To compare the long-term outcomes of fibular nailing and plate fixation for unstable ankle fractures in a cohort of patients under the age of 65 years. Patients from a previously conducted randomized control trial comparing fibular nailing and plate fixation were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Short term data were collected prospectively and long-term data were collected retrospectively using an electronic patient record software. Ninety-nine patients from one trauma centre were included (48 fibular nails and 51 plate fixations). Groups were matched for gender (p = 0.579), age (p = 0.811), body mass index (BMI)(p = 0.925), smoking status (p = 0.209), alcohol status (p = 0.679) and injury type (p = 0.674). Radiographically at an average of 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p = 0.851). Both groups had 1 tibio-talar fusion (2% of both groups) secondary to osteoarthritis with no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate between groups identified (p = 0.518,). Forty-five percent (n=42) of patients had so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=19, plate fixation n=23). No significant difference was found between groups at 10 years for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (p = 0.990), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (p = 0.288), Euroqol-5D Index (p = 0.828) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (p = 0.769). The current study illustrates no difference between fibular nail fixation and plate fixation at a long-term follow up of 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered

Introduction. The condition of the soft tissues surrounding an ankle fracture influences timing and treatment of injuries. Conventional treatment used an open approach to facilitate anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation. Intramedullary devices for fibular fractures provide a safe alternative in patients in which the condition of the soft tissue envelope or the patient's co-morbidities may benefit from a less invasive approach. We compared outcomes for patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with those undergoing treatment with fibular nails (FN). Methods. 13 consecutive patients treated with fibular nails (FN) were compared with 13 age-matched patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients were followed to union. Study outcomes were time from admission to surgery, length of stay, wound failure, implant failure, revision surgery, OMAS and SF-36. Results. There was no difference in age or sex distribution between groups. There was no difference in OMAS at 1 year (83 ± 9 in FN group; 80± 21 in ORIF group) and SF-36 (94 ± 11 and 90 ± 20). There were 2 implant failures in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. There was one wound failure in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. Patients treated with FN had a shorter time to surgery (1 day ± 24 hours vs 3 days ± 24 hours) and shorter length of stay (1 day ± 24 hours vs 4 days ± 96 hours). Conclusion. FN is a safe method to treat patients with displaced distal fibular fractures that may have a poor soft tissue envelope and risk factors for wound healing. FN reduces the time to surgery and overall length of stay compared with similar patients treated with conventional ORIF

Lateral malleolar plating is associated with complication rates of up to 30%. The fibular nail is an alternative fixation technique, requiring a minimal incision and tissue dissection, with the potential to reduce the incidence of complications. We reviewed our results of 105 unstable ankle fractures fixed with the Acumed fibular nail between 2002 and 2010. The mean age was 65 years and 72% of patients had significant systemic medical comorbidities. A number of different locking screw configurations were assessed over the study period. A proximal blocking screw resulted in satisfactory stability in 93%, single locking screws in 86%, but nailing without locking in only 66%, leading to the development of our current technique. Of the twenty-one patients treated with this technique there have been no significant complications, and only two superficial wound infections. Good fracture reduction was achieved in all of these patients. The mean physical component SF12, Olerud and Molander and Foot and Ankle Outcome scores were 46, 65 and 83 respectively. The outcomes of unstable ankle fractures managed with the fibular nail are encouraging, with good radiographic and functional outcomes and minimal complications. This technique should be considered in the management of debilitated patients with unstable ankle fractures

