Objectives. To quantify and compare
Introduction:
Aim. The saddle prosthesis was originally developed for reconstruction of large acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty. Later on the saddle prosthesis was also used for hip reconstruction after resection of
Introduction
Pelvic and acetabular surgery may be associated with significant blood loss because of the vascularity and anatomy of the pelvis. Concerns continue in relation to blood transfusion because of the potential for disease transmission and because of the increasing cost of providing safe blood products. The purpose of this study was to examine in a retrospective fashion the blood transfusion requirements in a consecutive series of patients undergoing
Ganz
Ganz
Aims. To determine whether there is any benefit using a minimally invasive trans-sartorial approach as described by Professor Søballe compared to the ilio-femoral for
Since acetabular osteolytic lesions following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be asymptomatic until extensive bone loss occurs, early detection and monitoring the progression of these lesions is important. The purpose of this study was to use high resolution helical CT to determine the progression of the osteolytic lesions over time by comparing serial studies. Fifty patients (Fifty-eight hips) with primary, cementless THA done between 1984–1996 were evaluated as part of an ongoing prospective study. These patients had a history of a high level of activity that was believed to place them at increased risk for accelerated polyethylene wear. The mean age was 51 yrs, 55% male:45% female. The average time from date of surgery to initial scan was 8.0 years (4.7–16.6). If an acetabular lytic lesion was identified, the patients were offered Alendronate for potential suppression of bone resorption with a repeat CT scan for follow-up. The area of the maximum size osteolytic lesions on axial images were measured on the initial scan and compared at the same level on the subsequent study. The interval between scans averaged 15 months (10 – 27). Progression was noted on 87% hips. The mean initial area was 328 mm2 (40–1084) with the follow-up area of 386 mm2 (46–1344) with a mean of progression of 15.7%. Once established,
Periacetabular osteolysis is seen in response to particles (polyethylene, ceramic, metal or cement), at times in the presence of an unstable implant, and perhaps made worse by the unique host response to the particle burden. The impact of wear modes: due to either the primary bearing surface (MOP, MOM, COC) or unintended surfaces as seen in impingement, as well as the quality of the bearing counterface all influence the extent of the osteolytic response. The final common pathway appears to be via macrophage stimulation, an upregulation of cytokines leading to a resorption of bone. The patterns of lysis range from linear resorption at the implant interface to more expansile patterns which can be more dramatic in size and may place the implant at jeopardy for loosening. Assessment of implant fixation as well as extent of the lytic process employs the use of plain radiographs (including oblique views), computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The utility of MRI for the quantification of bone loss as well as the newer phenomena of associated soft tissue lesions (pseudotumors, adverse tissue reactions) has turned out to be a valuable tool in helping determine timing and need for revision. The basic principles in determining need for revision surgery revolve around: degree of lysis, integrity of the soft tissues, fixation of the implant, track record of the implant, as well as patient factors including symptoms, age and activity. In cemented sockets, progressive bone loss, pain with or without overt loosening is indication for revision which is generally accomplished using an uncemented hemispherical acetabular component with bone graft and screw augmentation. In the uncemented socket, the decision to revise is based upon a) implant stability, 2) the integrity of the locking mechanism, 3) degree of bone loss. With stable implants, polyethylene exchange and “lesional” treatment is appropriate. Well fixed implants with extensive lysis can be successfully managed with liner exchange and bone grafting as necessary. If the liner locking mechanism is compromised, cementing a liner into place is an excellent strategy. Removing a well fixed cup with extensive lysis runs the risk of encountering a large acetabular defect which may be difficult to reconstruct. Loose implants clearly require revision. In the era of “hard bearings”, progressive soft tissue expansion leading to damage of the abductor and other soft tissue constraints about the hip is an indication for revision. Revision of MOM THR's may be performed by maintaining the femoral component and performing an isolated acetabular revision or in some instances of modular acetabular components, maintaining the shell and inserting a new liner. In all instances of implant retention, it is critical to confirm that the components are in optimised position: implants retained in suboptimal position are at risk for early failure.
