Introduction Venous thromboembolic disease is a serious complication of total hip replacement (THR). Use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been shown to reduce the occurrence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) significantly, but side effects such as bleeding and thrombocytopenia are frequent. Pneumatic compression with foot-pumps seems to provide the best balance of effectiveness and safety. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that the overall number of patients investigated in randomised clinical trials is too small to draw evidence-based conclusions regarding mechanical prophylaxis of DVT. This trial is a contribution in comparing the effectiveness and safety of mechanical versus chemical prophylaxis of DVT in patients managed with THR. Methods Inclusion criteria were hip osteoarthritis, age less than 80 years, and uninterrupted use of a foot-pump. Exclusion criteria were a history of thromboembolic disease, heart disease, malignancy and bleeding diatheses. Two hundred and sixteen consecutive patients were considered for inclusion in the trial and were randomized either for management with (LMWH) (Fraxiparin, Sanofi -Synthelabo, France) or with the A-V Impulse foot-pump (Orthofix Vascular Novamedix, UK). All patients started mobilisation on crutches with partial weight-bearing on day two using compression stockings. The foot-pump was applied on both feet in the recovery room and was used until patient discharge. Management with the foot-pump was interrupted only during physiotherapy and toileting. A reverse Trendelenburg position (head-high, feet-low) was applied at rest to enhance the pneumatic effect of the pumps. Patients were monitored for DVT using serial duplex sonography (Sonoline Elegra, Siemens, Germany) at day three, 10 and 45 after surgery. Results DVT was detected in three of 100 patients managed with the foot-pump compared with six of 100 patients who received chemical prophylaxis. Sixteen patients did not tolerate continuous use of the foot-pump and were excluded from the study. The average post-operative drainage was 259 ml in the foot-pump group and 328 ml in the control group (p=0.05). Patients with foot-pump had less swelling of the thigh (10 mm compared with 15 mm) (p=0.05). One patient developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Conclusions This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of mechanical prophylaxis of DVT in THR, confirming the outcomes of previous randomized clinical trials. Some patients cannot tolerate the foot-pump, mostly because of sleep disturbance. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

Objectives

We aimed to examine the characteristics of deep venous flow in the leg in a cast and the effects of a wearable neuromuscular stimulator (geko; FirstKind Ltd) and also to explore the participants’ tolerance of the stimulator.

Introduction A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 300 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Although this subject has been extensively studied in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, the true incidence of VTE related to spinal surgery remains unknown. We also sought to assess the efficacy of various forms of VTE prophylaxis, another area which has not been adequately studied. Methods Bilateral lower extremity venous duplex scans were performed pre-operatively, within one week postoperatively and at 4 to 6 weeks post-operatively. Information was collected regarding age, gender, body mass index, type and duration of surgical procedure, intra-operative blood loss and blood transfusion, pre- and post-operative mobility and other risk factors for VTE. All patients received vigorous mechanical prophylaxis with 56% of patients receiving pharmacological prophylaxis (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) according to surgeon preference. Results The overall incidence of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 3.4%. The incidence in those receiving pharmacological prophylaxis was 1.2% versus 6.3% in those who received mechanical prophylaxis alone (p< 0.05). Just under half of the post-operative DVTs (1.4%) occurred after hospital discharge with none of these patients receiving heparin. There were two cases of pulmonary embolism (0.7%), both occurring during hospitalization, and there were no deaths. There was no difference in blood loss or transfusion rates between patients receiving or not receiving pharmacological prophylaxis and there were no serious complications related to blood loss. There was a surprisingly high incidence of abnormalities detected on pre-operative scanning, with DVT occurring in 3.0% and superficial thrombophlebitis in 24.8%. Discussion The incidence of DVT in patients after spinal surgery was 3.4% and was significantly lower (1.2 %) in patients who received pharmacological prophylaxis. Given that the rates of bleeding-related complications were not different between the two groups, we conclude that it is both efficacious and safe to use pharmacological prophylaxis in combination with mechanical prophylaxis routinely in patients undergoing spinal surgery. A 27.8% incidence of pre-operative venous abnormalities may reflect pre-operative immobility due to pain in this group of patients, and justifies the use of ultrasound scanning as an important pre-operative screening tool. In addition, the high incidence of late-onset DVT justifies the need for follow-up scanning several weeks after discharge. This study is the amongst the largest of its type to date, however a larger, randomized and controlled trial is now necessary to confirm these results and allow the formulation of unambiguous guidelines for spinal surgery and VTE prophylaxis