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures is associated with well known complications including wound dehiscence and infection, construct failure and symptomatic metalwork. A technique of intramedullary fibular nailing has been developed that requires only minimal incisions, is biomechanically stronger than ORIF and has low-profile hardware. We hypothesized that fibular nailing would result in a rate of reduction and union comparable to ORIF, with a reduced rate of wound and hardware problems. 100 patients over the age of 65 years with unstable ankle fractures requiring fixation were randomised to undergo fibular nailing or ORIF. Outcome measures assessed over the 12 postoperative months were wound complications, accuracy of reduction, Olerud and Molander score (OMS), and total cost of treatment. The mean age was 74 years (range 65–93) and 75 patients were women, all had some form of comorbidity. Significantly fewer wound infections occurred in the fibular nail group (p=0.002). Eight patients (16%) in the ORIF group developed lateral-sided wound infections, two of these developed a wound dehiscence requiring further surgical intervention. No infections or wound problems occurred in the fibular nail group and at 1 year patients were significantly happier with the condition of their scar (p=0.02), and had slightly better OMS scores (p=ns). The overall cost of treatment in the fibular nail group was less despite the higher initial cost of the implant. The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with a significantly reduced rate of soft-tissue complications when compared with ORIF

Introduction. The primary goal of treatment of an ankle fracture is to obtain a stable anatomic fixation to facilitate early mobilisation and good functional recovery. However, the need for open reduction and internal fixation must be weighed against poor bone quality, compromised soft tissues, patient co-morbidities and potential wound-healing complications. Materials and Methods. We reviewed two matched groups of 18 patients each, who underwent fixation for unstable Weber-B ankle fractures with intramedullary fibular nail (Group 1) and Standard AO semi-tubular plate osteo-synthesis technique (Group 2) to achieve fracture control and early mobilisation. Clinical and radiological fracture union time, and the time at mobilisation with full weight bearing on the ankle were used as outcome measures. Results. The mean age of patients in both the groups was 53.6 yrs and 55.5 yrs respectively. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 months (Group 1) and 6.9 months (Group 2) before discharge. Clinical and radiological union was achieved earlier in patients treated with intramedullary fibular nail (7.3 weeks & 8.7 weeks respectively) compared with plate osteo-synthesis treatment (8.2 weeks & 9.8 weeks respectively) and this was statistically insignificant (p=0.66 & p=0.54 respectively). Patients achieved full weight bearing at 8.4 weeks in nailing group compared to 8.2 weeks in plate osteo-synthesis group (p=0.40). One patient in the plate osteo-synthesis group had wound infection, requiring removal of hardware after fracture union. There were no wound complications in the nailing group. Conclusion. Open reduction and internal fixation with the use of plates and screws based on the AO osteo-synthesis technique remains gold standard for treatment of ankle fracture. Advantages of fibular nail include a minimally invasive procedure with respect to fracture biology, feasibility of its use in compromised soft tissue states and negligible wound healing complications and can be used as a viable alternative

Techniques for fixation of the lateral malleolus have remained essentially unchanged since the 1960s, but are associated with complication rates of up to 30%. The fibular nail is an alternative method of fixation requiring a minimal incision and tissue dissection, and has the potential to reduce complications. We reviewed the results of 105 patients with unstable fractures of the ankle that were fixed between 2002 and 2010 using the Acumed fibular nail. The mean age of the patients was 64.8 years (22 to 95), and 80 (76%) had significant systemic medical comorbidities. Various different configurations of locking screw were assessed over the study period as experience was gained with the device. Nailing without the use of locking screws gave satisfactory stability in only 66% of cases (4 of 6). Initial locking screw constructs rendered between 91% (10 of 11) and 96% (23 of 24) of ankles stable. Overall, seven patients had loss of fixation of the fracture and there were five post-operative wound infections related to the distal fibula. This lead to the development of the current technique with a screw across the syndesmosis in addition to a distal locking screw. In 21 patients treated with this technique there have been no significant complications and only one superficial wound infection. Good fracture reduction was achieved in all of these patients. The mean physical component Short-Form 12, Olerud and Molander score, and AAOS Foot and Ankle outcome scores at a mean of six years post-injury were 46 (28 to 61), 65 (35 to 100) and 83 (52 to 99), respectively. There have been no cases of fibular nonunion. Nailing of the fibula using our current technique gives good radiological and functional outcomes with minimal complications, and should be considered in the management of patients with an unstable ankle fracture

