Surgical treatment of fragility sacrum fractures with percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation is associated with high failure rates in terms of screw loosening, cut-through and turn-out. The latter is a common cause for complications, being detected in up to 20% of the patients. The aim of this study was to develop a new screw-in-screw concept and prototype implant for fragility sacrum fracture fixation and test it biomechanically versus transsacral and SI screw fixations.

Twenty-seven artificial pelves with discontinued symphysis and a vertical osteotomy in zone 1 after Denis were assigned to three groups (n = 9) for implantation of their right sites with either an SI screw, the new screw-in-screw implant, or a transsacral screw. All specimens were biomechanically tested to failure in upright position with the right ilium constrained. Validated setup and test protocol were used for complex axial and torsional loading, applied through the S1 vertebral body. Interfragmentary movements were captured via optical motion tracking. Screw motions in the bone were evaluated by means of triggered anteroposterior X-rays.

Interfragmentary movements and implant motions in terms of pull-out, cut-through, tilt, and turn-out were significantly higher for SI screw fixation compared to both transsacral screw and screw-in-screw fixations. In addition, transsacral screw and screw-in-screw fixations revealed similar construct stability. Moreover, screw-in-screw fixation successfully prevented turn-out of the implant, that remained at 0° rotation around the nominal screw axis unexceptionally during testing.

From biomechanical perspective, fragility sacrum fracture fixation with the new screw-in-screw implant prototype provides higher stability than with the use of one SI screw, being able to successfully prevent turn-out. Moreover, it combines the higher stability of transsacral screw fixation with the less risky operational procedure of SI screw fixation and can be considered as their alternative treatment option.

Treatment of comminuted intraarticular calcaneal fractures remains controversial and challenging. Anatomic reduction with stable fixation has demonstrated better outcomes than nonoperative treatment of displaced intraarticular fractures involving the posterior facet and anterior calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ) articulating surface of the calcaneus. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical performance of three different methods for fixation of comminuted intraarticular calcaneal fractures.

Comminuted calcaneal fractures, including Sanders III-AB fracture of the posterior facet and Kinner II-B fracture of the CCJ articulating calcaneal surface, were simulated in 18 fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower legs by means of osteotomies. The ankle joint, medial soft tissues and midtarsal bones along with the ligaments were preserved. The specimens were randomized according to their bone mineral density to 3 groups for fixation with either (1) 2.7 mm variable-angle locking anterolateral calcaneal plate in combination with one 4.5 mm and one 6.5 mm cannulated screw (Group 1), (2) 2.7 mm variable-angle locking lateral calcaneal plate (Group 2), or (3) interlocking calcaneal nail with 3.5 mm screws in combination with 3 separate 4.0 mm cannulated screws (Group 3). All specimens were biomechanically tested until failure under axial loading with the foot in simulated midstance position. Each test commenced with an initial quasi-static compression ramp from 50 N to 200 N, followed by progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2Hz. Starting from 200 N, the peak load of each cycle increased at a rate of 0.2 N/cycle. Interfragmentary movements were captured by means of optical motion tracking. In addition, mediolateral X-rays were taken every 250 cycles with a triggered C-arm. Varus deformation between the tuber calcanei and lateral calcaneal fragments, plantar gapping between the anterior process and tuber fragments, displacement at the plantar aspect of the CCJ articular calcaneal surface, and Böhler angle were evaluated.

Varus deformation of 10° was reached at significantly lower number of cycles in Group 2 compared to Group 1 and Group 3 (P ≤ 0.017). Both cycles to 10° plantar gapping and 2 mm displacement at the CCJ articular calcaneal surface revealed no significant differences between the groups (P ≥ 0.773). Böhler angle after 5000 cycles (1200 N peak load) had significantly bigger decrease in Group 2 compared to both other groups (P ≤ 0.020).

From biomechanical perspective, treatment of comminuted intraarticular calcaneal fractures using variable-angle locked plate with additional longitudinal screws or interlocked nail in combination with separate transversal screws seems to provide superior stability as opposed to variable-angle locked plating only.

Aims

To devise a method to quantify and optimize tightness when inserting cortical screws, based on bone characterization and screw geometry.