Introduction. Guidelines from the North American Spine Society (2009 and 2013) are the best evidence-based instructions on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery. NICE guidelines exist for VTE prophylaxis but do not specifically address spinal surgery. In addition, the ruling of the UK Supreme Court in 2015 resulted in new guidance on consent being published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng). This study assesses our compliance in antibiotic, VTE prophylaxis and consent in spinal surgery against both US and UK standards. Methods. Retrospective review of spinal operations performed between August and December 2016. Case notes, consent forms and operation notes were analysed for consent, peri-operative antibiotic prescribing and post-operative VTE instructions. Results. Four Spinal surgeons performed 45 operations during this period. 31 patients (69%) received a copy of the signed consent with this process being formally documented in 22 (71%) of those cases. All patients were consented by a competent surgeon. 82% of cases consented prior to the date of procedure were countersigned on the day of operation. There was a mean time of 25.3 days between initial consent and operation (Range: 0–170). 37 (82%) cases had clear instructions for VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis. All prescribed post-operative antibiotics were administered. Discussion. The North American Guidelines state that prophylactic antibiotic is appropriate in all spinal surgery with prolonged cases requiring intraoperative re-dosing and only complex cases needing a postoperative regimen. Eight patients underwent a complex procedure and 7 appropriately received postoperative antibiotics. Of the 29 patients that underwent a simple procedure, 12 did not receive post-operative regimen, in line with the guidelines. However, the remainder 17 were over treated. The US Guidelines recommend mechanical VTE prophylaxis only in elective spinal surgery except in high risk patients. All our patients received VTE mechanical prophylaxis. RCSEng guidelines require consent being taken prior to procedure by a competent surgeon and confirmed on day of procedure. All patients in our cohort were consented prior to the date of operation allowing time for considering options and independent research. 82% of patients had consent confirmed on day of operation. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that we met guideline advice for all patients with regards VTE prophylaxis. We have a tendency to over treat with post-operative antibiotics and not all patients had their consent confirmed on day of procedure but was consented well before day of operation. North America still lead the way with guidelines on spinal surgery to which we should adhere, with NICE guidelines providing limited instructions. New consenting guidelines from RCSEng may not be currently widely known and thus should be a source of education for all surgeons

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common complication following major joint surgery. While attention has focused on VTE following joint arthroplasty their exists a gap in the literature examining the incidence of VTE in spinal surgery; with a shortage of epidemiological data, guidelines for optimal prophylaxis are limited. This survey, undertaken at the 2009 BASS Annual Meeting, sought to examine prevailing trends in VTE thromboprophylaxis in spinal surgery and to compare selections made by Orthopaedic and Neurosurgeons. We developed a questionnaire based around eight clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to supply details on their speciality (orthopaedics or neurosurgery) and level of training (grade) and to select which method(s) of thromboprophylaxis they would employ for each scenario. Thirty-nine participants provided responses to the eight scenarios; complete details, including speciality and grade of those surveyed, were complied for 27 of the 39 questionnaires completed. LMWH was the preferred pharmacological method of thromboprophylaixs selected 31% and 72% of the time by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons respectively. For each of the eight clinical scenarios LMWH and BK TEDS were selected more frequently by neurosurgeons than orthopaedic surgeons who elected to employ early mobilisation and mechanical prophylaxis. Neurosurgeons were more likely to employ more than method of thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylactic selections differed between the two groups; Neurosurgeons preferred LMWH and BK TEDS whilst Early Mobilisation and Mechanical prophylaxis were the preferred methods of thromboprophylaxis amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Based on the results of this survey neurosurgeons more closely adhered to guidelines outlined by NICE/BASS

