Abstract
The vertical migration of four configurations of a proximal femoral prosthesis, followed for up to nine years, was measured on standard radiographs. The same implant was used without cement (group 1) and with cement (group 2). The migration of both groups was linear from six months onwards. The mean migration rate and the incidence of late aseptic loosening were both greater in group 1. Survival analysis of the two groups, however, showed no statistically significant difference. In both groups, hips later destined for revision migrated more rapidly from the initial postoperative period onwards, than did the remainder. A threshold migration of 1.2 mm/year during the first two years after implantation detected hips likely to fail with a specificity of 86% and a sensitivity of 78%. This 'migration test' was applied to the results in two further groups of patients in which a modified femoral prosthesis had been implanted without hydroxyapatite coating (group 3) and with hydroxyapatite coating (group 4). The test distinguished between the four groups and suggested that at least two fixation procedures should be abandoned. We conclude that vertical migration measured on standard radiographs in the first two years after implantation can be used to predict late aseptic loosening. New prosthetic configurations should be evaluated by migration measurements before their general release. Our observations support the view that one cause of late aseptic loosening is imperfect initial fixation.