Nearly a quarter of screws cause damage during insertion by stripping the bone, reducing pullout strength by over 80%. Studies assessing surgically achieved tightness have predominately shown that variations between individual surgeons can lead to underpowered investigations. Further to the variables that have been previously explored, several basic aspects related to tightening screws have not been evaluated with regards to how they affect screw insertion. This study aims to identify the achieved tightness for several variables, firstly to better understand factors related to achieving optimal intraoperative screw purchase and secondly to establish improved methodologies for future studies.

Two torque screwdrivers were used consecutively by two orthopaedic surgeons to insert 60 cortical, non-locking, stainless-steel screws of 3.5 mm diameter through a 3.5 mm plate, into custom-made 4 mm thick 20 PCF sheets of Sawbone, mounted on a custom-made jig. Screws were inserted to optimal tightness subjectively chosen by each surgeon. The jig was attached to a bench for vertical screw insertion, before a further 60 screws were inserted using the first torque screwdriver with the jig mounted vertically, enabling horizontal screw insertion. Following the decision to use the first screwdriver to insert the remaining screws in the vertical position for the other variables, the following test parameters were assessed with 60 screws inserted per surgeon: without gloves, double surgical gloves, single surgical gloves, non-sterile nitrile gloves and, with and then without augmented feedback (using digitally displayed real-time achieved torque). For all tests, except when augmented feedback was used, the surgeon was blinded to the insertion torque. Once the stopping torque was reached, screws were tightened until the stripping torque was found, this being used to calculate tightness (stopping/stripping torque ratio). Screws were recorded to have stripped the material if the stopping torque was greater than the stripping torque. Following tests of normality, Mann-Whitney-U comparisons were performed between and combining both surgeons for each variable, with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.

There was no significant (p=0.29) difference in the achieved tightness between different torque screw drivers nor different jig positions (p=0.53). The use of any gloves led to significant (p < 0 .001) increases in achieved tightness compared to not using gloves for one surgeon but made no difference for the other (p=0.38–0.74). Using augmented feedback was found to virtually eliminate stripping. For one surgeon average tightness increased significantly (p < 0 .001) when torque values were displayed from 55 to 75%, whilst for the other, this was associated with significantly decreases (p < 0 .001), 72 to 57%, both surgeons returned to their pre-augmentation tightness when it was removed.

Individual techniques make a considerable difference to the impact from some variables involved when inserting screws. However, the orientation of screws insertion and the type of screwdriver did not affect achieved screw tightness. Using visual feedback reduces rates of stripping and investigating ways to incorporate this into clinical use are recommended. Further work is underway into the effect of other variables such as bone density and cortical thickness.

Proximal humeral fractures occur frequently, with fixed angle locking plates often being used for their treatment. However, the failure rate of this fixation is high, ranging between 10 and 35%. Numerous variables are thought to affect the performance of the fixation used, including the length and configuration of screws used and the plate position. However, there is currently limited quantitative evidence to support concepts for optimal fixation. The variations in surgical techniques and human anatomy make biomechanical testing prohibitive for such investigations. Therefore, a finite element osteosynthesis test kit has been developed and validated - SystemFix. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of variations in screw length, configuration and plate position on predicted failure risk of PHILOS plate fixation for unstable proximal humerus fractures using the test kit.

Twenty-six low-density humerus models were selected and osteotomized to create a malreduced unstable three-part fracture AO/OTA 11-B3.2 with medial comminution which was virtually fixed with the PHILOS plate. In turn, four different screw lengths, twelve different screw configurations and five plate positions were simulated. Each time, three physiological loading cases were modelled, with an established finite element analysis methodology utilized to evaluate average peri-screw bone strain, this measure has been previously demonstrated to predict experimental fatigue fixation failure.

All three core variables lead to significant differences in peri-screw strain magnitudes, i.e. predicted failure risk. With screw length, shortening of 4 mm in all screw lengths (the distance of the screw tips to the joint surface increasing from 4 mm to 8 mm) significantly (p < 0 .001) increased the risk of failure. In the lowest density bone, every additional screw reduced failure risk compared to the four-screw construct, whereas in more dense bone, once the sixth screw was inserted, no further significant benefit was seen (p=0.40). Screw configurations not including calcar screws, also demonstrated significant (p < 0 .001) increased risk of failure. Finally, more proximal plate positioning, compared to the suggested operative technique, was associated with reduced the predicted failure risk, especially in constructs using calcar screws, and distal positioning increased failure risk.

