Laminar flow theatres were first introduced in the United Kingdom in the 1960s and 1970s and have become standard in orthopaedic surgery involving implants. A study from 1982 showed a 50% reduction in infections with joint arthroplasties when compared to conventional theatres and laminar flow became standard in the following decades. Recent evidence including a meta-analysis from 2017 questions the effectiveness of these theatre systems. Most of the evidence for Laminar flow use is based on arthroplasty surgery. We aimed to determine the effect of using non-laminar flow theatres on our trauma patients.

A total of 1809 patients who had trauma surgery were identified from 2019 to 2021. 917 patients were operated on in a laminar theatre and 892 in a non-laminar theatre across two operating sites. We identified the surgical site infections as reported through our surveillance program within the first 90 days of infection. Patient co-morbidities were noted through patient records and procedure length was also noted.

Of the 1809 trauma patients identified between the years of 2019 and 2021, 917 patients had operations in a laminar flow theatre and 892 in a non-laminar theatre. Of the 892 operated in non-laminar flow theatres, 543 were operated in the University Hospital of Wales (UHW) and 349 at the University Hospital of Llandough (UHL). An analysis of soft tissue infections and hospital acquired infections post-operatively demonstrated 15/543 and 71/543 respectively for non-laminar UHW infections and 4/349 and 21/349 for non-laminar UHL infections. A look at laminar flow patients showed 25/917 with soft tissue infections and 86/917 hospital acquired infections. There was no difference between laminar and non-laminar flow theatre infection rates showing rates of 12.1% and 12.2% respectively.

In our trauma patients we noticed no significant advantage of using laminar flow theatres when compared to non-laminar flow theatres. This is in keeping with some recently published literature. Laminar flow theatres have been shown to decrease airborne pathogen counts under controlled conditions, but we conclude in the day to day environment of trauma theatres these conditions are either not met or that the theoretical advantage of laminar flow does not translate to a direct advantage of reduction of infections which may be achieved by standard prophylactic antibiotics.

Aims

Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Aim:

To determine the efficacy and safety of the Magec system in early onset scoliosis (EOS).

Aim:

To measure truncal parameters for patients treated with growing rod systems for early onset scoliosis (EOS).

Assessing the efficacy of cervical orthoses in restricting spinal motion has historically proved challenging due to a poor understanding of spinal kinematics and the difficulty in accurately measuring spinal motion. This study is the first to use an 8 camera optoelectronic, passive marker, motion analysis system with a novel marker protocol to compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars. Restriction of cervical spine motion was assessed for physiological and functional range of motion (ROM).

Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were fitted with collars by an approved physiotherapist. ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro-reflective marker clusters attached to the head and trunk. 3-D kinematic data was collected from uncollared and collared subjects during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for physiological ROM and during five activities of daily living (ADLs). ROM in the three clinical planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager (Qualisys, Sweden) 6 Degree of Freedom calculation to determine head orientation relative to the trunk.

For physiological ROM, the Aspen and Philadelphia were more effective at restricting flexion/extension than the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05). The Aspen was more effective at restricting rotation compared to the Vista (p<0.001) and Miami-J (p<0.05). The Vista was least effective at restricting lateral bending (p<0.001). Through functional ROM, the Vista was less effective than the Aspen (p<0.001) and other collars (p<0.01) at restricting flexion/extension. The Aspen and Miami-J Advanced were more effective at restricting rotation than the Vista (p<0.01 and p<0.05) and Miami-J (p<0.05). All the collars were comparable when restricting lateral bending.

The Aspen is superior to, and the Aspen Vista inferior to, the other collars at restricting cervical spine motion through physiological ROM. Functional ROM observed during ADLs are less than those observed through physiological ROM. The Aspen Vista is inferior to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ROM. The Aspen collar again performs well, particularly at restricting rotation, but is otherwise comparable to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ranges.

The aim of the study was to highlight the absence of an important pitfall in the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol in application of rigid collar to patients with potentially unstable cervical spine injury.

We present a case series of two patients with ankylosed cervical spines who developed neurological complications following application of rigid collar for cervical spine injuries as per the ATLS protocol.

This has been followed up with a survey of A&E and T&O doctors who regularly apply cervical collars for suspected unstable cervical spine injuries. The survey was conducted telephonically using a standard questionnaire. 75 doctors completed the questionnaire. A&E doctors = 42, T&O = 33. Junior grade = 38, middle grade = 37. Trauma management frontline experience >1yr = 50, <1yr = 25. Of the 75 respondents 68/75 (90.6%) would follow the ATLS protocol in applying rigid collar in potentially unstable cervical spine injuries. 58/75 (77.3%) would clinically assess the patient prior to applying collar. Only 43/75 (57.3%) thought the patients relevant past medical history would influence collar application.

Respondents were asked whether they were aware of any pitfalls to rigid collar application in suspected neck injuries. 34/75 (45.3%) stated that they were NOT aware of pitfalls. The lack of awareness was even higher 17/25 (68%) amongst doctors with less that 12 months frontline experience. When directly asked whether ankylosing spondylitis should be regarded as a pitfall then only 43/75 (57.3%) answered in the affirmative.

We would like to emphasise the disastrous consequences of applying a rigid collar in patients with ankylosed cervical spine. The survey demonstrates the lack of awareness (∼ 50%) amongst A&E and T&O doctors regarding pitfalls to collar application. We recommend the ATLS manual highlight a pitfall for application of rigid collars in patients with ankylosed spines and suspected cervical spine injuries.

Introduction

The British Scoliosis Society published a document in 2008 which set out the minimum standards for paediatric spinal deformity services to achieve over a period of time. But how do the UK paediatric spinal deformity centres measure up to these benchmarks?

Purpose

Comparison between Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid on blood conservation in scoliosis surgery.

Purpose

Retrospective review of growth sparing spinal instrumentation.

Purpose

To evaluate efficacy of blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult scoliosis surgery and establish a protocol for cross matching.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars at restricting cervical spine movement in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes.

