Abstract
Background
The anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has recently been hypothesized to result in less muscle damage. While clinical outcome studies are essential, they are subject to patient and surgeon bias. We prospectively analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients receiving anterior and posterior minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty to provide objective evidence of the surgical insult.
Methods
29 patients receiving an anterior and 28 patients receiving a posterior total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Peri-operative and radiographic data were collected to ensure similar cohorts. Creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-1beta, and Tumor necrosis factor-alpha were collected pre-operatively, post-operatively, and on post-operative days 1 and 2. Comparisons between the groups were made using the Student's t-test and Fisher's Exact test. Independent predictors of elevation in markers of inflammation and muscle damage were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
Markers of inflammation were slightly decreased in direct anterior group (mean differences in C-reactive protein 27.5 [95% confidence interval −24.7–79.6] mg/dL, Interleukin-6 13.5 [95% confidence interval −11.5–38.4] pg/ml, Interleukin-1beta 42.6 [95% confidence interval −10.4–95.6], and Tumor necrosis factor-alpha 148.6 [95% confidence interval −69.3–366.6] pg/ml). The rise in creatine kinase was 5.5 times higher in the post anesthesia care unit (mean difference 150.3 [95% confidence interval 70.4–230.2] units/L, p < 0.05) and nearly twice as high cumulatively in the miniposterior approach group (305.0 [95% confidence interval −46.7–656.8] units/L, p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Anterior total hip arthroplasty caused significantly less muscle damage compared to traditional posterior surgery as indicated by creatine kinase levels. The clinical importance of this rise needs to be delineated by further clinical studies. The overall physiologic burden as measured by markers of inflammation, however, appears to be similar. Objective measurement of muscle damage and inflammation provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in total hip arthroplasty patients.