Introduction. Reported incidence of DVT after spinal surgery ranges from 0-15% and PE 0.5-2.7%. Theoretically, manipulation of the vessels and venous stasis caused by retraction during anterior lumbar inter-body fusion may increase the propensity for thrombosis. The reported incidence of DVT and PE following major abdominal and pelvic surgery are high (up to 23%) and all these patients routinely receive chemical prophylaxis. Aim. Should patients undergoing ALIF surgery receive chemical prophylaxis routinely?. Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of ALIF procedures done between Jan 2007- Jan 2010. Review of case notes, radiology reports and telephone call to the patients to exclude DVT. Total of 76 patients underwent ALIF during this period. Forty six were female(60.5%) and 36 were 2 level fusions(47%). L5-S1 being commonly fused (76%) followed by L4-L5 (23%). Average surgical time from theatre records is 115 minutes(31-369 minutes). All patients received mechanical prophylaxis in the form of thigh length TED stockings. None of the patients were on treatment for DVT prior to surgery. Results. Three patients (3.9%) had Doppler proved DVT which required anticoagulation treatment. There was no reported incidence of PE. Discussion. There is no definite evidence in the literature to suggest ALIF surgery has higher incidence of thromboembolic complications, though theoretical possibility of increased risk. Current study suggests that incidence is 3.9% with mechanical prophylaxis alone which is very small when compared to incidence after major abdominal, pelvic or gynaecological procedures. Our small study sample suggests routine use of chemical prophylaxis to reduce the risk of DVT for anterior lumbar inter-body fusion is not justified

Purpose of Study. To investigate current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major UK spinal centres for both trauma and elective surgery, and to asses compliance with NICE guidelines. Methods. A telephonic survey was carried out which comprised of questions relating to current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major spinal units across the UK. Questions probed practice with regard to trauma versus elective surgery, agents used, timing of prophylaxis, length of treatment and whether practice has changed since the introduction of NICE guidelines. Results. Thirty specialised centres were contacted. Twenty eight centres followed NICE recommendations, with 2 centres using their own protocol. Four centres made changes to their existing protocols after the emergence of NICE guidelines. GCS (Graduated compression stockings) were uniformly used by all, with most centres using flowtron boots and/or foot in addition. The practices are differing within centres for elective versus trauma surgery. Of note, in patients with an acute cord injury, 20 centres used combined pre operative prophylaxis whereas 10 centres used only mechanical prophylaxis. Three units (10 %) describe a noticeable rise in complications related to chemoprophylaxis, whilst only one unit has reported a PE death within the last year. Discussion. Our survey assesses compliance to the NICE guidelines by the UK's spinal units. Mechanical prophylaxis appears to be the most common mode of prophylaxis understandably due to predictable safety profile. Use of chemo-prophylaxis varies amongst different surgeons and centres. Rather than a result of evidence based practice, the decision appears to be related to the previous experiences of that unit. Although the NICE guidelines provide a reasonable platform to the practice of thromboprophylaxis, more studies are required to evaluate the risks of thrombosis and bleeding events in spinal surgery

