Abstract
Aim
At our tertiary orthopaedic centre, mycobacterial cultures are routinely performed on bone and joint samples sent for bacterial culture. We have previously described the prevalence Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) in these samples. Here, we describe the prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). We calculate the number needed to test to identify one previously undiagnosed mycobacterial bone or joint infection.
Methods
Samples taken during a single procedure were pooled in one BACTEC MGIT culture. From laboratory records, we ascertained the number of mycobacterial cultures performed, the number positive for MTBC or NTM, and characteristics of individuals from whom mycobacteria were isolated. We collected the same data from 100 individuals with negative mycobacterial cultures. Results presented here are from interim analysis.
Results
Excluding sample types that were clearly not bone or joint samples, 6162 mycobacterial cultures were performed between 4 July 2017 and 30 September 2022. Twenty-two patients had MTBC and 6 patients had NTM newly isolated from bone or joint samples placed in mycobacterial culture, with a further patient having both M. tuberculosis and M. avium isolated. In both patients with M. abscessus, the organism also grew in routine bacterial cultures. In one further patient, M. fortuitum was isolated from a sample not put into mycobacterial culture.
To identify one new mycobacterial infection of bone or joint (MTBC or NTM) that would not be detected with routine bacterial cultures, 228 (95% CI 157 – 346) mycobacterial cultures were needed. The laboratory cost per additional patient identified using MGIT cultures was €12,540 (95% CI €8,635 - €19,030).
Mycobacterial cultures were much less likely to be positive in samples taken from prosthetic joints. They were more likely to be positive in spinal samples and in samples taken from patients with suspected sarcoma. In patients for whom we had contemporaneous histological specimens, these demonstrated granulomatous inflammation in 86% (18/21) of patients from whom MTBC had been isolated but in neither of the two patients from whom only NTM was isolated. Ascertaining the clinical significance of NTM isolates is challenging, although in 2/8 cases the same organism was isolated following repeat sampling.
Conclusions
Targeted rather than routine mycobacterial culture of bone and joint specimens should be considered in settings with a low burden of tuberculosis. NTM are rarely isolated from bone and joint specimens at our centre and fast growers may be isolated using routine bacterial culture.
