individual outcomes and the reasons for the late presentation were obtained from the patient notes and the records of the screening program which are maintained in the clinics and by the senior author. Results: 248 new patients had Pavlik’s harness fitted for the treatment of DDH which presents a treatment rate of 0.92%. 8 patients (0.03%) presented late because they did not undergo ultrasound scanning as they did not have the risk factors as required by this selective program. 10 (0.036%) failed Pavlik’s and needed late surgery to have their DDH treated. The total operation rate was 0.066%. Discussion: The late presentation of patients in this screening program is very low and comparable to the other papers from this department and from around the world. The cost implications of treating these 8 late presenting patients was found to be a lot cheaper than carrying out a general screening program which would mean, in this case 4 times more than the cost of the present screening program

Introduction: Ideally any screening system should use a simple reliable test with good intraobserver reproducibility. This is important in DDH as once there is an established abnormality surgical intervention is frequently required. The aim of early detection (within six weeks) is to increase the number of children that may be treated nonoperatively. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our selective screening program by determining the late presentation rate of DDH in our region. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2003 we looked retrospectively at all patients presenting with DDH in our region. We recorded their age at scan and presentation, the Graf classification if recorded, their management, the presence of risk factors for DDH, referral source and presence of a positive clinical examination. All these were entered into a database and analyzed specifically with regard to patients presenting late. Results: In the period between January 2001 and June 2002 prior to selective ultrasound screening (Group 1) there were 9441 live births and 26 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.75). There were 11 late presenters with an incidence of 1.12 per 1000 per year. Between July 2002 and December 2003 (Group 2) there were 9428 live births and 20 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.12). There were 3 late presenters with an incidence of 0.3 per 1000 per year. Discussion: We have shown that a program of selective ultrasound screening in our region has decreased the number of children presenting late with DDH. It must be remembered however, that in the absence of any risk factors, clinical examination remains critical in identifying those with DDH in a selective screening program

Background: Selective ultrasound screening of neonatal hips with risk factors has been undertaken in Lanarkshire from 2001. Referral reasons included family history, breech, clicky hip and instability. Patients are examined by an orthopaedic surgeon with a special interest and scanned by static Graf technique. Our experience with selective screening and its effect on late DDH is presented. Methods: All ultrasound screening data was collected prospectively and entered into a database. Late presenters were identified at the tertiary centre by case note and X ray review. Population data was obtained from the Scottish registry. Results: Between 2001–2005, there were 30,824 live-births. 405 babies (910 hips) were identified as being at risk. 5(1.2%) were identified as Graf III/IV. Three responded to splinting, 1 required closed reduction and 1 open reduction. 11 who had initially normal scans were noted to have abnormal acetabular index (> 30) at 6 months. 2 required open reduction, 1 closed reduction and the rest eventually normalised with follow up. True late presentation was identified (> 3 months) in 11 children. Mean age at diagnosis was 14.7m (4–29 mts). 7(64%) did not have any identifiable risk factors. 4 had risk factors, but had escaped screening. 8 underwent open and 3 closed reduction. 7 derotation osteotomies and 1 pelvic osteotomy were additionally performed. Discussion: The identifiable incidence of DDH in Lanarkshire is 0.87/1000. The incidence of true late presenting DDH in the same population was 0.35/1000. If all hips with risk factors had been successfully screened it would reduce to 0.22/1000. Selective screenings can minimise the incidence of late presenting DDH if rigorously implemented. Majority of late presenters do not have risk factors and are likely to escape detection with a selective screening programme. This suggests a different natural history in late presenting cases

