Introduction

Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design.

The Exeter (Howmedica Ltd) and Ultima-TPS (Depuy Ltd) implants are both collarless, polished, double-tapered, cemented femoral implants. The Exeter is manufactured in stainless steel and has an excellent long-term survivorship. The Ultima-TPS is manufactured in cobalt-chrome and has been recently introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the early performance of these implants in a 2-year randomised clinical trial.

65 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis were randomised to receive either the Exeter or TPS stem. All received a Charnley Cup. Outcome measures included the Oxford Hip Questionnaire, proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and implant subsidence measured using EBRA. At 2 years 43 patients (66%) were reviewed. 22 patients (mean age 70 years, 16 female, BMI 27.9Kg/m²) received the TPS implant, and 21 patients (mean age 70 years, 15 female, BMI 28.9Kg/m²) received the Exeter implant. 19 patients withdrew for reasons unrelated to the study, 2 died, and 1 was withdrawn after deep wound infection.

Complete Oxford hip scores were available pre-operatively and at 2 years in 37 patients (n=20 TPS). Median (IQR) pre-operative hip scores were 51 (43 to 54) and 48 (36 to 53) for the TPS and Exeter implants, respectively. At 2 years the hip scores improved to 24 (18 to 31) and 22 (16 to 31), respectively. There were no differences in scores between groups at each time-point. There were no differences in BMD between groups at pre-operative baseline, 3 months, 1 and 2 years (Gruen zones 1–7, all time-points; n=19 TPS, n=13 Exeter implants: P> 0.05). Maximum bone loss was seen in Gruen zone 7 at 2 years for bone implants (TPS-11%, Exeter -14%, P> 0.05). Measurement of subsidence over 2 years using EBRA was possible in 20 patients (n=7 TPS, n=13 Exeter). Mean subsidence at 2 years was 1.62mm for the TPS implant and 1.60mm for the Exeter implant (P> 0.05). There was no plain radiographic evidence of osteolysis in either group.

These data suggest that the early performance of the two implants studied is similar. However, long-term survivorship data is required to confirm their equivalency.

Purpose

Introduce an Integrated Approach for Orthopedic-Sports Medicine Practice and Patient Care Management that

Is built around effective and efficient surgical techniques, and patient care management processes

Integrates Operations and Service Excellence best practices with patient care management processes

Integrates orthopedic care delivery between outpatient clinic, pre-surgery, surgery, inpatient, (acute care) and post acute care settings

Delivers exceptional clinical, patient satisfaction and financial outcomes as validated by independent national healthcare benchmarking organization

Helps position Ortho-Sports medicine services for strategic growth

Is replicable to develop Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence

Presentation illustrates the ‘Ten Elements’ approach to implement the Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence and demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach with an outcomes study from over 1000 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. During the presentation, the speakers would share the key clinical, patient satisfaction, and financial outcomes achieved by the implementation of the best practices defined in our ‘Ten Elements’ approach. All performance data elements are collected, validated and analyzed by an independent third party, national healthcare benchmarking company.

During the presentation Dr. Bramlett would elaborate on the surgical protocol, and the key differentiating steps in procedure technique from traditional approach that significantly enhances procedure effectiveness, efficiency and lowers the patient complication rate as demonstrated by benchmarking data. Speakers would further present the key elements of Total Knee Arthoplasty procedure that focus on patient education, patient participation in pre-surgical weight loss and pre-habilitation program, anesthesia approach, avoiding tourniquet use and deep veen thrombosis (DVT) risk reduction, early post operative patient ambulation and weight bearing, and post operative patient management approach. On average the ortho-sports medicine clinical of Alabama TKA patients are disharged from the hospital in 2.6 days, and experience 65 percent less complications than expected for a similar patient population and assume early control of their independent functionality.

Purpose: The treatment of extension type II pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures remains controversial. Some argue that closed reduction and cast immobilization is sufficient to treat these fractures, while others advocate closed reduction and pinning. The purpose of this radiographic outcomes study was to determine whether closed reduction and cast immobilization could successfully obtain and maintain appropriate position of extension type II supracondylar humerus fractures.