Optimal fixation constructs were found when placing screws 4 mm from the joint surface, in configurations including calcar screws, in plates located more proximally, as these factors were associated with the greatest reduction in predicted fixation failure in 3-part unstable proximal humeral fractures. These results may help to provide practical recommendations on the implant usage for improved primary implant stability and may lead to better healing outcomes for osteoporotic proximal fracture patients. Whilst prospective clinical confirmation is required, using this validated computational tool kit enables the discovery of findings otherwise hidden by the variation and prohibitive costs of appropriately powered biomechanical studies using human samples.

Distal radius fractures have an incidence rate of 17.5% among all fractures. Their treatment in case of comminution, commonly managed by volar locking plates, is still challenging. Variable-angle screw technology could counteract these challenges. Additionally, combined volar and dorsal plate fixation is valuable for treatment of complex fractures at the distal radius. Currently, biomechanical investigation of the competency of supplemental dorsal plating is scant. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competency of double-plated distal radius fractures in comparison to volar locking plate fixation.

Complex intra-articular distal radius fractures AO/OTA 23-C 2.1 and C 3.1 were created by means of osteotomies, simulating dorsal defect with comminution of the lunate facet in 30 artificial radii, assigned to 3 study groups with 10 specimens in each. The styloid process of each radius was separated from the shaft and the other articular fragments. In group 1, the lunate facet was divided to 3 equally-sized fragments. In contrast, the lunate in group 2 was split in a smaller dorsal and a larger volar fragment, whereas in group 3 was divided in 2 equal fragments. Following fracture reduction, each specimen was first instrumented with a volar locking plate and non-destructive quasi-static biomechanical testing under axial loading was performed in specimen's inclination of 40° flexion, 40° extension and 0° neutral position. Mediolateral radiographs were taken under 100 N loads in flexion and extension, as well as under 150 N loads in neutral position. Subsequently, all biomechanical tests were repeated after supplemental dorsal locking plate fixation of all specimens. Based on machine and radiographic data, stiffness and angular displacement between the shaft and lunate facet were determined.

Stiffness in neutral position (N/mm) without/with dorsal plating was on average 164.3/166, 158.5/222.5 and 181.5/207.6 in groups 1–3. It increased significantly after supplementary dorsal plating in groups 2 and 3.

Predominantly, from biomechanical perspective supplemental dorsal locked plating increases fixation stability of unstable distal radius fractures after volar locked plating. However, its effect depends on the fracture pattern at the distal radius.

Locking plates have led to important changes in bone fracture management, allowing flexible biological fracture fixation based on the principle of an internal fixator. The technique of locking plate fixation differs fundamentally from conventional plating and has its indications and limitations. Most of the typical locking plate failure patterns are related to basic technical errors, such as under-sizing of the implant, too short working length, and imperfect application of locking screws. After analysis of the fracture morphology and intrinsic stability following fracture reduction, a meticulous preoperative planning is mandatory under consideration of the principles of the internal fixator technique to avoid technical errors and inaccuracies leading to early implant failure.

Aims

Plating displaced proximal humeral fractures is associated with a high rate of screw perforation. Dynamization of the proximal screws might prevent these complications. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new gliding screw concept for plating proximal humeral fractures biomechanically.

Introduction

The incidence of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population is growing and represents the second most common insufficiency fracture of the femur following fractures around the hip joint. Fixation of fractures in patients with poor bone stock and early mobilisation in feeble and polymorbide patients is challenging. Development of a fixation approach for augmentation of conventional LISS (less invasive stabilization system) plating may result in superior long-term clinical outcomes and enhance safe weight bearing.

Hip fractures constitute the most debilitating complication of osteoporosis with a steadily increasing incidence in an aging population. Intramedullary nailing of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures can be challenging because of poor implant anchorage in the femoral head. Recently, cement augmentation of PFNA blades with Polymethylmethycrylate (PMMA) has shown promising results by enhancing the cutout resistance in proximal femoral fractures. The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the impact of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of TFNA blades and screws within the femoral head, and compare its effect with head elements placed in a center or antero–posterior off–center positions.

