The increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is having a significant impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased interest in outpatient care pathways to reduce resource consumption. This study compared costs between patients who underwent outpatient THA using a Direct Anterior (DA) approach compared to a Direct Lateral (DL) approach to understand the effect of surgical approach on resource use. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial for DA patients undergoing primary THA. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the trial to a prospective cohort of outpatient DL approach THAs. We recorded all costs including: equipment, length of stay in hospital, and laboratory or other medical tests. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary recording resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, use of pain medications, informal care, productivity losses and out of pocket expenditures. We report costs from both Canadian public health care payer (HCP) and a societal perspective. The HCP perspective includes any direct health costs covered by the publicly funded system. In addition to the health care system costs, the societal perspective also includes additional costs to the patient (e.g. physiotherapy, medication, or assistive devices), as well as any indirect costs such as time off paid employment for patients or caregivers. We included 127 patients in the DA group (66.6 years old) and 51 patients in the DL group (59.4 years old) (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from both the healthcare payer (DA= 7910.19, DL= 7847.17, p=0.80) and societal perspectives (DA= 14657.21, DL= 14581.21, p=0.96). In patients undergoing a successful outpatient hip replacement, surgical approach does not have an effect on cost from in hospital or societal perspectives

Introduction. While additional resources associated with direct anterior (DA) approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) such as fluoroscopy, staff, and special tables are well recognized, time consumption is not well studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze anesthesia and surgical time in DA and posterior approach THA in a large healthcare system across multiple facilities and surgeons. Methods. 3,155 unilateral primary THAs performed via DA or posterior approaches between 1/1/2017 and 06/30/2019 at nine hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) in a large metropolitan healthcare system were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeons were experienced and beyond learning curves. 247 cases were excluded to eliminate confounds. Operating room (OR) in and out times and surgical times were collected via EMR electronic and manual data extraction with verification. Multivariate statistical analyses were utilized with p<0.05 significant. Results. 1261 DA approach (43%) and 1647 posterior approach (57%) THAs were analyzed. Mean total OR time, including anesthesia and positioning, was greatest for hospital-based DA THAs (146 mins), followed by hospital posterior approach THAs (126.4 mins), ASC-based DA THAs (118.1 mins) and ASC posterior THAs (90.1 mins) (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, compared to the optimal ASC posterior approach group, the total OR time predictive model added 31 minutes per ASC DA THA, 33 minutes per hospital posterior THA, and 56 minutes for hospital DA THA (p<0.001). Similar predictive effect was observed for surgical time, which added 18 minutes per ASC-based DA THA, 22 minutes for hospital posterior THA and 29 minutes for hospital DA THA (p<0.001). Conclusion. In the COVID era, efficiency should be enhanced to maximize patient access for elective procedures and facilitate the healthcare system financial recovery. Despite equivocal clinical results, DA approach THA consumes substantially more OR time when compared to the posterior approach in both the hospital and ASC setting

The purpose of our study was to prospectively examine early functional differences in gait between the direct anterior and direct lateral surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty over the first three months postoperatively. Forty participants were prospectively enrolled to either the direct anterior (20 patients) or direct lateral group (20 patients) based on their surgeon's expertise. Outcome measures were collected preoperatively at their preadmission appointment and postoperatively at discharge from the hospital, two weeks, six weeks and three months. We used the GAITRite® system to measure gait velocity, stride length, single-limb support and single-limb support symmetry. We also had participants complete the Timed Up and Go test and a series of questionnaires at each visit: WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip Score, and pain VAS. Our primary outcome, gait velocity, was significantly greater in the direct anterior group at discharge and six weeks postoperatively with adjusted mean differences of 0.12m/s and 0.17m/s respectively. Single-limb support symmetry was also significantly better in the direct anterior group at two weeks, six weeks and three months with adjusted mean differences of 0.10, 0.09 and 0.04 respectively. The direct anterior group also had significantly shorter times to complete the Timed Up and Go test at two and six weeks with adjusted mean differences of −9.02s and −2.64s. There were no differences between the groups at any time point for the WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip Score, or pain VAS. Preliminary results of our expertise-based study have found the direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty offers better early functional outcomes than the direct lateral approach

