Abstract
Aims
There is a considerable challenge in treating bone infections and orthopaedic device-associated infection (ODAI), partly due to impaired penetration of systemically administrated antibiotics at the site of infection. This may be circumvented by local drug administration. Knowledge of the release kinetics from any carrier material is essential for proper application. Ceftriaxone shows a particular constant release from calcium sulphate (CaSO4) in vitro, and is particularly effective against streptococci and a large portion of Gram-negative bacteria. We present the clinical release kinetics of ceftriaxone-loaded CaSO4 applied locally to treat ODAI.
Methods
A total of 30 operations with ceftriaxone-loaded CaSO4 had been performed in 28 patients. Ceftriaxone was applied as a single local antibiotic in 21 operations and combined with vancomycin in eight operations, and in an additional operation with vancomycin and amphotericin B. Sampling of wound fluid was performed from drains or aspirations. Ceftriaxone concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Results
A total of 37 wound fluid concentrations from 16 operations performed in 14 patients were collected. The ceftriaxone concentrations remained approximately within a range of 100 to 200 mg/l up to three weeks. The median concentration was 108.9 mg/l (interquartile range 98.8 to 142.5) within the first ten days. No systemic adverse reactions were observed.
Conclusion
Our study highlights new clinical data of locally administered ceftriaxone with CaSO4 as carrier material. The near-constant release of ceftriaxone from CaSO4 observed in vitro could be confirmed in vivo. The concentrations remained below known local toxicity thresholds.
Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):835–842.
Article focus
-
Local antibiotic application may enhance drug delivery at the site of infection of bone and orthopaedic device-associated infections (ODAIs).
-
The release kinetics of ceftriaxone from calcium sulphate (CaSO4) used as local antibiotic application to treat bone and ODAIs are documented.
Key messages
-
The ceftriaxone concentrations remained approximately within a range of 100 to 200 mg/l up to three weeks.
-
The concentrations remained below local toxicity thresholds.
-
The nearly constant release of ceftriaxone from CaSO4 observed in vitro could be confirmed in vivo, release being limited by dissolution of the carrier material.
Strengths and limitations
-
A range of ceftriaxone concentrations could be determined, nevertheless interpatient variability remained quite variable.
-
Only a rather limited amount of measurements were available for analysis, sampling having not been performed systematically but instead as treatment imposed and allowed.
-
Samples were available solely from hip wounds, while dissolution of the carrier material and release of the added antibiotic may differ at other sites.
Introduction
Bone infections and orthopaedic device-associated infections (ODAIs) are notably difficult to treat. One of the reasons is the impaired penetration of systemically administered antibiotics at the site of the infection, worsened by reduced activity against biofilm.1-4 Antibiotic drug delivery may be enhanced in bone and joint infections by local administration.5-8 Interesting release kinetics have been documented particularly for vancomycin with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement as well as with calcium sulphate (CaSO4) as antibiotic carrier materials.5-8 Even intermittent direct intra-articular administration is associated with high joint fluid concentrations of vancomycin.9 The choice of antibiotics is limited due to local toxicity and stability issues.10-12 The release of aminoglycosides from available carrier materials is relatively short and associated with emergence of resistance.5,13-16 Adequate options to treat Gram-negative bacteria are therefore limited.6
Ceftriaxone appears to have a nearly constant release from CaSO4 in vitro.12,17 Furthermore, it has excellent activity against streptococci and covers a large portion of Gram-negative bacterial species, offering interesting new treatment options.18-21 We aimed to study the release kinetics of CaSO4 loaded with ceftriaxone in various ODAIs when local application of the well-established vancomycin-loaded CaSO48,22 was not deemed adequate.
