Abstract
Aim: To assess if commonly used scoliosis instrumentation activates metal detectors at airport security gates.
Methods: 20 patientswho had travelled by air following scoliosis surgery were included. The type of instrumentation, number of journeys, body mass index and whether the alarm was triggered off by the airport security detector was recorded. We asked the patients opinion regarding provision of documentary evidence of surgery.
Results: 10 patients had posterior instrumentation, 5 patients -Paediatric ISOLA,4 patients had anterior instrumentation and one patient, anterior and posterior instrumentation. 12 patients (60%) had travelled more than four times by air following surgery corresponding to 48 passes through an airport archway detector.5 patients out of 20 had set off the alarm while passing through the metal detector everytime of which 4 had posterior instrumentation and 1 anterior instrumentation. None of the patients with ISOLA instrumentation set of the alarm. Two patients had set off the alarm every time they passed through the metal detector and both of them had posterior instrumentation. 14 patients(70%) suggested that we should provide documentary evidence of surgery to avoid delays in the airport security check. 25 % of patients set of the metal detector alarm following scoliosis instrumentation.
Conclusion: Patients with posterior instrumentation are more likely to set off the alarm compared to patients with ISOLA instrumentation. It is important to be aware that scoliosis instrumentation can activate airport archway detectors in our present security climate and to provide documentation to patients in order to avoid embarassment and delays.
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr Caroline Goldberg, The Research Centre, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.