The trend towards more minimal access has led to a series of instruments being developed to enable adequate access for Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for hip arthroplasty. These include longer levers, hooks attached to the operating table and a series of special attachments to the operating table to position the leg and apply traction where necessary. The forces applied in this way may be transmitted locally, damaging muscle used as a fulcrum, or the knee and ankle joints when torque has to be applied to the femur through a boot. The arthroplasty surgeon's aim is to minimise the forces applied to both bone and soft tissue during surgery.

We surmised that the forces needed for adequate access were related to the extent of the capsular and soft tissue releases, and that they could be measured and optimised. with the aim of minimising the forces applied to the tissues around the hip.

Eight fresh frozen specimens from pelvis to mid tibia from four cadavers were approached using the DAA. A 6-axis force/torque sensor and 6-axis motion tracking sensor were attached to a threaded rod securely fastened to the tibial and femoral diaphysis. The torque needed to provide first extension, then external rotation, adequate for hip arthroplasty were measured as the capsular structures were divided sequentially.

The Zona Orbicularis (ZO) and Ischiofemoral Ligament(IFL) contributed most of the resistance to both extension (4.0 and 3.1Nm) and external rotation torque (5.8 and 3.9Nm). The contributions of the conjoint tendon (1.5 and 2.4Nm) and piriformis (1.2 and 2.3Nm) were substantially smaller.

By releasing the Zona Orbicularis and Ischiofemoral Ligament, the torque needed to deliver the femur for hip arthroplasty could be reduced to less than the torque needed to open a jar (2.9–5.5Nm).

Introduction. The influence of surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) on scar healing and scar perception is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception of their scar following direct anterior (DA) or posterior approach (PA) for THA utilizing validated scar assessment scales. Methods. Fifty DA and 58 PA THA patients underwent scar assessment using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES). Patients were included if they had at least 1-year follow-up, and had no previous surgery or intervention (i.e. radiation) around the assessed hip. The mean age was different between the cohorts (DA 67 vs PA 62 years, p=0.03). Other variables including gender, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, steroid use, diabetes, and smoking were similar (p>0.05 for all comparisons). All patients had subcuticular running closure, secured with skin adhesive glue. Mean time from THA to scar assessment was 3.1 and 3.6 years for the DA and PA groups, respectively (p=0.18). Results. The overall opinion of the scar on the POSAS observer scale was graded as closer to normal skin more often for the PA than DA cohort (p=0.04). Age was not predictive of overall scar opinion on this scale (p=0.60). Scar vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area were graded similarly (p>0.05 for all comparisons). For the POSAS patient scale, scar pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, or irregularities were graded similarly (p>0.05 for all comparisons). On the SBSES, there was no difference for scar width, height, color, and presence of hatch marks (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Overall scar appearance was rated as “good” in 94% of the DA and 91% of the PA patients (p=0.72). Discussion/Conclusion. Scar healing is reported to resemble normal skin more often following a PA approach on a validated scar assessment scale. There were no other significant differences for other scar attributes. Summary Statement. When comparing scar healing and perception after total hip arthroplasty, the posterior approach heals with more normal looking skin as assessed on a validated scare assessment scale

