Abstract
The aim was to identify when primary amputation was used as primary treatment and to describe outcomes in patients managed with modern chemotherapy. A detailed review of the electronic patient records was undertaken. Statistical analysis was performed with univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Chi2 testing, whilst multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis.
There were 354 osteosarcomas. 93 patients presented with metastases and 192 subsequently developed metastases at a mean of 46 months. Amputation was performed as the primary surgical treatment in 101 patients. Endoprosthetic reconstruction was used in 253 patients. Amputation was performed as a secondary procedure on 15 patients.
The 5 and 10 year survival data for all patients, including those with metastatic disease were 60% and 60% for amputation with good chemotherapy response (>89% necrosis), 65% and 63% for limb salvage and good response, 21% and 21% for amputation and poor response (⋋90% necrosis) and 51% and 30% for limb salvage with poor response.
Local recurrence occurred both with amputation (10.8%) or limb salvage (9%), with no significant differences between the two.
Univariate analysis demonstrated that the extent of response to chemotherapy induced necrosis significantly affected survival, whether the patient had an amputation or not.
Whether or not amputation or LSS was used in the surgical management of patients, local recurrence rates where similar between the two groups. Further assessment of chemotherapy-induced necrosis is a key factor in determining subsequent limb salvage or amputation management strategies.
