Fresh-frozen allograft bone is frequently used in orthopaedic surgery. We investigated the incidence of allograft-related infection and analysed the outcomes of recipients of bacterial culture-positive allografts from our single-institute bone bank during bone transplantation.

The fresh-frozen allografts were harvested in a strict sterile environment during total joint arthroplasty surgery and immediately stored in a freezer at −78° to −68° C after packing. Between January 2007 and December 2012, 2024 patients received 2083 allografts with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.

The overall allograft-associated infection rate was 1.2% (24/2024). Swab cultures of 2083 allografts taken before implantation revealed 21 (1.0%) positive findings. The 21 recipients were given various antibiotics at the individual orthopaedic surgeon's discretion. At the latest follow-up, none of these 21 recipients displayed clinical signs of infection following treatment.

Based on these findings, we conclude that an incidental positive culture finding for allografts does not correlate with subsequent surgical site infection. Additional prolonged post-operative antibiotic therapy may not be necessary for recipients of fresh-frozen bone allograft with positive culture findings.

Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Introduction: etiology of late infection after arthroplasty can be difficult to establish. Histology is the gold standard for infection in patients without inflammatory arthritis but diagnosis in inflammatory arthritis depends on culture (Atkins et al). Real-time PCR offers a rapid and direct assessment for staphylococci and enterococci infection but has not been widely assessed.

The aims of this study were

to develop the Roche lightcycler Staphylococcal and Enterococcal PCR kits to facilitate diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infections

Methods: uplicate, multiple tissue samples were taken (with separate sterile instruments) at the 1^st stage of revision after informed consent. One set were cultured and results interpreted by the Oxford criteria. The second set were extracted using the Qiagen DNA kit, purified (in-house method) and tested using the Roche lightcycler kits.

Results:53 patients undergoing 2 stage revision for suspected infection were recruited.15 (28.3%) had negative histology and no inflammatory arthritis; 3 with single positive cultures and negative PCR – considered contaminants.

29 patients had non-inflammatory arthritis. 14/18 (77.8%) with positive cultures had staphylococci +/or enterococci isolated and 10 PCR results correlated. The other 11 patients had negative cultures.

9 patients had inflammatory arthritis. Six were culture negative and of the other three, 2 were positive for staphylococci on culture with 1 positive by PCR.

Discussion: Negative staphylococcal PCR correlates with the isolation of staphylococci from only one sample. This agrees with the Oxford criteria that such samples may be considered contaminants. Additional positives detected by staphylococcal PCR alone are rare.

Enterococcal PCR confirmed culture positivity in 2/3 patients. An additional 5 positive PCR’s were obtained from patients’ culture negative for enterococci. It is not clear if these are false positives or more sensitive detection of enterococcal isolation.

Aim. At our tertiary orthopaedic centre, mycobacterial cultures are routinely performed on bone and joint samples sent for bacterial culture. We have previously described the prevalence Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) in these samples. Here, we describe the prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). We calculate the number needed to test to identify one previously undiagnosed mycobacterial bone or joint infection. Methods. Samples taken during a single procedure were pooled in one BACTEC MGIT culture. From laboratory records, we ascertained the number of mycobacterial cultures performed, the number positive for MTBC or NTM, and characteristics of individuals from whom mycobacteria were isolated. We collected the same data from 100 individuals with negative mycobacterial cultures. Results presented here are from interim analysis. Results. Excluding sample types that were clearly not bone or joint samples, 6162 mycobacterial cultures were performed between 4 July 2017 and 30 September 2022. Twenty-two patients had MTBC and 6 patients had NTM newly isolated from bone or joint samples placed in mycobacterial culture, with a further patient having both M. tuberculosis and M. avium isolated. In both patients with M. abscessus, the organism also grew in routine bacterial cultures. In one further patient, M. fortuitum was isolated from a sample not put into mycobacterial culture. To identify one new mycobacterial infection of bone or joint (MTBC or NTM) that would not be detected with routine bacterial cultures, 228 (95% CI 157 – 346) mycobacterial cultures were needed. The laboratory cost per additional patient identified using MGIT cultures was €12,540 (95% CI €8,635 - €19,030). Mycobacterial cultures were much less likely to be positive in samples taken from prosthetic joints. They were more likely to be positive in spinal samples and in samples taken from patients with suspected sarcoma. In patients for whom we had contemporaneous histological specimens, these demonstrated granulomatous inflammation in 86% (18/21) of patients from whom MTBC had been isolated but in neither of the two patients from whom only NTM was isolated. Ascertaining the clinical significance of NTM isolates is challenging, although in 2/8 cases the same organism was isolated following repeat sampling. Conclusions. Targeted rather than routine mycobacterial culture of bone and joint specimens should be considered in settings with a low burden of tuberculosis. NTM are rarely isolated from bone and joint specimens at our centre and fast growers may be isolated using routine bacterial culture