In response to the recent publication in April 2007 of NICE guidelines on venous thromboembolism, we report our practice and experience of VTE in adult hip and knee arthroplasty. It is generally agreed that the 2 major complications of VTE are sudden death as a result of pulmonary embolism and post thrombotic syndrome. NICE guidelines make 2 assumptions:. That chemical and mechanical prophylaxis can reduce these complications. That Orthopaedic surgery, in particular elective Primary Joint Replacements are particularly high risk procedures with respect to these 2 complications. We have studied a large cohort of patients who had Aspirin only as chemical prophylaxis to determine the incidence of clinical thromboembolism before and after discharge and the mortality from PE at 90 days. We performed a prospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee and hip replacement from November 2002 to November 2007. In total 2050 patients had total knee replacement and 2203 patients had total hip replacement. All patients were treated at one specialist centre under the care of one surgeon. Data was complete and accurate for all patients at 90 days post-operatively. Standard practice was the use of 150mg Aspirin from Day 1 post-operatively for a total of six weeks combined with spinal anaesthesia and early mobilisation. The overall rate for Fatal Pulmonary embolism 0.07% (3/4253), overall death rate 0.3%(13/4253), for treated non-fatal PE 0.66% (28/4253) and for treated above knee DVT was 0.33%(14/4253). Our data suggests that fatal pulmonary embolism is not common and does not account for most deaths following total hip and knee arthroplasty. We suggest there is no evidence that chemical/mechanical prophylaxis reduces the risk of sudden death from PE following elective primary joint replacement and with modern surgical practice elective hip and knee replacement should no longer be considered high risk procedures

In response to the recent publication in April 2007 of NICE guidelines on venous thromboembolism, we report our practice and experience of VTE in adult hip and knee arthroplasty. It is generally agreed that the 2 major complications of VTE are sudden death as a result of pulmonary embolism and post thrombotic syndrome. NICE guidelines make 2 assumptions:. That chemical and mechanical prophylaxis can reduce these complications. That Orthopaedic surgery, in particular elective Primary Joint Replacements are particularly high risk procedures with respect to these 2 complications. We have studied a large cohort of patients who had Aspirin only as chemical prophylaxis to determine the incidence of clinical thromboembolism before and after discharge and the mortality from PE at 90 days. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee and hip replacement from November 2002 to November 2007. In total 2050 patients had total knee replacement and 2203 patients had total hip replacement. All patients were treated at one specialist centre under the care of one surgeon. Data was complete and accurate for all patients at 90 days post-operatively. Standard practice was the use of 150mg Aspirin from Day 1 post-operatively for a total of six weeks combined with spinal anaesthesia and early mobilisation. The overall rate for Fatal Pulmonary embolism 0.07% (3/4253), overall death rate 0.31%(13/4253), for treated non-fatal PE 0.66% (28/4253) and for treated above knee DVT was 0.33%(14/4253). Our data suggests that fatal pulmonary embolism is not common and does not account for most deaths following total hip and knee arthroplasty. We suggest there is no evidence that chemical/mechanical prophylaxis reduces the risk of sudden death from PE following elective primary joint replacement and with modern surgical practice elective hip and knee replacement should no longer be considered high risk procedures

Recently, the International Consensus Statement Group reported that mechanical prophylaxis with foot-pumps should be considered “Grade A” recommendation for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. Mechanical prophylaxis with foot-pumps provides an interesting alternative to chemical agents in the prevention of thomboembolic disease following major orthopaedic surgery procedures. Recent duplex ultrasound studies have suggested that simultaneous use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) may hinder the pneumatic compression effect of foot pumps. The hypothesis of this prospective study was that the use of foot-pumps without GCS does not affect the efficacy of DVT prophylaxis, and improves patient compliance. 846 consecutive patients admitted at a single institution undergoing total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) were included in the study. The A-V Impulse System® foot-pump units (Orthofix Vascular Novame-dix, Andover, UK) was used in all patients. Forty-six patients discontinued the use of foot-pumps, leaving 400 patients who received foot-pumps in combination with GCS and 400 patients with foot pumps alone. Eleven patients of the stocking group (2.7%) and 9 patients of the no-stockings group (2.3%) developed postoperative symptomatic DVT (p=0.07). DVT was more frequent in TKR (10 of 364; 2.7%) than in THR (10 of 436; 2.3%). Non-fatal pulmonary embolism occurred in 4 patients out of 20 with symptomatic DVT, 2 each of the stockings and no stockings groups. The foot pump discontinuation rate of patients treated with stockings was 7%, versus 4% of patients treated without stockings (p< 0.05). In conclusion, management of patients with foot-pumps without GCS does not reduce efficacy of DVT prophylaxis after THR and TKR, and improves patient compliance

