HOW PRESENTING THE RISKS OF FRACTURE SURGERY TO PATIENTS INFLUENCES DECISION-MAKING

Abstract

Risk information is understood differently when it is presented in absolute or relative terms; the latter overemphasizes the magnitude of risk. How surgeons communicate risk may influence patient choice. We evaluated whether presenting information about the benefits of surgery in absolute and relative terms affects an individual’s decision to accept or reject alternative surgical procedures in hip fracture management. Our findings show how framing risk in relative terms affects the perception of risk and influences patient choice. Surgeons must use care in utilizing relative risk reduction in the absence of actual risk data.

Risk information is understood differently when it is presented in absolute or relative terms; the latter overemphasizes the magnitude of risk. How surgeons communicate risk may influence patient choice.

To evaluate whether presenting information about the benefits of surgery in absolute and relative terms affects an individual’s decision to accept or reject alternative surgical procedures in hip fracture management.

We administered a face-to-face survey to fifty patients attending the fracture clinic. We asked patients to consider a scenario and to decide which treatment alternative they preferred based upon risk presentation. We presented risk in five ways: absolute risk difference, relative risk reduction, relative risk, number needed to treat, and odds ratio.

Patients were most likely to favor internal fixation when the mortality results comparing internal versus arthroplasty were presented as a relative risk reduction. Patients continued to favor internal fixation despite being presented with a significantly increased risk of revision surgery. Lower level of education and those patients who had not experienced a fracture were significantly associated with their perceptions about method of presentation.

Our findings show how framing risk in relative terms affects the perception of risk and influences patient choice. Patients concerns about mortality, even if non-significant differences are presented, outweigh concerns about significant increases in revision surgery with internal fixation. Surgeons must use care in utilizing relative risk reduction in the absence of actual risk data given our findings that may over-estimate the relative benefits of one procedure over another.