Introduction

Reported incidence of DVT after spinal surgery ranges from 0-15% and PE 0.5-2.7%. Theoretically, manipulation of the vessels and venous stasis caused by retraction during anterior lumbar inter-body fusion may increase the propensity for thrombosis. The reported incidence of DVT and PE following major abdominal and pelvic surgery are high (up to 23%) and all these patients routinely receive chemical prophylaxis.

Purpose of Study

To investigate current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major UK spinal centres for both trauma and elective surgery, and to asses compliance with NICE guidelines

Aim of Study

To highlight the absence of an important pitfall in the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol in application of rigid collar to patients with potentially unstable cervical spine injury.

Introduction

Halo traction, either on bed or with an accompanying vest is used commonly in Spine surgery, in a variety of clinical situations. The pins are inserted into the skull in safe anatomic zones, using wrenches that are either pre-torqued or exhibit a torque gauge to allow measurable torque application. A torque of 6 – 8 inch pounds is considered ideal for optimal pin tightening. Lesser torques may hypothetically lead to pin loosening and pin track infections, while, excessive torques could lead to pin penetration through the skull.

Incidence of pars defect associated with idiopathic scoliosis has been reported as 6% based on roentgenographic evaluation in previous studies. (Fisk et al, 1978). We aim to present our results in an MRI based study.

224 patients of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had an MRI scan over a period of three years (2006-2008), performed either as a preoperative investigation or due to other symptoms were reviewed. All MRI scans were reviewed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiology consultants independently.

Among 224 patients 13 (5.8%) patients were found to have pars defect. Mean age-group of patients were (19 years, range-11-40). 84.6% (n=11) patients were female and 15.3% patients were male. There was varying severity of curve patterns. We have noted two lumbar/thoraco-lumbar curves (Lenke 5), King Type I-6, King Type II-2 and three King Type III curves. All scoliotic deformities were non-structural. Bilateral pars defect was noted in nine (69%) patients.

Previous studies (Fisk et al, 1978; Mau H 1981) have described the incidence of pars defect as approximately 6.2%. Recent studies have emphasized use of MRI to diagnose pars defect based on signal changes in the pedicle (Sairyo et al.). Our study reveals the incidence of pars defect in AIS to be 5.8 % based on MRI diagnosis which does not seem to be different to previous roentgenographic studies.

In major procedures like scoliosis surgery, parents are often asked to sign the consent on behalf of children because of the pretext that minor may have limited understanding and judgement about the procedure. Scoliosis surgery for patients with AIS is mainly indicated for cosmetic or psychological reasons.

We audited our practice in the department to collect information on the current consent practices involving the minor patients undergoing scoliosis surgery.

We also have conducted a questionnaire survey of the various spinal units in UK to assess their practice in this regard.

Forty-two consent forms (28 patients; multiple procedures in some patients) and case notes of patients between 12 and 16 years undergoing scoliosis surgery were reviewed. We have contacted 12 spinal deformity correction units and 11 spinal trauma units across UK over telephone to assess the current consenting practice as well.

9.5% (n=4) patients signed there own consent forms. Except in one case explanation of risks were documented in detail. Except two units (18%) offering the minor patient to sign their consent, parents are usually asked to sign consent on their behalf in majority (10/12) units. Seven out of the twelve spinal units use standard NHS or department of health consent forms. Few units have their own consent form with some alterations or additions.

There is no specific age when a child becomes competent to consent to treatment: It depends both on the child and on the seriousness and complexity of the treatment being proposed. However, it is still good practice to encourage competent children to more involved along with their families in decision-making.

Purpose

To evaluate Radiological changes in the lumbosacral spine after insertion of Wallis Ligament for Foraminal Stenosis.

To evaluate Radiological changes in the lumbosacral spine after insertion of Wallis Ligament for Foraminal Stenosis.

Thirty two Levels in Twenty Six patients were followed up with standardised radiographs after insertion of Wallis Ligaments for Foraminal Stenosis. Wallis ligaments as a top-off or those with prolapsed discs were not included. The Radiological parameters compared were Anterior and Posterior Disc height, Foraminal height and width, The inter-vertebral angle (IVA), Lumbar lordosis and Scoliosis if any. The presence of slips and their progression post-op was noted, as was bony lysis if any.

There were ten males with thirteen levels and sixteen females with nineteen levels in the study. Eighteen levels (56.25%) were L4/L5, ten (31.25%) were L5/S1 and 4 (12.5%)were L3/L4. The average age in the series was 59.6 years (Range 37 – 89 yrs). Average follow up was 9.5 months (Range 2 to 36). The Average increase in Anterior disc height was 1.89 mm (+/−1.39), the posterior disc height increased by an average 1.09 mm (+/−1.14). Foraminal height increased by an average 3.85 mm (+/− 2.72), while foraminal width increased by 2.14 mm (+/− 1.38). The IVA increased in 16 and reduced in 15 patients, with no change in 1. Lumbar Lordosis increased in 23 patients, with an average value of 2.3°. No patient exhibited progression in scoliosis and no lysis could be identified. There were three Grade I slips pre-op; none progressed.

Foraminal dimensions and Disc height were consistently improved after Wallis insertion. Changes in IVA and Lumbar lordosis were however variable. A longer follow up is suggested to look for sustained improvement and the presence of lysis.

Spinal cord injury following trauma is initially dealt with by acute hospitals. The early management including stabilization is usually performed by these centres. This is followed by onward referral to one of the Regional Spinal Injury Units.

There is concern of both sides of the fence regarding mobilization following spinal cord injury. The acute hospitals want to avoid the problems of prolonged recumbency and the Regional Spinal Injury Units wish to avoid the problems of early aggressive mobilization.

Therefore, we set out to discover if there was a standard approach to mobilising these patients following surgical stabilization, because of the oversubscribed resources of the spinal injury units and the wish to start mobilizing the injured as soon as possible.

A comparative audit of the Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and North American Units.

Regional Spinal Injury Units in United Kingdom and North America

Clear Management Plan

Mobilisation Schedule

We had replies from all Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and from seven in North America.

The Regional Spinal Injury Units all had differing approaches. Only a few were able to convey a clear management plan and mobilization schedule. Whereas the North American Units provided a ‘mobilize as able’ plan in all cases.

