Abstract
The Alloclassic and Endoplus femoral stems have the same grit-blasted surface and are hot forged from the same titanium alloy. Only the external form of the implants differs slightly. It was our aim to examine the differences in radiographic bone response between the Alloclassic (second generation) and the Endoplus (third generation) femoral stems.
We compared 79 prostheses in 70 matched patients studied over a minimum of two years. Radiolucent lines, adaptive bone remodelling, subsidence, heterotopic bone formation and lysis were recorded in the Gruen zones.
Radiolucencies were mainly found in zones 1 and 7 but to a greater extent in the Endoplus than in the Alloclassic group (p < 0.001 in zone 1, p < 0.05 in zone 7). We found lucent lines in three or more Gruen zones in seven patients all of whom were in the Endoplus group (p < 0.05). Zones 2 and 6 had a significantly higher rate of lucencies in the Endoplus group (p < 0.001). We encountered a combination of proximal lucent lines in zones 1 and 7 with distal hypertrophy of the cortical bone in zones 2, 3, 5 and 6 in eight patients, all from the Endoplus group (p < 0.05). In other patients bone atrophy (stress shielding) in zones 2 and 6 was seen more frequently in the Endoplus than in the Alloclassic group (p < 0.001). In neither group was there radiological evidence of osteolysis. Heterotopic bone formation and subsidence occurred with similar frequency in both groups.
Our study shows that a small change in the form of the femoral implant can result in statistically significant radiological changes in bone remodelling. Whether this will result in clinical compromise is unknown. However, it seems likely that the Endoplus femoral stem will perform differently from the Alloclassic.