Introduction. The direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated successful short term outcomes. However, debate remains about which patients are candidates fo this approach. To our knowledge, there are no studies which specifically investigate short-term outcomes in obese versus non-obese patients undergoing THA through a DA approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complication rates and short term outcomes of obese, pre-obese, and normal BMI patients undergoing THA through DA approach. Methods. A retrospective review of 151 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA through a DA approach for osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis was performed after IRB approval. Forty patients had a normal BMI, 54 were pre-obese, and 57 were obese by WHO classification (37 class I obese, 12 class II obese, and 8 class III obese). Electronic and paper charts were reviewed to determine differences in surgical time, length of stay, disposition, wound and major complications, and short term outcome measures. Results. When comparing normal and pre-obese patients to a combined group of WHO class I, II, and III obese patients, surgical time was increased by 15.8 minutes (P <0.0001), narcotic use was increased at two weeks (P=0.0242), and assistive device use was increased at 2 weeks (P=0.0079) in the obese patient group. There were trends toward increased wound complications in obese patients, 14.3% vs 4.2% (P=0.0569), increased major complications, 7.1% vs 1.1% (P=0.0633), and a higher use of rehabilitation facilities, 20.0% vs 9.5% (p=0.0676). Conclusions. This study demonstrated significantly increased surgical time and higher use of narcotics and assistive devices in obese patients. Trends toward increased wound and major complications, and a higher likelihood of rehabilitation placement were found. This study helps determine appropriate candidates for THA through a DA approach as obese patients may have more complicated postoperative courses

Purpose: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is recognized as an etiological risk factor for hip arthritis. The potential for joint preserving surgical techniques that may delay the progression to early arthritis and retard the possibility of arthroplasty at a young age is promising. This study presents the outcome of surgical treatment of FAI through a less invasive technique performed through a modified Smith-Peterson approach without hip dislocation, or arthroscopy. Method: Using an institutional database, a total of 72 patients (80 hips) with radiographic and clinical diagnosis of FAI who underwent direct anterior femoroacetabular osteoplasty (FAO) were identified. Preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation was performed on these patients. The operative findings were recorded in detail and evaluated with regard to outcome. Results: Intraoperative diagnosis of labral tear and osteochondral lesions in the anterosuperior acetabulum was confirmed in all cases. The surgical approach provided adequate access to allow labral repair and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and the acetabulum, whenever needed. There were no intraoperative complications. All patients experienced a significant improvement in function as measured by modified Harris hip and SUSHI scores. Majority (85%) of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. In addition, Health Survey SF-36 showed most patients felt their health had improved significantly. The predictors of poor outcome were previous hip scope, lack of labrum for repair, large chondral lesions, and workman’s compensation status. Conclusion: This study presents the early results of a less invasive surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. This ongoing study shows that the described technique seems to be a viable approach for treatment of this painful condition in the young

INTRODUCTION. Cadaveric studies have reported damage to the direct head of rectus femoris and tensor fascia lata muscles with direct anterior approach(DAA) and to the abductors, external rotators with posterior approach(PA). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate differences in hip muscle strength recovery between DAA and posterior approach (PA) THA. METHODS. Patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA at a single institution from January 2011 to October 2011 were enrolled. All DAA THA's were performed by one surgeon, and all PA THA's were performed by another surgeon with similar design of components, pain management and rehabilitation protocols. Hip muscle strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer in all planes by a single observer preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Functional recovery was assessed with the motor component of Functional Independence Measure, UCLA activity score, Harris hip score, SF-12 score. RESULTS. There were 30 patients (15 per group) with similar age, sex, BMI and preoperative functional scores. There was a significant difference between groups in ER strength recovery pattern(p=0.04) with greater mean deficit in PA group from preoperative to 6 weeks(37%), 3 months (28%) and 6 months (25%); whereas DAA group demonstrated 3% mean deficit at 6 weeks, 2% mean improvement at 3 months and 10% mean improvement at 6 months from preoperative values. Flexion strength decreased in DAA group by a mean of 10% at 6 weeks(p=0.07) but improved at 3 months by a mean of 12% as compared to preoperative values. There were no differences in recovery pattern of other hip movements between groups. Functional recovery scores between groups were similar. DISCUSSION. Both DAA and PA THA offer similar recovery in hip muscle strength up to 6 months with exceptions of ER strength deficit in PA group and a trend to flexion strength deficit at 6 weeks in DAA group