The North American Units had a ‘mobilize as able’ policy, whereas the UK units had a mixed approach. A coherent collaboration between the spinal surgeons stabilizing these injuries and the spinal injury units providing rehabilitation would improve patient management.

Spinal Biomechanics Lab, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

Documenting the patterns and frequency of collapse in non-operatively managed spine fractures, using a motion analysis software.

Retrospective analysis of prospective case series

105 patients with thoracic or lumbar fractures, were neurologically intact, and treated non-operatively for the ‘stable’ injury at our unit between June 2003 and May 2006. The mean age of the cohort was 46.9 yrs

Serial radiographs (mean 4 radiographs/patient; range 2 – 9) were analysed using motion analysis software for collapse at the fracture site. We defined collapse as a reduction of anterior or posterior vertebral body height greater than 15% of the endplate AP width, or a change in the angle between the inferior and superior endplates > 5°.

The changes were assessed on serial radiographs performed at a mean of 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.1 – 7.1 mo) after the initial injury. 11% showed anterior collapse, 7.6% had posterior collapse, 14% had collapse apparent as vertebral body wedging, and 17% had any form of collapse. ODI scores were obtained in 35 patients at the time of the last available radiograph. There were no significant differences in ODI scores that could be associated with the presence of any form of collapse (p > 0.8 for anterior collapse; and p = 0.18 for posterior collapse).

This pilot study with the motion analysis software demonstrates that some fractures are more likely to collapse with time. We hope to carry this work forward by way of a prospective study with a control on other variables that are likely to affect the pattern and probability of post-fracture collapse, including age, bone density, vertebral level, activity level, fracture type.

We do know that the use of stand-alone cage with no plate is prone to subsidence and segmental kyphosis. Cage and plate construct are prone to adjacent level ossification. Zero P (Synthes, UK) cage combines the functionality of spacer and anterior plate.

Radiological evaluation of subsidence of cervical spine after anterior cervical interbody fusion using Zero P cage system.

Method: Retrospective review of radiographic records of patients undergoing surgery between June 2008- Oct 2009. We evaluated lateral cervical standing radiographs before, after, 6 weeks, 3, 6 months of surgery. We measured subsidence (using Total Intervertebral Height (TIH). All measurements were done using Web 1000 (Impax Agfa). Two level was treated as single segment. Subsidence > 3mm was considered significant.

20 patients (11 male: 9 female) with median age of 51 yrs (40-65) underwent one (n=10) or two level (n= 10) cervical fusion. Immediately post-op there was increase in TIH in one and two level group by 1.74mm (1.61 and 4.25mm (1.48 respectively, which at 6 months reduced to 1.05mm (0.24 (p< 0.003) and 1.32mm (1.29 (p< 0.085) at 6 months respectively. Subsidence was seen in all cases and was rapid in first 3 months and then tailed off. It was significant (> 3mm) only in 2/20 (2%) patients at 6 months.

Early results indicate that spine alignment is maintained radiologically with no associated complications as screw loosening, cage extrusion etc.

Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Wallis implant in management of discogenic back pain.

We have prospectively studied thirty patients between 2006 and 2007. Average age of patients was 40.8 years. Average follow-up period 20.6 months (9-28). Main inclusion criteria includes failure of conservative management of low back pain due to degenerative disc disease, preservation of 50% of the disc height and positive discographic features. In majority of the patients the implant was put in at the level of L4-L5.

Pre-op and post op SF36 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed during clinic follow-up and by telephonic interview. Mean SF36 score improved from thirty-seven (8.3 – 54.3) to 51.4. Mean ODI improved from forty-three (20-60) to 26.5(2-60) (p = 0.026). Complications including superficial infection occurred in one patient, deep infection in one patient, erosion of spinous process in one and displacement of the implant in one case. Three (10%) patients had revision surgery due to various reasons.

Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization system could be used as a soft stabilisation device avoiding fusion and short-term results are promising. In selected group of discogenic low back pain patients it is a useful interim procedure. Long-term follow-up of our series is ongoing.

Incidence of pars defect associated with idiopathic scoliosis has been reported as 6% based on roentgenographic evaluation in previous studies. (Fisk et al, 1978). We aim to present our results in an MRI based study.

Methods: 229 patients of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had an MRI scan over a period of three years (2006–2008), performed either as a preoperative investigation or due to other symptoms were reviewed. All MRI scans were reviewed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiology consultants independently.

Results: Among 229 patients 18 (7.86%) patients were found to have pars defect. Mean age-group of patients were (19 years, range-11–40). Male -5 (27.7%), female- 13(72.2%). There was varying severity of curve patterns, major thoracic curve-10, major lumbar curve-4, mild thoracic curve-3 and mild lumbar curve in one. Bilateral pars defect was noted in 14 (77.8%) patients.

Discussion: Previous studies (Fisk et al, 1978; Mau H 1977) have described the incidence of pars defect as approximately 6.2%. Recent studies have emphasized use of MRI to diagnose pars defect based on signal changes in the pedicle (Sairyo et al, 2009). Our study reveals the incidence of pars defect in AIS to be 7.86 % based on MRI diagnosis which does not seem to be different to previous roentgenographic studies.

Conflicts of Interest: none

Source of Funding: none

We aimed to evaluate the effects of implementing blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. We retrospectively studied 50 consecutive adult patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery (anterior, posterior or combined) between 2003 and 2007. All patients had a standard transfusion protocol. Age, BMI, pre and post operative haemoglobin, levels fused, duration of surgery, hospital stay, anti-fibrinolytics used and blood transfused was noted.

50 patients with mean age 24.6 years and mean BMI 21.9 kg/m2 were studied. 14 patients had anterior surgery, 19 patients had posterior surgery and 17 had combined anterior and posterior procedures. Mean number of levels fused was 9.5 (6–15) and mean duration of surgery was 284.6 minutes (135–550 minutes). Antifibrinolytics were used in 31 patients (62%), Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10 (20%). Mean blood loss in patients who received anti fibrinolytics was 530mls while mean blood loss in the other patients was 672mls. (p< 0.05). Blood transfusion was not required in any of the patients undergoing anterior correction only while 7 patients (41%) undergoing anterior and posterior correction and 3 patients (15.8%) undergoing posterior correction only required blood transfusion. Mean volume of cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 mls and mean hospital stay was 9.2 days. Mean pre-op haemoglobin was 13.2 g/dl (10.4–17.4) and mean post-op haemoglobin was 10.7 g/dl (7.7–15). 4 patients (8%) required intra and post-operative blood transfusion while 6 patients (12%) required blood transfusion postoperatively.

