Aims. Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing
Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the functional results in a fitter subgroup of participants in the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of
Aims.
Aims. Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during
Aims. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common pre- and postoperative issue in
Aims. Implant waste during
Aims. Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning software has the potential to improve postoperative stability in
Aims. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with
Aims. Young adults undergoing
Aims. Adult patients with history of childhood infection pose a surgical challenge for
Aims. The volume of ambulatory
Aims. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of hip osteoarthritis, resulting in an increased number of
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a patient-specific algorithm which we developed for predicting changes in sagittal pelvic tilt after
Aims. Osteoporosis is common in
Aims. A revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in
Aims. Traditionally,
Aims. The primary aim of this study was to compare the hip-specific functional outcome of robotic assisted
Aims. This study was designed to develop a model for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) loss of the femur after
Aims. The primary aim of our study was to assess the influence of age on hip-specific outcome following
Aims. Precise implant positioning, tailored to individual spinopelvic biomechanics and phenotype, is paramount for stability in