header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Children's Orthopaedics

WHY DOES SELECTIVE ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR DDH FAIL?

Warwick, England, 22 January 2010



Abstract

Purpose of study

Results clinically & statistically of a 10 year prospective observational longitudinal study of the effects of sonographic screening for ‘risk’ factors in DDH.

Methods & Results

From 1997 to 2006 the project analysed the results of a sonographic screening programme for clinical instability & ‘risk factors’ in Blackburn (modified Graf system). ‘Risk factors’ included: breech presentation, strong family history, foot deformities & oligohydramnios. Statistically 95% confidence intervals, relative risk, sensitivity, specificity PPV & NPV were calculated. The outcome measure was irreducible dislocation of the hip joint. There was a birth population of 37,510, of which 2693 were ‘at risk’ & 132 clinically unstable.

Three subsections:

1. Clinically unstable hips (birth) 2 irreducible dislocations
2. ‘At risk’ 6 irreducible dislocations
3. Secondary referral (GP screening) 11 irreducible dislocations

The overall irreducible dislocation rate was 0.51 per 1000 live births.

‘Risk factors’: mGraf Type III/IV/ Irreducible:

CTCV: 1: 13.8 RR = 26.5
Family history: 1:18.5 RR = 23.3
Breech: 1:35 RR = 14.8
Oligohydramnios 1:99.5
TEV (postural) 1:202
CTEV (fixed) 0.0

Narrow 95% CI for Breech, CTCV & CTEV

Wide 95% CI for Family history, oligohydramnios & TEV (postural)

95% CI (RR) for Oligohydramnios & TEV not significant.

RR for clinical hip instability was 983.6

Percentage female

18/19 irreducible hips 94.74%
64/92 Type IV hips 69.56%
26/30 Type III hips 86.66%

34.15% of clinically unstable hip joints had a ‘risk factor’

Conclusion

Only 13 from 2693 ‘at risk’, had Type IV or Irreducible hips. Only 7 were treatable by splintage. Clinically & statistically screening for at ‘risk hips’ alone has a poor return. Female gender & clinical instability appear more important.