CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THRS OPERATED BY TRAINEES AND CONSULTANTS -NO DIFFERENCE TO 4 YEARS

Abstract

There is concern that patients undergoing total hip replacement by trainee surgeons may do worse than those operated on by consultants. We examined the clinical outcomes of over patients in the Exeter Primary Outcomes Study who underwent primary THR with a cemented Exeter stem (Stryker) with various acetabular components. Over 1400 patients entered the prospective non-randomised multi centre study. Patient reported hip scores (Oxford Hip Score (OHS)) were measured pre operation and at 3 months, 1,2,3 and 4 years post operatively.

The number of patients assessed at 4 years was 982. Trainees operated on patients with worse pre-operative OHS (p< 0.05; t test)) and on significantly less patients under 60 years (p< 0.05 chi square). There was no significant difference in the improvement in OHS (i.e. pre-op OHS – post-op OHS) at any post-operative time point between consultants and trainees. However, patients operated upon by consultants had consistently better postoperative absolute OHS scores (p< 0.05 at 3 months and 1, 2, 3 and 4 years; t test). Complications were low in both groups. Operations performed by trainees lasted longer (mean of 104 vs. 85 minutes). There was also no difference in OHS scores of patients operated by trainees whether they were assisted by an SHO (n=132) or by a consultant (n=249).

In this large cohort of patients there was no difference in the improvement in OHS between patients operated by registrars and consultants. The difference in the absolute OHS values is likely explained by the difference in pre-operative status. We conclude that THRs performed by consultants and by trainees under appropriate supervision give similar initial clinical results. Given current changes to shorten surgical training, it is important that outcomes of THRs performed by future trainees are reviewed to ensure that outcomes are maintained.