Introduction. Identification of the causative pathogen in musculoskeletal infection is critical as it directs further treatment. Fracture-related infection is often associated with ‘no growth’ in standard culture. We investigated the efficiency of two alternate methods to identify the causative pathogen, namely extended bacterial culture and 16Sr RNA gene sequence analysis with next generation sequencing (NGS) in ‘culture negative’ fracture related infections. Method. Patients were diagnosed as having fracture related infection based on the MSIS criteria (n=120). All patients had samples taken for culture and sensitivity. All samples which were culture negative by standard culture methods formed the study group. These samples were subjected to further extended culture in both aerobic and anaerobic medium for 14 days to improve recovery of pathogens. Further, DNA isolated from implants from a sub-group of these culture negative patients were subjected to 16SrRNA gene amplification followed by Sanger sequencing. Subsequent sequencing analysis was performed using the Illumina NGS platform which identified and detected the most abundant genera/species present in those samples more precisely. Result. 57 culture negative samples formed the study group. Eight samples (14%) converted to positivity after 14 days of culture. Bacteroides fragilis was the commonest yield. 14 samples underwent 16SrRNA gene amplification followed by Sanger sequencing. Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified as common pathogens. Next generation sequencing (n=12) not only identified common pathogens like as Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter baumannii, but also many uncultivable species. Conclusion. Positive results from extended bacterial culture are about 15%. The delay in definite identification of pathogens in extended culture may be critical in certain clinical situations. Molecular methods are quicker and have additional yield in culture negative infections. The exact role of all microorganisms identified by molecular methods in the pathogenesis of infection is unknown

Aims. Treatment outcomes for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) using systemic vancomycin and antibacterial cement spacers during two-stage revision arthroplasty remain unsatisfactory. This study explored the efficacy and safety of intra-articular vancomycin injections for PJI control after debridement and cement spacer implantation in a rat model. Methods. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), MRSA inoculation, debridement, and vancomycin-spacer implantation were performed successively in rats to mimic first-stage PJI during the two-stage revision arthroplasty procedure. Vancomycin was administered intraperitoneally or intra-articularly for two weeks to control the infection after debridement and spacer implantation. Results. Rats receiving intra-articular vancomycin showed the best outcomes among the four treatment groups, with negative bacterial cultures, increased weight gain, increased capacity for weightbearing activities, increased residual bone volume preservation, and reduced inflammatory reactions in the joint tissues, indicating MRSA eradication in the knee. The vancomycin-spacer and/or systemic vancomycin failed to eliminate the MRSA infections following a two-week antibiotic course. Serum vancomycin levels did not reach nephrotoxic levels in any group. Mild renal histopathological changes, without changes in serum creatinine levels, were observed in the intraperitoneal vancomycin group compared with the intra-articular vancomycin group, but no changes in hepatic structure or serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels were observed. No local complications were observed, such as sinus tract or non-healing surgical incisions. Conclusion. Intra-articular vancomycin injection was effective and safe for PJI control following debridement and spacer implantation in a rat model during two-stage revision arthroplasties, with better outcomes than systemic vancomycin administration. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):371–385

