Abstract
Introduction Peri-acetabular osteolysis is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine, using quantitative computed tomography (CT), the location, volume and rate of progression of peri-acetabular osteolytic lesions, and to determine the validity of this CT technique with intra-operative measurements.
Methods High-resolution spiral multislice CT scan (Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens, Munich, Germany), with metal-artefact suppression protocol, was used to measure the volume of osteolytic lesions around 47 cementless THAs in 36 patients (median age 73 years, duration 14 years, range five to 24 years). In vitro validation was undertaken. CT scans were taken from the top of sacroiliac joint down to two centimetres below the end of the prosthesis. Reconstruction images were analysed by two different observers and progression of osteolysis with time was determined. In some patients, subsequently revised, in-vivo CT measurements were compared to intra-operative measurements. The rate of progression of osteolytic lesions was calculated. The technique was optimised and validated by extensive in-vitro studies, using bovine and human pelves.
Results The incidence of lesions located in each site was: the ilium, 65%; around fixation screws, 20%; in the anterior column, nine percent; and in the medial wall, six percent. Some lesions were shown to be relatively quiescent, while others were aggressively osteolytic. Intra and inter-observer error for the CT measurement technique was four percent and 2.8%, respectively. In vitro volumetric measurements of simulated bone defects adjacent to the acetabular component and fixation screw were accurate to within 96% and precise to 98%. In addition, preliminary data obtained intra-operatively indicate the accuracy of CT in identifying the sites of osteolysis.
Conclusions CT is thus a valid and reliable technique for investigating the natural history of osteolysis and the factors that may influence its progression. It will also enable assessment of non-surgical treatments of osteolysis.
In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.