Background. Studies have compared open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with fibular nail fixation (FNF) and shown reduced wound complications with minimal difference to PROMS in the short term. Our aim is to compare long-term outcomes for unstable ankle fractures at 10 year follow up. Methods. Patients from a previously conducted RCT were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Case notes were reviewed, and patient reported outcome measures acquired at 10 years. Results. Ninety-nine patients were included (48 FNF and 51 ORIF). After 10 years 75% (33/44) of patients in the FNF group required no further follow up versus 81% (39/48) in the ORIF group. Radiographically at 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p=0.851). There was one tibio-talar fusion in each group secondary to osteoarthritis, but no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate (p=0.518). Fifty-one percent (n=50) of patients have so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=23, plate fixation n=27). No significant difference was found between groups for the mean scores of Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (FNF 84.78 vs ORIF 84.07; p=0.883), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) (FNF 89.54 vs ORIF 96.47; p=0.112), Euroqol-5D Index (FNF 0.88 vs ORIF 0.87; p=0.701) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (FNF 77.30 vs ORIF 77.52; p=0.859). Conclusion. The current study illustrates that both methods of treatment result in a satisfactory long-term outcome with no difference in late complications or PROM scores at up to 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered

We have previously reported that fibular nailing in the elderly is associated with a significantly reduced complication rate and greater cost-effectiveness when compared to ORIF. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fibular nailing to ORIF in patients under the age of 65. 100 patients aged 18 to 64 were randomly allocated between groups. Outcomes assessed over two years post-operatively included: development of wound complications or radiographic arthritis, the accuracy of reduction and patient satisfaction. The mean age was 44, 25% of patients were smokers and 35% had some form of comorbidity of whom three were diabetic. 27 injuries occurred after sport and two after assault the remainder occurred after a simple fall from a standing height. Superficial wound infections occurred in two patients in each group. Six patients requested removal of the nail, and six patients requested plate and screw removal. Patient reported outcome scores were comparable for the two groups. Two failures of fixation occurred in the fibular nail group; one in a patient with neuropathy. One failure of fixation occurred in the ORIF group. All other patients went on to an anatomical union without complication. Patient satisfaction with the surgical scar was higher after fibular nailing (visual analogue scale mean 0.75, range 0–5) than for ORIF (mean 1.5, range 0–7). The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes to ORIF at two years and a greater patient satisfaction with the appearance of the surgical scars

Introduction. Positive reports from implant designer centres on the use of fibular nails in the complex ankle fractures has resulted in a marked increase in their use nationally. Our aim in this study was to report on the outcomes of the use of all fibular nails in two major trauma centres. Methods. All patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation using a fibular nail in two major trauma centres, were included for analysis. MTC 1 included patients from April 2013 to May 2015, and MTC 2 included patients February 2015 to March 2018. A minimum follow up of 1 year was achieved for all patients. Radiographic reduction was confirmed by Pettrones criteria at time of operation and at 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively. Kellgren Lawrence radiographic criteria was used to classify osteoarthritis. All complications and further surgery were recorded. Results. Forty-four patients underwent fibular nail fixation in the two centres. The average age was 59 (range 21–91). Using Pettrones criteria, 86% were malreduced at time of operation. A further 34% deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 6 weeks and an additional 16% (n=7) deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 1 year. 57% had developed radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis by 1 year. Only 4.5% (2ankles) maintained complete reduction by 1 year. Other significant complications were reported in 43% of patients. Conclusion. Both major trauma centres report the same experience in the use of fibular nails for ankle fracture fixation. As previously reported in smaller number studies, initial reduction is challenging. Worryingly, the majority of well-reduced lose position with time. We suggest that the fibula nail is used with caution and as part of an appropriately approved audit