Background. Between 1999 and August 2005, we performed Direct Lateral Approach (DLA) in lateral decubitus position as the main approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). After August 2005, we introduced Direct Anterior Approach(DAA) in supine position. Intraoperative target orientation in primary THA was planned in 40–45°cup abduction, 10–20°cup anteversion, and 10–20° stem anteversion. Precice implant positioning has been considered to be very important for postoperative function and stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the DLA and DAA for implant positioning accuracy. Methods. From 1999 to July 2009, we performed 566 primary THAs(78 male, 488 female). The subjects were divided into two groups of 224 DLA and 342 DAA (72 in early stage and 270 in late stage) The difference of the mean age at surgery and preoperative diagnosis among the groups were not significant. We planned to set the cup anteversion at 20°in DAA early stage and 12.5°in late stage DAA due to the development of postoperative dislocation in several cases with early stage DAA. We measured the cup and stem alignment postoperatively using radiography and computed tomography, and measured the combined anteversion angle by Widmer. Statistical analysis was done using the Bartlett Statistical Test and F-test. The results were expressed as median and interquartile range, with an alpha level set at less than 0.05. Results. Cup abduction angle with DLA was 42.7±6.25 °(average±standard deviation), 42.1±4.1°with early stage DAA and 41.9±5.3°with late stage DAA. There was no significant difference between the approaches with average and standard deviation (SD) of cup abduction. The mean cup anteversion with DLA (17.3±10.0°) was significantly smaller than that with early stage DAA(26.6±8.1°) and late stage DAA(21.0±8.0°). SD of cup anteversion with DLA was significantly larger than that with both DAA groups. The mean stem anteversion was significantly smaller with DLA (18.9±14.3) and late stage DAA (16.7±11.1°) than that with early stage DAA (23.5±11.9°). SD of stem anteversion with DLA was significantly larger than that with both DAA groups. There were 9 hips of dislocation: 5 hips in DLA, 3 in early DAA and one in late DAA. SD of combined anteversion Value with DLA(30.5±13.7) was significantly larger than that with early DAA (40.3±12.2) and late DAA (32.7±11.1.∗∗∗∗∗. Conclusion. Significantly less SD for anteversion of stem and cup was demonstrated with DAA compared with DLA. Stable operative positioning with DAA could yield a more accurate and reliable implantation compared with DLA in lateral position. DAA in supine position was a superior approach for primary THA

Background. The anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has recently been hypothesized to result in less muscle damage. While clinical outcome studies are essential, they are subject to patient and surgeon bias. We prospectively analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients receiving anterior and posterior minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty to provide objective evidence of the surgical insult. Methods. 29 patients receiving an anterior and 28 patients receiving a posterior total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Peri-operative and radiographic data were collected to ensure similar cohorts. Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-1beta, and Tumor necrosis factor-alpha were collected pre-operatively, post-operatively, and on post-operative days 1 and 2. Comparisons between the groups were made using the Student's t-test and Fisher's Exact test. Independent predictors of elevation in markers of inflammation and muscle damage were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. Markers of inflammation were slightly decreased in direct anterior group (mean differences in C-reactive protein 27.5 [95% confidence interval −24.7–79.6] mg/dL, Interleukin-6 13.5 [95% confidence interval −11.5–38.4] pg/ml, Interleukin-1beta 42.6 [95% confidence interval −10.4–95.6], and Tumor necrosis factor-alpha 148.6 [95% confidence interval −69.3–366.6] pg/ml). The rise in creatine kinase was 5.5 times higher in the post anesthesia care unit (mean difference 150.3 [95% confidence interval 70.4–230.2] units/L, p < 0.05) and nearly twice as high cumulatively in the miniposterior approach group (305.0 [95% confidence interval −46.7–656.8] units/L, p < 0.05). Conclusion. Anterior total hip arthroplasty caused significantly less muscle damage compared to traditional posterior surgery as indicated by creatine kinase levels. The clinical importance of this rise needs to be delineated by further clinical studies. The overall physiologic burden as measured by markers of inflammation, however, appears to be similar. Objective measurement of muscle damage and inflammation provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in total hip arthroplasty patients

