Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

We present the results of a technique of dynamic hip screw insertion through a very small incision, typically 2.5cm. Method: The technique is performed using a standard dynamic hip screw set and requires no additional equipment. We compared the results to those of an age and sex matched group who had undergone the operation through a traditional approach. We compared the time spent in theatre, the pre and post-operative haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, and prevalence of wound infection. Results: 13 consecutive intertrochanteric hip fractures were treated with a dynamic hip screw and 4-hole plate by one surgeon using the percutaneous technique. There were 9 females and 4 males with a mean age of 84 years (range 62 to 96 years). The mean post-operative drop in haemoglobin concentration in the percutaneous group was 2.2 g/dl (range 0 to 4.4 g/dl) compared to 3.5 g/dl (range 1.2–5.4) in the control group (p=0.014). The mean haematocrit drop was 0.07 (range 0 to 0.12) in the percutaneous group compared to 0.10 (range 0.03 to 0.17) in the control group (p=0.017). The mean theatre time with the percutaneous technique was 57 minutes (range 40–75 minutes) and in the control group, 60 minutes (range 30–95). There were no wound problems. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this technique has not been previously reported. The percutaneous technique offers a better clinical outcome at no extra expense and warrants further evaluation in a larger study

Aim: The addition of the Trochanteric Support Plate (TSP) to the Dynamic Hip Screw is a very effective way of treatment of the reverse oblique fractures of the proximal femur. It secures the stabilisation of the greater trochanter as well as it prevents from the lateral transposition of the greater trochanter during the impaction of the fracture postoperatively. Method: The reversed oblique fractures of the proximal femur is a group of unstable fractures characterised by a fracture line going from lateral distal to medial proximal of the lesser trochanter. The OTA classifies them as 3.1 A3 fractures and subdivides them in 31 A3.1, 31 A3.2. and 31 A3.3 groups. We operated on 1535 fractures of the hip in our Department during Jan. 1998 to Dec. 2002, 997 of them were introchanteric or subtochanteric fractures. Among them there were 35 reversed oblique fractures. Five of them were fixed by an interlocking nail (gamma nail), nire of them by a Dynamic Hip Screw and twenty one by the Dynamic Hip Screw with the addition of a Trochanteric Support Plate. We surveyer the duration of the operation as well as the duration of the operation as well as the radiation time in each of them. Results: Five out of nine fractures treated by the dynamic hip screw alone failed and were reoperated one out of four fractures treated by the gamma nail developed a pseudarthrosis and was reoperated, too. Only one out of twenty one fractures treated by the dynamic hip screw with the addition of the trochanteric support plate (TSP) failed because of inadequate reduction of the fracture and wrong placement of the screw. Conclusion: The addition of the Trochanteric Support Plate to the Dynamic Hip Screw is a more satisfactory way of treatment of the reversed oblique fractures of the proximal femur when compared to the other methods of osteosynthesis. The advantages are: lower percentage of complications, easy application of the plate and short radiation time. However the result may be disastrous in case of a bad reduction of the fracture and a wrong placement of the screw

Objectives: To compare the biomechanical properties of lag screw insertion in a laboratory model. Two blades, the Synthes Dynamic Helical Hip Screw (DHHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), and two screws, the Synthes Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Stryker Gamma 3 lag screw, were compared. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanics laboratory. Design: Insertion testing was carried out in high and low density polyurethane foam mounted and attached to a Zwick Roell Amsler Hydrowin. Outcome Measures: The axial load and torque during insertion of the implants was measured. Results: The force required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades was greater than the DHS and Gamma 3 screws into both low and high density foam. The force required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades into high density foam was greater than low density foam. The torque required to insert the DHHS and PFNA blades into high density foam was less than that to insert the DHS and Gamma 3 screws. The torque required to insert the DHS and Gamma 3 screws into low density foam was less than the DHHS and PFNA blades. The torque during insertion of the DHHS and PFNA blades seemed to be independent of foam density. Conclusions: The insertional properties of blades are significantly different to screws and this may have clinical importance

