Aims. Shoulder arthroplasty is effective in the management of end-stage glenohumeral joint arthritis. However, it is major surgery and patients must balance multiple factors when considering the procedure. An understanding of patients’ decision-making processes may facilitate greater support of those considering shoulder arthroplasty and inform the outcomes of future research. Methods. Participants were recruited from waiting lists of three consultant upper limb surgeons across two NHS hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants who were awaiting elective shoulder arthroplasty. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Systematic coding was performed; initial codes were categorized and further developed into summary narratives through a process of discussion and refinement. Data collection and analyses continued until thematic saturation was reached. Results. Two overall categories emerged: the motivations to consider surgery, and the information participants used to inform their decision-making. Motivations were, broadly, the relief of pain and the opportunity to get on with life and regain independence. When participants’ symptoms and restrictions prevented them enjoying life to a sufficient extent, this provided the motivation to proceed with surgery. Younger participants tended to focus on maintaining employment and recreational activities, and older patients were eager to make the most of their remaining lifetime. Participants gathered information from a range of sources and were keen to optimize their recovery where possible. An important factor for participants was whether they trusted their surgeon and were prepared to delegate responsibility for elements of their care. Conclusion. Relief of pain and the opportunity to get on with life were the primary reasons to undergo shoulder arthroplasty. Participants highlighted the importance of the patient-surgeon relationship and the need for accurate information in an accessible format which is relevant to people of different ages and functional demands. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):543–549

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

Background. Knee replacement surgery is currently facing three dilemmas: a high dissatisfaction rate; increasing demand with financial constraints; and variation in utilisation. A patient centred approach, usually achieved through shared decision-making, has the potential to help address these dilemmas. However, such an approach requires an understanding of the factors involved in patient decision-making. This is the first study examining decision-making in knee replacements that includes patients at different stages of decision-making – this is critical when considering decision-making as a process. We base our findings in a theoretical model, proposed by Elwyn et al, that highlights the distinction between deliberation and decision-making, and propose modifications to this model specific to knee replacement decision-making. Methods. This study used two focus groups of six patients each and in-depth interviews with 10 patients to examine the factors that affect patient decision-making and their interaction at different points in the decision-making process. A qualitative analysis of themes, based on a constant comparative method, is used to analyse the data. This study was approved by the Dyfed Powys Research Ethics Committee (13/WA/0140). Results. We describe 10 themes that affect patient deliberation over the decision: decision-making style; coping strategies; expectation of outcome; decision-making stress; personal situation; preferred model of care; trust in doctor; sources of information; mental state; and loss of control. We add to Elwyn's model by demonstrating the boundary between deliberation and decision-making is the decision-making threshold. Conclusion. This study provides increased detail on a theoretical model that can be used to describe decision-making, and an understanding of the factors that affect decision-making for patients considering knee replacement. Such an understanding will aid patient centred care, and has particular relevance in developing interventions aimed at delivering information. This is likely to affect the satisfaction rate, demand, and utilisation of knee replacements. Level of evidence. 4

Introduction. Shared decision making (SDM) was introduced in hospital Lillebelt in 2019 and research reports that patients are more satisfied with their treatment, if they play an active role in choosing treatment. A Decision-Helper was constructed and introduced in the treatment for Colles fractures. This study aimed to understand how patients experience shared decision-making (SDM) for an acute illness, and how it affects them when making decisions about the treatment of their distal radius fracture. Method. An exploratory, qualitative study design was performed to understand the patient's experience, during the choice of treatment with SDM. 12 were recruited when they came to their first follow-up 5 days after the injury, in the outpatient clinic. 10 were interviewed; 3 face to face and 7 by telephone. All women aged 57-87 years and all had a displaced Colles fracture, which had been reduced in the Emergency Room. Result. Analyzing the interviews three themes emerged: 1) Acute situation. Patients was positive towards SDM, but found it demanding to participate in. Patients was still in crisis, 5 days after suffering from a fracture. Patients were unable to remember the information given in the ER, regarding the use of the Decision helper. Few had prepared themselves for the consult in the outpatient clinic. 2) Influence on treatment choice. It was unclear to the majority of patients, that cast or surgery, resulted in similar clinical outcomes. 3) The treatment decision was based on personal factors, more than the information received during the consult. Conclusion. Patients wants to be included in the treatment decision. It is important to highlight that booth treatments are equal in clinical outcome, before introducing the Decision-Helper. The doctor´s demeanor is of great importance to the patient's experience. Introducing SDM in the clinical setting requires training and repeated observations, to succeed