The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists. We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology. We retrospectively reviewed the PAO's performed from 2014–2017, for symptomatic dysplasia in our unit (single-surgeon, minimum 1-year follow-up). All patients with adequate pelvic radiographs were included. Radiographic parameters of dysplasia were measured from pre- and post-operative AP pelvic radiographs using a validated software (Introduction
Methods
With cementless porous-coated acetabular replacements, extensive bone loss can occur without effecting implant stability. As a result, the surgeon is frequently faced with re-operating on a well-fixed cementless acetabular component with osteolysis and must decide whether or not to remove a well-fixed porous coated socket. A classification system and treatment algorithm has been developed to aid in management decisions regarding re-operation for polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis. Cases are classified into one of 3 possible categories depending on the radiographic stability of the porous coated shell and the ability to replace the polyethylene liner. Type I case; stable porous coated shell, liner replaceable; Type II case; socket stable, liner not replaceable; Type III case; socket loose, not osseointegrated. Treatment Algorithms - Retain well-fixed shell in Type I cases and replace the liner. Debride accessible lytic lesions and graft with allograft chips. Remove the well-fixed shell in Type II case. Assess defect once the shell is removed. Reconstruction based on the bony defect present. The vast majority can be revised with a larger porous coated socket. Remove loose socket in Type III cases. Assess defect and reconstruct based on the defect. There is a greater need for more extensive grafting and the use of reconstruction rings with Type III cases. This treatment algorithm has helped the authors successfully evaluate and treat a large series of patients with polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis in association with porous coated acetabular components. The stability of the acetabular component and appropriate knowledge of the implant are important factors that impact surgical management.
With cementless porous-coated acetabular replacements, extensive bone loss can occur without affecting implant stability. As a result, the surgeon is frequently faced with re-operating on a well-fixed cementless acetabular component with osteolysis and must decide whether or not to remove a well-fixed porous coated socket. A classification system and treatment algorithm has been developed to aid in management decisions regarding re-operation for polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis. Cases are classified into one of 3 possible categories depending on the radiographic stability of the porous coated shell and the ability to replace the polyethylene liner. Type I case; stable porous coated shell, liner replaceable; Type II case; socket stable, liner not replaceable; Type III case; socket loose, not osseointegrated Relative Contra-indications for Liner Exchange – Type II Case - Malpositioned socket, Severely damaged shell or lock detail (consider cementing shell in place), Poor track record of the implant, Highly crosslinked polyethylene liner of adequate thickness not available, Ongrowth (as opposed to ingrowth) fixation surface Treatment Algorithm Type I Case: Retain well-fixed shell in Type I cases and replace the liner. Debride accessible lytic lesions and graft with allograft chips. Type II Case: Remove the well-fixed shell in Type II case. Assess defect once the shell is removed. Reconstruction based on the bony defect present. The vast majority can be revised with a larger porous coated socket. Type III Case: Remove loose socket. Assess defect and reconstruct based on the defect. There is a greater need for more extensive grafting and the use of reconstruction rings with Type III cases. This treatment algorithm has helped the authors successfully evaluate and treat a large series of patients with polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis in association with porous coated acetabular components. The stability of the acetabular component and appropriate knowledge of the implant are important factors that impact surgical management.
Polyethylene and femoral head exchange for wear or osteolysis is a common operation. The difficulty lies in the facts that wear and osteolysis are difficult to measure, wear does not always correlate with osteolysis, catastrophic failure (wear through, loosening, or fracture) is difficult to predict, and these problems are usually asymptomatic. I currently recommend this procedure when complete wear through of the polyethylene is present or impending, when the patient has obvious wear and symptoms, or if there is a rapidly enlarging osteolytic lesion. The surgical goals focus on management of debris generation and management of the osteolytic lesion. A third goal becomes avoidance of the know complications of this procedure. Management of debris generation basically involves modernising the head and polyethylene. Management of the osteolytic lesion includes debridement and when possible grafting. By far the most common complication after this procedure is dislocation. Prevention of dislocation should be accomplished by patient education, use of larger heads when possible, and capsular repair. Prerequisites to perform this procedure are a replacement liner of adequate thickness that can be locked or cemented in place. The acetabular component must be stable. Lastly the component must be properly oriented to minimise both wear and dislocation. Metal-on-metal liner conversion to metal-on-poly is becoming more common. Since patient satisfaction with THA is high, MoM patients may unknowingly minimise their symptoms because they are minor compared to the symptoms before surgery. The patient history should include specific questions about groin pain, swelling, hip noise, and asking the patient if they notice their hip on a daily basis. Patient symptoms, osteolysis and a pseudotumor are indications for modular conversion. Radiographically stable, well-oriented components that can accept a polyethylene liner are requirements for a successful conversion.
