Abstract
Purpose: Wrist fractures are often seen in elderly subjects who cannot generally tolerate aggressive fixation of unstable fractures. Percutaneous intra-focal pinning (Kapandji) is usually employed. The purpose of this study was to compare the classical treatment of unstable extra-articular fractures of the lower quarter of the radius with posterior displacement with a modified pinning technique.
Material and methods: This prospective radiological study concerned two groups of randomised patients aged 30 – 70 years who were hospitalised for surgical treatment of Pouteau-Colles fractures. In the first group, all patients were treated by the classical intra-focal technique using one or two dorsal pins and one lateral pin (group K). In the second group, all patients were treated by fixation with one or two infrafocal dorsal pins and a third pin inserted transfocally (group KM). Preoperative care, anaesthesia, and postoperative care (21 days immobilisation, pin removal at 45 days) were the same in both groups. The following anatomic measurements were made on the radiographs at day 1, 21, 45, and last follow-up: radial inclination on the lateral and AP views, bistyloid line.
Results: Group K included 49 patients, mean age 45 years. Group KM included 46 patients, mean age 54 years. There was no statistical difference between groups for age, gender, side, type of fracture. Radial inclination on the AP view was 19.2 (10–27 in group KM and 23.2 (19-30) in group. On the lateral view, radial inclination was 0 (−11 to 20) in group KM and −5.7 (−25 to 2) in group K. The proportion of bistyloid lines considered satisfactory was not different between groups.
Discussion: Infra-focal pinning can have limitations for maintaining reduction to bone healing. The Kapandji technique modified by use of a third transstyloid pin appears to provide better stabilisation of unstable fractures of the lower extremity of the radius, particularly in older subjects who cannot tolerate aggressive surgery. This preliminary study should be completed by a radio-clinical analysis in a larger number of patients to confirm these results.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.