Following the recent publication in April 2007 of NICE guidelines on venous thromboembolism, we report our practice and experience of VTE in adult hip and knee arthroplasty. It is generally agreed that the 2 major complications of VTE are sudden death as a result of pulmonary embolism and post thrombotic syndrome. NICE guide-lines make 2 assumptions:. That chemical and mechanical prophylaxis can reduce these complications. That Orthopaedic surgery, in particular elective Primary Joint Replacements are particularly high risk procedures with respect to these 2 complications. Methods and Results: We have studied a large cohort of patients who had Aspirin only as chemical prophylaxis to determine the incidence of clinical thromboembolism before and after discharge and the mortality from PE at 90 days. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee and hip replacement from November 2002 to November 2007. In total 2050 patients had total knee replacement and 2203 patients had total hip replacement. All patients were treated at one specialist centre under the care of one surgeon. Data was complete and accurate for all patients at 90 days post-operatively. Standard practice was the use of 150mg Aspirin from Day 1 post-operatively for a total of six weeks combined with spinal anaesthesia and early mobilisation. The overall rate for Fatal Pulmonary embolism 0.07% (3/4253), overall death rate 0.31%(13/4253), for treated non-fatal PE 0.66% (28/4253) and for treated above knee DVT was 0.33%(14/4253). Conclusion: Our data suggests that fatal pulmonary embolism is not common and does not account for most deaths following total hip and knee arthroplasty. We suggest there is no evidence that chemical/mechanical prophylaxis reduces the risk of sudden death from PE following elective primary joint replacement and with modern surgical practice elective hip and knee replacement should no longer be considered high risk procedures

Venous Thromboembolism is a common complication following a hip replacement. Recently the pulmonary embolism prevention study was published. It reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients admitted with a fracture neck of femur. In addition new products (synthetic factor X inhibitor -Fondaparinux, and a direct thrombin inhibiter-Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. We felt it was important to repeat a survey, done in 1997, on the use thromboembolism prophylaxis among British Orthopaedic Surgeons. A single page questionnaire was sent out to all 1308 consultants Orthopaedic surgeons who were members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Those who did not respond were sent a reminder letter. We achieved a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis. Eighty five percent of surgeons use pharmacological prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons. Twenty percent of surgeons use aspirin as their only form of pharmacological prophylaxis. Less than 1% (5 consultants) use early mobilisation alone and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only form of prophylaxis. Seventy four percent of surgeons have a unit policy. Thirty percent have changed their regime in the last 3 years. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%

Aims. This phase II safety study aimed to investigate the bleeding side effect profile in patients treated with Rivaroxaban as a new agent for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective study of complications was conducted in 88 consecutive patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty at one centre. Patients received chemical and/or mechanical VTE prophylaxis according to local guidelines. Data was collected from notes and evaluated using Fisher's exact test and t-Test. Significance was determined if p< =0.05. The primary end-point was local wound site oozing or bleeding. Secondary end-points were drop in haemoglobin, drain output and infection. Results. 55 patients were treated with Rivaroxaban, 18 with mechanical prophylaxis only, 10 with Enoxaparin and 5 with aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin. The Rivaroxaban cohort demonstrated a statistically significant amount of increased major bleeding (24% vs. 0% p=0.03) and wound oozing (27% vs. 0% p=0.02) when compared to patients treated with Enoxaparin. Compared to those treated with other methods of VTE prophylaxis, Rivaroxaban also significantly increased major bleeding (24% vs. 6% p=0.01) and wound oozing (27% vs. 12% p=0.03). The Rivaroxaban cohort demonstrated a significantly larger drop in haemoglobin compared to the combined non-Rivaroxaban group (3.0 vs. 2.4 g/dL p=0.04). There was no significant difference in drain volume or rate of infection between groups. Conclusions. Rivaroxaban appears to cause increased wound site bleeding in comparison to Enoxaparin and other methods of thromboembolism prophylaxis. Further use of Rivaroxaban at this centre was therefore discontinued; however, the small group sizes and retrospective non-randomised design of this study introduce bias and limit the reliability of its findings. Prospective randomised controlled trial focused on wound complications is required to eliminate selection and reporter biases