Introduction: The quality of newborn hip screening is usually measured as the number of late detected cases of hip dysplasia. There is no consensus concernig the use of ultrasonography in hip joint screening in newborns. At our hospital the number of late detected cases was around 2/1000 births using clinical screening. In a prospective, randomised study we compared universal ultrasound screening and selective ultrasound screening. We reduced the number of late detected cases when using universal ultrasound screening to 0,13/1000, whereas the group with selective ultrasound screening had 0,65/1000, the difference was not significant. We have therefore continued selective ultrasound screening, and present the results concerning late detected cases in the 9-year period 1999–2007 with this screening model. Materials and Methods: Newborns in our county are now offered selective ultrasound hip joint screening, in addition to the stanard clinical screening. The ultrasound examinations are performed 1–3 days after birth. The following risk factors lead to ultrasound examination: positive or doubtful Ortolani or Barlow tests, breech position, family history of hip dysplasia, foot deformities, and some syndromes. In the 9-year period 1999–2007 a total of 34000 babies where born in our county, and 13% had risk factors for hips dysplasia and were examined by ultrasound. Our hospital is the only hospital dealing with lated detected cases in our county. Results: In the 9-year period the primary treatment rate using the Frejka pillow was 0,9/1000 births. In the same period there were 16 children treated for lated detected hip dysplasia. There were 14 girls and 2 boys, giving an incidence of late detected cases of 0,47/1000 births. There were no common characteristics among the children with late detected hip dysplasia. Discussion/Conclusions: It has been assumed that a good clinical hip joint screening in newborns should not give more than 0,5/1000 births of late detected cases. By using selective ultrasound screening we have achieved 0,47/1000 births of late detcted cases in our county. We therefore recommend selective ultrasound hip screening in newborns

Early detection and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) yields simpler and more effective the treatment. Diagnosis by ultrasound has changed the clinical view of the disease. However, the need and the way of ultrasound screening is still controversial. Diagnosis by ultrasound has shown that morphological abnormalities may not be associated with clinical signs. In Hungary all newborns are screened clinically within the first and also the third week of life, and controlled at the age of four month. Clinical examination is performed by an Ortopaedic specialist. Ultrasound screening is first performed for children with clinical signs and for children at risk at three weeks of age. Radiological examination, when necessary, is first performed at the age of four month. In the five year timeline (2001–2005) that was re-evaluated 7339 children presented 9706 times for screening for DDH at the University of Szeged (Hungary) Department of Orthopaedics. Out of these cases 6991 (95.2%) children were found to be healthy and 348 (4.8%) were diagnosed for DDH. Children with dysplasia presented 896 times for treatment and follow-up. Patient compliance in the DDH group was average 2.5 visits, while for the healthy group it was only average 1.2 visits. Because of clinical signs or risk factors 1569 (21%) children had ultrasound examination, all-together 2169 times. 84% of the initial ultrasound examination showed Graf stage Ia hip. Out of the diagnosed 348 DDH cases 31 patients (Graf IIa-IIc) were administered with Pavlik harness, and 314 (Graf Ib-IIa) were treated with splinting. Remaining 3 cases were diagnosed late, where no ultrasound examination was performed. In the DDH cases 832 ultrsonographic examination was performed during the treatment (average 2.4 examination/case). Radiographic control of all treated children excluded avascular necrosis in all cases. For this population 14 first operative procedure was needed so far. In our experience clinical screening and selective ultrasound examination is effective in the screening and early detection of developmental dyspalsia of the hip. In our practice, we promptly treated all patients with detected morphological changes as a deficiency in hip development. This way selective screening has helped us in the management of developmental dyspalsia of the hip. Hopefully, with the selective indication the number of false positive cases was reduced, while the „silent” clinical instabilities were given a chance for better long term development

Introduction: To measure the incidence of late presenting DDH following the introduction of selective ultrasound screening of neonatal hips with associated risk factors. Method: Retrospective cohort study of children with late diagnosed DDH in a defined population of Greater Glasgow Region. A hip ultrasound program was introduced in the year 1997 for secondary screening of children with risk factors for DDH. The departmental and theatre database was used to identify children with late diagnosed DDH. (Defined as diagnosed 3 months after birth) Demographic details, age at presentation, presence of risk factors (Breech presentation, family history, clicks, caesarian section) and details of treatment were recorded. The number of live births for each year was obtained from the General Registrar Office for Scotland. The incidence of late presenting DDH was calculated taking in to account the year of child’s birth. The incidence of late DDH was then compared between the period 1992 –1996 and 1997– 2001. Results: 78 children were identified, of which 49 babies were between 1992 – 96 and 29 between 1997 –01. The average age at diagnosis was 17 months (Median 15 months, range 5 –84 months). The average annual incidence from 1992 –6 was 0.84 per 1000 live births and from 1997 – 2001 was 0.57 per 1000 live births. This decrease in incidence of late DDH was not significant at 5% level (chi squared p = 0.088). 64 children (82%) with late diagnosed DDH had no factors that could be perceived as risk factors for the condition. Discussion: Targeted ultrasound screening of babies with risk factors appears to have reduced the average incidence of late DDH from 0.84 to 0.57 per 1000 live births. However this reduction in incidence is not statistically significant. The vast majority of late presenters (82%) do not have risk factors. It remains unclear whether universal ultrasound screening program, practiced in some parts of United Kingdom is a cost effective alternative to eliminate the incidence of late presenting DDH

Purpose of study

Results clinically & statistically of a 10 year prospective observational longitudinal study of the effects of sonographic screening for ‘risk’ factors in DDH.