Method: The radiographs of 1017 pediatric patients treated for supracondylar fractures between 1987 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-reduction, immediate post-reduction, and final radiographs of 155 extension type II fractures were measured in order to assess the position and alignment of the fracture fragments. Measurements included the anterior humeral line, humeral-capitellar angle, Baumann’s angle, the Gordon index, and the Griffet index. The latter two indices calculate the rotational instability of the fracture, which can be predictive of reduction loss. Patients were excluded if insufficient radiographs failed to allow complete assessment of the measurement parameters, or if open reduction was required.

Results: The average age of the subjects was 5.3 years (range 1–13 years) and had a mean follow-up of 5.3 months. Analysis of the final radiographs demonstrated that in 80% of subjects, the anterior humeral line remained anterior to the mid third segment of the capitellum (radiographic extension deformity), the mean humeral-capitellar angle was 23.8° (range – 11°–50°), the mean Baumann’s angle was 79.4° (range 62°–97°), the mean Gordon index was 4.59%, and 44% of subjects had a Griffet index between 1–3 (potentially indicative of unstable reduction due to malrotation of the fragments, which can allow the development of a cubitus varus deformity).

Conclusion: From this radiographic review, a significant proportion of fractures treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization failed to achieve anatomic position and alignment on final x-rays. However, the clinical significance of these results and the potential for long-term re-modeling of these fractures remains unknown.

Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.

Purpose. Patient expectations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be managed through education. E-learning is the application of information technology to education. Providing information to patients at the place and time of their choosing, e-learning has the potential to broaden the reach of existing services for patients. This study evaluated whether an e-learning tool could affect whether patients felt their expectations were met and whether they were satisfied with surgery one year following primary TKA. Method. We recruited consecutive patients with osteoarthritis and randomized them to either standard patient education (n=207), or to our standard patient education plus a new e-learning tool (n=209). Preoperative measures were completed following the patients’ Pre-Admission clinic (PAC) visit and prior to accessing the e-learning tool. Postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were completed at six weeks, three months and one year after TKA. We used the Postoperative Expectation Questionnaire to measure the degree to which patient expectations had been met and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) question to measure patient satisfaction at one year postoperative. We collected several PROMs for descriptive purposes including: new Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS); (Pre-Op and Post-Op versions), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, and the Social Role Participation Questionnaire (SRPQ). Results. Both groups were similar with respect to their preoperative PROMs. Preoperative patient satisfaction was low, with few patients satisfied with their present state prior to TKA and similar between groups (14% intervention group, 11% control group). At one year postoperatively, the risk that expectations of patients were not met was 21.8% in the control group and 21.4% in the intervention group for a risk difference of 1.3% (95% CI −7.8% to 10.4%, p = 0.78). The proportion of patients satisfied with their TKA at one year postoperative was similar in the intervention group 78.6% and the control group 78.2%, and the risk difference 0.6% (95% CI −8.4% to 9.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.78). At one year postoperative we found significant postoperative between-group differences in favour of the control group for the new KSS symptoms score and the functional activities score. We also found that control patients had less anxiety, lower scores for rumination, magnification, and helplessness than intervention patients on the PCS. Conclusion. Patients randomized to the e-learning tool had significantly better KSS symptom scores and functional activities scores as well as lower anxiety and helplessness scores but they did not have a reduced risk of expectations not being met or an improved overall satisfaction with their TKA

Aims

This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts.