Aims: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a common implant used for extracapsular fracture neck of femur. Accurate placement of the guide wires for the DHS insertion is the most important surgical step. In order to improve precision and accuracy of the guide wire placement, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery System (CAOSS) was used , which was developed at the University of Hull. Methods: CAOSS helps in surgical planning and aid surgeons for accurate guide wire placement into femoral neck. After fracture reduction, intra-operative computer based surgical planning was performed using one fluoroscopic image in two planes each. A trajectory obtained thus helped surgeon to place a guide wire along with the required course under the computer guidance. Results: CAOSS system was used on 11 patients for guide wire placement. Intra-operative fluoroscopic images of all the patients showed accurate position of the guide wire both in AP and lateral planes. In theory only 4 fluoroscopic images are required during this surgical procedure in total. But in practice, more than 4 were required depending upon the experience of the radiographer. None of the patient had any intra-operative complication. Conclusions: The computer aided surgery was found to be safe, accurate and reliable for guide wire placement for dynamic hip screw insertion

Aims: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a common implant used for extracapsular fracture neck of femur. Accurate placement of the guide wires for the DHS insertion is the most important surgical step. In order to improve precision and accuracy of the guide wire placement, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery System (CAOSS) was used which was developed at the University of Hull. Early clinical experience in 14 cases is presented. Methods: CAOSS helps in surgical planning and aid surgeons for accurate guide wire placement into femoral neck. After fracture reduction, intraoperative computer based surgical planning was performed using one ßuoroscopic image in two planes each. A trajectory obtained thus helped surgeon to place a guide wire along with the required course under the computer guidance. Results: CAOSS system was used on 11 patients for guide wire placement. Intraoperative ßuoroscopic images of all the patients showed accurate position of the guide wire both in AP and lateral planes. Only 4 ßuoroscopic images were required during the surgical procedure in total, both pre and post guide wire insertion. Conclusions: The computer aided surgery used in guide wire placement for dynamic hip screw insertion proves to be accurate and reliable. It also reduces ionisation radiation exposure to the surgeon, patients and theatre personnel

Background: To determine patients clinical and haematological characteristics that could affect the use of blood and infection incidence with hip fractures (HF) treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of all the HF patients during 5 years (January1995- December1999) who were treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS ïf’, Synthes-Stratec, Oberdof, Switzerland) at one unique university hospital. No patient was excluded. Age, gender, elapsed time, anaesthesia risk (ASA clasification), type of HF (internationalAO classification), transfusion procedure and the total used; haemoglobin (Hb) at days 0 (incoming to urgency service) and first postoperative (POD ï€1) were examined. We also analyzed the infection incidence (CDC criteria), place and severity. The statistical univariate analysis included Student’s t-test for numeric variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for string variables. There was considered to be a statistically significant difference (SSD) when p< 0.05. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression model was used. Results: Three hundred and one patients with HF were studied. 125 A1 and 176 A2, according to the AO classification. Male/female ratio: 76/225 (25.2%/74.8%); age 78.97 years old (range: 23–104); ASA: I 53 (17.6%); II 97 (32.2%); III 138 (45.8%) and IV 13 (4.3%). Hb Values on the day of admission: 128.7 g/L (range: 81.7–176.7) and POD ï€1: 101 g/L (range: 54.7–150.7). 186 (61.8%) patients were transfused with an average 1.42 red cell concentrate (range: 0–6). 89 (29.6%) had an infection diagnosis: 79 (26.2%) urinary tract infection (UTI), 7 (2.3%) pneumonia and 8 (2.7%) superficial wound. 18 (6%) died in the first month. At univariant study of transfusion act, the transfused patients were older (p< 0.001), suffered more infections (p:0.019), more UTI (p:0.003), had lower Hb day 0 (p< 0.001) and POD ï€1(p< 0.001). When analyze the infection, the patients were older (p< 0.001), had higher ASA (p:0.019), lower Hb at day0 (p< 0.026), longer stay (p< 0.001), were more transfused (p:0.019), and received more transfusions (p:0.004). The logistic regression analysis identified only the type of HF, the age and the Hb level (p< 0.05) as independent predictors of transfusion. Comments: In patients with HF the Hb is the most important predictor of blood transfusion, and it is associated with a higher rate of post surgical infection and longer hospital stays. These complications may be explained by the possible inmunomodulation effect of allogenic blood transfusion