Aim. The pathogenesis of non-union is multifactorial. Path biological factors, mechanical factors, and low-grade-infection contribute to impaired bone healing. Aim of this study was to determine the rate of low-grade-infection in patients with long bone non-union of the lower extremity without signs of acute infection, the influence of CRP (C-reactive protein), and the outcome. Method. In a retrospective study (2003–2013), all patients who underwent surgery for treatment of tibial- or femoral-shaft-non-union without any clinical evidence of infection were assessed. Bacterial cultures harvested during non-union revision, the CRP and WBC (white blood cells) values at hospital admission, the outcome, and epidemiological data were analysed. Results. In 88 patients with tibial-shaft-non-union without any clinical signs of infection, bacterial samples remained negative in 51 patients (46 yr; 33% open fracture; 33% nicotine abuse; 8% diabetes mellitus; revision of non-union 10.9 months following primary osteosynthesis). In 37 patients (46 yr; 54% open fracture; 42% nicotine abuse; 11% diabetes mellitus; revision of non-union 15.2 months) microbiological diagnostic studies after long-term-culturing demonstrated positive bacterial cultures whereas after short-term-culturing for 2 days only 17 positive cultures were observed. Among patients with negative bacterial cultures bone healing was achieved after 13.2 months, whereas in 29% additional surgical interventions (1.3 procedures) were necessary. Non-union with positive bacterial cultures required 22.9 months (p-value<0.01) until bone healing, and even 57% of these patients required additional operations (2.9 procedures; p-value<0,01). Hematological studies performed at hospital admission demonstrated no significant difference regarding CRP (negative vs. positive culture: 0.8 mg/dl vs. 1.9 mg/dl) and WBC (negative vs. positive culture: 7.6/nl vs. 7.8/nl). Comparable results were observed in 86 patients with femoral-shaft-non-union (38 patients with positive bacterial cultures after long-term-culturing and 18 patients after short-term-culturing) with an increased number of required operations (0.8 vs. 1.6 procedures; p-value<0.05) and a longer time period until bone healing (18.2 months vs. 27.2 months; p-value<0.05) in the group with positive bacterial cultures. In contrast to tibial-shaft-non-union, a significant difference of the CRP level was observed (negative vs. positive culture: 0.8 mg/dl vs. 2.7 mg/dl; p-value<0.01). Conclusions. The pathogenesis of non-union may originate from low-grade-infection even in patients without any signs of infection and may result in increased number of required surgical interventions. Therefore, during any non-union revision surgery, multiple bacterial samples should be harvested for long-term-culturing. Possibly, increased CRP levels may be a predictor for low-grade-infection in femoral – but not in tibial-shaft-non-union

Aims. Preoperative diagnosis is important for revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of our study was to determine whether reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), which is used to detect bacterial ribosomal RNA (rRNA) preoperatively, can reveal PJI in low volumes of aspirated fluid. Methods. We acquired joint fluid samples (JFSs) by preoperative aspiration from patients who were suspected of having a PJI and failed arthroplasty; patients with preoperative JFS volumes less than 5 ml were enrolled. RNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bacterial culture were performed, and diagnostic efficiency was compared between the two methods.According to established Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, 21 of the 33 included patients were diagnosed with PJI. Results. RNA-based PCR exhibited 57.1% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, 69.7% accuracy, 92.3% positive predictive value, and 55.0% negative predictive value. The corresponding values for culture were 28.6%, 83.3%, 48.5%, 75.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. A significantly higher sensitivity was thus obtained with the PCR method versus the culture method. Conclusion. In situations in which only a small JFS volume can be acquired, RNA-based PCR analysis increases the utility of preoperative puncture for patients who require revision surgery due to suspected PJI. Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(5):219–224

Aim. Surgical treatment of ankle fractures comes with a substantial risk of complications, including infection. An unambiguously definition of fracture-related infections (FRI) has been missing. Recently, FRI has been defined by a consensus group with a diagnostic algorithm containing suggestive and confirmatory criteria. The aim of the current study was to report the prevalence of FRI in patients operated for ankle fractures and to assess the applicability of the diagnostic algorithm from the consensus group. Method. Records of all patients with surgically treated ankle fractures from 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for signs of postoperative infections. Patients with suspected infection were stratified according to confirmatory or suggestive criteria of FRI. Rate of FRI among patients with confirmatory and suggestive criteria were calculated. Results. Suspected infection was found in 104 (10%) out of 1004 patients. Among those patients, confirmatory criteria were met in 76/104 (73%) patients and suggestive criteria were met in 28/104 (27%) at first evaluation. Patients with clinical confirmatory criteria (N= 76) were diagnosed with FRI. Patients with suggestive criteria were further examined with either bacterial sampling at the outpatient clinic, revision surgery including bacterial sampling, or a wait-and-see approach. Eleven (39%) of the 28 patients had positive cultures and were therefore diagnosed as having FRI at second evaluation. In total 87 (9%) patients were diagnosed with FRI according to the consensus definition. Only 73 (70%) of the 104 patients with suspected FRI had adequate bacterial sampling. Conclusions. The prevalence of FRI, applying the FRI-consensus criteria, for patients with surgically treated ankle fractures was 9%. Twenty-two percent of patients who met the confirmatory criteria had negative bacterial cultures. The current study shows that we did not have a systematic approach to patients with suspected FRI as recommended by the consensus group. A systematic approach to adequate bacterial sampling when FRI is suspected is paramount. The consensus definition of FRI and its diagnostic algorithm facilitates such an approach