In conclusion, the use of anti-fibrinolytics like Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in scoliosis surgery. In the current scenario, with Aprotinin no longer available for use, our study would recommend the use of Tranexamic acid alongwith other blood conservation measures. In our unit we do not have blood cross matched for anterior surgery alone.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a diarthrodial joint and can often be a source of chronic low back pain complex. We present a percutaneous technique for SIJ fusion and the functional and radiological outcome following arthrodesis with HMA (Hollow modular anchorage; Aesculap Ltd, Tuttlingen) screws.

Fifteen consecutive patients operated for SIJ fusion between Sep 2004 and Aug 2007 were included in the study. The diagnosis was confirmed with MRI and diagnostic injections. Pre-operative and post-operative functional evaluation was performed using SF-36 questionnaire and Majeed’s scoring system. Postoperative radiological evaluation was performed using plain radiographs. The HMA screws packed with bone substitute were implanted percutaneous under fluoroscopic guidance.

The study group included 11 females and 4 males with a mean age of 48.7 years. Mean follow-up was 14 months. Mean SF-36 scores improved from 37 to 80 for physical function and from 53 to 86 for general health. The differences were statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p < 0.05). Majeed’s score improved from mean 37 preoperative to mean 79 postoperative. The difference was statistically significant (student t test, p< 0.05). 13 had good to excellent results. The remaining 2 patients had improvement in SF-36 from mean 29 to 48. Persisting pain was potentially due to coexisting lumbar pathology. Intra-operative blood was minimal and there were no post-operative or radiological complications.

Percutaneous HMA screws are a satisfactory way to achieve sacroiliac stabilisation.

Background: The simultaneous occurrence of spina bifida occulta (SBO) and spondylolysis has been noted previously. The occurrence of SBO and spondylolysis are approximately 17% and 5% respectively.

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of SBO when a symptomatic spondylolysis has been proven.

Method: Analysis of four years of lumbar spine CT scans was performed. Patients with spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis caused by a pars defect were identified. These patients’ CT images were then reviewed to establish the patients who also had SBO.

Results: In this unit 650 CT scans of lumbar spines were performed in the last five years. Of these scans 100 (15%) were found to have a pars defect. The average age was 34.6. On CT 30 (30%) patients were shown to have SBO. Of the total 23 were under 18 years old and 13 (56%) of these patients had SBO associated with the spondylolysis. In the over 18 year olds 21 (27%) patients had SBO associated with spondylolysis.

On review of the 550 other scans the average age was 51.9 years old. The incidence of SBO within this group is 10%. Only 6% of these patients were under 18. Out of these 33 patients 30.3% (10 patients) had SBO. Over 18 the incidence of SBO was only 8.5%.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the occurrence of SBO within the group with a spondylolysis is much higher than in the group where no spondylolysis is present. There is higher incidence of SBO in the younger patients with spondylolysis. 56% of paediatric patients with symptomatic spondylolysis will have SBO. Clinicians should be aware of this fact preoperatively to decide on the technique of repair of the symptomatic lysis.

Introduction: Spinal surgical procedures are associated with significant morbidity. It is vital the patients are aware of the potential complications and the implications. The General Medical Council published guidelines regarding consent in June 2008.

Aim: To examine the adequacy for consenting for spinal surgical procedures and focussing on documentation of serious risks.

Methods: Case notes of seventy consecutive patients who had undergone spinal surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The consent forms were examined for documented procedures, complications, grade of the consenting member and timing of the consent.

Results: The documented procedure on the consent form and the operation sheet matched in all seventy cases (100%). Consent was taken by the consultant in 50% of the patients, 30% were consented by middle grade doctors and 20% were consented by the junior doctor. The consenting person was present at the procedure in 63% of the cases. Sixty percent (60%) of the patients were consented in the pre-admission clinic, 23% were consented on the day before the procedure and 17% were consented on the day of the procedure. Common and serious complications such as infection (84%), bleeding (76%), pain (67%), bladder and bowel problems (84%), paralysis (70%) and nerve root damage (67%) were clearly documented.

Conclusion: Two-thirds of the patients are given adequate information to obtain informed consent in the pre-admission clinic. Majority of the patients are aware of the common and the serious risks associated prior to the procedure.

Interests: None

Ethics approval: None

Background: Satisfaction following anterior and/or posterior spinal fusion varies greatly between individuals. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the post-operative scars following surgical correction of scoliosis.

Methods: Prospective study; 31 patients (range 10–37 years), minimum of 2 months post-operation, interviewed in clinic or over the telephone using a questionnaire.

Results: Overall, 18 (58%) patients were disappointed with their scar; it was not what they expected, Patients with anterior scars or both anterior and posterior scars were the most disappointed groups.

39% of patients felt they were inadequately informed or not informed of the nature of scar. However, over 50% of those who had a specialist spinal nurse (SSN) consultation reported the scar to be as they expected. Scar length was the main source of disappointment. 55% reported their scars as being raised (keloid), particularly at the ends. Scar colour and shape was an issue for 23%, whilst 39% experienced prolonged healing. 19 patients had a pre-op consultation with the SSN, 11 did not get this opportunity, 1 declined.

Conclusion: Clearly there’s a need for improved education and understanding with regard to the nature of the scoliosis surgical scar(s). Input from a SSN is important and surgeons must clarify exactly what they mean when discussing operations with patients. This could be done with the aid of pictograms or leaflets detailing issues discussed in consultations along with the opportunity to meet patients who have already had surgery. These measures may lead to increased patient satisfaction with surgery.

Ethics approval: Audit

Interest Statement: None

Incidence of pars defect associated with idiopathic scoliosis has been reported as 6% based on roentgenographic evaluation in previous studies. (Fisk et al, 1978). We aim to present our results in an MRI based study.