Methods
Patients with ODAI treated with antibiotic-loaded CaSO4 were identified from a prospectively collected database.8,14 Between October 2013 and August 2022, CaSO4 (Osteoset; Wright Medical Technologies, USA) loaded with ceftriaxone (2 g in ten cases, 4 g in 19 cases, and 6 g in one case) was used in 30 operations (21 hip periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), two femur fracture-related infections (FRIs), one pelvis FRI, three knee PJIs, two shoulder PJIs, and one elbow PJI) performed on 228 patients (16 male, 12 female; median age 71.6 years (range 49.5 to 97.1)). In 21 cases, ceftriaxone was applied as the only local antibiotic. In eight cases, ceftriaxone was combined with vancomycin (2 g in 25 ml CaSO4), and in one case with both vancomycin and amphotericin B (2 g in 25 ml CaSO4 and 450 mg in 75 ml CaSO4, respectively).
The preparation of the CaSO4 pellets has been described elsewhere.8,17 Briefly, 2 g of ceftriaxone powder was added per package of 25 ml Osteoset fast cure, adding sterile water for a total liquid volume of 13 to 15 ml, instead of the standard 7.8 ml provided in the set, for the dough to be hydrated enough for mixing and moulding.17 The total volume exceeded the volume of the moulds provided in each set, although the surplus was nevertheless implanted, even if irregularly formed.
Sampling of wound fluid was performed if available or necessary. When drains were in place, fluid was collected over the shortest possible period of time to obtain samples at a specific timepoint. Drains were not maintained for more than five days. Wound fluid aspirations were performed only at reoperations or in case of clinical need. The samples were collected in serum separator tubes and frozen at -80°C until analyses by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described previously.12 The limit of quantification (LOQ) for ceftriaxone was 0.5 mg/l.17
Results
A total of 37 wound fluid concentrations of ceftriaxone were available from 116 operations (15 hip PJIs and one proximal femur FRI) performed on 114 patients (eight male, six female; median age 69.5 years (range 50.4 to 97.1)). In 12 operations, ceftriaxone was the sole antibiotic added to CaSO4. A combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin was applied in four cases, of which one also had amphotericin B added. Detailed data are summarized in Table I. All wound fluid samples were collected from the hip, except in one patient treated for FRI of the femur, with sample collection performed over a drain maintained for three days. All samples were collected from the wound cavity of the hip joint or around the proximal femur. Examples illustrating the distribution of the CaSO4 pellets are shown in Figure 1.
Table I.
Operation no. | Sex | Age, yrs | Organ | Problem | Procedure | CaSO4, ml | Ceftriaxone, mg | Vancomycin, mg | Amphotericin B, mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 50.4 | Proximal femur | FRI | Debridement and hardware removal | 75 | 4,000 | 2,000 | 0 |
2 | F | 68.2 | Hip | PJI | Resection arthroplasty | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
3 | F | 82.7 | Hip | PJI | Resection arthroplasty | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
4 | M | 69.5 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
5 | F | 82.3 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 25 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 |
6 | M | 75.3 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
7 | M | 71.1 | Hip | PJI | Two-stage exchange with spacer | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
8 | F | 70.2 | Hip | PJI | Two-stage exchange without spacer | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
9 | F | 56.7 | Hip | PJI | Two-stage exchange with spacer | 75 | 6,000 | 0 | 0 |
10 | M | 57.1 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
11 | M | 57.1 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 0 |
12 | Identical 11 | Identical 11 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 125 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 450 |
13 | M | 67.0 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 75 | 4,000 | 2,000 | 0 |
14 | M | 72.1 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
15 | F | 73.2 | Hip | PJI | One-stage exchange | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
16 | M | 97.1 | Hip | PJI | DAIR | 50 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 7 × M 6 × F |
Median 69.5 (50.4 to 97.1) | All hip or proximal femur | 1 × FRI 15 × PJI |
N/A | 1 × 25 11 × 50 3 × 75 1 × 125 |
3 × 2,000 12 × 4,000 1 × 6,000 |
10 × 0 4 × 2,000 |
12 × 0 1 × 450 |
-
Cases 11 and 12 were from the same patient and hip, from two revisions performed 11 days apart, whereas case 10 was the same patient but from the contralateral hip. The quantities of ceftriaxone ranged from 2,000 to 6,000 mg. In four cases, vancomycin-loaded ceftriaxone-loaded calcium sulphate had been added concomitantly, in addition to amphotericin B in one case.
