Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a logic procedure when osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis is limitad to one femorotibial compartment. The indications for the procedure includes osteoarthrosis or osteonecrosis with full-thickness loss of articular cartilage limited to one of the tibiofemoral knee compartments. Physical examination should ensure full range of knee motion. Frontal and sagittal knee stability has to be tested. A particular attention should be given to the state of the anterior cruciate ligament. The status of the patellofemoral joint should be analysed by physical examination and patellofemoral view at 30, 60 and 90° of flexion. Preoperative anteroposterior varus and valgus stress radiographs should be done to confirm the complete loss of articular cartilage in the involved compartment, the full thickness cartilage in the opposite compartment and the possibility of full correction of the deformity to neutral. The so-called minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure using a specific instrumentation is able to provide quicker recovery since the extensor mechanism disruption is eliminated. More importantly the radiological evaluation has shown that precise implantation of the components is possible with an MIS approach which is important for the long term results of the arthroplasty. The clinical results at ten years of follow-up of cemented metal-backed UKA performed through a conventional approach have shown results comparable to those obtained with total knee arthroplasty. The in vivo kinematic evaluation of patients implanted with UKA has shown that kinematics similar to the normal knee can be obtained, enhancing the importance of a functional anterior cruciate ligament. Recent design improvements have increased the femorotibial area of contact to accommodate high flexion angles. Additionally our experience has demonstrated that modern UKA is a valid alternative for young and active patients with unicompartmental tibiofemoral noninflammatory disease, including both osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. Compared to medial UKA lateral UKA represents in our experience only 5% of all UKA implantations. However the long term results of lateral UKA compares at least equally with those reported for medial UKA.
objective and subjective functional improvement; patient satisfaction and preference and cost-utility ratio after gender specific TKA or standard component implanted on the same women.
At 10 years we have a survivorship, if femoral aseptic loosening is used as an end point, of 97.6%. There was a deep infection rate of 1.2%, and a dislocation rate of 1.9%. There were no cases of thigh pain, and no intra-operative femoral neck/shaft fractures.
A clinical and radiographic study was conducted on 97 total hip arthroplasties (79 patients) performed for congenital hip dislocation using three-dimensional custom cementless stem. The mean age was 48 years (17 to 72). The mean follow up was 123 months (83 to 182). According to Crowe, there were 37 class 1, 28 class 2, 13 class 3 and 19 class 4. The average lengthening was 25 mm (5 to 58 mm), the mean femoral anteversion 38.6° (2° to 86°) and the correction in the prosthetic neck −23.6° (71° to 13°). The average Harris hip score improved from 58 to 93 points. Six hips (6.2%) required a revision. The survival rate was 97.7% ± 0.3% at 13 years. Custom cementless stem allows anatomical reconstruction and good functional results in a young and active population with disturbed anatomy, while avoiding a femoral osteotomy.
The purpose of this study was to review the results of biceps tenodesis and biceps reinsertion in the treatment of type II SLAP lesions. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a continuous series of patients. Only isolated type II SLAP lesions were included: twenty-five cases from January 2000 to April 2004. Exclusion criteria included associated instability, rotator cuff rupture and previous shoulder surgery. Ten patients (ten men) with an average age of thirty-seven years (range, 19–57) had a reinsertion of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) to the labrum with two suture anchors. Fifteen patients (nine men and six women) with an average age of fifty-two years (range, 28–64) underwent biceps tenodesis in the bicipital groove. All patients were reviewed by an independent examiner. In the reattachment group, the average follow-up was thirty-five months (range, 24–69); three patients underwent subsequent biceps tenodesis for persistent pain, three others were disappointed because of an inability to return to their previous level of sport, and the remaining four were very satisfied. The average Constant score improved from sixty-five to eighty-three points. In the tenodesis group, the average follow-up was thirty-four months (range, 24–68). No patient required revision surgery. Subjectively, one patient was disappointed (atypical residual pain), two were satisfied and twelve were very satisfied. All patients returned to their previous level of sports, and the average Constant score improved from fifty-nine to eighty-nine points. The results of labral reattachment were disappointing in comparison to biceps tenodesis. Thus, arthroscopic biceps tenodesis can be considered as an effective alternative to reattachment in the treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions. By moving the origin of the biceps to an extra-articular position, we eliminated the traction on the superior labrum and the source of pain; furthermore, range of motion and strength are unaltered allowing for a return to a pre-surgical level of activity.