We perform the direct approach using a standard radiolucent operative table with extender at the foot, and the assistance of fluoroscopy. The patient is positioned supine with the pubic symphysis aligned at the table break. The anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and center of the knee are marked, and a line drawn between. The incision commences proximally from two finger breadths distal and two finger breadths lateral to the ASIS, and extends distally 8–10 cm. Using fluoroscopy, the anterior aspect femoral neck is located. The incision is placed over the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter, which avoids the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The tensor fascia lata is identified, which has a distinctive purple hue, and dissected free from the intermuscular septum lateral to the sartorius and the rectus muscles. The deep, investing aponeurosis of the tensor fascia lata is split using a tonsil. Just below lie the lateral circumflex vessels, two veins and one artery, which must be either ligated or cauterised. A retractor is placed superior to the femoral neck over top of the superior hip capsule. A blunt, cobra-type retractor is then placed along the inferior femoral neck, deep to the rectus muscle and the rectus tendon. A sharp retractor is then used to peel the rectus off from the anterior capsule and placed over the anterior rim of the acetabulum. An anterior capsulectomy is performed. A saw blade is positioned for femoral neck resection and confirmed with fluoroscopy. After resection, acetabular retractors are placed, the socket is reamed, the cup is placed, and position confirmed with fluoroscopy. Turning to the femoral side, the surgeon palpates underneath and around the tensor, around the lateral aspect of the femur, proximal to the gluteus maximus tendon, and places a bone hook around the proximal femur. Femoral preparation and stem insertion require maneuvering the table and adjusting the patient position. The table is “jack-knifed” by lowering the foot of the table to approximately 45 degrees and placing the bed into approximately 15 degrees of Trendelenburg. The contralateral well leg is placed on the padded Mayo stand. A table-mounted femur elevator is attached to the bed, requiring a change in surgical gloves, and attached to the traction hook around the proximal femur. Gentle retraction is placed on the femur to tension the capsule. As the capsule is released the femur will begin to come up/out of the wound and into view. With increasing gentle retraction via the table-mounted hook, the femur is elevated. Simultaneously, the operative limb is externally rotated and adducted underneath the non-operative leg in a lazy “figure of 4” position by the assistant. The use of a “broach-only” stem design is preferred as direct straight reaming of the femur is difficult in most cases. Fluoroscopic images are obtained to confirm femoral implant positioning, offset, neck and leg length. A standardised rapid recovery hospitalization and rehabilitation protocol is used in all cases.

Introduction

Dissemination of Total hip Arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach has, depending upon one's experience and perspective, benefitted from or been plagued by aggressive marketing. Although first developed over 60 years ago it was all but unknown until the past decade. This study exams one community surgeon's experience and thus sheds light on whether the ATHA is a viable operation for all orthopaedic surgeons.

Background

Direct anterior approach (DAA), total hip arthroplasty (THA, performed with the patient in the supine position, creates a unique opportunity to do bilateral THA under one anesthesia. Previous studies evaluating this option are limited by small sample size or lack of control group. The purpose of this study is to compare early clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral, unilateral and staged bilateral DAA-THA.

Introduction:

Direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be a muscle sparing approach. The purpose of this study was to compare gait patterns over time between patients undergoing THA via DAA and posterior approach (PA).

Introduction

The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) offers potential advantages of quicker rehabilitation compared to posterior approach THR. The aim of this study was to compare hospital based and early clinical outcomes between these two groups with utilisation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol.