-
CaSO4, ceftriaxone-loaded calcium sulphate; DAIR, debridement, antibiotics and implant retention; F, female; FRI, fracture-related infection; M, male; N/A, not applicable; PJI, periprosthetic joint infection.
Fig. 1
The ceftriaxone concentrations measured in the wound fluid over time are illustrated in Figure 2. In one case, marked on the figure, concomitant systemic treatment with ceftriaxone interfered. The concentrations remained approximately within a range of 100 to 200 mg/l over a period of up to three weeks. The highest concentrations were observed between five and 12 days postoperatively, with one exception (385.2 mg/l on day 17 at revision due to secondary wound oozing attributed to the dissolution of CaSO4). Over the first ten days, median ceftriaxone concentration was 108.9 mg/l (53.6 to 200; interquartile range (IQR) 98.8 to 142.5) in 16 operations. In three operations, wound fluid could be sampled after a longer follow-up on days 56, 63, and 91, respectively, as aspirations were performed to rule out persistence of infection.
Fig. 2
No systemic adverse reactions (toxicity or hypersensitivity) related to ceftriaxone were observed. In one case (4%), CaSO4 had been removed secondarily due to persistent wound oozing (11 days postoperatively).
Discussion
This study provides to the best of our knowledge the first in vivo data of ceftriaxone concentrations released in wound fluid from CaSO4 used as carrier material (Figure 1). Results over time up to three months after implantation were available from 16 operations for PJI of the hip and FRI of the proximal femur. Systemic administration of ceftriaxone interfered in only one case. Considering known serum trough and tissue concentrations,23 inclusion of this one case does not change the conclusions of this study. These observations confirmed a continuous release, as observed in vitro, probably driven by the slow dissolution of the carrier material (Figure 1).17 Concentrations remained mainly within a range of 100 to 200 mg/l for at least three weeks. While a certain effect of the ceftriaxone released from CaSO4 may be expected on any biofilm formed in ODAI, the required time and concentration profiles necessary for biofilm eradication, rather than just reduction, remain unknown to the best of our knowledge.24-26
Ceftriaxone-loaded CaSO4 appears to have a particular and outstanding release profile, with constant concentrations persisting for some weeks (Figure 1).17 As a beta-lactam antibiotic, and consequently highly soluble compound, ceftriaxone would be expected to elute rapidly from the matrix of the carrier.12,27,28 However, the concentrations observed do not follow the exponential decrease observed in aqueous solution at body temperature without any carrier material.12,27,28 Persistent high local concentrations over some weeks indicate a slow release, most probably limited by dissolution of the carrier material (Figure 1).29,30 From clinical experience, dissolution appears to happen faster within well-vascularized muscles around the hip and within the thigh than in case of application within a medullary cavity, or closer to the ankle.
As a beta-lactam antibiotic, time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone determines antibacterial activity.31-33 Continuous exposure would be ensured by the release observed from CaSO4 (Figure 1). However, the activity of ceftriaxone against staphylococci is slightly reduced in presence of albumin, a protein that binds to this drug with a high affinity.18,19,34,35 High local drug concentrations may however compensate for protein binding, which may be saturated with an exponential increase of ceftriaxone observed from 10 mg/l upwards.34,35 While wound fluid albumin concentration is unknown in the early postoperative phase, native joint fluid and periprosthetic joint fluid, as well as wound fluid from chronic wounds, have a lower albumin content than serum.36-38 Considering the concentrations observed, very high activity may be expected against streptococci (MIC < 0.1 mg/l).18,20,21 Streptococci may be identified in up to 12% of chronic osteomyelitis cases,39-41 and cause up to 12% of PJIs.42-46 Staphylococci cause the vast majority of ODAIs as well as most cases of osteomyelitis,39-41–43-46 but may show resistance to this antibiotic, particularly coagulase-negative staphylococci.20,21,42 Ceftriaxone does not suffer from an inoculum effect with Gram-positive bacteria.18 Gram-negative bacteria may be identified in up to 45% of chronic osteomyelitis cases,39-41 and cause up to 12% of PJIs42-46 and 15% of FRIs.44 While ceftriaxone has an antibacterial spectrum enlarged to Gram-negative bacteria, there are potential issues with resistance.20,21 Non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli are usually not sensitive to ceftriaxone.20,21,47 All Gram-negative bacilli carry variants of the AmpC gene, an inducible cephalosporinase.48 The high concentrations of Ceftriaxone locally released may not suffice to overcome these resistances, despite being of a competitive type. Therefore, other antibiotics may have to be preferred or added to successfully treat such bacterial species.