Eight groups were formed out of 96 polyurethane foam specimens with low density, simulating isolated femoral heads with severe osteoporotic bone. The specimens in each group were implanted with either non–augmented or PMMA–augmented TFNA blades or screws in a center or antero–posterior off–center position, 7 mm anterior or 7 mm posterior. They were mechanically tested in a setup simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture with lack of postero–medial support and load sharing at the fracture gap. All specimens underwent progressively increasing cyclic loading until catastrophic construct failure. Varus–valgus and head rotation angles were monitored by an inclinometer mounted on the head. A varus collapse of 5° or a 10° head rotation were defined as the clinically relevant failure criterion.

Load at failure for specimens with augmented TFNA head elements (screw center: 3799 N ± 326 (mean ± SD); blade center: 3228 N ± 478; screw off–center: 2680 N ± 182; blade off–center: 2591 N ± 244) was significantly higher compared to the respective non–augmented specimens (blade center: 1489 N ± 41; screw center: 1593 N ± 120; blade off–center: 1018 N ± 48; screw off–center: 515 N ± 73), p<0.001. In both non–augmented and augmented specimens, the failure load in center position was significantly higher compared to the respective off–center position, regardless of head element, p<0.001. Non–augmented TFNA blades in off–center position revealed significantly higher load at failure versus non–augmented screws in off–center position, p<0.001.

Cement augmentation clearly enhances fixation stability of TFNA blades and screws. Non–augmented blades outperformed screws in antero–posterior off–center position. Positioning of TFNA blades in the femoral head is more forgiving than TFNA screws in terms of failure load. Augmentation with TFNA has not been approved by FDA.

Injury to the syndesmosis occurs in 10–13% of all operative ankle fractures and there is evidence that both incomplete treatment and malreduction of the syndesmosis can lead to poor clinical outcomes. Much attention has been given to post–operative malreduction documented by computer tomography (CT), however, there is limited data about the intact positioning and relative motion of the native syndesmosis. The aim of this study is to elucidate more detailed information on the position of the fibula in the syndesmosis during simulated weight–bearing in intact state, with sequential ligament sectioning and following two reconstructive techniques.

Fourteen paired, fresh–frozen human cadaveric limbs were mounted in a weight–bearing simulation jig. CT scans were obtained under simulated foot–flat loading (75 N) and in single–legged stance (700 N), in five foot positions: neutral, 15° external rotation, 15° internal rotation, 20° dorsiflexion, and 20° plantarflexion. The elements of the syndesmosis and the deltoid ligament were sequentially sectioned. One limb of each pair was then reconstructed via one of two methods: Achilles autograft and peroneus longus ligamentoplasty. The specimens were rescanned in all 5 foot positions following each ligament resection and reconstruction. Measurements of fibular diastasis, rotation and anterior–posterior translation were performed on the axial cuts of the CT scans, 1 cm proximal to the roof of the plafond.

Multiple measurements were made to define the position of the fibula in the incisura. Clinically relevant deformity patterns were produced. The deformity at the incisura was consistent with clinical injury, and the degree of displacement in all ligament states was dependent on the foot position. The most destructive state resulted in the most deformity at the syndesmosis. Differences between the intact and reconstructed states were found with all measurements, especially when the foot was in external rotation and dorsiflexion. There was no significant difference with direct comparison of the reconstructions.

This study has detailed the motion of the fibula in the incisura and its variation with foot position. Neither reconstruction was clearly superior and both techniques had difficulty in the externally rotated and dorsiflexed foot positions. This study design can serve as a model for future ex–vivo testing of reconstructive techniques.

Three Cannulated Screws (3CS), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) with antirotation screw (DHS–Screw) or with a Blade (DHS–Blade) are the gold standards for fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Compared to 3CS, both DHS systems require larger skin incision with more extensive soft tissue dissection while providing the benefit of superior stability. The newly designed Femoral Neck System (FNS) for dynamic fixation combines the advantages of angular stability with a less invasive surgical technique. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FNS in comparison to established methods for fixation of the femoral neck in a human cadaveric model.

Twenty pairs of fresh–frozen human cadaveric femora were instrumented with either DHS–Screw, DHS–Blade, 3CS or FNS. A reduced unstable femoral neck fracture 70° Pauwels III, AO/OTA31–B2.3 was simulated with 30° distal and 15° posterior wedges. Cyclic axial loading was applied in 16° adduction, starting at 500N and with progressive peak force increase of 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Relative interfragmentary movements were evaluated with motion tracking.