There is a lack of evidence as to the best way to deliver rehabilitation following TKA. Previous work has suggested that postoperative physiotherapy applied to all patients is not effective at improving one-year post-surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to target physiotherapy to those at risk of poor outcome following TKA, and to determine if a therapist-led intervention offered superior results compared to a home-exercise based protocol in this ‘at risk’ group. The Targeted Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes (TRIO) study was a prospective randomised controlled trial run at 15-centres in the UK. Patients were identified as ‘potential poor outcome’ based on an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) classification at 6-weeks post-surgery and randomised to either therapist-led or home-exercise based protocols. Patients were reviewed by a physiotherapist and commenced 18-exercise sessions over 6-weeks. The therapist-led group undertook a progressive functional protocol (modified weekly in 1-1 contact sessions) in contrast to the static home-exercise based regime. Evaluation took place following rehabilitation intervention, then at 6-months and 1-year post-surgery. Primary outcome was comparative group OKS at 1-year. Secondary outcomes included, ‘worst’ and ‘average’ pain scores, OXS and EQ-5D, and satisfaction questionnaire. Health economic (cost-utility) analysis was undertaken from NHS perspective up to 1-year post-surgery. Incremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated from intervention costs, patient reported primary and secondary care usage, and EQ-5D data. 4264 patients were screened, 1296 were eligible, 334 patients were randomised, 8 were lost to follow-up, therapy compliance was >85%. Clinically meaningful improvement in OKS (between baseline and 1-year) was seen in both arms (p < 0 .001). Between group difference in 1-year OKS was 1.91 (95%CI, −0.17–3.99) points favouring the therapist-led arm (p=0.07). Incorporating all time point data, between group difference in OKS was 2.25 points (95%CI, 0.61–3.90, p=0.008). Small, non-significant reductions (< 5 %) in both worst and average pain scores were observed favouring the therapist-led group. Enhanced satisfaction with pain relief (OR 1.65, p < 0 .02), ability to perform daily functional tasks (OR 1.66, p < 0 .02), and perform heavy functional tasks (OR 1.6, p=0.04) was reported in the therapist-led group. There was a small non-significant difference of 0.02 points (95%CI −0.02–0.06) between groups in EQ-5D, resulting in a £12,125 cost per QALY of delivering the therapist led intervention with a 57% chance of being cost-effective at the standard UK policy threshold of £20,000 per QALY. TRIO is the largest randomised trial of physiotherapy following TKA, and the first to target rehabilitation to patients at risk of poor outcomes. Both therapist-led and home-exercise based rehabilitation groups made clinically meaningful improvements in outcome by 1-year. We observed a modest difference in OKS in favour of therapist-led rehabilitation compared to the home-exercises which was not statistically significant. The relatively tight confidence intervals suggests that any difference which might exist is too small to be clinically relevant. Patient satisfaction with outcome was however higher in those that received greater physiotherapist contact. While cost per QALY estimates were below UK policy threshold, this result is uncertain and insufficient to make accept-decline recommendations

Background and purpose. The musculoskeletal system is a common, but often overlooked, cause of chest pain. Little is known about the efficacy of spinal manipulation for this condition. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of two conservative treatment approaches for acute musculoskeletal chest pain, 1) a spinal manipulation-based therapy as a typical example of chiropractic treatment and 2) self-management as an example of minimal intervention. Methods and results. In a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial set at an emergency cardiology department and four outpatient chiropractic clinics, 115 consecutive patients with acute chest pain and no clear medical diagnosis at initial presentation were included. After a baseline evaluation, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomized to four weeks of chiropractic treatment or self-management, with post-treatment questionnaire follow-up four and 12 weeks later. Primary outcome measures were numeric change in pain intensity (11-point box numerical rating scale) and self-perceived change in pain (7-point ordinal scale). Secondary measures included Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores, change in pain intensity (chest, thoracic spine, neck and shoulder/arm), and self-perceived change in general health. Preliminary results will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions. This is the first randomised controlled trial assessing chiropractic treatment versus a minimal intervention in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain. Results will indicate whether chiropractic treatment is a useful option for patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, but the design does not allow for standardisation of treatment or identification of potentially active ingredients of care

Introduction. The objective of this study was to verify the long-term outcome of transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy (ARO) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Consecutive series of 21 symptomatic ONFH patients with SLE (33 hips), aged 20 to 40 years, underwent ARO between 1980 and 1988. We reviewed the cases of 16 patients (25 hips), which represents a 76% rate of follow-up. Patients included 4 men and 12 women who had a mean age of 29 years at the time of surgery. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used for the survivorship analysis of ARO. Patients with surviving hips were evaluated by the modified Oxford hip score and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36). Results. Twelve hips in 8 patients survived at the final follow-up. The average length of surviving was 25 years (range, 20 to 27 years). Three patients (6 hips) had died of unrelated causes without any conversion at the mean time of 9 years after ARO. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis with the end point defined as any conversion, the survival rate at 25 years was 73.7% (95% confidence interval, 53.9 to 93.5%). Based on the classification of the modified Oxford hip score, 5 hips were classified as excellent, 2 hips were good, and the remaining 5 hips were fair. The average SF-36 physical component summary score was 34 points and the average mental component summary score was 46 points. The physical component summary scores of 3 patients (53.0, 56.6, 57.1) exceeded the level of the Japanese population norm. Conclusion. In ONFH patients with SLE, ARO achieved a 73.7% survival rate at 25 years