Purpose of the Study and Background. With a strong political agenda for change towards patient-centred healthcare, the notion of shared decision-making is reported to substantially improve patient experience, adherence to treatment and health outcomes. In clinical practice however, observational studies have shown shared decision-making is rarely implemented and patient preferences are seldom met. The aim of this study was to measure the extent of shared decision-making in clinical encounters involving physiotherapists and patients with low back pain. Methods and Results. Eighty outpatient encounters (from 12 clinicians) were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the OPTION instrument. This measures 12 decision-making items, rated on a scale 0–4, which are summated and scaled to give a percentage: The higher the score, the greater the shared decision-making competency. The mean OPTION score was 24.0% (range 10.4%–43.8%). Providing patients with a list of treatment options was the only behaviour exhibited by every clinician, however in 73.8%, this was not demonstrated beyond a perfunctory level. Failure to offer the choice of doing nothing, or deferring the decision precluded clinicians from attaining a higher OPTION score. Conclusion. Despite the political agenda, a paternalistic view of care was evident and shared decision-making was under-developed in this cohort of patients with back pain. Providing a comprehensive outline of the available treatment options forms part of the duty-of-care and, whilst clinicians may have altruistic motives and a strong desire to treat, depending on patient preference and clinical indicators, doing nothing could be a legitimate option

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):306–308.

Introduction

Various biomaterials and bone graft substitute technologies for use in osteomyelitis treatment are currently used in clinal practice. They vary in mode of action (with or without antibiotics) and clinical application (one-stage or two-stage surgery). This systematic review aims to compare the clinical evidence of different synthetic antimicrobial bone graft substitutes and antibiotic-loaded carriers in eradicating infection and clinical outcome in patients with chronic osteomyelitis.

The foot and ankle are very commonly affected in various paralytic conditions. Paralysis of different muscles acting on the foot results in characteristic gait aberrations. The gait abnormalities are a result of one or more of the consequences of paralysis including: loss of function, muscle imbalance, deformity and instability of joints. The aims of treatment of the paralysed foot and ankle are to: make the foot plantigrade, restore active dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait (if this is not possible then prevent the foot from ‘dropping’ into plantar flexion during swing), ensure that the ankle and subtalar joints are stable throughout the stance phase of gait, facilitate a powerful push-off at the terminal part of the stance phase (if this is not possible, at least prevent a calcaneal hitch in terminal stance). The specific aims of treatment in each patient depend on the pattern and the severity of paralysis that is present and hence the aims are likely to vary. In order to determine what treatment options are available in a particular patient, it is imperative that a careful clinical assessment of the foot is done. Based on the clinical assessment, these questions need to be answered before planning treatment: What are the muscles that are paralysed What is the power of each muscle that is functioning? Is there muscle imbalance at the ankle, subtalar or midtarsal joints that has either already produced a deformity or has the potential to produce a deformity in future? Are there any muscles of grade V power that can be spared for a tendon transfer without producing a fresh imbalance or instability. To facilitate responses to these questions, the muscle power of each muscle can be charted on a template that facilitates graphic representation of the muscle balance around the axes of the ankle and subtalar joints. This assessment clarifies whether a tendon transfer is a feasible option. If a tendon transfer is considered feasible, then the following questions also need to be answered: Is there a fixed, static deformity that needs to be corrected prior to a tendon transfer? If a tendon transfer was performed, would the child be capable of comprehending and cooperating with the post-operative muscle re-education programme?. The decision-making process will be outlined and the use of the template in choosing the tendon transfer and deciding the site of anchorage of the transferred tendon will be explained. With suitable examples the choice of tendon transfers in different patterns of paralysis would be illustrated