Samples were frozen at -80°C until assaying, to prevent degradation of ceftriaxone during storage.12,27,28 LC-MS/MS was used to measure ceftriaxone concentrations, as described elsewhere.12,17 This method is independent of the protein matrix of the samples.49 Therefore, the protein matrix has no influence on the measurement, contrary to the fluorescence assays commonly used in clinical chemistry, which are calibrated to the protein content of serum. However, wound and joint fluid has another protein content.36-38 While the chosen assay had not been validated formally for wound fluid, results may be considered as reliable due to the independence of the protein matrix.49 Samples were collected both from drains, particularly those from the first three days, and by aspiration. Precipitation of the drug may happen within the drains, resulting in falsely low results. However, all results remained within the same range (Figure 1), making such a sampling issue unlikely. One sample reached a high peak of 385.5 mg/l at day 17. This sample was collected at revision due to persistent wound oozing induced by CaSO4, a known issue with this carrier material.50 In this case, a more rapid degradation of CaSO4 may have happened for an unknown reason, with consecutive secretion and high ceftriaxone concentrations.
Cell toxicity is limiting any local application of drugs.10,11 Toxicity of ceftriaxone is both concentration- and time-dependent.11 Nevertheless, the release from CaSO4 remains far below long-term toxicity thresholds observed in vitro.11 No systemic toxicity is to be expected from local application of a single dose of 2 to 6 g of ceftriaxone, as the slow release process is associated with low systemic exposure, and the single dose is within or close to the highest recommended daily dosage (4 g).17,18,20,21 Ceftriaxone is primarily eliminated by hepatobiliary pathways.18 Therefore, an accumulation in case of renal failure is not an issue. Hypercalcaemia may, however, be an issue, particularly in case of renal impairment, and may require limiting the total amount of CaSO4 carrier material.51 The implantation of CaSO4 may be associated with prolonged wound drainage. In a recently published systematic review, the risk of prolonged wound drainage was estimated at 3.8%.52 With one patient from this study reoperated for prolonged wound drainage, the risk in this cohort was 4%. Uncontrolled infection may also cause prolonged wound drainage and require reoperations, a risk mitigated by the local application of antibiotic-loaded CaSO4.22 Placement of a subcutaneous suction drain may allow the skin to heal without prolonged oozing, without aspirating relevant quantities of the antibiotic placed in the depth of a hip. As mentioned, we remove this drain on day 5 at the latest.
