Abstract
Introduction
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains the main cause of failure in primary and revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Local delivery of antibiotics, mainly antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC), is commonly employed to prevent PJI. Over the past decade, tantalum and porous titanium have been successfully utilized as metaphyseal fixation devices to address bone loss and improve biologic fixation during revision TKA. However, no study has examined the antimicrobial properties compared to bone cement. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of tantalum, 3D porous titanium, antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) and smooth titanium alloy (STA) to inhibit Staphylococci bacterial agents in an in vitro medium environment, based on the evaluation of the zone of inhibition (ZOI) and the antibacterial activity duration. Our study hypothesis was that we will found no significant difference between groups to inhibit Methicillin-Sensitive or Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA/MRSA) agents.
Methods
Thirty beads made of 3 different materials (tantalum/ 3D porous titanium/ STA) were bathed during 1hour inside of a solution made of 1g vancomycin with 20-mL of sterile water for injection (bath concentration: 50 mg/mL). Ten 1cm3 cylinders were also created mixing standard surgical cement with 1g of Vancomycin in standardized sterile molds (ALBC beads). Finally, thirty beads made of tantalum/ 3D porous titanium/ STA were bathed in phosphate buffered saline solution to act as a control group. Cylinders were then placed on agar plates inoculated with MSSA and MRSA. Inhibition zone diameters were measured each day and cylinders were transferred onto a new inoculated plate. Inhibition zones were measured with a manual Vernier caliper and with automated software. The mean inhibition zones between groups were compared using the Wilcoxon Test.
Results
The inter-class coefficient correlation values indicated an optimal intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility for ZOI measurement (ICC 0.96 and ICC 0.98). For MSSA and MRSA, no inhibitory effect was found in the control group and antibiotic-loaded STA beads exhibited a short inhibitory effect until day 2. For MSSA, both tantalum and 3D porous titanium beads exhibited larger inhibition zones than cement beads (all p<0.01) each day until day 7 for tantalum and until day 3 for 3D porous titanium. After 6 days, ALBC presented larger inhibition zone than the 3D porous titanium, but no difference was found with tantalum. For MRSA, both tantalum and 3D porous titanium beads had significantly larger inhibition zones than ALBC each day until day 6 for tantalum (all p<0.01) and until day 3 for 3D porous titanium (all p<0.04). ALBC presented larger inhibition zone than tantalum and 3D porous titanium from day 7 to 9 (all p<0.04).
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that porous metal implants can deliver local antibiotics over slightly varying time frames based on our in vitro analysis. Antibiotic-impregnated tantalum and 3D porous titanium constructs exhibited superior antimicrobial properties when compared to STA. Future goals include impregnating porous metals with antibiotics for intraoperative use during revision TKA.
For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly.
