Abstract
Introduction
Controlling post-operative pain and reducing opioid requirements after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a challenge, particularly in an era stressing rapid recovery protocols and early discharge. A single shot adductor canal block (ACB) has been shown to be effective in decreasing post-operative pain. This requires a specialty-trained Anesthesiologist skilled in ultrasound techniques, which imposes cost, time and skill barriers. Cadaveric studies and magnetic resonance imaging data have shown that access to the adductor canal is possible from within the joint, and thus the potential for intraoperative, intra-articular, surgeon administered ACB through a standard surgical approach is a feasible alternative to ultrasound guided ACB at the time of TKA. The purpose of the present study is to compare the efficacy of surgeon administered intraoperative ACB to anesthesiologist administered ACB.
Methods
Patients' undergoing primary TKA were prospectively randomized to receive either an Anesthesiologist administered (Group 1) or Surgeon administered (Group 2) ACB using 15 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5%, both in conjunction with spinal anesthesia. Perioperative multimodal anesthesia was standardized for the two groups. Primary outcomes were pain visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion, and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction scores and length of stay (LOS).
Results
51 patients were enrolled and followed for a minimum of 6 weeks. 28 were randomized to Group 1 and 23 to Group 2. Opioid equivalents consumed were equal on POD 0,1, and 2 (p=0.86, 0.68, 0.47). Patients in Group 1 had significantly less pain on POD 0 [46.9 vs 61.8] (p=0.014), but there was no difference in pain on POD 1 or 2 (p=0.4, p=0.95). There was no difference in active flexion on post-operative day (POD) 0, POD 1 or 6 weeks post op (p=0.86, 0.074 and 0.59) and no difference in active extension on POD 0, 1, or 6 weeks (p=0.38,0.07and p=0.3). There was no difference in patient satisfaction with pain control on POD 0, 1, or 2 (p=0.6, p=0.7, p=0.9). There was no difference in LOS (1.3 vs 1.4 days p=0.34).
Conclusion
Surgeon administered ACB is not inferior to Anesthesiologist administered ACB with respect to range of motion, patient satisfaction, or opioid consumption, although pain on the day of surgery may be greater. Surgeon administered ACB is an effective and cost- and time- efficient alternative to Anesthesiologist administered ACB.
For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly.