Despite interesting release kinetics observed clinically,5,6,8 local application of antibiotics in the treatment of bone and joint infections remains a matter of debate. A recently published large study even showed a negative effect of local application of antibiotics in the treatment of PJI.53 This, however, may have been due to application of inappropriate antibiotics as well as poor carrier materials.22,54 The historically used standard carrier material PMMA is non-resorbable and may serve as substrate for biofilm formation, despite active antibiotic drug release.55,56 PMMA may have to be removed for mechanical reasons, thus requiring reoperations with consecutive supplementary risks negating any advantages of local delivery.57 The most commonly applied aminoglycosides may simply be inadequate for local application. Release of these small, very hydrophilic molecules may be too fast, resulting in a high initial burst with potential toxicity, whereas the concentrations drop too fast towards subtherapeutic values.5,13,14,16 In addition, the mode of action of these antibiotics may be inadequate for local delivery, as it requires an oxygen-dependent active transport against the proton gradient, which is particularly unfavourable for treating bacteria with low metabolic activity in an acidic environment.58 The addition of antibiotic-loaded CaSO4 to standard of care did greatly improve outcomes in two studies examining debridement, antibiotics and implant retention procedures in hip22 or knee54 PJI, but had no effect in two other studies.59,60 A potential explanation is insufficient quantities or concentrations. Another hypothetical explanation is the type of CaSO4 used, as both studies with a positive effect used Osteoset, whereas the other two studies used Stimulan (Biocomposites, UK). Ceftriaxone-loaded CaSO4 may be particularly useful in case of PJI caused by streptococci, considering their sensitivity to this antibiotic and the currently subpar outcome of the standard treatment.20,21,61
In conclusion, this study provides new clinical data on ceftriaxone wound fluid concentrations when locally applied with CaSO4 as carrier material to treat orthopaedic infections. The near-constant release of ceftriaxone from CaSO4 observed in vitro could be confirmed in the clinical application (Figure 1).17 Furthermore, the concentrations are below the local toxicity threshold and therefore are not expected to have any negative impact on regenerative capacity of the tissues. First clinical results for antibiotic-loaded CaSO4 are encouraging,22,54 but further studies are necessary to determine the ceftriaxone time-concentration profiles necessary for eradication of the various bacteria causing ODAIs and their associated biofilm.
References
1. Mouton JW , Theuretzbacher U , Craig WA , Tulkens PM , Derendorf H , Cars O . Tissue concentrations: do we ever learn? J Antimicrob Chemother . 2008 ; 61 ( 2 ): 235 – 237 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2. Landersdorfer CB , Bulitta JB , Kinzig M , Holzgrabe U , Sörgel F . Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations . Clin Pharmacokinet . 2009 ; 48 ( 2 ): 89 – 124 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
3. Craig WA . Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimens for broad-spectrum cephalosporins . Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis . 1995 ; 22 ( 1–2 ): 89 – 96 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
4. Kaplan JB . Antibiotic-induced biofilm formation . Int J Artif Organs . 2011 ; 34 ( 9 ): 737 – 751 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
5. Anagnostakos K , Wilmes P , Schmitt E , Kelm J . Elution of gentamicin and vancomycin from polymethylmethacrylate beads and hip spacers in vivo . Acta Orthop . 2009 ; 80 ( 2 ): 193 – 197 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
6. Hsieh P-H , Chang Y-H , Chen S-H , Ueng SWN , Shih C-H . High concentration and bioactivity of vancomycin and aztreonam eluted from Simplex cement spacers in two-stage revision of infected hip implants: a study of 46 patients at an average follow-up of 107 days . J Orthop Res . 2006 ; 24 ( 8 ): 1615 – 1621 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
7. Anagnostakos K , Meyer C . Antibiotic elution from hip and knee acrylic bone cement spacers: A systematic review . Biomed Res Int . 2017 ; 2017 : 4657874 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
8. Wahl P , Guidi M , Benninger E , et al. The levels of vancomycin in the blood and the wound after the local treatment of bone and soft-tissue infection with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate as carrier material . Bone Joint J . 2017 ; 99-B ( 11 ): 1537 – 1544 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9. Whiteside LA , Roy ME , Nayfeh TA . Intra-articular infusion: a direct approach to treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty . Bone Joint J . 2016 ; 98-B ( 1 Suppl A ): 31 – 36 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