The primary objective of this study was to determine if surgical treatment for spinal stenosis is comparable to total hip and knee arthroplasty in improving patients’ self-reported quality of life. An age, sex and time of surgery matched cohort of patients who had undergone elective primary one-two level spinal decompression (n=90) with (n=26 /90) or without fusion for spinal stenosis (n=40 with degenerative spondylolisthesis) and elective primary total hip (n=90) and knee (n = 90) arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were compared. The primary outcome measure was the preoperative and two year postoperative Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. There was no significant difference in the mean pre-operative Physical Component Summary (PCS) / Mental Component Summary between groups [Spine −32/43; Hip − 30/45; Knee 31/46 (p > 0.5)]. With the exception of the knee MCS (p=0.2), postoperative scores were significantly improved for all groups [Spine −40/53; Hip − 43/51; Knee 39/48 (p < 0.001)]. Overall the hip surgery had the great impact on PCS and the spine surgery on MCS. Studies have shown the significant impact on overall patient quality of life and cost-effectiveness of primary total joint arthroplasty. The results of this unique study show that surgical intervention for spinal stenosis has a similar positive effect at two year follow up. This study provides data that supports the need advocacy regarding waiting time initiatives and surgical resources for the treatment of patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis with a similar demographic to those with primary OA of the hip or knee

Aims

The value of core decompression (CD) in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether CD combined with other treatments could improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of ONFH patients compared with CD alone.

Objective scoring techniques for back pain are increasingly being used both in the pre-operative selection of patients and as a post-operative outcome measure. Our aim was to determine the strength of correlation between three main scoring techniques used to quantify the severity of the back or leg pain on presentation to a chronic back pain clinic. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Medical Outcomes Study 36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF36), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were competed by 130 patients between July and December 1999. There were 65 males and 65 females with the mean age of 49 years. The patients were divided into three groups: with back pain only, sciatic leg pain only, and those with both. The correlation was analysed using the Pearson correlation test. There was a good correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analogue Scale for patients with back pain (r=0.641, p< 0.001) and with sciatic leg pain (r=0.469, p< .001). The physical component of the SF36 strongly correlates with the VAS in back pain (r=0.364) and sciatic leg pain (r=1). However there is a poor correlation between the ODI and VAS and all other components of the SF36

There has been controversy about the practice of mixing femoral and acetabular implants from different manufacturers in total hip replacement (THR). We studied the clinical outcomes of over 1500 patients in the Exeter Primary Outcomes Study (EPOS) who underwent primary THR with a cemented Exeter stem (Stryker) but with various acetabular components. This was a prospective non-randomised multicentre study. Patient reported hip scores (Oxford Hip Score (OHS)) were measured before operation and at 1 and 2 years post operatively. The choice of acetabular implant was at the surgeons’ discretion. 982 patients had reached four year follow up. Six types of acetabular component were examined (Exeter, Exeter Contemporary, Duraloc (all Stryker), Charnley (DePuy), Cenator (Corin), and Trilogy (Zimmer)). Patients who received a Charnley cup were found to have worse pre-operative status (significantly higher OHS) than those receiving other cups (especially those receiving Exeter cups) (p< 0.01). Post operatively, this difference continued, with the absolute OHS value remaining greater (i.e. worse clinical result) for the Charnley cup at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. The association of poor pre-op status with worse post-op result was anticipated. However, when the clinical benefit of surgery (i.e. the improvement in OHS between pre-op and post-op) was assessed, there was no significant difference between the various implants at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. These results demonstrate that initial clinical benefit of surgery does not differ between patients receiving acetabular implants from varying manufacturers when the Exeter stem is used. These patients will be followed further to determine whether such “mixing and matching” results in differences in longer term outcomes