Highest axial stiffness was observed for FNS (748.9 ± 66.8 N/mm), followed by DHS–Screw (688.8 ± 44.2 N/mm), DHS–Blade (629.1 ± 31.4 N/mm) and 3CS (584.1 ± 47.2 N/mm) with no statistical significances between the implant constructs. Cycles until 15 mm leg shortening were comparable for DHS–Screw (20542 ± 2488), DHS–Blade (19161 ± 1264) and FNS (17372 ± 947), and significantly higher than 3CS (7293 ± 850), p<0.001. Similarly, cycles until 15 mm femoral neck shortening were comparable between DHS–Screw (20846 ± 2446), DHS–Blade (18974 ± 1344) and FNS (18171 ± 818), and significantly higher than 3CS (8039 ± 838), p<0.001.

From a biomechanical point of view, the Femoral Neck System is a valid alternative to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, representing the advantages of a minimal invasive angle–stable implant for dynamic fixation with comparable stability to the two DHS systems with blade or screw, and superior to Three Cannulated Screws.

The high risk and the associated high mortality of secondary, contralateral hip fractures [1,2] could justify internal, invasive prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur to avoid these injuries in case of a low energy fall. Previous studies have demonstrated high potential of augmentation approaches [3,4,5], but to date there has no ideal solution been found. The development of optimized reinforcement strategies can be aided with validated computer simulation tools that can be used to evaluate new ideas.

A validated non-linear finite element (FE) simulation tool was used here to predict the yield and fracture load of twelve osteoporotic or osteopenic proximal femora in sideways fall based on high resolution CT images. Various augmentation strategies using bone cement or novel metal implants were developed, optimized and virtually performed on the bone models. The relative strengthening compared to the non-augmented state was evaluated using case-specific FE analyses.

Strengthening effect of the cement-based augmentation was linearly proportional to cement volume and was significantly affected by cement location. With the clinically acceptable 12.6 ± 1.2 ml volume and optimized location of the cement cloud, compared to the non-augmented state, 71 ± 26% (42 – 134%) and 217 ± 166% (83 – 509%) increase in yield force and energy was reached, respectively. These were significantly higher than previously published experimental results using the “central” cement location [5], which could be well predicted by our FE models. The optimized metal implant could provide even higher strengthening effect: 140 ± 39% (76 – 194%) increase in yield force and +357 ± 177% (132 – 691%) increase in yield energy. However, for metal implants, a higher risk of subcapital fractures was indicated. For both cement and metal, the originally weaker bones were strengthened exponentially more compared to the stronger ones.

The ideal solution for prophylactic augmentation should provide an appropriate balance between the requirements of being clinically feasible, ethically acceptable and mechanically sufficient. Even with the optimized location, the cement-based approach may not provide enough strengthening effect and adequate reproducibility of the identified optimal cement cloud position may not be achieved clinically. While the metal implant based strategy appears to be able to deliver the required strengthening effect, the ethical acceptance of this more invasive option is questionable. Further development is therefore required to identify the ideal, clinically relevant augmentation strategy. This may involve new cement materials, less invasive metal implants, or a combination of both. The FE simulation approach presented here could help to screen the potential ideas and highlight promising candidates for experimental evaluation.

Objectives

Osteosynthesis of anterior pubic ramus fractures using one large-diameter screw can be challenging in terms of both surgical procedure and fixation stability. Small-fragment screws have the advantage of following the pelvic cortex and being more flexible.

The aim of the present study was to biomechanically compare retrograde intramedullary fixation of the superior pubic ramus using either one large- or two small-diameter screws.

Summary

Time-lapsed CT offers new opportunities to predict the risk of cement leakage and to evaluate the mechanical effects on a vertebral body by monitoring each incremental injection step in an in-vitro vertebroplasty procedure.

Summary Statement

Tibia plateau split fracture fixation with two cancellous screws is particularly suitable for non-osteoporotic bone, whereas four cortical lag screws provide a comparable compression in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic bone. Angle-stable locking plates maintain the preliminary compression applied by a reduction clamp.

Summary

Biomechanically, a 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis in the PFLCP leads to significantly earlier implant failure. Screw deviation relies on a technical error on insertion, but in our opinion cannot be controlled intraoperatively with the existing instrumentation devices.