Introduction. There is renewed interest in dislocation after surgical approach with popularization of the direct anterior approach. The purported advantage of both the lateral and direct anterior approaches is decreased risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of dislocation by approach following modern primary THA. Methods. All primary THAs at a single academic institution from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed through our institutional total joint registry. There were 7023 THAs including 3754 posterior, 1732 lateral, and 1537 direct anterior. Risk of dislocation was assessed against the competing risks of revision surgery and death as well as by individual patient and surgical factors including surgical approach. Risk of revision surgery was considered as a secondary outcome. Step-wise selection was utilized to develop multivariable models. Clinical outcomes were documented with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Mean age was 63 years, 51% were female, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m. 2. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results. The cumulative incidence of dislocation at 1-year and 5-years by approach was as follows: posterior (2.1%; 3.0%), lateral (0.7%; 0.7%), direct anterior (0.4%; 0.4%) (p<0.001) (Figure 1). Compared to the posterior cohort, the adjusted risk of dislocation was decreased for the lateral (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, p<0.001) and direct anterior cohorts (HR=0.18, p<0.001). The cumulative incidence of revision for instability at 1-year and 5-years by approach was as follows: posterior (0.8%; 1.0%), lateral (0.6%; 0.6%), direct anterior (0%; 0%) (p=0.09). The adjusted risk of all-cause revision surgery was increased among the lateral cohort compared to posterior (HR=1.75, p=0.003) and direct anterior (HR=2.44, p=0.002) and among patients with diagnoses other than osteoarthritis (HR=2.89, p<0.001). Among patients who dislocated, 69 (83%) had anteversion >25° (Figure 2). Mean increase in HHS from preoperative assessment to final follow-up was greatest among direct anterior patients (37 points), followed by posterior patients (33 points), followed by lateral patients (29 points) (p<0.05, all comparisons). Conclusions. This study documents the risk of dislocation by surgical approach among a large contemporary cohort undergoing primary THA. The risk of dislocation was higher following the posterior approach, whereas all-cause revision surgery was found to be higher following the lateral approach. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Direct anterior approach (DAA) arthroplasty has generated great interest because of its minimally invasive and muscle sparing nature. Obese patients are reported to be associated with greater incidence of complications in primary joint replacement. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes and complication rates between obese and non-obese patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a Bikini direct anterior incision. This retrospective, single surgeon study compared the outcome of 258 obese patients and 200 non-obese patients undergoing DAA THA using a Bikini incision, over a 7-year period. The average follow-up was 4.2 years (range 2.6-7.6 years). There were no statistically significant differences in the complication rate between the two groups. The obese group recorded 2 major (venous thromboembolism and peri-prosthetic fracture) and 2 minor complications (superficial wound infection), compared with the non-obese group, which recorded 2 major (deep-wound infection and peri-prosthetic fracture) and 1 minor complication (superficial wound infection). Patient-reported outcomes (WOMAC and Harris Hip Scores) showed significant post-operative improvements (p < 0.001) and did not differ between the two groups. Bikini DDA THA does not increase the complication rate in obese patients and offers similar clinical improvements compared to non-obese patients. (200 words)