Methods: 229 patients of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had an MRI scan over a period of three years (2006–2008), performed either as a preoperative investigation or due to other symptoms were reviewed. All MRI scans were reviewed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiology consultants independently.

Result

Among 229 patients 18 (7.86%) patients were found to have pars defect. Mean age-group of patients were (19 years, range-11–40). Male-5 (26.3%), female- 4(73.6%). Majority of the patients with were females (72.2%). There was varying severity of curve patterns, major thoracic curve-10, major lumbar curve-4, mild thoracic curve-3 and mild lumbar curve in one. Bilateral pars defect was noted in 14 (77.7%) patients.

Discussion

Previous studies (Fisk et al, 1978; Mau H 1977) have described the incidence of pars defect as approximately 6.2%. Recent studies have emphasized use of MRI to diagnose pars defect based on signal changes in the pedicle (Jon R. Davids et al, 2004). Our study reveals the incidence of pars defect in AIS to be 7.86 % based on MRI diagnosis which does not seem to be different to previous roentgenographic studies.

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of sheer off self limiting screw drivers and to assess repeatability with age.

It has been reported that overzealous tightening of halo pins is associated with co-morbidity. Our unit has recently received a tertiary referral where the patient over tightened a pin leading to intracranial haematoma, hence our interest in this subject. The torque produced by six new and nine old screw drivers was tested using an Avery Torque Gauge and a Picotech data recorder. These devices are designed to produce a torque of 0.68 Nm, any greater than this is potentially hazardous. Accepted error for each device was +/− 10%. The average torque produced by the new screw drivers was 0.56 Nm with a range of 0.35–0.64 Nm (SD 0.120). The older screw drivers produced an average torque of 0.67 Nm ranging from 0.52–0.85 Nm (SD 0.123).

In conclusion, sheer off self limiting screw drivers are not accurate devices. The older devices are more likely to produce a torque exceeding a safe range and therefore we would recommend the use of new devices only.

Ethics approval: none audit.

Interest statement: none local grant.

Background: It remains unclear and controversial whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) should be mandatory.

Aim: (1) To review our own practice, (2) conduct a national survey of United Kingdom Consultants, and (3) to perform a literature review.

Methods: Our own practice was established by identifying patients with AIS and examining whether an MRI scan was performed preoperatively. A survey of Consultants practice in the UK (British Scoliosis Members) was conducted by either an e-mail or telephone conversation. Finally, a literature survey was performed to establish current views.

Results: 118 patients with AIS were identified between 2003 and 2007. 78% of these patients underwent pre-operative MRI scans. Neural axis abnormalities were found in 8% of these patients. They included syrinx’s, chiari malformations, tonsillar herniation, cord tethering, central canal dilatation and undiagnosed spina bifida. Only 1 patient required intervention by the neurosurgeons. 92% of respondents to the national survey routinely performed preoperative MRI scans. The literature was not conclusive with regards to mandatory preoperative imaging.

Conclusion: Despite the literature showing little evidence, our survey shows a widespread consensus in clinical practice across the UK that routine preoperative MRI should be performed from a risk management viewpoint. It is mandatory in our unit to perform pre-operative MRI scans on all patients with AIS and would recommend that this becomes standard practice in all other units.

Ethics Approval: None/Audit

Interest Statement: None

In a high-risk technically advanced speciality like spine surgery, detailed information about all aspects of possible complications could be frightening for the patients, and thereby increase anxiety and distress. Therefore, aim of this study was to

Analyze written evidence of the consenting procedure pertaining to (a) nature of operation (b) benefits intended as a result of the operation (c) risks specific to the particular type of operation (c) general risks of spine surgery and anaestheia.

Methods: 70 adult elective, consecutive patients who had been listed for Lumbar discectomy /decompression surgery were chosen. The patients were presented with questionnaire of broad-based and open-ended questions designed to elicit theirs views in each of the following areas: expectation, knowledge of risks and alternatives, and personal attitude to information and satisfaction.

The study had a non-randomized design and patients divided into TWO groups Group A and group B.

The patients in the group A received standard information and were consented in a routine way without being given written proforma with all complications. The patients in the group B were given the same information as patients in the control group, with written information about common and rare complications. Patients in both groups were assessed on an ‘impact of events scale’ and hospital anxiety and depression scale immediately before ad after the consent process and again after surgery when they were discharged from the hospital.

For comparison of the proportion of Yes and No answers in 2 groups, Fisher’s exact test was used, and for comparison of more than 2 groups, the Chi-square test was used. For graded answers and other ordinal scales, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparison of 2 groups and the Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison of more than 2 groups. Spearman’s test was used when assessing the correlation between 2 variables measured on an ordinal scale.

Results: Many patients (71%) agreed that the consent form made clear what was going to happen to them, and 77%) reported that it made them aware of the risks of the operation they were to undergo. Over a third (36%) saw it as a safeguard against mixups in the operating theatre. Few patients’ decision to accept surgery appeared to depend on risk information; 8% of patients said that they might have changed their decision, had they been advised of the risks of permanent stroke and myocardial infarction. However, 92% were clear that their decision to accept treatment would not have altered. The women in the group B had symptoms of definite anxiety to a significantly higher degree than the men before the operation. Post-operatively, patients receiving extended information were significantly more satisfied with both the written and oral information about common and rare complications than patients in the control group There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for anxiety or depression, as measured by the HADS, either before or after the operation between Group A and B. Provision of extended information describing most of the possible complications did not have any negative effects on the patients. The patients receiving the extended information were more satisfied and experienced to a higher degree that they could discuss alternative treatment methods with the surgeon. Discussion: Provision of extended information describing most of the possible complications did not have any negative effects on the patients. “Ignorance is bliss” may prove to be an excellent preoperative strategy for patients when outcome is good but detrimental to long term adjustment where significant postoperative complications arise. This raises the possibility that a separate consent could be used where these risks are pre-printed and explained in vocabulary easily understood by patients. The added advantages of this form would be less confusion for the patient and there would be written evidence that patients had understood each of the major risks involved with the proposed procedure. This proposed consent form would also reduce the chance that important risks and complications are omitted when consent is being taken, as well as tackling the issue of variability of experience or lack of knowledge by the person obtaining consent.