The aim was to compare the efficacy of selective ultrasound-screening (SUSS) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) to clinical screening alone, by comparing outcomes in a contemporary group with those from a 40 year old cohort.

This was a retrospective cohort study. The department's DDH and surgical databases were used to identify all cases of DDH, and all cases of surgery for DDH during the study period (2009–13). Patients born outside our region, and teratologic cases were excluded from analysis. The Obstetric database provided the total number of live births over the five-year period. This data was used to calculate the incidence of late-diagnosis (age over 3 months) DDH and the rate of surgery for DDH in our region. These results were compared to those of a similar study from our institution published in 1977, after the introduction of universal clinical screening. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for the two groups, and analysed for statistical significance.

The incidence of late-diagnosis DDH over the recent 5-year study period was 0.66/1000 live births, compared to 0.6/1000 in the control group. The RR for late-diagnosis DDH was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.6 to 2.2). The rate of surgery for DDH was 0.86/1000, compared to 0.9/1000 live births in the control group. The RR for surgery for DDH in the current study population compared to the historic control was 0.97, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% C.I. 0.57 to 1.68; p=0.92).

Despite advances in screening for DDH over the last 40 years, neither the incidence of late diagnosis DDH, nor rates of surgery for DDH in our region have changed. Whilst previous studies have demonstrated that SUSS does not eliminate late-presenting DDH, this study suggests it confers no advantage over clinical screening alone.

Introduction. Selective screening of children at risk for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is based on clinical examination and risk factor identification. Two meta-analyses published in 2012 found breech presentation, family history of DDH, female sex and primiparity to increase the risk of DDH. However, the DDH definition, reference tests and age of the examined children vary considerably, complicating the translation of those findings to current screening guidelines. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association of previously proposed risk factors to the risk of sonographically verified DDH. Method. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library to identify cohort, RCTs, case-control and cross-sectional studies from 1980 to 2023 in English language. Eligible studies included participants under three months of age, where the diagnosis of DDH was made by hip ultrasound using the gold standard Graf method and reported information on one or more of the proposed risk factors and final diagnosis was available. Result. Of 5363 studies screened, 20 studies (n=64543 children) were included. Breech presentation (OR: 4.2, 95%CI 2.6-6.6), family history (3.8, 95%CI 2.1-7.2), female sex (2.5, 95%CI 1.7-3.6), oligohydramnios (3.8, 95%CI 1.7-8.5) and high birthweight (2.0, 95%CI 1.6-2.5) significantly increased the risk of DDH. C-section, primiparity, multiple births, low birthweight and prematurity were not found to increase the risk for DDH, and there was only one study about clubfoot as a risk factor. Heterogeneity was high (I. 2. >75%) in all the tested factors except high birthweight (I. 2. =0%). Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate these heterogeneities. Conclusion. Family history of DDH and breech presentation are associated with significant increase of the risk of sonographic DDH in children aged three months. A similar risk increase was detected for oligohydramnios, which was not detected in previous meta-analyses. Additionally, the DDH risk increase of female sex was found to be lower than previously reported