Polyethylene and femoral head exchange for wear or osteolysis is a common operation. The difficulty lies in the facts that wear and osteolysis are difficult to measure, wear does not always correlate with osteolysis, catastrophic failure (wear through, loosening, or fracture) is difficult to predict, and these problems are usually asymptomatic. I currently recommend this procedure when complete wear through of the polyethylene is present or impending, when the patient has obvious wear and symptoms, or if there is a rapidly enlarging osteolytic lesion. The surgical goals focus on management of debris generation and management of the osteolytic lesion. A third goal becomes avoidance of the know complications of this procedure. Management of debris generation basically involves modernising the head and polyethylene. Management of the osteolytic lesion includes debridement and when possible grafting. By far the most common complication after this procedure is dislocation. Prevention of dislocation should be accomplished by patient education, use of larger heads when possible, and capsular repair. Prerequisites to perform this procedure are a replacement liner of adequate thickness that can be locked or cemented in place. The acetabular component must be stable. Lastly the component must be properly oriented to minimise both wear and dislocation. Metal-on-metal liner conversion to metal-on-poly is becoming more common. Since patient satisfaction with THA is high, MoM patients may unknowingly minimise their symptoms because they are minor compared to the symptoms before surgery. The patient history should include specific questions about groin pain, swelling, hip noise, and asking the patient if they notice their hip on a daily basis. Patient symptoms, osteolysis and a pseudotumour are indications for modular conversion. Radiographically stable, well-oriented components that can accept a polyethylene liner are requirements for a successful conversion.Metal-on-metal liner exchanges
Objective: Severe acetabular dysplasia with established dislocation of the hip represents a common problem in cerebral palsy. Once significant dysplasia is present little remodeling of the acetabulum occurs with femoral osteotomies alone. Pelvic osteotomies should address the problem of acetabular deficiency in order to restore optimal coverage of the femoral head. Standard innominate osteotomies are not recommended for neuromus-cular hip dysplasia. To address the lack of postero-lateral coverage in this population, a modified periacetabular osteotomy was performed. Methods: Between 1991 and 2000 a total of 44 patients (52 hips) with total body involvement CP underwent this procedure at a mean age of 9,4 yrs. The modification includes only one bicortical cut at the posterior corner at the sciatic notch. The cut extends down to the trira-diate cartilage, if present, and through the former site of the triradiate cartilage after closure of the acetabu-lar growth plate in adolescence. Additional procedures included: open reduction, femoral varus osteotomy, and soft tissue releases. Follow-up included a subjective and clinical evaluation. Radiographic assessment included measurements of the migration percentage and acetab-ular index, evidence of AVN, and premature closure of the triradiate cartilage. Results: The mean follow-up period for these patients was 3.5 years (1.0 to 8,1 yrs) after surgery, and 70% of the patients had reached skeletal maturity at that time. The median acetabular index improved from 30% pre-operatively to 18% at follow-up. The median migration percentage was 71% preoperatively, and 0 at follow-up. A re-dislocation occurred in 1 hip, and a re-subluxation in another. All other hips were stable and well contained at follow-up. There were 3 hips showing signs of postoperative femoral head defects . Premature closure of the triradiate cartilage was not noted. The caregivers had the impression that the surgery had improved personal care, positioning/transferring, and comfort. Conclusions: This osteotomy reduces the volume of the elongated acetabulum and provides coverage by articular cartilage. It provides coverage particularly at the posterior part of the acetabulum. Compared to other techniques this modified periacetabular osteotomy has only one posterior cortical cut which extends down to the sciatic notch. Since this cut is cortical, the fragment can be mobilized extensively and it allows placement of a graft and a better posterior coverage.
The reconstruction of
The reconstruction of
The April 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: Goal-directed fluid therapy in hip fracture; Liberal blood transfusion no benefit in the longer term; Repeated measures: increased accuracy or compounded errors?;
Mixed Reality has the potential to improve accuracy and reduce required dissection for the performance of