Objectives. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common cause of arthroplasty failure. However, infection is often difficult to detect by conventional bacterial cultures, for which false-negative rates are 23% to 35%. In contrast, 16S rRNA metagenomics has been shown to quantitatively detect unculturable, unsuspected, and unviable pathogens. In this study, we investigated the use of 16S rRNA metagenomics for detection of bacterial pathogens in synovial fluid (SF) from patients with hip or knee PJI. Methods. We analyzed the bacterial composition of 22 SF samples collected from 11 patients with PJIs (first- and second-stage surgery). The V3 and V4 region of bacteria was assessed by comparing the taxonomic distribution of the 16S rDNA amplicons with microbiome sequencing analysis. We also compared the results of bacterial detection from different methods including 16S metagenomics, traditional cultures, and targeted Sanger sequencing. Results. Polymicrobial infections were not only detected, but also characterized at different timepoints corresponding to first- and second-stage exchange arthroplasty. Similar taxonomic distributions were obtained by matching sequence data against SILVA, Greengenes, and The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). All bacteria isolated from the traditional culture could be further identified by 16S metagenomics and targeted Sanger sequencing. Conclusion. The data highlight 16S rRNA metagenomics as a suitable and promising method to detect and identify infecting bacteria, most of which may be uncultivable. Importantly, the method dramatically reduces turnaround time to two days rather than approximately one week for conventional cultures. Cite this article: M-F. Chen, C-H. Chang, C. Chiang-Ni, P-H. Hsieh, H-N. Shih, S. W. N. Ueng, Y. Chang. Rapid analysis of bacterial composition in prosthetic joint infection by 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:367–377. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.88.BJR-2019-0003.R2

Aim. In recent years, many studies on revision for infection after arthroplasty have been published. In national arthroplasty registers, revision for infection is defined as surgical debridement, with or without removal or exchange of the entire or parts of the prosthesis due to deep infection, and should be reported to the register immediately after surgery. The diagnosis of infection is made at the surgeon's discretion, based on pre- and perioperative assessment and evaluation, and is not to be corrected to the register based on peroperative bacterial cultures. Due to this lack of validation, the rate of revision for infection will only be an approximation of the true rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim was to validate the reporting of infection after total hip arthroplasty, and to assess if revisions for infection actually represented true PJI. Methods. We investigated the reported revisions for infection and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty from 12 hospitals, representing one region of the country, reported during the period 2010–2020. The electronic patient charts were investigated for information on surgical treatment, use of antibiotics, biochemistry and microbiology findings. PJI was defined as growth of at least two phenotypically identical microbes in perioperative tissue samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Results. 145 revisions for infection and 137 revisions for aseptic loosening were reported. Of the reported infections, there were 141/145 true positives and 4/145 false positives. Of the reported aseptic loosenings, there were 126/137 true negatives and 11/137 false negatives. This gives a positive predictive value of 0.97, negative predictive value of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.97 and accuracy of 0.95. Interpretation. We found the reporting revision for infection after total hip arthroplasty to the national register accurate. There was high correlation between reported revision for infection and PJI. Studies on revision for infection from arthroplasty registers may therefore be considered as reliable as studies of true PJI

Irrigation with antiseptic agents, antibiotics, and surfactants are used for treatment and prevention of infections. Despite desirable microbicidal actions, studies have demonstrated cytotoxic effects on host tissue that may impair healing. This study investigated the extent of tissue damage caused by commonly used irrigation solutions in the presence or absence of infection. Air pouches created in 60 balb/c mice were divided into two groups (n=30): infected with Staphylococcus aureus and control. One week later the infected group was subdivided into 5 subgroups (n=6) based on irrigation solutions and by day 0 (immediately) and day7 after irrigation (n=3). Solutions included Saline, Bacitracin, Clorpactin, Irrisept and Bactisure. In infected group wash fluid was collected for quantitative analysis of bacterial growth. At the specified times mice were sacrificed, pouch tissue sent for histology, and sections analyzed for inflammation, necrosis, and edema. Inflammation decreased in infected vs sterile pouches for all solutions except Bacitracin day 0 and for all solutions day 7 with significance in all except Bacitracin (p<0.05). On day 0, necrosis increased in infected vs sterile pouches in Bacitracin (p=0.006), Irrisept (p=0.18), or Bactisure (p=0.07); however, on day 7, necrosis significantly decreased in infected pouches for all solutions (p<0.05) except for Clorpactin (p=0.18). Edema decreased in infected vs sterile pouches on day 0 for all solutions with significance in saline, Irrisept, and Bacitracin (p<0.05). On day 7, infected pouches had decreased edema in saline, Bacitracin, and Bactisure (p<0.05) and increased in Irrisept (p<0.05) and Clorpactin (p=0.069) compared to sterile pouches. Bacterial culture of washouts demonstrated that Clorpactin, Irrisept and Bactisure controlled the infection, whereas saline and Bacitracin showed bacterial multiplication 3.9 × 10^7 CFU/ml and 6.7 × 10^7 CFU/ml respectively. Bacitracin wash showed significantly more bacteria growth compared to Clorpactin (p=0.024), Irrisept (p=0.025) and Bactisure (p=0.025). Tissue damage varied with irrigation solutions and the presence or absence of infection. Presence of bacteria appeared to lead to less tissue inflammation and edema. Tissue necrosis varied over time with different solutions. Surgeons must weigh risks and benefits when selecting solutions and determining when to irrigate

