Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

The rate of wear of second-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene liners five years post-operatively does not increase if large femoral heads are used



Download PDF

Abstract

Aims

The increased in vivo resistance to wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to an increased use of larger articulations which have been shown to reduce the incidence of early dislocation. To date, there are few reports of the wear of larger articulations using second generation HXLPE liners. Our prospective cohort study measured the bedding-in and early wear of large (36 mm and 40 mm diameter) articulations involving a second generation X3 HXLPE liner and compared our findings with previous clinical and in vitro studies of the same material.

Patients and Methods

The proximal penetration of the femoral head five years post-operatively was measured for 15 patients using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Results

The median proximal bedding-in within the first post-operative year was 0.022 mm (interquartile range (IQR) -0.050 to 0.091). The median proximal rate of wear between one and five years was -0.004 mm/year (IQR -0.021 to 0.022). The rates of proximal, medial, 2D or 3D wear between one and five years post-operatively of the X3 HXLPE liner did not increase with larger articulations compared with our previous study of 32 mm articulations.

Conclusion

Although reassuring, the use of larger articulations requires continued monitoring to determine whether the low wear observed in the short-term continues to the mid- to long-term.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1604–10.


Correspondence should be sent to S. A. Callary; e-mail:

For access options please click here