Introduction: In the United Kingdom, the wait for hip or knee joint replacement surgery can be particularly long. There are conflicting research accounts whether debilitating symptoms, such as pain and the effects on physical function and quality of life deteriorate or remain the same in individuals who are on the waiting list for hip or knee joint replacement. This study was conducted to investigate the severity of pain, level of physical function and quality of life amongst adults with osteoarthritis awaiting hip or knee joint replacement. Methods: A longitudinal study was undertaken in the North West of England during 2003–2005. A total of 105 patients listed for primary hip or knee joint replacement were recruited, interviewed at baseline, and followed-up at three, six and nine months, or until their joint replacement. Measurement tools used were a visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario McMaster’s University (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results: High levels of pain and poor physical function and quality of life were experienced by patients on the waiting list for joint replacement. At the three month follow-up (n=84) changes in VAS pain scores (0.6; 95% CIs mean difference 0.3,1.0); WOMAC pain scores (1.2 (95% CIs mean difference 0.7, 1.8) and WOMAC physical function scores (4.8; 95% CIs mean difference 2.8, 6.7) were significantly worse compared to baseline. However, there were minimal changes in quality of life as measured by the SF-36 while on the waiting list. Discussion: The often long wait for joint replacement surgery and deterioration in pain and physical function has highlighted the need for active management by health professionals while patients are on the waiting list. There needs to be a clinical reassessment of patients by health professionals while on the waiting list for joint replacement

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to determine if surgical treatment for spinal stenosis is comparable to total hip arthroplasty in improving patients’ self-reported quality of life. Methods: An age, sex and time of surgery matched cohort of patients who had undergone elective primary 1–2 level spinal decompression (n=90) with (n=30/90) or without fusion for spinal stenosis (n=40 with degenerative spondylolisthesis) and elective primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (n=90) were compared. The primary outcome measure was the preoperative and one year postoperative Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: The mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) / Mental Component Summary (MCS) for the stenosis compared to hip patients were 32.0/43.3 vs. 30.5/46.2 preoperatively (analysis between groups: p = 0.2/0.1) and 39.1/47.3 vs.44.1/46.1 postoperatively (analysis between groups: p = 0.003/0.4). The pre- and postoperative PCS significantly improved for both groups (p < 0.0001);however, the pre- and postoperative MCS improved in the stenosis group only (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Studies have shown the significant impact on overall patient quality of life and cost-effectiveness of primary total hip arthroplasty. The results of this unique study show that surgical intervention for spinal stenosis also has a very positive overall effect on patients’ self-reported quality of life at one year follow up. This study provides data that supports the need for a long term prospective study and advocacy regarding waiting time initiatives and surgical resources for the treatment of patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis with a similar demographic to those with primary OA of the hip

There has been controversy about whether limb length discrepancy (LLD) affects outcome after total hip replacement (THR). We examined input variables and outcomes of over 1200 patients who received primary THR with the Exeter stem and a variety of acetabular components in the Exeter Primary Outcomes Study. This was a non randomized prospective multi centre study. We examined whether specific groups of patients or surgeons were more likely to have LLD at one year after surgery. Data for leg length measured on clinical assessment were available for 1207 patients at 1 year. 237 patients were recorded as having a leg length difference of 1 cm or more, and 73 a difference of 2 cm or more. 138 were longer on the operated side and 99 were shorter. The likelihood of having LLD of 2 cm or more was not significantly affected by the grade of surgeon (consultant or trainee), BMI, age of patient, position of patient during surgery or surgical approach, or the use of regional or general anaesthetic. We examined the effect of LLD on outcomes at 3 months and 1,2,3 and 4 years. Patients with LLD > 1cm had significantly worse Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years (p< 0.01), with the OHS generally being an average 2 points worse in those with LLD. The most consistent difference between those with and without LLD was a patient reported limp on the Oxford Hip Questionnaire. We conclude that LLD is a common problem after THR and that all patient groups may be affected. It is associated with a significantly worse functional outcome as measured by a validated hip score. Systematic adoption of accurate intra-operative measures of leg length might pay dividends in minimizing this complication