10. Rathbone CR , Cross JD , Brown KV , Murray CK , Wenke JC . Effect of various concentrations of antibiotics on osteogenic cell viability and activity . J Orthop Res . 2011 ; 29 ( 7 ): 1070 – 1074 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
11. Wiesli MG , Kaiser J-P , Gautier E , et al. Influence of ceftriaxone on human bone cell viability and in vitro mineralization potential is concentration- and time-dependent . Bone Joint Res . 2021 ; 10 ( 3 ): 218 – 225 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
12. Samara E , Moriarty TF , Decosterd LA , Richards RG , Gautier E , Wahl P . Antibiotic stability over six weeks in aqueous solution at body temperature with and without heat treatment that mimics the curing of bone cement . Bone Joint Res . 2017 ; 6 ( 5 ): 296 – 306 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
13. Swieringa AJ , Goosen JHM , Jansman FGA , Tulp NJA . In vivo pharmacokinetics of a gentamicin-loaded collagen sponge in acute periprosthetic infection: serum values in 19 patients . Acta Orthop . 2008 ; 79 ( 5 ): 637 – 642 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
14. Wahl P , Livio F , Jacobi M , Gautier E , Buclin T . Systemic exposure to tobramycin after local antibiotic treatment with calcium sulphate as carrier material . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2011 ; 131 ( 5 ): 657 – 662 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
15. Corona PS , Espinal L , Rodríguez-Pardo D , Pigrau C , Larrosa N , Flores X . Antibiotic susceptibility in gram-positive chronic joint arthroplasty infections: increased aminoglycoside resistance rate in patients with prior aminoglycoside-impregnated cement spacer use . J Arthroplasty . 2014 ; 29 ( 8 ): 1617 – 1621 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
16. Krause KM , Serio AW , Kane TR , Connolly LE . Aminoglycosides: An overview . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med . 2016 ; 6 ( 6 ): a027029 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
17. Wahl P , Rönn K , Bohner M , et al. In vitro study of new combinations for local antibiotic therapy with calcium sulphate - Near constant release of ceftriaxone offers new treatment options . J Bone Jt Infect . 2018 ; 3 ( 4 ): 212 – 221 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
18. Richards DM , Heel RC , Brogden RN , Speight TM , Avery GS . Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use . Drugs . 1984 ; 27 ( 6 ): 469 – 527 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
19. Palmer SM , Kang SL , Cappelletty DM , Rybak MJ . Bactericidal killing activities of cefepime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone against Staphylococcus aureus and beta-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1995 ; 39 ( 8 ): 1764 – 1771 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
20. Blumer J . Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone . Hosp Pract (Off Ed) . 1991 ; 26 Suppl 5 : 7 – 13 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
21. Beam TR . Ceftriaxone: a beta-lactamase-stable, broad-spectrum cephalosporin with an extended half-life . Pharmacotherapy . 1985 ; 5 ( 5 ): 237 – 253 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
22. Reinisch K , Schläppi M , Meier C , Wahl P . Local antibiotic treatment with calcium sulfate as carrier material improves the outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedures for periprosthetic joint infections after hip arthroplasty - a retrospective study . J Bone Jt Infect . 2022 ; 7 ( 1 ): 11 – 21 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
23. Goonetilleke AK , Dev D , Aziz I , Hughes C , Smith MJ , Basran GS . A comparative analysis of pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in serum and pleural fluid in humans: A study of once daily administration by intramuscular and intravenous routes . J Antimicrob Chemother . 1996 ; 38 ( 6 ): 969 – 976 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
24. Baeza J , Cury MB , Fleischman A , et al. General assembly, prevention, local antimicrobials: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections . J Arthroplasty . 2019 ; 34 ( 2S ): S75 – S84 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
25. Post V , Wahl P , Richards RG , Moriarty TF . Vancomycin displays time-dependent eradication of mature Staphylococcus aureus biofilms . J Orthop Res . 2017 ; 35 ( 2 ): 381 – 388 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
26. Hajdu S , Lassnigg A , Graninger W , Hirschl AM , Presterl E . Effects of vancomycin, daptomycin, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and ceftriaxone on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms . J Orthop Res . 2009 ; 27 ( 10 ): 1361 – 1365 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
27. Esteban MJ , Cantón E , Rius F . Influence of temperature on degradation kinetics of ceftriaxone in diluted and undiluted human serum . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1990 ; 34 ( 6 ): 1268 – 1270 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
