Abstract
Background
The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) published clinical guidelines in 2006 defining urgent referral criteria for soft tissue sarcoma to help improve the diagnostic accuracy and overall outcome. Despite these guidelines inadvertent excisions of soft tissue sarcomas continue to occur with alarming frequency potentially compromising patient outcomes.
Objective
We reviewed the East Midlands Sarcoma Service experience of treating inadvertent excision of STSs and highlight the patient profile, referral pattern, subsequent management and oncological outcome associated with inadvertent resection.
Methods
Patients were identified from our sarcoma database and a retrospective case note review performed.
Results
Over a period of 32 months, 42 patients presented to our specialist centre after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas. There were 29 men and 13 women, with a mean age at presentation of 59 years (19-90). 50% of the tumours were located in lower extremity, 33% around the trunk and 17% in the upper extremity. The unplanned surgery was most commonly from general surgeons, non-specialist orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners followed by plastic surgeons. Re-resection was undertaken in 40 (95.2%) cases to achieve clear margins. Residual tumour was present in 74% of cases. Resected specimen histology was high grade in 90% of cases. Limb salvage surgery was not possible in 4 cases.
Conclusion
Unplanned excision of sarcoma by non-oncologic surgeons remains a problem. It appears that it is equally prevalent in varied surgical community and general practitioners. Patients with soft tissue masses of unknown identity should be appropriately imaged and if the diagnosis remains unclear be transferred to centres that specialize in treating sarcomas for biopsy and adequate initial resection. Implementation of NICE guidelines and local strategies could improve the expedient management of these patients.