Following ankle sprain, there can be many causes of disability including ligament injuries, soft tissue or bony impingement, Peroneal tendon tears, osteochondral defects (OCD), synovitis and Osteoarthritis (OA). Aim: To assess the use of Ankle MRI in clinical decision-making in patients with pain and/or chronic instability following ankle sprains. Method: A retrospective case note review was undertaken for all ankle scopes performed and all Ankle MRI ordered by a single surgeon (AOA) over a three-year period (April 2004 – April 2007). Results: During this period 54 Ankle arthroscopies were performed. 24 had pre op MRI scans (16 ordered by AOA and 8 by others who then referred the patient) and 30 had no MRI. 8 case notes were not available. In 43 of the 46 available notes the patients presented with either chronic ankle pain or instability following ankle sprain. 32 had Anterolateral soft tissue impingement on arthroscopy. Of these 24 had MRI scans with only 3 reporting a soft tissue impingement. 13 patients had lateral ligament reconstruction. All 13 of these patients showed signs of instability on examination under anaesthesia (EUA). Of these 9 had MRI scans with 4 reporting a ligamentous injury. Five other patients had MRI scans that showed a lateral ligament injury but had a normal EUA and did not undergo a ligament reconstruction. 10 patients had moderate to severe OA on arthroscopy of the ankle. Of these 4 had MRI scans with 2 reporting OA changes but 2 reported as OCD. Conclusion: Analysing the available data suggests that the indication to perform an arthroscopy is not dependent on the results of the MRI scan but is a clinical one. The decision to reconstruct/repair the lateral ligament complex is a clinical one dependent on patient symptom and the EUA findings

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):598–600.

Increasingly often diagnosed by sophisticated investigation, rotator cuff disease may be treated conservatively or surgically. Surgical options are decompression alone, decompression and debridement, partial rotator cuff repair, full reconstruction, tendon transfer and prosthetic replacement.

Emphasising the quality of the repair rather than the classification of the injury, this paper details the criteria used in reaching a decision about the type of surgical treatment. Clinical, radiological, ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings are used. The prognosis is directly related to the repair.

Introduction

Dissatisfaction rates after TKA are reported to be between 15 – 25%, with unmet outcome expectations being a key contributor. Shared decision making tools (SDMT) are designed to align a patient's and surgeon's expectations. This study demonstrates clinical validation of a patient specific shared decision making tool.

Although wait-times for hip fracture surgery have been linked to mortality and are being used as quality-of-care indicators worldwide, controversy exists about the duration of the wait that leads to complications. Our objective was to use new population-based wait-time data to emprically derive an optimal time window in which to conduct hip fracture surgery before the risk of complications increases.

We used health administrative data from Ontario, Canada to identify hip fracture patients between 2009 and 2014. The main exposure was the time from hospital arrival to surgery (in hours). The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mortality or other medical complications (MI, DVT, PE, and pneumonia) also within 30 days. Risk-adjusted cubic splines modeled the probability of each complication according to wait-time. The inflection point (in hours) when complications began to increase was used to define ‘early’ and ‘delayed’ surgery. To evaluate the robustness of this definition, outcomes amongst propensity-score matched early and delayed patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (% ARDs, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).

There were 42,230 patients who met entry criteria. Their mean age was 80.1 (±10.7) and the majority were female (70.5%). The risk of complications modeled by cubic splines consistently increased when wait-times were greater than 24 hours, irrespective of the complication considered. Compared to 13,731 propensity-score matched patients who received surgery earlier, 13,731 patients receiving surgery after 24 hours had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (N=898 versus N=790, % ARD 0.79 [95% CI 0.23 to 1.35], p = .006) and the composite outcome (N=1,680 versus N=1,383, % ARD 2.16 [95% CI 1.43 to 2.89], p < .001). Overall, there were 14,174 patients (33.6%) who received surgery within 24 hours and 28,056 patients (66.4%) who received surgery after 24 hours.

Increased wait-time was associated with a greater risk for 30-day mortality and other complications. The finding that a wait-time of 24 hours represents a threshold defining higher risk may inform existing hip fracture guidelines. Since two-thirds of patients did not receive surgery within this timeframe, performance improvement efforts that reduce wait-times are warranted.

Risk information is understood differently when it is presented in absolute or relative terms; the latter overemphasizes the magnitude of risk. How surgeons communicate risk may influence patient choice. We evaluated whether presenting information about the benefits of surgery in absolute and relative terms affects an individual’s decision to accept or reject alternative surgical procedures in hip fracture management. Our findings show how framing risk in relative terms affects the perception of risk and influences patient choice. Surgeons must use care in utilizing relative risk reduction in the absence of actual risk data.

Risk information is understood differently when it is presented in absolute or relative terms; the latter overemphasizes the magnitude of risk. How surgeons communicate risk may influence patient choice.

To evaluate whether presenting information about the benefits of surgery in absolute and relative terms affects an individual’s decision to accept or reject alternative surgical procedures in hip fracture management.