Introduction: Scoliosis surgery involves major blood loss, at times exceeding estimated blood volume.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of implementing blood conservation strategies (including cell salvage, controlled hypotension and anti-fibrinolytic drugs) on transfusion requirements in adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. To establish a protocol for cross matching of blood.

Study Design: We retrospectively studied 50 consecutive adult patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery (anterior, posterior or combined) between 2003 and 2007. All patients were anaesthetised by the same anaesthetist who implemented a standard transfusion protocol. Age, BMI, pre and post operative haemoglobin, levels fused, duration of surgery, hospital stay, antifibrinolytics used and blood transfused was noted.

Results: 50 patients with mean age 24.6 years and mean BMI 21.9 kg/m2 were studied. 14 patients had anterior surgery, 19 patients had posterior surgery and 17 had combined anterior and posterior procedures. Mean number of levels fused was 9.5 (6–15) and mean duration of surgery was 284.6 minutes (135–550 minutes). Anti-fibrinolytics were used in 31 patients (62%), Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10(20%). Mean blood loss in patients who received anti fibrinolytics was 530mls while mean blood loss in the other patients was 672mls. (p< 0.05). Blood transfusion was not required in any of the patients undergoing anterior correction only while 7 patients (41%) undergoing anterior and posterior correction and 3 patients (15.8%) undergoing posterior correction only required blood transfusion. Mean volume of cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 mls and mean hospital stay was 9.2 days. Mean pre-op haemoglobin was 13.2 g/dl (10.4–17.4) and mean post-op haemoglobin was 10.7 g/dl (7.7–15). 4 patients (8%) required intra and post-operative blood transfusion while 6 patients (12%) required blood transfusion postoperatively.

Conclusion: Use of anti-fibrinolytics like Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in scoliosis surgery. In the current scenario, with Aprotinin no longer available for use, our study would recommend the use of Tranexamic acid alongwith other blood conservation measures.

In our unit we do not have blood cross matched for anterior surgery alone.

Background: Radicular pain has been reported even in the absence of a compressive lesion. It has been postulated that annular tears provide a conduit for pro-inflammatory substances, which can leak around the nerve root causing radiculitis. A link between the side of back pain and the side of the annular tear has been reported.

Objective: To establish whether the side of the annular tear may influence the side of the leg in a non-compressive setting.

Methods and patients: We identified 121 patients from the patients referred to our unit with back and radicular leg pain. The mean age of the cohort was 50 yrs and 49% were male. All these patients were investigated with an MRI scan that demonstrated no compression of the nerve root. We used strict exclusion criteria to exclude the patients with any neural compression, previous lumbar operation, degenerative deformity or an associated pathology such as peripheral neuropathy.

Results: The annular pathology was described as annular tears (47 patients) and non compressive disc bulges (106 patients). The odds ratio for the concurrence of an annular tear causing ipsilateral leg pain is 1.05 and for a non-compressive disc bulge causing ipsilateral leg pain is 2.14

Conclusion: A non-compressive disc bulge is more likey to cause radicular symptoms than an annular tear. Though, both these annular lesions can cause ipsilateral nerve root symptoms.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Cages are used to recreate the lumbar lordosis in scoliosis surgery as anterior instrumentation is usually kyphogenic. We report two cases in which an anterior release was performed and interbody cages were used.In both these patients the cage was displaced anteriorly by an incorrectly positioned pedicle screw during posterior instrumentaion. In one case the cage was retrieved and correctly repositioned from the back using a TLIF approach, in the other this was noticed only post-operatively and patient needed another anterior surgery. We recommend a lateral Image Intensifier screening for combined anterior and posterior cases in which anterior cages are used in addition to posterior pedicle screws to prevent this complication.

Objective: To do assess changes in patients’ symptoms and the operative plan.

Materials and methods: 147 patients on a spinal surgery waiting list were assessed at a mean wait of 15.8 ± 1.3 months. 89 (61%) were male and 58 (39%) were female at a mean age of 49.7 yrs (16–78). 123 patients had a degenerative condition (20 cervical; 03 lumbar); 20 patients were seen for scoliosis; 2 with a post-traumatic kyphosis and 1 each with ankylosing spondylitis and a psudarthrosis.

Outcomes assessed: Changes in patients symptoms; changes from the initial operative plan when listed; requirement for re-imaging due to the wait.

Results: 31 patients reported improved symptoms at the re-assessment, while 96 were worse off and 20 were unchanged. 137 had axial pain when listed which changed to 116 at review (p=0.0018). 130 had radicular pain when listed which improved to 80 on re-assessment (p< 0.0001). However 19 reported an increase in the axial and 17 in the radicular symptoms. 71 patients (48.3%) required to be re-imaged at the re-assessment due to changes in the clinical picture. 42 patients received the procedure as originally listed. 30 patients were taken off the list, 24 received a different operation, and 38 had an interim or a definitive needling procedure while 13 await a re-assessment.

Conclusions: On the basis of the observations on our cohort, 1 in 5 operations were cancelled; 65% had an increased severity of the symptoms and just 1 in 3 patients were operated as planned while 48% required re-imaging. A long wait inevitably leads to changed symptoms and a review of these patients is mandatory. The review and the re-imaging adds to the burden on the already over-loaded system.

Objective: To assess the temporal geometric sagittal profile changes on serial radiographs of fractures of the thoracic and thoraco-lumbar spine.

Materials and methods: We have included 103 patients with thoracic or lumbar fractures were treated at our unit between June 2003 and May 2006. The patients were suitable for non-operative treatment. The mean age of the cohort was 46.9±2.4 (16–90). The sex distribution was equal. 94 patients had a single level lesion. 19 fractures were in the thoracic spine; 64 in the thoraco-lumbar (T11-L1) and 29 between L2 and L5. The radiographs were scored using the AO classification by 2 senior orthopaedic trainees. The radiographs were analysed at the Spine Research Laboratory. The results were computed using Stat, a statistical software.

