EFFICACY, SAFETY AND PATIENT COMPLIANCE OF FOOT-PUMPS WITHOUT GRADUATED COMPRESSION STOCKINGS FOR PREVENTION OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT

Abstract

Recently, the International Consensus Statement Group reported that mechanical prophylaxis with foot-pumps should be considered “Grade A” recommendation for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. Mechanical prophylaxis with foot-pumps provides an interesting alternative to chemical agents in the prevention of thomboembolic disease following major orthopaedic surgery procedures. Recent duplex ultrasound studies have suggested that simultaneous use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) may hinder the pneumatic compression effect of foot pumps. The hypothesis of this prospective study was that the use of foot-pumps without GCS does not affect the efficacy of DVT prophylaxis, and improves patient compliance.

846 consecutive patients admitted at a single institution undergoing total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) were included in the study. The A-V Impulse System® foot-pump units (Orthofix Vascular Novame-dix, Andover, UK) was used in all patients. Forty-six patients discontinued the use of foot-pumps, leaving 400 patients who received foot-pumps in combination with GCS and 400 patients with foot pumps alone.

Eleven patients of the stocking group (2.7%) and 9 patients of the no-stockings group (2.3%) developed postoperative symptomatic DVT (p=0.07). DVT was more frequent in TKR (10 of 364; 2.7%) than in THR (10 of 436; 2.3%). Non-fatal pulmonary embolism occurred in 4 patients out of 20 with symptomatic DVT, 2 each of the stockings and no stockings groups. The foot pump discontinuation rate of patients treated with stockings was 7%, versus 4% of patients treated without stockings (p< 0.05).

In conclusion, management of patients with foot-pumps without GCS does not reduce efficacy of DVT prophylaxis after THR and TKR, and improves patient compliance.