Utilization of C-arm fluoroscopy during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) is disruptive and potentially increases the risks of patient infection and cumulative surgeon radiation exposure. This pilot study evaluated changes in surgeon C-arm utilization during an initial 10 cases of direct anterior THA in which an imageless computer-assisted navigation device was introduced. This retrospective study includes data from 20 direct anterior THA cases performed by two orthopaedic surgeons (BC; SRE) in which an imageless computer-assisted navigation device was utilized (Intellijoint HIP®; Intellijoint Surgical, Waterloo, ON, Canada). Total C-arm image count was recorded in each case, and cases were grouped in sets of 5 for each surgeon. The mean C-arm image count was calculated for each surgeon, and combined C-arm image counts were calculated for the study cohort. Student's t-tests were used to assess differences. The use of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy decreased from a mean of 9.4 images (standard deviation [SD]: 8.6; Range: 3 – 23) to a mean of 2 images (SD: 2.9; Range: 0 – 7) for surgeon BC (P=0.10) and decreased from a mean of 10.75 images (SD: 1.2; range 9 – 12) to a mean of 6.7 images (SD: 8.3; range: 0 – 16) for surgeon SRE (P=0.36). Combined, an overall decrease in intraoperative C-arm image count from a mean of 11.3 images (SD: 6.9; range: 6 – 23) to a mean of 3.7 images (SD: 3.9; range: 0 – 8.5) was observed in the study cohort (P=0.06). The adoption of imageless computer-assisted navigation in direct anterior THA may reduce the magnitude of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy utilization; however further analysis is required

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of surgical approach on femoral stem version in THA. This was a retrospective database review of 830 THAs in 830 patients that had both preoperative and postoperative CT scans. All patients underwent staged bilateral THAs and received CT-based 3D planning on both sides. Stem version was measured in the second CT-scan and compared to the native neck axis measured in the first CT-scan, using the posterior condyles as the reference for both. Cases were performed by 104 surgeons using either a direct anterior (DAA, n=303) or posterior (PA, n=527) approach and one of four stem designs: quadrangular taper, calcar-guided short stem, flat taper and fit-and-fill. Sub-analyses investigated changes in version for low (≤5°), neutral (5–25°) and high (≥25°) native version subgroups and for the different implant types. Native version was not different between approaches (DAA = 12.6°, PA = 13.6°, p = 0.16). Overall, DAA stems were more anteverted relative to the native neck axis vs PA stems (5.9° vs 1.4°, p<0.001). This trend persisted in hips with high native version (3.2° vs -5.3°, p<0.01) and neutral native version (5.3° vs 1.3°, p<0.001), but did not reach significance in the low native version subgroup (8.9° vs 5.9°, p=0.13). Quadrangular taper, calcar-guided, and flat taper stem types had significantly more anteversion than native for DAA, while no differences were found for PA. Stems implanted with a direct anterior approach had more anteversion than those implanted with a posterior approach. The smaller surgical field, soft tissue tension and lack of a “tibial” vertical reference frame may contribute to this finding

Navigation in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve acetabular positioning and can decrease the incidence of mal-positioned acetabular components. The aim of this study was to assess two surgical guidance systems by comparing intra-operative measurements of acetabular component inclination and anteversion with a post-operative CT scan. We prospectively collected intra-operative navigation data from 102 hips receiving conventional THA or hip resurfacing arthroplasty through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. Two guidance systems were used simultaneously: an inertial navigation system (INS) and optical navigation system (ONS). Acetabular component anteversion and inclination was measured on a post-operative CT. The average age of the patients was 64 years (range: 24-92) and average BMI was 27 kg/m. 2. (range 19-38). 52% had hip surgery through an anterior approach. 98% of the INS measurements and 88% of the ONS measurements were within 10° of the CT measurements. The mean (and standard deviation) of the absolute difference between the post-operative CT and the intra-operative measurements for inclination and anteversion were 3.0° (2.8) and 4.5° (3.2) respectively for the ONS, along with 2.1° (2.3) and 2.4° (2.1) respectively for the INS. There was significantly lower mean absolute difference to CT for the INS when compared to ONS in both anteversion (p<0.001) and inclination (p=0.02). Both types of navigation produced reliable and reproducible acetabular cup positioning. It is important that patient-specific planning and navigation are used together to ensure that surgeons are targeting the optimal acetabular cup position. This assistance with cup positioning can provide benefits over free-hand techniques, especially in patients with an altered acetabular structure or extensive acetabular bone loss. In conclusion, both ONS and INS allowed for adequate acetabular positioning as measured on postoperative CT, and thus provide reliable intraoperative feedback for optimal acetabular component placement