28. Cantón E , Esteban MJ . Stability of ceftriaxone solution . J Antimicrob Chemother . 1992 ; 30 ( 3 ): 397 – 398 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
29. Kelly CM , Wilkins RM , Gitelis S , Hartjen C , Watson JT , Kim PT . The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2001 ; 382 ( 382 ): 42 – 50 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
30. Petruskevicius J , Nielsen S , Kaalund S , Knudsen PR , Overgaard S . No effect of Osteoset, a bone graft substitute, on bone healing in humans: a prospective randomized double-blind study . Acta Orthop Scand . 2002 ; 73 ( 5 ): 575 – 578 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
31. Mueller M , de la Peña A , Derendorf H . Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2004 ; 48 ( 2 ): 369 – 377 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
32. Craig WA . Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men . Clin Infect Dis . 1998 ; 26 ( 1 ): 1 – 10; quiz 11-2 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
33. Turnidge JD . The pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams . Clin Infect Dis . 1998 ; 27 ( 1 ): 10 – 22 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
34. Schleibinger M , Steinbach CL , Töpper C , et al. Protein binding characteristics and pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in intensive care unit patients . Br J Clin Pharmacol . 2015 ; 80 ( 3 ): 525 – 533 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
35. Stoeckel K , McNamara PJ , Brandt R , Plozza-Nottebrock H , Ziegler WH . Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics . Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1981 ; 29 ( 5 ): 650 – 657 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
36. Galandáková A , Ulrichová J , Langová K , et al. Characteristics of synovial fluid required for optimization of lubrication fluid for biotribological experiments . J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater . 2017 ; 105 ( 6 ): 1422 – 1431 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
37. Guenther LE , Pyle BW , Turgeon TR , et al. Biochemical analyses of human osteoarthritic and periprosthetic synovial fluid . Proc Inst Mech Eng H . 2014 ; 228 ( 2 ): 127 – 139 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
38. Trengove NJ , Langton SR , Stacey MC . Biochemical analysis of wound fluid from nonhealing and healing chronic leg ulcers . Wound Repair Regen . 1996 ; 4 ( 2 ): 234 – 239 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
39. Senneville E , Savage C , Nallet I , et al. Improved aero-anaerobe recovery from infected prosthetic joint samples taken from 72 patients and collected intraoperatively in Rosenow’s broth . Acta Orthop . 2006 ; 77 ( 1 ): 120 – 124 . Crossref Google Scholar
40. Zuluaga AF , Galvis W , Saldarriaga JG , Agudelo M , Salazar BE , Vesga O . Etiologic diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis: a prospective study . Arch Intern Med . 2006 ; 166 ( 1 ): 95 – 100 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
41. Dudareva M , Hotchen AJ , Ferguson J , et al. The microbiology of chronic osteomyelitis: Changes over ten years . J Infect . 2019 ; 79 ( 3 ): 189 – 198 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
42. Fulkerson E , Valle CJD , Wise B , Walsh M , Preston C , Di Cesare PE . Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria infecting total joint arthroplasty sites . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2006 ; 88-A ( 6 ): 1231 – 1237 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
43. Holleyman RJ , Baker PN , Charlett A , Gould K , Deehan DJ . Analysis of causative microorganism in 248 primary hip arthroplasties revised for infection: a study using the NJR dataset . Hip Int . 2016 ; 26 ( 1 ): 82 – 89 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
44. Arciola CR , An YH , Campoccia D , Donati ME , Montanaro L . Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates . Int J Artif Organs . 2005 ; 28 ( 11 ): 1091 – 1100 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
45. Moran E , Masters S , Berendt AR , McLardy-Smith P , Byren I , Atkins BL . Guiding empirical antibiotic therapy in orthopaedics: The microbiology of prosthetic joint infection managed by debridement, irrigation and prosthesis retention . J Infect . 2007 ; 55 ( 1 ): 1 – 7 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
46. Schäfer P , Fink B , Sandow D , Margull A , Berger I , Frommelt L . Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: A promising strategy . Clin Infect Dis . 2008 ; 47 ( 11 ): 1403 – 1409 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
47. Hancock RE . Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria . Clin Infect Dis . 1998 ; 27 Suppl 1 : S93 – 9 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