Introduction: Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical procedures. Tip Apex Distance (TAD) is a well recognised method of evaluating the screw position of the DHS. We studied the adequacy of fixation of DHS by assessing TAD and type of reduction. Materials and Methods: We selected a random cohort of 102 patients who had DHS fixation and had the requisite clinico-radiologic data. TAD is defined as sum of the distance, in millimeteres, from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of femoral head, as measured on AP radiograph and Lateral radiograph, after correction has been made for radiological magnification. Tip apex distance of 25 mm or less is considered as good, 26–30mm as acceptable, 31–35mm as poor and more than 35mm as unacceptable. Quality of reduction was assessed as per Sernbo. Good, if alignment was normal on AP and maximum 20 degrees angulation on lateral radiograph and less than 4mm of displacment of any fragment. To be labelled acceptable, a reduction had to meed the criteria of a good reduction with respect to either alignement or displacement, but not both. A poor reduction met neither. Results: Mean TAD in our series was 24mm. (9.84 – 37.6). Our of this 58.82% were 25mm or less indicating good, 25.49% of them were 26–30mm indicating acceptable, 8.82% were 30–35mm indicating poor and 6.8% were more than 35mm indicating unacceptable. 39.21% patients had good reduction. 43.13% had acceptable reduction and 17.64% had poor reduction. Conclusion: This study shows that only 58.82% of all patients having DHS fixation had good placement of the fixation device and only 39.21% had a good reduction. We conclude that complacency must not set in on DHS fixation and that we must endeavour for good reduction and placement in as many cases as possible

The placement of the guide wire in the dynamic hip screw operation can be a challenging task to the trauma surgeon. Complications can arise related to incorrect guide wire entry point, making wrong tracks, or even accepting an unsatisfactory lag screw placement. Insisting to optimise the guide wire position can lead to increase in operation and radiation exposure times. A new non-invasive technique is described to assist precision placement of the guide wire in the dynamic hip screw fixation of the neck of femur fractures using no more than a size A4 plain folded paper and a non-permanent marker pen. The new non-invasive “no high tech” method can help the trauma surgeons to shorten the operation time and reduce the radiation exposure time needed to place the guide wire in the dynamic hip screw fixation of the neck of femur fractures

Background. The advantages of treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur have been well known for several decades. Failure of fixation can result in revision surgery, prolonged inpatient stay and has major socio-economic consequences. There are many new devices on the market to help deal with this problem. Expandable hip screw (EHS) is one such device, which is an expanding bolt that may offer superior fixation in osteoporotic bone compared to the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) type device. Methods. Static axial compression tests with elastic deformation of the specimens were performed with a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min to determine stiffness of testing was performed with 3 cycles from 0 N to 250 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 500 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 750 N and 3 cycles from 0 N to 1000 N with a holding time of 10 s per test cycle. Displacement control was apply the pullout strength with a velocity of 1mm/sec. The ability to resist rotation about the axis of a lag screw is of critical importance particularly when the fracture line is perpendicular, or nearly perpendicular, to the femoral neck. Implants were subjected to a rotation of 1 degree/sec and peak torque values were recorded. Results. The mean axial cyclic loading DHS showed higher stiffness value than EHS. The mean stiffness achieved at pullout test in the EHS and DHS groups were 587.8N/mm and, 334.1N/mm respectively (p<0.05). The peak torque for the EHS device was significantly greater than the torque for the DHS with torque values of 4.56 Nm/degree and 2.97 Nm/degree, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusions. The EHS device demonstrated superior resistance to pullout and torsion greater loads compared to the DHS in an unstable fracture model. However, axial cyclic loading demonstrate lower strength, by optimising the size of device will perform. Level of Evidence. Level 5