We administered a face-to-face survey to fifty patients attending the fracture clinic. We asked patients to consider a scenario and to decide which treatment alternative they preferred based upon risk presentation. We presented risk in five ways: absolute risk difference, relative risk reduction, relative risk, number needed to treat, and odds ratio.

Patients were most likely to favor internal fixation when the mortality results comparing internal versus arthroplasty were presented as a relative risk reduction. Patients continued to favor internal fixation despite being presented with a significantly increased risk of revision surgery. Lower level of education and those patients who had not experienced a fracture were significantly associated with their perceptions about method of presentation.

Our findings show how framing risk in relative terms affects the perception of risk and influences patient choice. Patients concerns about mortality, even if non-significant differences are presented, outweigh concerns about significant increases in revision surgery with internal fixation. Surgeons must use care in utilizing relative risk reduction in the absence of actual risk data given our findings that may over-estimate the relative benefits of one procedure over another.

We evaluated growth and remodeling of the 21 hips after valgus osteotomy with rotational and sagittal components for hinge abduction in 21 patients (mean, 9.7 years) with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) both clinically and radiologically. The type of osteotomy was determined by assessing the hinge movement three-dimensionally using preoperative gait assessment, 2-dimensional/3-dimensional computed tomography (2D/3D-CT), and intraoperative dynamic arthrography. The Iowa hip score averaged 66 (34 to 76) before operation and 92 (80 to 100) at a mean follow-up of 7.1 years (3.0 to 15.0). Radiographic measurements revealed favorable remodeling of the femoral head and improved hip joint mechanics. Valgus osteotomy with rotational and sagittal components results in sustained improvement in symptoms and functions and beneficially influences remodeling of the hip.

Preoperative gait assessment, 2D/3D-CT, and intra-operative dynamic arthrography are helpful for assessing the spatial features of the femoral capital hump and for determining the optimal congruent position of the hip.

Aim: Assessment of unilateral Sprengel’s deformity using CT scan with 3-D reconstruction in order to determine if there are sub-groups in which different procedures maybe appropriate.

Materials and Methods: Between 1996 and 2002, 14 consecutive patients with unilateral Sprengel’s deformity were assessed using CT scanning with 3-D reconstruction. Size, shape, elevation and rotation of the scapulae and glenoid were measured. The incidence of omovertebral connections and congenital abnormalities were noted. A spiral CT scanner was used.

Results: 3 of the 14 cases had clearly abnormal scapulae with widespread and multiple associated abnormalities. These were classified as the dysplastic group. The other 11 cases had wide variation in the elevation of the scapula or glenoid, the length of the supra-spinous portion and the rotation of the scapula and glenoid. There was only one case of a superior hook. The location of the tether could be determined from the shape of the medial border. It was noted that rotation was variable and elevation was variable.

Conclusion: It was felt that no one procedure was appropriate for all scapulae, but the guiding factors included the elevation of the glenoid, the rotation of the glenoid, the location of the tether in addition to the clinical considerations. It was felt that these features were best evaluated using this 3-D CT scanning technique.

Aims. To identify factors influencing clinicians’ decisions to undertake a nonoperative hip fracture management approach among older people, and to determine whether there is global heterogeneity regarding these factors between clinicians from high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods. A SurveyMonkey questionnaire was electronically distributed to clinicians around the world through the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN)’s Perioperative Special Interest Group and clinicians’ personal networks between 24 May and 25 July 2021. Analyses were performed using Excel and STATA v16.0. Between-group differences were determined using independent-samples t-tests and chi-squared tests. Results. A total of 406 respondents from 51 countries answered the questionnaire, of whom 225 came from HIC and 180 from LMIC. Clinicians from HIC reported a greater median and mean estimated proportion of admitted patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery (median 96% (interquartile range (IQR) 95% to 99%); mean 94% (SD 8%)) than those from LMIC (median 85% (IQR 75% to 95%); mean 81% (SD 16%); p < 0.001). Global heterogeneity seems to exist regarding factors such as anticipated life expectancy, insufficient resources, ability to pay, treatment costs, and perception of risk in hip fracture management decision-making. Conclusion. This study represents the first international sampling of clinician perspectives regarding nonoperative hip fracture management. Several factors seemed to influence the clinician decision-making process. Further research is needed to inform the development of best practice guidelines to improve decision-making and the quality of hip fracture care among older people. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(10):766–775