The purpose of the present study is to determine the incidence, location and rate of VTE following routine mechanical, chemical prophylaxis in trauma/elective patients and to understand what factors are responsible for the continuing high frequency of thromboembolic complication despite the fact that low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is now widely used for prophylaxis. All of the inpatients at the orthopaedics ward, Princess Alexandra Hospital (level one trauma centre, Brisbane) between the first May 2009 and 30th of April 2010 with the diagnosis of DVT/PE were included in this study. Patients were chosen based on the diagnosis of DVT with ultrasound or PE with CTPA during their admission in this period which was performed whenever clinical signs indicated DVT or PE. 64% of the included patients had DVT and 42% had PE which was developed during their admission. Included patients had a mean age ±SD age of 56years ± 23 years, 68% were men and 72% suffered trauma. The 18% of patients had previous history of PE or DVT. The incidence of VTE was significantly higher in men at ages between 20–40 .29% of the patients had ICU admission during their stay in hospital. 28%had spinal cord injury, 21%with head trauma, and 36%with multiple bone fractures. Most of the patients had lower limb injury or operation and just one patient was with isolated upper limb injury. The mean period of hospitalization for the included patients were 29 ± 19 days (range, 6–77). DVTs occurred 8 days ± 7 days(range, 1–31) post admission. PEs occurred 10 days ± 8 days (range, 3–30) after admission. Location of DVT was available for 14 patients: 9 (64%)lower and 6 (43 %)upper, with one(0.07%)having both. Twelve of 28 patients with VTE were started on prophylactic clexane (40mg once daily), and six patients were on heparin(5000 unit twice daily). All of the patients with PE had lower limb injury. Considering the number of orthopaedics ward patients during our study period our data show the incidence of VTE in one year is lower than that of literature and the common standard prophylaxis with early mechanical prophylaxis after admission and following pharmacological prophylaxis when it is safe has acceptable results