Abstract. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of inpatient admissions for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) at a UK tertiary referral centre, and identify any association between newborn screening (NIPE) status and the cost of treatment. Methods. This was a retrospective study, using hospital episodes data from a single NHS trust. All inpatient episodes between 01/01/2014 to 30/06/2019 with an ICD-10 code stem of Q65 ‘congenital deformities of hip’ were screened to identify admissions for management of DDH. Data was subsequently obtained from electronic and paper records. Newborn screening status was recorded, and patients were divided into ‘NIPE-positive’ (diagnosed through selective screening) and ‘NIPE-negative’ (not diagnosed through screening). Children with neuromuscular conditions or concomitant musculoskeletal disease were excluded. The tariff paid for each inpatient episode was identified, and the number of individual clinic attendances, surgical procedures and radiological examinations performed (USS, XR, CT, MRI) were recorded. Results. 41 patients with DDH were admitted for inpatient management. 44% (n = 18) were NIPE-positive, diagnosed mean age 6.7 weeks. 56% (n = 23) were NIPE-negative, diagnosed mean age 26 months. The total cost of inpatient care in the NIPE-positive group was £171,471 (£9,526.18 per-patient) compared to £306,615 (£13,331.10 per-patient) for NIPE-negative. In the NIPE-positive group, there were 99 clinic attendances, 47 inpatient admissions and 160 radiological examinations performed (36 USS, 107 XR, 17 CT). This compared to 148 clinic attendances, 59 inpatient admissions and 215 radiological examinations (187 XR, 26 CT, 2 MRI) in the NIPE-negative group. Conclusion. A greater proportion of inpatient admissions for DDH are among NIPE-negative children. They incur a higher cost of treatment per patient and necessitate more inpatient resources. This study adds to the ongoing conversation around the cost-effectiveness of selective screening for DDH in the UK. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The role of metal sensitivity or allergy in causing persistent symptoms or failure and need for a revision of a total joint replacement has been the topic of debate and controversy for decades. There was renewed interest in this area with the rise of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and the advent of adverse local tissue reactions. This led to an increase in metal ion testing as well as metal sensitivity testing. With the decline of the use of metal-on-metal hip components, this is now mostly an issue in knee arthroplasty. It is well known that a substantial percentage of patients have persistent symptoms following knee replacement. What remains in question is whether allergy to metal or other materials such as PMMA may be a contributing factor. It is accepted that the incidence of positive skin patch tests is higher in symptomatic failed joint replacements. Nickel sensitivity is most common as a positive skin test with up to 15% of patients demonstrating this followed by chromium and cobalt. A recent review by Lachiewicz et al. concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend routine or widespread cutaneous or in vitro hypersensitivity testing before primary TKA, that there is no evidence-based rationale to recommend a routine metal allergy screening questionnaire, that there is only anecdotal support for Ni-free implants, and that local dermatitis should be treated with topical steroids. In another article, routine screening for metal allergy was not recommended, however, selective screening for history of sensitivity or unexplained pain or early loosening was suggested. Other experts have recommended a role for utilizing a commercially available alternative to components containing nickel or cobalt in patients thought to be hypersensitive. A recent study, however, concluded that there was no difference in complications, revisions, or reoperations among patients who tested positive with patch testing whether they were treated with standard components or nickel free components. Likewise, a consensus panel published results from the United Kingdom in which cobalt chrome implants were recommended regardless of the patients metal allergy status. Patient perception is important, however, and among patients who report multiple allergies of any kind, a higher percentage are likely to be dissatisfied with their knee replacement. Of more importance are those reporting a specific allergy to metal are substantially more likely to express some dissatisfaction with their components. Metal allergy as a cause of chronic pain and/or early failure of joint replacement is rare if it exists at all. It is always a diagnosis of exclusion. Patients who think they are allergic are probably more likely to be more symptomatic following joint replacement. Whether or not to use a nickel free or hypoallergenic component in such patients remains an area of controversy

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) refers to a spectrum of anatomical abnormalities. Despite various screening programs, delayed diagnosis still occurs. Delayed cases are more difficult to treat and can have poorer outcomes. Rural address, low socioeconomic status, and ethnicity have recently been associated with late presentation. The objectives of this study were to examine the incidence of DDH, as well as factors associated with delayed presentation in Saskatchewan. Retrospective review of paediatric orthopaedic records from the tertiary referral centre in Saskatchewan was completed from 2008–2014. Variables collected included age at presentation, sex, birth order, birth presentation, birth complications, laterality, family history of DDH, postal code and treatment. Socioeconomic and geographic indicators were determined from postal code using the 2011 National Household Survey. Population level variables included income, ethnic origin, distance from referral centre and education. Associations were examined with bivariate and multivariate analysis. There were 108 new presentations of DDH; 34 cases presented after age 3 months. Demographic data showed 83.3% of cases were female, 48.1% involved the left hip, 17.2% had a positive family history, 57.1% were first born, and 27.9% were breech. An estimated 5.6% of patients were Aboriginal. The mean age at presentation was 199.7 days. 48% of cases lived in the same city as the referral center. Late presenting cases lived on average 46.19 km farther from the referral centre and had a lower mean population, percent of adults with post-secondary education and income. However, none of these were statistically significant. No significant associations were found within the demographic data. Overall incidence of DDH was not estimated due to few cases from southern areas of the province presenting to the tertiary referral center. The estimated incidence of DDH in the Aboriginal population from our sample was lower than previously reported in the literature. This association may be related to earlier swaddling practices, rather than Aboriginal ethnicity. There was a trend toward lower socioeconomic indicators and an increased distance from the referral centre in cases of late presentation, in keeping with recent literature exploring these factors. This suggests there may be deficits in the current selective screening protocols in North America. The study is limited by the retrospective nature of the research and the population level data obtained for certain variables. Future research to collect prospective individual level data may help elucidate important associations. Also, identifying any additional cases would increase the power to detect significant associations with late presentation, and allow an accurate estimate of overall incidence