Background. Hip fractures affect 1.6 million people globally per annum, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A large proportion are extracapsular neck of femur fractures, treated with the dynamic hip screw (DHS). Mechanical failure due to cut-out is seen in up to 7% of DHS implants. The most important predictor of cut-out is the tip-apex distance (TAD), a numerical value of the lag screw”s position in the femoral head. This distance is determined by the psychomotor skills of the surgeon guided by fluoroscopic imaging in theatre. With the current state of surgical training, it is harder for junior trainees to gain exposure to these operations, resulting in reduced practice. Additionally, methods of simulation using workshop bones do not utilise the imaging component due to the associated radiation risks. We present a digital fluoroscopy software, FluoroSim, a realistic, affordable, and accessible fluoroscopic simulation tool that can be used with workshop bones to simulate the first step of the DHS procedure. Additionally, we present the first round of accuracy tests with this software. Methods. The software was developed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, England. Two orthogonally placed cameras were used to track two coloured markers attached to a DHS guide-wire. Affine transformation matrices were used in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and cross table lateral (CTL) planes to match three points from the camera image of the workshop bone to three points on a pre-loaded hip radiograph. The two centre points of each marker were identified with image processing algorithms and utilised to digitally produce a line representing the guide-wire on the two radiographs. To test the accuracy of the system, the software generated 3D guide-wire apex distance (GAD) (from the tip of the guide-wire to a marker at the centre of calibration) was compared to the same distance measured with a digital calliper (MGAD). In addition, the same accuracy value was determined in a simulation scenario, from 406 attempts by 67 medical students. Results. The median absolute inaccuracy of FluoroSim with 270 measurements was 3.35mm (IQR = [1.15mm, 6.53mm]). The absolute inaccuracy showed a graded increase the further away the tip of the guide-wire was from the centre of calibration; MGAD ≤10mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 1.53mm; MGAD 10mm<x≤20mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 4.97mm; MGAD >20mm, median absolute inaccuracy = 7.23mm. Comparison between all three groups reached significance (p < 0.001). In a simulation scenario with medical students, FluoroSim had a significantly greater median absolute inaccuracy of 4.79mm compared to the testing scenario (p < 0.001). Conclusion. FluoroSim is a safe and inexpensive digital imaging adjunct to workshop bones simulation. To our knowledge this technology has not been explored in the context of DHS simulation, and has the potential to be extended to other orthopaedic procedures

Background. Hip fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality, affecting 70,000 people in the UK each year. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) is used for the osteosynthesis of extracapsular neck of femur fractures, a procedure that requires complex psychomotor skills to achieve optimal lag screw positioning. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measure of the position of the lag screw from the apex of the femoral head, and is the most comprehensive predictor of cut-out (failure of the DHS construct). To develop these skills, trainees need exposure to the procedure, however with the European Working Time Directive, this is becoming harder to achieve. Simulation can be used as an adjunct to theatre learning, however it is limited. FluoroSim is a digital fluoroscopy simulator that can be used in conjunction with workshop bones to simulate the first step of the DHS procedure (guide-wire insertion) using image guidance. This study assessed the construct validity of FluoroSim. The null hypothesis stated that there would be no difference in the objective metrics recorded from FluoroSim between users with different exposure to the DHS procedure. Methods. This multicentre study recruited twenty-six orthopaedic doctors. They were categorised into three groups based on the number of DHS procedures they had completed as the primary surgeon (novice <10, intermediate 10≤x<40 and experienced ≥40). Twenty-six participants completed a single DHS guide-wire attempt into a workshop bone using FluoroSim. The TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR) were recorded for each attempt. Results. A significant construct effect was seen for TAD and COR between novice and other users (p < 0.05). The intermediate and experienced users were not significantly different for these metrics. For all other metrics, experienced users had the highest score, contrary to expectation. Conclusion. FluoroSim was able to separate novice users from other cohorts for the two clinically significant outcome metrics. We can therefore partially reject the null hypothesis as construct validity was present for TAD and COR. We have demonstrated that FluoroSim has the potential to be a useful adjunct when learning the psychomotor skills needed for the DHS procedure away from theatre