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, costly, and morbid complication following TJA. Consequently, the current standard of care recommends that all TJA candidates receive some form of thromboprophylaxis postoperatively. Chemoprophylaxis, however, is not without its own risks and has been associated with greater risk of perioperative complications such as major bleeding, infection, stroke, and increased wound drainage. Mechanical compression devices serve as an alternative to chemoprophylaxis. Compression devices are thought to function by decreasing venous stasis and activating fibrinolysis. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCD) function by providing pressure at a constant cycle; whereas continuous enhanced circulation therapy (CECT) devices such as ActiveCare portable system (Medical Compression Systems, Or Akiva, Israel) function in a synchronized manner with the patient's own respiratory cycles. While both of these systems are widely utilized, there is scarce data comparing their effectiveness as thromboprophylatic agents following TJA. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of ActiveCare to IPCDs in the prevention of thromboembolic events following TJA. Methods. A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to identify all articles published between January 2000 and August 2016. Key words used to conduct the search were venous foot pump, intermittent pneumatic compression, total hip arthroplasty/replacement, total knee arthroplasty/replacement, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolic disease and pulmonary emboli. Two independent investigators carried out the literature review using the PRISMA guidelines (Figure 1). Analysis of risk ratio was performed by evaluation of studies which compared IPCD with any control chemoprophylaxis regiment or ActiveCare with any control chemoprophlaxis regiment. Assessment of heterogeneity and analysis of data were operated by Review Manager 5.3. Results. Our primary search protocol yielded 968 individual studies by both reviewers of which 525 were duplicates. After screening the remaining 443 abstracts for relevancy 357 were excluded, leaving 86 for full text examination. After a thorough evaluation, 60 were further excluded, and a total of 24 studies, published between 2000 and 2014, were included for analysis, representing 9,134 patients. Of these, 13 were randomized controlled trials and 11 were retrospective studies. When compared to control chemoprophylactic groups, the risk ratio (RR) of DVT development was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.39 – 0.67; I. 2. =69%) with NSIPCDs and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27 – 0.80; I. 2. =0%) with RSCDs. The RR for development of PE in these groups respectively were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.04 – 0.15) versus 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35 – 0.88) (Figure 3). Conclusion. When compared to chemoprophylaxis alone, compression devices appear to reduce the incidence of VTEs following TJA. The addition of mechanical prophylaxis to any chemoprophylactic regimen increased VTED prevention Following a comparative analysis of IPCDs and ActiveCare our study suggests that ActiveCare may be more effective at preventing VTE events, albeit not statistically significant. Thus, our results demonstrate that while both devices are effective thromboprophylactic modalities, more research is warranted to better elucidate the strengths and limitations of compression devices as thromboprophylatic agents. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. Post-operative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) remain a serious complication after total joint replacement. Although with modern chemical and mechanical prophylaxis and rapid rehabilitation the rate of symptomatic DVT and PE has reduced, isolation of pre-operative DVT, especially in patients with prior history of DVT remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of pre-operative dopplers as a tool to screen and reduce DVT/PE rate in patients undergoing total joint replacement. Methods. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 211 elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from our prospective institutional database as two consecutive cohorts (115 cases had pre-operative dopplers and 96 did not). All cases were performed by two adult reconstruction specialists. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) were non-cemented and all primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were cemented with similar implant and technique. In the first cohort, all cases underwent routine pre-operative doppler screening and in the control cohort, only patients with prior history of DVT or PE underwent pre-operative dopplers. All patients with clinical symptoms of calf pain underwent post-operative dopplers. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 month post-operatively. All emergency room (ER) visits for role out DVT were identified. No patient was lost to follow. Results. In the cohort with pre-operative dopplers, none of the pre-operative dopplers were positive for DVT, including three patients that had a history of prior DVT. 34 patients in this group (29%) underwent post-operative dopplers, either during the hospital stay or in the ER within 3 month after index surgery. Only one patient (no prior history of DVT) developed symptomatic DVT/PE (0.8%) after total knee arthroplasty. In the control cohort, 3 of which (3%) had symptomatic DVT, one of which had PE (1%) during hospital stay, all after total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistical difference for rate of symptomatic DVT/PE between the two groups (p=0.3). There was no correlation between DVT and age, gender or BMI. Discussion and Conclusions. Utilization of routine pre-operative dopplers for all patients did not lower the rate of symptomatic DVT/PE and are not helpful in early detection and prevention in asymptomatic patients prior to routine total joint replacement. Pre-operative dopplers should be used in selected patients with high risk of DVT

Background. Post-operative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) remain a serious complication after total joint replacement. Although with modern chemical and mechanical prophylaxis and rapid rehabilitation the rate of symptomatic DVT and PE has reduced, isolation of pre-operative DVT, specially in patients with prior history of DVT remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the use of pre-operative dopplers as a tool to detect and identify prior DVT in patients undergoing total joint replacement. Methods. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 211 elective primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from our prospective institutional database. All cases were performed by two adult reconstruction specialists. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) were non-cemented and all primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were cemented with similar implant and technique. Prior to July 2014, only patients with prior history of DVT or PE underwent pre-operative dopplers. From July 2014, all cases underwent routine pre-operative doppler screening. All patients with clinical symptoms of calf pain underwent post-operative dopplers. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 month post-operatively. All emergency room (ER) visits for role out DVT were identified. No patient was lost to follow. Results. 115 patients patient underwent pre-operative dopplers. Three patients had a history of prior popliteal DVT, none of which had post-operative DVT or PE. In the remaining 112 patients, none of the pre-operative dopplers were positive for DVT. 34 patients in this group (29%) underwent post-operative dopplers, either during the hospital stay or in the ER within 3 month after index surgery. Only one patient developed symptomatic PE (0.8%) after total knee arthroplasty. 96 patients did not have pre-operative dopplers, 3 of which (3%) had symptomatic DVT and PE during hospital stay, all after total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistical difference for rate of symptomatic DVT/PE between the two groups (p=0.3). There was no correlation between DVT and obesity, age, or revision versus primary cases. Discussion and Conclusions. Routine pre-operative dopplers do not significantly lower rate of symptomatic DVT/PE and are not helpful in early detection and prevention in asymptomatic patients prior to routine total joint replacement