Aim. A novel anti-infective biopolymer implant coating was developed to prevent bacterial biofilm formation and allow on-demand burst release of anti-infective silver (Ag) into the surrounding of the implant at any time after surgery via focused high-energy extracorporeal shock waves (fhESW). Method. A semi-crystalline Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) was loaded with homogeneously dissolved silver (Ag) applied onto Ti6Al4V discs. A fibroblast WST-1 assay was performed to ensure adequate biocompatibility of the Ag concentration at 6%. The prevention of early biofilm formation was investigated in a biofilm model with Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A after incubation for 24 hours via quantitative bacteriology. In addition, the effect of released Ag after fhESW (Storz DUOLITH SD1: 4000 impulses, 1,24 mJ/mm. 2. , 3Hz, 162J) was assessed via optical density of bacterial cultures (Escherichia coli TG1, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A, Staphylococcus aureus 6850) and compared to an established electroplated silver coating. The amount of released Ag after the application of different intensities of fhESW was measured and compared to a control group without fhESW via graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results. The coating with 6% Ag reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by 99.7% (mean±SD: 2.1×10^5 ± 3,9×10^5 CFU/µL) compared to uncoated controls (6.8×10^7 ± 4.9×10^7 CFU/µL); (p=0.0001). After applying fhESW the commercially available electroplated silver coating did not prevent the growth of all tested bacterial strains. Bacterial growth is delayed with 4% Ag and completely inhibited with 6% Ag in the novel coating, except for a small increase of S. aureus after 17 hours. SEM and EDS confirmed a local disruption of the coating after fhESW. Conclusions. This novel anti-infective implant coating has the potential to prevent bacterial biofilm formation. The on-demand burst release of silver via fhESW could be an adjunctive in the treatment of implant related infection and is of particular interest in the concept of single stage revision surgery

Aims. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause wound infections via a ‘Trojan Horse’ mechanism, in which neutrophils engulf intestinal MRSA and travel to the wound, releasing MRSA after apoptosis. The possible role of intestinal MRSA in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is unknown. Methods. Rats underwent intestinal colonization with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged MRSA by gavage and an intra-articular wire was then surgically implanted. After ten days, the presence of PJI was determined by bacterial cultures of the distal femur, joint capsule, and implant. We excluded several other possibilities for PJI development. Intraoperative contamination was excluded by culturing the specimen obtained from surgical site. Extracellular bacteraemia-associated PJI was excluded by comparing with the infection rate after intravenous injection of MRSA or MRSA-carrying neutrophils. To further support this theory, we tested the efficacy of prophylactic membrane-permeable and non-membrane-permeable antibiotics in this model. Results. After undergoing knee surgery eight or 72 hours after colonization, five out of 20 rats (25.0%) and two out of 20 rats (10.0%) developed PJI, respectively. Strikingly, 11 out of 20 rats (55.0%) developed PJI after intravenous injection of MRSA-carrying neutrophils that were isolated from rats with intestinal MRSA colonization. None of the rats receiving intravenous injections of MRSA developed PJI. These results suggest that intestinal MRSA carried by neutrophils could cause PJI in our rat model. Ten out of 20 (50.0%) rats treated with non-membrane-permeable gentamicin developed PJI, whereas only one out of 20 (5.0%) rats treated with membrane-permeable linezolid developed PJI. Conclusion. Neutrophils as carriers of intestinal MRSA may play an important role in PJI development. Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(4):152–161