Results: The changes were assessed over a mean period of 5.6 mo (range 1–49 mo; 95% CI 4.1–7.1 mo). Weighted kappa score of 0.58 was computed for the primary fracture type and 0.22 for the fracture sub-types. The inter-observer rater agreement was similar to that reported in literature. 7 patients showed a significant collapse. We report the association between the fracture types and the extent of collapse. We have also assessed the association between the medium to long term symptoms, the fracture types and the extent of collapse at the fracture sites and the adjacent disc.

Conclusion: Some fracture sub-types are more likely to collapse and cause long term symptoms. Identifying these fractures at the outset would help clarify surgical indications.

Objective: To assess the correlation between the side of the annular pathology and the radicular symptoms, in the absence of a compressive root lesion.

Materials and Methods: 121 patients underwent MRI scan fro axial back and radicular symptoms. The mean age was 49.9 yrs (24–80). The sex distribution was equal. We excluded the patients that had a compressive lesion, previous operations, spinal deformity, spondylolyses, an underlying pathology (tumour, trauma or infection) or a peripheral neuropathy. Annular pathology was documented as annular tear or a non-compressive disc bulge with its location and side. We also recorded marrow endplate changes and facet arthrosis.

Results: Bilateral radicular symptoms were reported in 16 (13.2%): right side in 33 (27.3%) and left in 47 (38.8%) patients. Additionally, 82 patients (67.8%) had axial back pain. 33 patients (27.3%) were noted to have a right sided annular pathology (tear or bulge) and 72 (59.5%) had a left sided annular lesion. 21 patients (17.4%) had a central annular tear and 43 (35.5%) had a generalised disc bulge. 14 patients (11.6%) with right sided symptoms also had annular pathology, while 38 patients (31.4%) with left sided symptoms had a left sided annular lesion. There was no statistical correlation between the side of symptoms and the side of the lesion (r = −0.00066, p=0.994), any particular annular pathology (annular tear r=0.085, p=0.35; disc bulge r-0.083, p=0.36). There was no correlation between the axial back pain and the annular pathology (r=0.004; p=0.97) and facet joint or marrow end plate changes (r= −,29, p=0.76).

Conclusions: Although annular pathology can cause the radicular symptoms, our results suggest that they do not influence the side of the symptoms.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint pathology can contribute to lowback pain and sciatica. Its frequency and significance is controversial.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of positive SI joint pathology on MRI scans.

Methodology: 353 MRI reports and scans carried out over a one year period for backpain and sciatica were reviewed. Demographic data and clinical notes of patients who had positive SI joint pathology on MRI scans were analysed. Correlation between clinical suspicion of SI joint pathology and MRI findings was studied.

Results: 12 scans showed pathology in the SI joint, an overall incidence of 3.3%.8(66%) were males and 4(33%) females. Only 4(33%) of these patients had Plain Film abnormality. Average age of 41.2 years (33–54). One patient was known case of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Other positive pathology included oedema, sclerois and bridging osteophytes. Clinicians requested inclusion of SI joint in 43 patients. 8 of these were positive, an incidence of 18.6%. In 130 patients, the SI joints were imaged as routine. This yielded positive pathology in 4 patients (3%).

Conclusion: Our study concludes that 18.6% of patients who are suspected to have SI joint involvement clinically have positive pathology on MRI scans.

Routine inclusion of imaging of the SI joint as part of lumbosacral spine MRI for back pain and sciatica shows only 3% positive results.

SI joint should be imaged only if clinically suspected.

Aim: To assess if commonly used scoliosis instrumentation activates metal detectors at airport security gates.

Methods: 20 patientswho had travelled by air following scoliosis surgery were included. The type of instrumentation, number of journeys, body mass index and whether the alarm was triggered off by the airport security detector was recorded. We asked the patients opinion regarding provision of documentary evidence of surgery.

Results: 10 patients had posterior instrumentation, 5 patients -Paediatric ISOLA,4 patients had anterior instrumentation and one patient, anterior and posterior instrumentation. 12 patients (60%) had travelled more than four times by air following surgery corresponding to 48 passes through an airport archway detector.5 patients out of 20 had set off the alarm while passing through the metal detector everytime of which 4 had posterior instrumentation and 1 anterior instrumentation. None of the patients with ISOLA instrumentation set of the alarm. Two patients had set off the alarm every time they passed through the metal detector and both of them had posterior instrumentation. 14 patients(70%) suggested that we should provide documentary evidence of surgery to avoid delays in the airport security check. 25 % of patients set of the metal detector alarm following scoliosis instrumentation.

Conclusion: Patients with posterior instrumentation are more likely to set off the alarm compared to patients with ISOLA instrumentation. It is important to be aware that scoliosis instrumentation can activate airport archway detectors in our present security climate and to provide documentation to patients in order to avoid embarassment and delays.

Introduction: Scoliosis Nursing service was introduced at the Cardiff Spinal Unit in 2003 as part of a multi-disciplinary team to improve quality of care for the patients and their families.

Background: This nurse is a point of contact at pre-admission and discharge. She co-ordinates the peri operative care and liases with other team-members including physiotherapists, occupational therapists and dieticians. Information regarding type of surgery, pain management, wounds/dressings, investigations is offered.

Aims and Objectives: To assess patients’ and families perception and satisfaction with the various aspects of care provided by the Scoliosis Nurse.

Methods and Materials: From 2005 to 2006, 30 consecutive patients and families who had seen the Scoliosis Nurse filled a questionnaire. 25 questionnaires were completed. Response was collated by an independent observer.

Results: All (100%) respondents felt that the presence of a nurse in clinic was beneficial. (100%) reported that they had received adequate information and literature. 66% of the patients felt a pre admission ward visit would be beneficial. 63% felt that further information about discharge and aftercare would be helpful.

Conclusion: Thus the Scoliosis Nurse was perceived to be beneficial by the patients and the family. Based on the abovefeedback the patient Information booklet has been updated.