Introduction. Recent UK national guidelines advocate using a combination of mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. We compared the results from our two series of patients: one treated with clexane and the other treated with rivaroxaban. Methods. Both groups received mechanical prophylaxis. In the first group 89 patients were given 40 mg subcutaneous clexane once daily from the day prior to surgery until they were independently mobile. The second group comprised 99 patients who were given 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban. Results. The mean length of stay was 5 days in the clexane group and 5.5 days in the rivaroxaban group. 24 patients stayed in hospital for 5 days or more because of wound leakage in the rivaroxaban group compared to 10 in the clexane group. 5 patients were readmitted in the clexane group: 3 for pulmonary embolism (PE), 1 for dislocation and 1 for periprosthetic fracture. 5 patients were also readmitted from the rivaroxaban group: 4 for infection and 1 for PE. No patients in the clexane group required re-operations. 2 patients in the rivaroxaban group went back to theatre: 1 for haematoma evacuation and 1 for haematoma evacuation and subsequent revision knee arthroplasty. Conclusion. This study raises concern regarding the rates of postoperative complications with rivaroxaban prophylaxis

Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are considered at very high risk for recurrence after lower limb arthroplasty (LLA). However, the chance of a new VTE episode after LLA has not been yet quantified. The aim of this study was to define the incidence of VTE recurrence following knee and hip arthroplasty. The case notes for all LLA patients treated at our hospital from 2009 to 2011 were reviewed. There were 5946 primary and revision LLA operations in total; 118 of these interventions were performed in 106 patients with a history of VTE. This group included 69 females and 37 males with a mean age of 69.9. Routine thromboprophylaxis for LLA patients included mechanical (footpumps & TED stockings) plus chemical prophylaxis using Aspirin 150 mg for 6 weeks. Patients with a VTE history had the same mechanical prophylaxis but received warfarin for 3 months. There were no fatal VTEs within 90 days of surgery. There were 5 episodes (4.2%) of VTE recurrence and specifically 4 PE and one DVT (femoral vein) at 4 months after the operation. Two of the PEs were asymptomatic, diagnosed on CTPA scans being requested for low O2 saturations on routine monitoring. In the group of patients without a VTE history there were 35 VTE episodes (0.6%), indicating a significantly lower rate of VTE (p=0.001) in comparison with the study group. Patients with a history of VTE had a 4.2% chance of having a further VTE. This is seven times greater than the rate among all other patients despite using more aggressive chemoprophylaxis

Aim. To assess the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) following elective total knee replacement (TKR) with a standardised multi-modal prophylaxis regime in a large teaching DGH over a 10 year period. Material and methods. Information was gathered from a prospective audit database, utilising clinical coding for TKR and those that had died within 42 and 90 days. The 10 years from April 2000 were analysed to establish both 42 and 90 day mortality rates. A multi-modal prophylaxis regime for all patients included regional anaesthesia (when possible), mechanical prophylaxis (Flo-tron calf garment per-operatively, AV impulse boots until mobile and anti-embolism stockings for 6 weeks), mobilisation within 24 hours and 75mg aspirin for 4 weeks. A case note review was performed to ascertain the causes of death. Where a patient had been referred to the coroner, the coroner's office was contacted for PM results. Results. There were 6,584 cases; the mortality rates at 42 and 90 days were 0.36 and 0.52%. There were no fatal PE's within 42 days of surgery. 2 fatal PE's occurred subsequently at 48 and 57 days (0.03%) The leading causes of death were myocardial infarction and cerebro-vascular accident. Conclusion. Fatal pulmonary embolus following elective TKR with a multi-modal prophylaxis regime is not a significant cause of mortality