A 15 year prospective, observational cohort study was undertaken to assess selective screening of DDH in males and females referred with risk factors only. Individuals born breech or with evidence of a strong family history for DDH were the ‘risk factors’ studied. All were clinically examined and sonographically screened by one Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic surgeon. Irreducible hip dislocation rate was the primary outcome measure. From a cohort of 64670 live births, 2,984 neonates/infants, 46.1 per 1000 live births [95% CI 44.6 to 47.8 per 1000 live births] were referred and sonographically screened with ‘pure’ risk factors of breech presentation and/or family history, with clinical stability. 1360 were male, of which 4 were identified as having ‘pathological’ DDH; an incidence of 1 in 333 of those males referred [95 CI 0.001, 0.008]. 1624 were female, of which 45 were identified as having ‘pathological’ DDH; an incidence of 1 in 36 of those females referred [95% CI 0.021, 0.037]. There was a significant difference in the number of female individuals sonographically diagnosed as having ‘pathological’ DDH compared to males (p<0.001). Four individuals were diagnosed with irreducible hip dislocation, 0.06 per 1000 live births [95% CI 0.24, 0.159 per 1000 live births]. All were in females. Additionally, there were 2 female individuals; both with family history of DDH (1. st. cousin splinted and sister splinted, respectively) as a risk factor, referred late. Our study suggests that there is a significant difference between the incidence of female and male individuals diagnosed with ‘pathological’ DDH, in those referred purely with risk factors (breech and family history). These findings question the current screening policy for ultrasound examination of males with risk factors in the absence of clinical instability, and may influence future DDH screening programme policy. Level of evidence: II

Aims

The present study seeks to investigate the correlation of pubofemoral distances (PFD) to α angles, and hip displaceability status, defined as femoral head coverage (FHC) or FHC during manual provocation of the newborn hip < 50%.

Introduction: It is common practice to screen the hips of infant with a family history of DDH clinically and ultra-sonographically in selective screening programmes. The practice of regular radiographic follow-up of infants with a positive family history of Developmental Hip Dysplasia (DDH) is based on the widespread belief that Primary Acetabular Dysplasia is a genetic disorder that can occur in the absence of frank hip subluxation or dislocation. 1. It has been our practice to obtain a 6 – 12 month screening radiograph in such patients but this practice is not conclusively supported in the literature. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all such infants who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hips at the 6–8 week screening examination but who, because of the family history underwent further radiographic screening after a 6–12 month interval. The radiographs of all such infants (n=77) were analysed for any signs of late hip dysplasia. Results and Discussion: Sixty six infant had normal X rays at the 6–8 month assessment and were discharged. The remaining eleven patients had acetabular angles at the upper end of the normal range for age and were reviewed again with further radiographs at 12 months. At this stage ten patients were normal and were discharged. The remaining patient was reviewed again at 18 months and 24 months and finally proved to be normal and was discharged. The result of a postal survey has suggested that majority of BSCOS members do not get follow up x-ray done if the clinical and ultrasound scan is normal at screening visit. Conclusion: All of the seventy seven patients eventually developed normal radiographs and we question the need for radiographic follow up of infants with a family history of DDH but who have a normal clinical examination and ultrasound scan at 6–8 weeks