Aim. Differentiation of infected (INF) nonunion from aseptic (AS) nonunion is crucial for the choice of intra- and postoperative treatment. Preoperative diagnosis of infected nonunion is challenging, especially in case of low-grade infection lacking clinical signs of infection. Standard blood markers such as C-reactive protein or leucocyte count do not aid in preoperative diagnosis. Proteomic profiling has shown promising results for differentiation of numerous chronic disease states, and in this study was applied to preoperative blood samples of patients with nonunion in an attempt to identify potential biomarkers. Method. This prospective multicenter study enrolled patients undergoing revision surgery of femur or tibia nonunion. Patients with implant removal after regular fracture healing (HEAL) were included as a control-group. Preoperative blood samples, intraoperative tissue samples, sonication of osteosynthesis material and 1-year-follow-up questionnaire were taken. Nonunion patients were grouped into INF or AS after assessing bacterial culture and histopathology of retrieved samples. Diagnosis of infection followed the fracture related infection consensus group criteria, with additional consideration of healing one year after revision surgery. Targeted proteomics was used to investigate a predefined panel of 45 cytokines in preoperative blood samples. Statistical differences were calculated with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post hoc test. Cytokines with less than 80% of samples being above the lower limit of detection range (LLDR) were excluded for this study. Results. We recruited 62 AS, 43 INF and 32 HEAL patients. Patients in the two nonunion groups (INF and AS) did not differ concerning smoking, diabetes or initial open or closed fracture. Thirty-two cytokines were above LLDR in >80% of patients. INF patients showed a significant difference in expression of 8 cytokines compared to AS, with greatest differences observed for Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (MCSF-1) and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) (p<0.01). In comparing AS with HEAL patients, 9 cytokines displayed significant differences, including interleukin (IL)-6, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA), Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1). Comparison of INF with HEAL patients revealed significantly different expression of 20 cytokines, including. IL-6, IL-18, VEGFA or MMP-1. Conclusions. Our study revealed differences in plasma cytokine profile of blood samples from INF and AS patients. Although no single biomarker is sufficient to differentiate these patients preoperatively in isolation, future multivariant analysis of this cytokine data in combination with clinical characteristics may provide valuable diagnostic insights. Funded by German Social Accident Insurance (FF-FR 0276) and AO Trauma (AR2021_04)

Aim. Bone and Joint Infections (BJIs) present with non-specific symptoms and can be caused by a wide variety of bacteria and fungi, including many anaerobes and microorganisms that can be challenging to culture or identify by traditional microbiological methods. Clinicians currently rely primarily on culture to identify the pathogen(s) responsible for infection. The BioFire. ®. FilmArray. ®. Bone and Joint Infection (BJI) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) was designed to detect 15 gram-positive (seven anaerobes), 14 gram-negative bacteria (one anaerobe), two yeast, and eight antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes from synovial fluid specimens in an hour. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of an Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire BJI Panel (BBJIP) compared to conventional used as reference methods. Method. In a monocentric study, leftover synovial fluid specimens were collected in a single institution including 4 hospitals and tested using conventional bacterial culture (Standard of Care (SoC)) according to routine procedures following French national recommendations. Specimen has been placed in a refrigerator (4°C) as soon as possible after collection and stored for less than or equal to 7 days before enrollment. Performance of the IUO version of the BBJIP was determined by comparison to SoC for species identification. Results. To date, 201 specimens have been collected and tested using BBJIP. A total of 39 pathogens were obtained in culture. Compared to SoC culture, the overall PPA was 89.7% (35 TP, 4 FN (SA, 1; Strepto Spp, 2; P. micra, 1) and the overall NPA was 99.7% with 16 FP for a total of 5374 bacterial targets screened. Two complementary molecular tests using home-made PCR are underway to definitively conclude about the FN et FP for BBJIP observed in the preset study. Conclusions. The BioFire BJI Panel appears as a promising, sensitive, specific, and robust test for rapid detection of 31 microorganisms (including anaerobes) and eight AMR genes in synovial fluid specimens. The number of pathogens and resistance markers included in the BioFire BJI Panel, together with a reduced time-to-result and increased diagnostic yield compared to culture, is expected to aid in the management of BJIs

Aims. The aim of this study was to develop a single-layer hybrid organic-inorganic sol-gel coating that is capable of a controlled antibiotic release for cementless hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium orthopaedic prostheses. Methods. Coatings containing gentamicin at a concentration of 1.25% weight/volume (wt/vol), similar to that found in commercially available antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were prepared and tested in the laboratory for: kinetics of antibiotic release; activity against planktonic and biofilm bacterial cultures; biocompatibility with cultured mammalian cells; and physical bonding to the material (n = 3 in all tests). The sol-gel coatings and controls were then tested in vivo in a small animal healing model (four materials tested; n = 6 per material), and applied to the surface of commercially pure HA-coated titanium rods. Results. The coating released gentamicin at > 10 × minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for sensitive staphylococcal strains within one hour thereby potentially giving effective prophylaxis for arthroplasty surgery, and showed > 99% elution of the antibiotic within the coating after 48 hours. There was total eradication of both planktonic bacteria and established bacterial biofilms of a panel of clinically relevant staphylococci. Mesenchymal stem cells adhered to the coated surfaces and differentiated towards osteoblasts, depositing calcium and expressing the bone marker protein, osteopontin. In the in vivo small animal bone healing model, the antibiotic sol-gel coated titanium (Ti)/HA rod led to osseointegration equivalent to that of the conventional HA-coated surface. Conclusion. In this study we report a new sol-gel technology that can release gentamicin from a bioceramic-coated cementless arthroplasty material. In vitro, local gentamicin levels are in excess of what can be achieved by antibiotic-loaded bone cement. In vivo, bone healing in an animal model is not impaired. This, thus, represents a biomaterial modification that may have the potential to protect at-risk patients from implant-related deep infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):522–529