Background. Training within surgery is changing from the traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model. There is need for objective assessment of trainees, especially their technical skills, to ensure they are safe to practice and to highlight areas for development. In addition, due to working time restrictions in both the UK and the US, theatre time is being limited for trainees, reducing their opportunities to learn such technical skills. Simulation is one adjunct to training that can be utilised to both assess trainees objectively, and provide a platform for trainees to develop their skills in a safe and controlled environment. The insertion of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) relies on complex psychomotor skills to obtain an optimal implant position. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measurement of this positioning, used to predict failure of the implant. These skills can be obtained away from theatre using workshop bone simulation, however this method does not utilise fluoroscopy due to the associated radiation risks. FluoroSim is a novel digital fluoroscopy simulator that can recreate digital radiographs with workshop bone simulation for the insertion of a DHS guide-wire. In this study, we present the training effect demonstrated on FluoroSim. The null hypothesis states that no difference will be present between users with different amounts of exposure to FluoroSim. Methods. Medical students were recruited from three London universities and randomised into a training (n=23) and a control (n=22) cohort. All participants watched a video explanation of the simulator and task and were blinded to their allocation. Training participants completed 10 attempts in total, 5 attempts in week one, followed by a one week wash out period, followed by 5 attempts in week 2. The control group completed a single attempt each week. For each attempt, 5 metrics were recorded; TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR). Results. No significant difference was present for any metric between the groups at baseline; randomisation had produced heterogeneous groups minimising selection bias. Intragroup training effect (comparison of initial and last attempt) was significant for all metrics in the training group (p < 0.05) but for no metrics in the control group. The intergroup training effect (comparison of training group attempt ten to control group attempt ten) was present for procedural time, number of radiographs and number of guide-wire retries (p < 0.05). Significance was not reached for TAD and COR. Conclusion. FluoroSim shows skill acquisition with repeat exposure, so the null hypothesis can be rejected. This study has demonstrated the merits of FluoroSim as a training adjunct for psychomotor skill development in a DHS setting

Introduction: Many patients admitted to acute fracture units with femoral neck fractures are frail and elderly, dehydrated and malnourished, often with associated medical conditions. Surgery may be delayed for investigation, prolonged management and inadequate review of their medical problems, leading to clinical deterioration with poor outcome. Local anaesthetic techniques have been described for intracapsular fractures. We describe a technique effective for the treatment of the more difficult extracapsular type. Aims: To provide a safe and effective technique using local anaesthetic and sedation, for the insertion of a dynamic hip screw in high risk elderly patients with extracapsular femoral neck fractures. Method: Fifty elderly patients who sustained an inter-trochanteric fracture of their femoral neck underwent dynamic hip screw insertion under local anaesthetic and sedation. These patients were medically assessed following admission, all were ASA grade 4, had an additional medical condition (recent MI, CVA, chest infection, aortic stenosis) and were deemed unfit for either general or spinal anaesthesia. All patients not fit for traditional anaesthetic methods were assessed for their suitability for operation under LA, consented and placed on the next available theatre list. A femoral nerve block was performed, with the aid of a nerve stimulator for accurate location, in the anaesthetic room; skin and periosteal infiltration was performed using a 22g spinal needle, with caution to include the distribution of the lateral cutaneous nerve. The patient was then placed on the fracture table and mild sedation (Ketamine, Diazemul, 02/N20) was administered, titrated against the patients requirements. The fracture was reduced using traction and internal rotation, and the DHS inserted. Local Anaesthetic:Infiltration; * 20mls O.25% marcaine/1 in 200,000 adrenaline diluted to 40mls with sterile water. (30mls used with 10mls reserved) * 20mls 1% lidocaine diluted in 40mls of sterile water. (10mls used for skin). Local Anaesthetic femoral nerve block; * 10mls 0.25% plain marcaine. The combined amount of local anaesthetic used is well below safe limits recommended by the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists. Conclusion: This technique is a safe, simple and effective method of allowing high risk, medically unfit patients to undergo surgery. It reduces operative bleeding and postoperative analgesia requirements, no peri-operative deaths occurred and one patient had evidence of post operative tachycardia that settled within 12 hours

A tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm is a strong predictor of screw cut-out in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). We aim to show you a simple and reliable way to check this. By calculating the sum of the distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head on anteroposterior and lateral views the TAD is found. X-rays often have magnification errors and therefore measuring tools in digital x-ray systems will be inaccurate. The original method of calculating the TAD uses the known diameter of the screw to avoid magnification errors. We found that due to the no-cylindrical shape of the screw shaft there is potential of an inaccurate measurement. By using the distance across the highest points of the thread a more accurate TAD can be calculated. The distance across the highest points of the threads in all three of the most commonly used DHSs in the UK is 13 mm. If the measured distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head in both the anteroposterior and lateral views is less than the measured distance across of the treaded diameter of the screw then the surgeon knows the TAD is less than 26 mm. This method can be used intraoperatively to check the TAD by looking at the fluoroscopy images in these two views

Introduction: The use of intramedullary nailing (IMHS) has increased at the expense of the dynamic hip screw (DHS), although the outcome is not different in the studies of pertrochanteric fractures (PTF), known as AO/OTA type 31A1-2 fractures with a preoperative intact lateral femoral wall. We therefore investigated the two implants in the subgroup of PTF with a fractured greater trochanter. Materials and Methods: Six hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with PTF fixated by a short IMHS or by a DHS mounted on a four hole lateral plate were prospectively included between 2002 and 2008. The fractures were preoperatively classified according to AO/OTA classification system, including status of the greater and lesser trochanter. The integrity of the lateral femoral wall, fracture reduction and implant positioning were assessed postoperatively. Reoperations due to technical failures were recorded for one year. Results: Among the 311 patients sustaining a PTF with a fractured greater trochanter, 4% (6/158) operated with an IMHS were reoperated compared to 14% (22/153) with a DHS (p=0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis combining demographic and biomechanical parameters showed the IMHS to have a lower rate of reoperation (p=0.002). During the operative procedure, the lateral femoral wall was fractured in 6% (9/158) of patients, in which an IMHS was performed versus 28% (42/153) operated with a DHS (p< 0.001). Among the DHS, a fractured lateral femoral wall was confirmed to be a predictor of a reoperation (31% (13/42) of patients with a fractured lateral femoral wall versus 8% (9/111) with an intact lateral femoral wall, p< 0.001). As in other studies, the different reoperation rate would have been overseen in the main group of AO/ OTA type 31A1-2 PTF fractures (4% (6/164) IMHS versus 6% (30/471) DHS, p=0.196). Conclusion: The IMHS seems to have a lower reoperation rate than the DHS in the subgroup of PTF with a fractured greater trochanter. In contrast to the DHS, the IMHS presumably keeps the integrity of the lateral femoral wall. In future studies, PTF should be divided into subgroups

Increasing incidence of osteoporosis, obesity and an aging population have led to an increase in low energy hip fractures in the elderly. Perceived lower blood loss and lower surgical time, media coverage of minimal invasive surgery and patient expectations unsurprisingly have led to a trend towards intramedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures. This is contrary to the Cochrane review of random controlled trials of intramedullary vs extramedullary implants which continues recommends the use of a sliding hip screw (SHS) over other devices. Furthermore, despite published literature of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of SHS citing benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma, smaller scar, faster recovery, reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia needs; the uptake of these approaches has been poor. We describe a novel technique one which remains minimally invasive, that not only has a simple learning curve but easily reproducible results. All patients who underwent MIS SHS fixation of extracapsular fractures were included in this study. Technique is shown in Figure 1. We collated data on all intertrochanteric hip fractures that were treated by a single surgeon series during period Jan 2014 to July 2015. Data was collected from electronic patient records and radiographs from Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Surgical time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, surgical incision length, post-operative transfusion, Tip Apex Distance (TAD) were analyzed. There were 10 patients in this study. All fractures were Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type A1 or A2. Median surgical time was 36 minutes (25–54). Mean fluoroscopy time was similar to standard incision sliding hip screw fixation. Blood loss estimation with MIS SHS can be undertaken safely and expeditiously for extracapsular hip fractures.