There is concern that patients undergoing total hip replacement by trainee surgeons may do worse than those operated on by consultants. We examined the clinical outcomes of over patients in the Exeter Primary Outcomes Study who underwent primary THR with a cemented Exeter stem (Stryker) with various acetabular components. Over 1400 patients entered the prospective non-randomised multi centre study. Patient reported hip scores (Oxford Hip Score (OHS)) were measured pre operation and at 3 months, 1,2,3 and 4 years post operatively. The number of patients assessed at 4 years was 982. Trainees operated on patients with worse pre-operative OHS (p< 0.05; t test)) and on significantly less patients under 60 years (p< 0.05 chi square). There was no significant difference in the improvement in OHS (i.e. pre-op OHS – post-op OHS) at any post-operative time point between consultants and trainees. However, patients operated upon by consultants had consistently better postoperative absolute OHS scores (p< 0.05 at 3 months and 1, 2, 3 and 4 years; t test). Complications were low in both groups. Operations performed by trainees lasted longer (mean of 104 vs. 85 minutes). There was also no difference in OHS scores of patients operated by trainees whether they were assisted by an SHO (n=132) or by a consultant (n=249). In this large cohort of patients there was no difference in the improvement in OHS between patients operated by registrars and consultants. The difference in the absolute OHS values is likely explained by the difference in pre-operative status. We conclude that THRs performed by consultants and by trainees under appropriate supervision give similar initial clinical results. Given current changes to shorten surgical training, it is important that outcomes of THRs performed by future trainees are reviewed to ensure that outcomes are maintained

Introduction: Various surgical approaches have been described for the hip joint but the optimal surgical approach for total hip replacement remains controversial. The lateral approach & the posterior approach are the most commonly used approaches. Various scoring systems are in use to assess the outcome of total hip replacement. Since its introduction in 1996, Oxford hip score (OHS) has been validated in several studies. Total hip replacement has been shown to improve the OHS in several studies but we could not find any studies on effect of the surgical approach on OHS. AIM: To find out the affect of surgical approach on oxford hip score. Methods: Exeter Primary Outcomes Study was a prospective non-randomised multicentre study involving six centres across the UK. Ethical committee approval was taken and the study was conducted over a period of five years. 1610 patients were included in the study. All the patients underwent primary hip replacement with Exeter stem AND were followed up in the clinics for pre-operative assessment and then at three months, year one, year two and year five post-operatively. Oxford hip score was noted at pre-operative assessment and postoperatively at three months, year one, two, three, four and five, either in the clinics or by post. All data was analysed in conjunction with a statistician using SPSS. Results: We had 1587 patients with regular follow-up. Lateral approach was the most common surgical approach (n=1143) compared to posterior approach (n=436). Sex ratio for each surgical approach was comparable. Oxford hip scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05) up to four years, with both the surgical approaches. The posterior approach gave a better improvement in OHS compared to the lateral approach for all the four years. The absolute oxford hip scores improved significantly with the posterior approach for the first 12 months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Posterior approach gives greater patient perceived clinical benefit in the first year after surgery which could help in early rehabilitation compared to lateral approach. This should be considered when assessing the best approach for the patients

Introduction: Various surgical approaches have been described for the hip joint but the optimal surgical approach for total hip replacement remains controversial. The lateral approach & the posterior approach are the most commonly used approaches. Various scoring systems are in use to assess the outcome of total hip replacement. Since its introduction in 1996, Oxford hip score (OHS) has been validated in several studies. Total hip replacement has been shown to improve the OHS in several studies but we could not find any studies on effect of the surgical approach on OHS. Aim: To find out the affect of surgical approach on oxford hip score. Methods: Exeter Primary Outcomes Study was a prospective non-randomised multicentre study involving six centres across the UK. Ethical committee approval was taken and the study was conducted over a period of five years. 1610 patients were included in the study. All the patients underwent primary hip replacement with Exeter stem and were followed up in the clinics for pre-operative assessment and then at three months, year one, year two and year five post-operatively. Oxford hip score was noted at pre-operative assessment and postoperatively at three months, year one, two, three, four and five, either in the clinics or by post. All data was analysed in conjunction with a statistician using SPSS. Results: We had 1587 patients with regular follow-up. Lateral approach was the most common surgical approach (n=1143) compared to posterior approach (n=436). Sex ratio for each surgical approach was comparable. Oxford hip scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05) up to four years, with both the surgical approaches. The posterior approach gave a better improvement in OHS compared to the lateral approach for all the four years. The absolute oxford hip scores improved significantly with the posterior approach for the first 12 months post-operatively. Conclusion: Posterior approach gives greater patient perceived clinical benefit in the first year after surgery which could help in early rehabilitation compared to lateral approach. This should be considered when assessing the best approach for the patients