INTRODUCTION. Peri-prosthetic fungal infection is generally considered more difficult to cure than a bacterial infection. Two-stage exchange is considered the gold standard of surgical treatment. A recent study, however, reported a favorable outcome after one stage exchange in selected cases where the fungus was identified prior to surgery. The routine one stage exchange policy for bacterial peri-prosthetic infection involves the risk of identifying a fungal infection mimicking bacterial infection solely on intraoperative samples, i.e. after reimplantation, realizing actually a one stage exchange for fungal infection without pre-operative identification of the responsible fungus, which is considered to have a poor prognosis. We report two such cases of prosthetic hip and knee fungal infection. Despite this negative characteristic, no recurrence of the fungal infection was observed. CASE N°1: A 78 year old patient was referred for loosening of a chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus dysgalactiae). One stage exchange was performed. Intraoperative bacterial cultures remained sterile. Two fungal cultures were positive for Candida albicans. Antifungal treatment was initiated for three months. No infection recurrence was observed at three year follow up. CASE N° 2: A 53-year-old patient was referred for loosening of a chronically infected total knee prosthesis (Staphylococcus aureus methicillin susceptible, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus epidermidis). One stage exchange was performed. Intraoperative bacterial cultures remained sterile. Five fungal cultures were positive for Candida albicans. Antifungal treatment was initiated for three months. No infection recurrence was observed at two-year follow-up. DISCUSSION. This experience suggests that eradication of fungal infection of a total hip or knee arthroplasty may be possible after one stage exchange even in cases where the diagnosis of fungal infection was not known before surgery, when the fungus was not identified and its antifungal susceptibility has not been evaluated before surgery. It is however not possible to propose this strategy as a routine procedure. CONCLUSION. We suggest evaluating the results of one stage exchange for peri-prosthetic fungal infection on a larger scale

We studied twelve parameters (physical appearance, mucin clot, fibrin clot, white cell count, differential count, red blood cell count, gram stain for bacteria, crystal microscopy, aerobic bacterial culture, anaerobic bacterial culture and ratio between synovial sugar and blood sugar) in over 300 samples of synovial fluid from patients with a variety of suspected pathologies (e.g. infection, inflammatory disease, infection adjacent to a joint, aseptic loosening of a prosthesis). The diagnosis of infection was further established using clinical signs, radiological features, full blood count, C-reactive protein and iron profile. Many of the patients came to surgery. This of course created further opportunity to establish or rule out the diagnosis of infection with greater certainty. Nine of the features of synovial fluid were analysed statistically, including turbidity, diminished viscosity, mucin clot, fibrin clot, total white cell count, polymorphs greater than 60%, bacteria observed on direct microscopy, bacteria yielded by culture and concentration of synovial sugar less than 40% of the simultaneous blood sugar. The positive or negative features of infection were determined to be true or false in the light of the cumulative overall features of infection. The data so obtained was analysed to establish sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. The mass of data so obtained cannot be meaningfully expressed in such a brief abstract. Important examples are when culturing synovial fluid there were 44% false negatives or no growth and 56% true positives. Looking at the ratio between synovial sugar and blood sugar we found that taking 40% as the critical value, this was 62% sensitive, the specificity was 89%, the accuracy was 73%, the positive predictive value was 89%, the negative predictive value was 62.4%. However we went further and separated those who were definitely infected or probably infected i.e. Groups 4 & 5 from those who were probably or definitely NOT infected according to the sum of clinical laboratory and radiological parameters. When thus separated the predictive value of a positive result was 100% in Group 4 & 5 and 0% in Group 1 & 2. The predictive value of a negative result in Group 1 & 2 was 98.7% accurate and 22.4% in Group 4 & 5