Introduction. The use of the dynamic hip screw is common practice for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. The success of this procedure requires accurate guide wire placement. This can prove difficult at times and can result in repeated attempts leading to longer operating time, multiple tracks and more importantly greater radiation exposure to both patient and operating staff. We hypothesised that rather than using the standard anterior-posterior projected image (Figure 1) of a proximal femur, rotating the intensifier image (Figure 2) so that the guide wire appears to pass vertically makes it easier to visualise the projected direction of the guide wire. Methods. Fifty Specialist Registrars, thirty participating in the London hip meeting 2009, ten from Oxford and ten from Northern deanery orthopaedic rotations were involved in the study. They were presented with standard AP and rotated images of the femoral neck on paper using 135 degree template to replicate the DHS guide. The participants were asked to mark the entry point on the intertrochanteric area of femur on the image where they would have placed the guide wire. They did this on both standard AP and rotated images aiming for the centre of the head of the femur. Fig. 1 Standard AP image Fig. 2 Rotated image. Results. Thirty-seven Specialist Registrars (74%) were able to accurately mark their entry point on rotated images on their first attempt as compared to eighteen trainees (36%) managing to place it correctly first time on the standard image. Thirteen trainees (26%) were able to mark their entry point correctly on both standard AP and rotated images with equal accuracy. Conclusion. Coren et al. 1 argue that human vision can more easily judge horizontal and vertical lines rather than oblique lines. Thus, rather than use the standard anterior-posterior projected image of the hip, we should routinely rotate the intensifier image so that the guide wire appears to be passing in a vertical direction. By rotating the image (Figure 2) in this way it becomes significantly easier to visualise the projected direction of the guide wire and in doing so ensure its accurate final placement thereby minimising possible complications

Introduction: While recent guidelines for the treatment of such fractures do not recommend load-bearing devices, there is little evidence actually condemning them, and there is still a lack of literature on the reconstruction nails now generally used. Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcome of pathological (metastatic) proximal femoral fractures treated by either a long Gamma nail, an AO nail with a spiral blade plate (AO-SBP), or a dynamic hip screw (DHS). Method: Eighty-six operations in 80 patients with average age 63.9 years were followed for 18 months or until death. Thirty-one procedures were prophylactic. Results: Thirty Gamma nails (three bilateral), 28 AO SBP rods (three bilateral) and 28 DHS were implanted. The DHS had complications in 10 cases (35%), all occurred in less than 14 months; three implants fractured, four cut out, and three failed to relieve symptoms. The Gamma nail group had two (7%) complications, both after 20 months; one nail fractured and the other lost fixation. The AO-SBP group had two (7%) complications, with one SBP misplacement, and one postoperative death after bilateral nailing. Pain relief and function were greatly improved by the nailing procedures in 57 out of 58 cases. Survival averaged 5.5 months, and was related to primary disease, and presence of visceral metastases. Conclusion: Both the long Gamma and AO- SBP nails reliably treated metastatic proximal femoral fractures, but loss of fixation occurred with long-term survival. The DHS had a high complication rate when used in these cases, and we do not recommend its use

Background: A radiological audit of the local use of the Dynamic Hip Screw in extracapsular proximal femur fractures. Study aim: to identify cases of mechanical failure and revision, to determine predictors of fixation failure. Methods: A retrospective radiological review of 567 consecutive cases at Western Australian tertiary hospitals over a 3 year period (2002 – 2004) using the Picture Archive Computer System (PACS). Results: Female: male ratio was 2.79: 1. Evan’s classification: 418 fractures stable (73.7%), 149 unstable (26.3%). Failure of fixation occurred in 14 cases (2.5%); ten due to hip screw cut out (1.8%) and four due to plate pull off (0.8%). All cases of cut out had a significantly higher mean tip apex distance (TAD) (31 vs 20mm, P < 0.001) and an unstable fracture configuration; 8 of 10 had a poor reduction. Bivariate logistical regression revealed TAD of 25mm or more to be most predictive of cut out; followed by mean TAD, superior anterior and inferior posterior screw placement, unstable fracture configuration and poor reduction. Unassociated factors included gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ score, plate angle and length, operation time and surgeon level. A three-variable model found TAD of 25mm or more and unstable fracture configuration to be predictive, but not poor reduction. Cases with a TAD of 25mm or more with unstable fracture configuration and a poor reduction had a 21.6% chance of cut out (8 of 29). Conclusions: This is the first multifactorial multivariate analysis of a single implant sliding hip screw series. Compared with the literature, the rate of failure is low. Possible reasons include appropriate choice of implant for fracture type, improved performance with use of a single model of implant, and low exclusion rates due to the use of PACS