Paravertebral anaesthesia is a particularly effective, safe and reliable option in scoliosis patients undergoing anterior release in whom percutaneous epidural placement may be difficult to perform. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials has demonstrated that whilst paravertebral block and thoracic epidural insertion provide comparable pain relief after thoracic surgery, paravertebral block placement is associated with a better side effect profile, including a reduction in pulmonary complications, hypotension, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. We describe a case of a 16 year old female patient who underwent staged correction of her thoracolumbar scoliosis. A paravertebral catheter was inserted under direct vision for continuous infusion post operative analgesia following the anterior release. 48 hours after surgery a swelling was noted in the groin, which was confirmed with ultrasonography as a fluid collection. The swelling resolved upon removing the paravertebral catheter. This suggests that it was caused by the local anaesthetic fluid tracking along the psoas muscle. Retroperitoneal infections, venous thrombosis, femoral hernia, femoral artery aneurysm and inguinal lymphadenopathy are other differentials. Ultrasonography was a fast and sensitive investigation to rule out these differentials and determined that fluid communicating with the abdominal cavity was the cause for this swelling. The infused local anaesthetic had tracked down into the femoral triangle and the swelling resolved upon cessation of the infusion.

Background: Thoraco-lumbar fractures without a neurological deficit are usually suitable for non-operative treatment. The main area of clinical interest is the deformity at the injured levels. The deformity may be evident at the time of presentation, though could be expected to progress in time.

Objective: Accurate assessment of the temporal behaviour in the geometry of the injured segments in non-operatively treated thoracolumbar fractures with normal neurology.

Materials: 102 patients with thoracolumbar fractures without a neurological deficit were treated non-operatively at our unit between June 2003 and May 2006. The mean age of our patient cohort was 46.9 yrs (16–90 yrs). Strict criteria were followed to determine suitability for non-operative treatment. Supine radiographs were performed at the initial assessment. Erect radiographs were performed when trunk control was achieved and at follow-up assessments thereafter.

Methods: Quality Motion Analysis (QMA) software (Medical Metrics Inc, Houston, Tx) was used to measure rotational and translation changes between the end plates using a validated protocol. The radiographs were standardised for magnification and superimposed from different time points. Transformation matrices were used to track the changes. The AO classification was used to classify the fractures by 2 independent observers.

Results: A median of 4 radiographs were analysed for each patient (range 2–9), at a mean follow-up of 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.1–7.1 mo). 92% of the cohort had sustained a 1 level injury. 76% of the injuries were between T12 and L2; 19% were in the thoracic spine. An inter-observer rating of 0.58 was obtained for the classification of the primary fracture type. The mean rotational change was −1.4855° ± 0.248° (95% CI: −0.994° to–1.976°). The mean anterior vertebral body height collapse was −4.3444° ± 0.6938 (95% CI: −2.695 to −5.724). The mean posterior vertebral height collapse was −0.7987 ± 0.259 (95% CI: −0.284 to −1.313).

Conclusions: We report the use of QMA software to track changes in the vertebral body geometry accurately. This has implications on the clinical aspects of management of thoracolumbar fractures based to progression of deformity that could be explored in future studies.

Background data: The Paediatric Isola system uses the philosophy of torsion-countertorsion force as a means of scoliosis correction. It aims to maintain this correction till such time that definitive fusion can be carried out.

Aim: This is a retrospective case series of our experience with the Paediatric Isola system and we evaluated the results of this system in the treatment of Scoliosis of various etiologies.

Methods: Twenty –one children,5 with neuromuscular,1 with Ehler-Danlos,5 with idiopathic,3 syndromic and 7 congenital treated with the Isola Instrumentation were studied.

Average age was 6.5 years(2–12). Average follow-up was 24 months (6m-36m).

Results: The average Cobb angle was 52° before surgery, 33.7° after surgery (64 % correction) and 32.5° (62.5% correction) at latest follow-up. The mean apical vertebral translation was 86% and 84% at post-op and latest follow-up. Stabilisation was most commonly perfomed from T2 to L4/L5. Three patients had implant complications, two had deep seated wound infections which necesssiated removal of implants in one case. Five of these patients have gone on to definitive fusions. Curve correction was best for primary thoracolumbar curves and lumbar curves. 2 patients with thoracic curves did not maintain correction.

Conclusion: The Paediatric Isola system is a safe and effective instrumentation in early management of a difficult and challenging sub group of scoliosis patients.

Background data: Previous studies have questioned the quality of information available on the internet. Internet research has proven to more prevalent among scoliosis patients as compared to other orthopaedic conditions.

Aim: Scoliosis websites identified by commonly used search engines were assessed for quality and medical accuracy.

Methods: The word scoliosis was entered into top six search engines and Websites ranked according to frequency. Five websites from the worldwide web and five from the UK only search were evaluated by medical professionals – 4 spinal consultants, 2 registrars, 3 nurses and 1 physiotherapist. 10 patients/carers who had scoliosis surgery also assessed these sites. A scale of 1 to 5 was used for ease of understanding, reliability, clinical correlation, adequacy and links and average score calculated.

Results: None of the top five UK websites figured in the top 5 WWW searchs. Scoliosis research society (SRS) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) website scored the highest by clinicians and patients in the www list. From the UK list, SAUK website scored the highest with both groups followed by Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) website. We compared the assessment of websites by a healthcare professionals and by patients who had undergone treatment and showed no statistical difference in the scoring.

Conclusion: As treating clinicians it is necessary to educate patients by guiding them to reliable internet sites like SAUK and SRS.

Objective: Prolonged waiting time after being referred for a specialist opinion has plagued the NHS despite pressures to deliver optimum healthcare. We have assessed changes in clinical situation in patients referred to a spinal service while awaiting the first assessment.

Materials & Results: 89 patients were referred to our unit between Jan 2001 and December 2004. The gender distribution in this cohort was equal and the mean age was 50.7 yrs. The mean delay for being seen in the clinic was 28.4 mo (16–58 mo). Significant changes in the symptom pattern were noted in 46 patients, of which 8 patients reported radicular symptoms on a different side. In addition, 7 patients experienced an increased severity in the existing symptoms. 43 patients had been referred to us with an MRI. However due to the delay, 20 of these patients required re-scanning. Following the clinical assessment 25 patients were referred for Physiotherapy, 4 patients required a further clinical review and 44 patients were referred for further imaging.

Conclusion: The problem of excessive out-patient waiting time results in changes in symptom patterns and an increase in the severity of existing symptoms. The changes frequently results in an increased requirement of re-imaging.