Aims. Perthes’ disease is an idiopathic avascular necrosis of the developing femoral head, often causing deformity that impairs physical function. Current treatments aim to optimize the joint reaction force across the hip by enhancing congruency between the acetabulum and femoral head. Despite a century of research, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of children, their families, and clinicians when considering the treatment of Perthes’ disease. Methods. A qualitative study gathered information from children and their families affected by Perthes’ disease, along with treating clinicians. Interviews followed a coding framework, with the interview schedule informed by behavioural theory and patient and public involvement. Transcripts were analyzed using the framework method. Results. A total of 24 interviews took place, with 12 child/family dyads and 12 clinicians from UK NHS centres. Interviews identified widespread variation of routine care. Children/their families recounted positive experiences when included in the decision-making process for treatment. There is a strong desire from clinicians and children/families for consistent guidance from everyone involved in care, which should be based on clinical consensus. Conclusion. This is the first study to describe how children/families and clinicians experienced receiving or providing treatment in Perthes’ disease. The results indicate the need for robust evidence to support treatment decisions. Children and families valued feeling involved in the clinical decision-making process. Clinicians acknowledged the central importance of providing patient-centred care, particularly in the absence of robust evidence to guide the optimal treatment decisions. This study will inform a future Delphi project to develop clinical consensus guidelines for the treatment of Perthes’ disease. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(10):735–741

We test the clinical validity and financial implications of the proposed Choosing Wisely statement: “Using ultrasound as a screening test for shoulder instability is inappropriate in people under 30 years of age, unless there is clinical suspicion of a rotator cuff tear.”. A retrospective chart review from a specialist shoulder surgeon's practice over a two-year period recorded 124 patients under the age of 30 referred with shoulder instability. Of these, forty-one had already had ultrasound scans performed prior to specialist review. The scan results and patient files were reviewed to determine the reported findings on the scans and whether these findings were clinically relevant to diagnosis and decision-making. Comparison was made with subsequent MRI scan results. The data, obtained from the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), recorded the number of cases and costs incurred for ultrasound scans of the shoulder in patients under 30 years old over a 10-year period. There were no cases where the ultrasound scan was considered useful in decision-making. No patient had a full thickness rotator cuff tear. Thirty-nine of the 41 patients subsequently had MRI scans. The cost to the ACC for funding ultrasound scans in patients under 30 has increased over the last decade and exceeded one million dollars in the 2020/2021 financial year. In addition, patients pay a surcharge for this test. The proposed Choosing Wisely statement is valid. This evidence supports that ultrasound is an unnecessary investigation for patients with shoulder instability unless there is clinical suspicion of a rotator cuff tear. Ultrasound also incurs costs to the insurer (ACC) and the patient. We recommend x-rays and, if further imaging is indicated, High Tech Imaging with MRI and sometimes CT scans in these patients

Pre-operative definitive diagnosis of infection in painful total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not always easy to be established, making the intra-operative decision-making process crucial in management of revision hip surgery. Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJIs. From November 2020 to December 2022, 105 patients with painful primary THA were treated with revision THA in 3 orthopaedic departments. Pre-operatively, 23 were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA. The remaining 82 were likely infected according to the 2019 EBJIS criteria. The suspicion of low-grade infection was based on clinical (rest and/or night pain), laboratory (CRP, ESR, WBC – normal or slightly elevated) and radiological evaluation (loosening). Hip aspiration under CT imaging was performed in these cases and 34 of them yielded positive culture and were treated with two-stage revision. Aspiration was ineffective in the remaining 48 cases (33 negative, 15 unsuccessful attempts). Intra-operatively, calprotectin was measured with lateral flow immunoassay test in these patients. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/L were treated with 2-stage revision THA; otherwise, they were considered not-infected and one-stage revision was performed. Synovial fluid and tissue samples were collected for analysis. Implants were sent for sonication fluid cultures. Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/L) in 27 cases and negative in 21 cases. There was 1 false negative case with positive tissue cultures. Out of the 27 positive cases, 25 had positive tissue cultures and sonication. However, 2 cases with high calprotectin levels (>200 mg/L) were not infected. The false positive result was attributed to severe metallosis. Calprotectin sensitivity was 96.2%, specificity 90.9%, PPV 92.6%, NPV 95.2%, AUC 0.935. The results of this ongoing study indicate that calprotectin seems to be a valuable tool in facilitating the intra-operative decision-making process in cases that low-grade infection is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established pre-operatively