Abstract
Introduction
Recent focus has queried whether of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing modalities of bacterial DNA found in periarticular fluid and tissues will improve in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis and organism identification diagnostic accuracy for periprosthetic joint infection The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of next generation sequencing (NGS) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) multiplex, and culture, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and the recently proposed criteria by Parvizi et al. [1] in the diagnosis of periprosthetic knee infections.
Methods
In this retrospective study, aspirate or tissue samples were collected in 70 revision and 58 primary knee arthroplasties for routine diagnostic workup for PJI and sent to the laboratory for NGS and PCR multiplex. Concordance along with statistical differences between diagnostic studies were calculated using Chi-squared test for categorical data.
Results
When comparing to the MSIS criteria, concordance was 78.1% for NGS, 66.4% for PCR, and 85.9% for culture (p<0.001). There was no significant difference based on prior infection (p=0.825), or sample collection method (tissue swab or synovial fluid) (p=0.986). Fifteen samples were culture positive and NGS negative, of which 10 (66.7%) met both criteria for PJI. Thirteen patients were culture negative but NGS positive, of which 2 (15.4%) met both criteria. Concordance was 100% between the MSIS criteria and criteria proposed by Parvizi et al. [1].
Conclusion
In this initial cohort NGS was more accurate than 16s subunit PCR techniques, but less accurate than culture in the diagnosis of PJI determining the presence or absence of PJI. What is not clear is how NGS will perform against culture in terms of identifying the specific bacterial strain. Currently, laboratory tests used for either criteria for PJI diagnosis should be obtained regardless of NGS along with the overall clinical picture to help guide decision making for PJI treatment.
For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly.