Aim. Posttraumatic pelvic-osteomyelitis is one of the most serious complications after pelvic-fractures. The necessary extensive surgical debridement as part of interdisciplinary treatment is complicated by the possible persistence of pelvic instability. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome and outline the course of treatment after early posttraumatic pelvic bone infections due to type-C pelvic ring injuries. Method. In a retrospective cohort study (2005–2015) all patients with pelvic-osteomyelitis within six weeks of surgical stabilization of a type-C pelvic-fracture were assessed. Microbiological results, risk factors, course of treatment and functional long-term outcome using the Orlando-Pelvic-Score were analyzed. Results. A total of 18 patients (age 43.7 years; Body-Mass-Index 27.9 kg/m2; ASA-physical-status 1.8; Injury-Severity-Score 38) developed a pelvic-osteomyelitis within an average of 27 days after internal surgical stabilization of a type-C pelvic injury (AO-type C1: 10, C2: 4, C3: 4). Os pubis was affected in 7 and Os ilium in 11 cases. In addition to the pelvic-fracture, major vascular injuries occurred in 8, nerve injuries in 9, and intestinal and/or bladder ruptures in 11 cases. In 14 cases a mass transfusion was necessary. In addition to clinical signs of inflammation, (10 × redness, 12 × wound secretion, 6 × fistula) elevated levels of c-reactive-protein (7.7 mg/dl) and white-blood-cells (10.5/nl) were found. Bacterial cultures harvested during the initial surgical revision demonstrated mixed cultures in 17/18 cases, with an average of 3 different organisms isolated per case (61% intestinal bacteria). During the scheduled repetitive debridement a reduction of the initial mixed cultures into a single organism was observed. Overall 6.8 surgical interventions, including implant removal, were necessary until osteomyelitis was eradicated. In no cases was re-osteosynthesis performed. In 6/18 cases recurrence of infection occurred after an average of 5 months, followed by an additional repetitive debridement. An average 3-year-follow-up after the initial osteomyelitis-diagnosis demonstrated eradication of infection in 17/18 cases combined with an Orlando-Pelvic-Score of 21.9 points (best possible function: 40 points). Despite significant pelvic malalignment the ability to walk was achieved in all patients, with one exception due to a spinal cord injury. Conclusions. Despite no new surgical stabilization of the initial unstable pelvic injury, the early removal of implants combined with extensive debridement and antibiotic therapy led to sufficient long-term outcomes in patients with early posttraumatic pelvic-osteomyelitis. In particular, due to the severity of the initial injury and the complex interdisciplinary approach, early diagnosis of the osteomyelitis is essential

Introduction. Despite several preventive strategies, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is still a devastating complication. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial to achieve successful infection control, but challenging since there is no test with 100% sensitivity and 100%. Therefore, several national and international guidelines include synovial analysis of joint aspirates as important diagnostic criteria, but cut-off levels for synovial cell count (CC) and polymorphonuclear (granulocyte) percentage (PMN%) are still debatable. The current investigation was performed to analyze the overall accuracy and optimal cut-off of synovial CC and PMN% following total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Between October 2012 and June 2017, all patients with painful TKA or THA, who underwent joint aspiration before revision arthroplasty were included in this retrospective study. From aspirated synovial fluid, leukocyte esterase activity, leukocyte CC and PMN% were determined, and specimens were sent for bacterial culture. A total of 524 preoperative joint aspirations (255 hips, 269 knees) were enrolled for final analysis. For 337 patients, the synovial CC and PMN% could be measured by the laboratory. From those patients, 203 patients were scheduled for aseptic revision, and 134 patients for septic revision arthroplasty according to the MSIS criteria for PJI. Specificity (SP), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive and overall accuracy were measured for CC and PMN%. The optimum cut-off value was calculated by the ROC and the value giving the AUC, achieving the best possible level of sensitivity and specificity. Results. The best cut-off level for PJI of all study patients was 2582 leukocytes/μL (Se 80.6%, Sp 85.2%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (Se 80.6%, Sp 83.3%). The chosen cut-off levels for PJI of TKA was 1630 leukocytes/μL (Se 83.6%, Sp 82.2%) and a PMN% of 60.5% (Se 80.3%, Sp 77.1%). The optimal cut-off values for PJI of THA was 3063 leukocytes/μL (Se 78.1%, Sp 80.0%) and a PMN% of 66.1% (Se 82.2%, Sp 82.4%). Conclusions. Synovial cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage are sensitive methods for diagnosing PJI with differences in cut-off levels for THA and TKA. We suggest considering the cut-off levels of CC and PMN% from aspirates of TKA at 1600/μL and 60%, respectively, as possible PJI. For THA, the cut-off levels of CC and PMN% are at 3000/μL and 66%, respectively