Between June 1988 and December 1997, 332 babies with 546 dysplastic hips were treated in the Pavlik harness for primary Developmental Dysplasia (DDH) as a product of the Southampton selective screening program. Each was managed by a strict protocol including ultrasonic monitoring of treatment within the harness. The group was prospectively studied over a mean duration of 6. 5 years (SD=2. 7y) with 89. 1% follow-up. The Acetabular Index (AI) and Centre-Edge angle of Wiberg (CEA) were measured on annual radiographs to determine the natural history of hip development following treatment in the Pavilik harness. These were compared to published normal values. We observed a failed reduction rate of 15. 2% of all complete hip dislocations; these required alternative surgical treatment. The development of those hips of infants successfully treated in the harness showed no significant difference from the normal values of Acetabular Index for female left hips, after eighteen months of age. Of those dysplastic hips that were successfully reduced in the harness; 2. 4% exhibited persisting significant late dysplasia (CEA< 20°) and 0.2% demonstrated persistent severe late dysplasia (CEA< 15 °) All such cases could be identified at sixty months. Dysplasia was clinically deemed sufficient to merit innominate osteotomy in 0. 9% dysplastic hips treated. Avascular necrosis was noted in 1% of hips treated in the harness. We conclude that using our protocol, successful initial treatment of DDH with the Pavlik harness appears to revert the natural history of hip development to that of the normal population. We recommend that regular radiographic surveillance up to 60 months of age constitutes safe and effective practice

Aims

Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with improved outcomes of conservative treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a novel screening programme that included both the primary risk factors of breech presentation and family history, and the secondary risk factors of oligohydramnios and foot deformities.

Introduction: This study examined the cohort of patients selectively screened over a 5 year period with ultrasonography according to our risk factors (positive Ortolani or Barlow manoeuvre, breech presentation, first degree affected relative and talipes equinovarus) for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH). The aims were to evaluate the success of those managed in a Pavlik harness and identify predictive factors for those that failed treatment. Methods: 728 patients were selectively screened between 1999 and 2004. Of those, 128 patients (189 hips) were identified as having hip instability. Failure was defined as inability to achieve or maintain hip reduction in a Pavlik harness. A proforma was designed to document patients’ risk factors and ultrasound findings at time of initial dynamic ultrasound scan where the senior radiographer and treating consultant were present. Each hip was classified according to Graf type. Acetabular indices were recorded prior to discharge. Results: All 128 patients with hip instability were managed in a Pavlik harness. This was abandoned for surgical treatment in 9 patients (10 hips) giving a failure rate of 5.3 %. All those successfully managed had an acetabular index of less than 30 degrees at follow up (6 – 48 months). 7 hips in the series were classified as Graf type IV, of these, 6 went on to fail management in a Pavlik harness. 67% of those that failed were also breech presentation compared to 22% of those managed successfully. There were no complications associated with management in a Pavlik harness. Discussion: Our overall rate of selective screening is 14 per 1,000 with a subsequent treatment rate of 2.3 per 1,000, which is comparable with other centres. Our rate of failure for DDH in a Pavlik harness (5.3 %) is extremely encouraging. Graf type IV hips and breech presentation correlated with a high likelihood of treatment failure

Introduction: This study examined the cohort of patients selectively screened over a 5 year period with ultrasonography according to our risk factors (positive Ortolani or Barlow manoeuvre, breech presentation, first degree affected relative and talipes equinovarus) for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH). The aims were to evaluate the success of those managed in a Pavlik harness and identify predictive factors for those that failed treatment. Methods: 1181 patients were selectively screened between 1999 and 2004. Of those, 128 patients (189 hips) were identified as having hip instability. Failure was defined as inability to achieve or maintain hip reduction in a Pavlik harness. A proforma was designed to document patients’ risk factors and ultrasound findings at time of initial dynamic ultrasound scan where the senior radiographer and treating consultant were present. Each hip was classified according to Graf type. Acetabular indices were recorded prior to discharge. Results: All 128 patients with hip instability were managed in a Pavlik harness. This was abandoned for surgical treatment in 9 patients (10 hips) giving a failure rate of 5.3 % (0.17 per 1000 live births). All those successfully managed had an acetabular index of less than 30 degrees at follow up (6 – 48 months). 7 hips in the series were classified as Graf type IV, of these, 6 went on to fail management in a Pavlik harness. 67% of those that failed were also breech presentation compared to 22% of those managed successfully. There were no complications associated with management in a Pavlik harness. 16 patients born within our region presented after 12 weeks of age with DDH resulting in a late presentation rate of 0.3 per 1000 live births. Discussion: Our overall rate of selective screening is 14 per 1000 live births with a subsequent treatment rate of 2.3 per 1000 is comparable with other centres. Our rate of failure for DDH in a Pavlik harness 0.17 per 1000 live births is an improvement on any previously published results. Irreducible hips, Graf type IV hips and breech presentation correlated with a high likelihood of treatment failure