48. Jacoby GA . AmpC beta-lactamases . Clin Microbiol Rev . 2009 ; 22 ( 1 ): 161 – 182 , . Crossref Google Scholar
49. Srinivas NR . Dodging matrix effects in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric assays--compilation of key learnings and perspectives . Biomed Chromatogr . 2009 ; 23 ( 5 ): 451 – 454 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
50. Ferguson JY , Dudareva M , Riley ND , Stubbs D , Atkins BL , McNally MA . The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases . Bone Joint J . 2014 ; 96-B ( 6 ): 829 – 836 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
51. Vallon F , Meier C , Gautier E , Wahl P . The incidence of severe hypercalcaemia-induced mental status changes in patients treated with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate depot for orthopaedic infections . J Clin Med . 2022 ; 11(16):4900 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
52. Tarar MY , Khalid A , Usman M , Javed K , Shah N , Abbas MW . Wound leakage with the use of calcium sulphate beads in prosthetic joint surgeries: A systematic review . Cureus . 2021 ; 13 ( 11 ): e19650 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
53. Wouthuyzen-Bakker M , Sebillotte M , Lomas J , et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors for failure in late acute prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention . J Infect . 2019 ; 78 ( 1 ): 40 – 47 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
54. Gramlich Y , Johnson T , Kemmerer M , Walter G , Hoffmann R , Klug A . Salvage procedure for chronic periprosthetic knee infection: the application of DAIR results in better remission rates and infection-free survivorship when used with topical degradable calcium-based antibiotics . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2020 ; 28 ( 9 ): 2823 – 2834 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
55. Neut D , van de Belt H , Stokroos I , van Horn JR , van der Mei HC , Busscher HJ . Biomaterial-associated infection of gentamicin-loaded PMMA beads in orthopaedic revision surgery . J Antimicrob Chemother . 2001 ; 47 ( 6 ): 885 – 891 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
56. Anagnostakos K , Hitzler P , Pape D , Kohn D , Kelm J . Persistence of bacterial growth on antibiotic-loaded beads: is it actually a problem? Acta Orthop . 2008 ; 79 ( 2 ): 302 – 307 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
57. McKee MD , Li-Bland EA , Wild LM , Schemitsch EH . A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing an antibiotic-impregnated bioabsorbable bone substitute with standard antibiotic-impregnated cement beads in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion . J Orthop Trauma . 2010 ; 24 ( 8 ): 483 – 490 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
58. Taber HW , Mueller JP , Miller PF , Arrow AS . Bacterial uptake of aminoglycoside antibiotics . Microbiol Rev . 1987 ; 51 ( 4 ): 439 – 457 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
59. Flierl MA , Culp BM , Okroj KT , Springer BD , Levine BR , Della Valle CJ . Poor outcomes of irrigation and debridement in acute periprosthetic joint infection with antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads . J Arthroplasty . 2017 ; 32 ( 8 ): 2505 – 2507 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
60. Tarity TD , Xiang W , Jones CW , et al. Do antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads improve outcomes after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention? A matched cohort study . Arthroplast Today . 2022 ; 14 : 90 – 95 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
61. Lora-Tamayo J , Senneville É , Ribera A , et al. The not-so-good prognosis of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection managed by implant retention: The results of a large multicenter study . Clin Infect Dis . 2017 ; 64 ( 12 ): 1742 – 1752 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
Author contributions
M. G. Wiesli: Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization.
F. Livio: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Y. Achermann: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
E. Gautier: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
P. Wahl: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration.
Funding statement
The authors received no financial or material support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ICMJE COI statement
Y. Achermann reports payment for a lecture at European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Graz, 2022 from Biocomposites, unrelated to this study.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Markus Rottmar for his support in creating the graphical illustrations.
Ethical review statement
The patients involved provided written consent for publication of anonymized data.
Open access funding
The authors report that the open access funding for their manuscript was self-funded.
© 2022 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/