Fragility ankle fractures are traditionally managed conservatively or with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion is an alternative option for the geriatric patient. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a detailed analysis of the functional and clinical outcomes of hindfoot nailing for fragility ankle fractures presented so far in the literature. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, identifying fourteen studies for inclusion. Studies including patients over 60 with a fragility ankle fracture, treated with TTC nail were included. Patients with a previous fracture of the ipsilateral limb, fibular nails, and pathological fractures were excluded. Subgroup analyses were performed according to (1) open vs closed fractures, (2) immediate post-operative FWB vs post-operative NWB, (3) majority of cohort are diabetics vs minority of cohort are diabetics. Meta-regression analyses were done to explore sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. The pooled proportion of superficial infection, deep infection, implant failure, malunion, and all-cause mortality was 0.10 (95%CI:0.06-0.16; I2=44%), 0.08 (95%CI:0.06-0.11, I2=0%), 0.11 (95%CI:0.07-0.15, I2=0%), 0.11 (95%CI:0.06-0.18; I2=51%), and 0.27 (95%CI:0.20-0.34; I2=11%), respectively. The pooled mean post-operative OMAS score was 54.07 (95%CI:48.98-59.16; I2=85%). The best-fitting meta-regression model included age and percentage of male patients as covariates (p=0.0263), and were inversely correlated with higher OMAS scores. Subgroup analyses showed that studies with a majority of diabetics had a higher proportion of implant failure (p=0.0340) and surgical infection (p=0.0096), and a lower chance of returning to pre-injury mobility than studies with a minority of diabetics (p=0.0385). Egger's test (p=0.56) showed no significant publication bias. TTC nailing is an adequate alternative option for fragility ankle fractures. However, current evidence includes mainly case series with inconsistent outcome measures reported and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. Prospective RCTs with long follow-up times and large cohort sizes are needed to clearly guide the use of TTC nailing for ankle fractures

Introduction. Fixation of the distal fibula in conjunction with ankle fractures has not changed over the last 50 years. The complication rate of these fixation techniques is as high as 30%. The fibula nail is an alternative method of fixation and uses a minimal invasive technique. This technique preserves soft tissue compared to previous techniques used, and fewer soft tissue complications. Method. We reviewed the preliminary results of 178 patients with unstable Weber B and C ankle fractures that were operated on in our unit between January 2012 and February 2013. We used the Acumed fibular nail for reduction and fixation of the lateral malleolus. Using the nail we had significant reduction in our operating time. Patients were discharged one day post operation without any POP and partial weight bearing on crutches. Various parameters were measured on all the follow- up x-rays and assessed for incongruencies compared with the normal ankle. These parameters were medial clearspace, talo-crural angle, talar tilt and fibular length. No patients thus far have had any loss of fixation. The Olerud and Molander score was used at three month and six month follow up. Results. Patients at three months scored an average of 80 and at six months an average of 85. There were no cases of non-union. 40 patients had systemic co-morbidities. We had four superficial wound complications that healed well with antibiotics and daily wound care. Conclusion. The fibula nail is an effective fixation technique for most Weber B and C ankle fractures. It causes minimal destruction of the soft tissue. Functional outcome of patients is excellent. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. The optimal treatment of elderly patients with unstable ankle fractures is a widely contested and as yet unresolved issue. Whereas the AO technique of anatomical reduction and plate fixation has been shown to give good functional results it is associated with a wound complication rate of up to 40%. This has led some surgeons to believe the risks of operative intervention are too great. The fibula nail is an intra-medullary device with the benefit of requiring minimal soft-tissue dissection. It provides lateral column support over a greater area than the standard plate. The study aims were to assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of a cohort of patients managed with the Fibula Nail (Acumed). Methods. A prospectively collected group of 36 patients with an unstable Weber B or C fracture were managed with a fibula nail. Outcome measures at one-year follow-up were Olerud and Molander ankle scores, radiographic measurements and complications. Results. At one-year follow-up the average Olerud and Molander score was 89/100. Four patients had died and none were lost to follow-up. Twenty-nine patients had normal radiographic measurements, one required a fusion due to fixation failure and two had signs of osteoarthritis. There were two lateral wound infections which both settled without metal work removal. Conclusions. Our case series has demonstrated similar one-year clinical and radiographical results for the fibular nail as previously published with the standard plate and screw technique with few wound complications. The results do indicate the fibula nail has a role in the management of this notoriously difficult fracture. Whether this cohort continues to do well however is unknown and will be the focus of future research