Abstract
Objectives
We have observed clinical cases where bone is formed in the overlaying muscle covering surgically created bone defects treated with a hydroxyapatite/calcium sulphate biomaterial. Our objective was to investigate the osteoinductive potential of the biomaterial and to determine if growth factors secreted from local bone cells induce osteoblastic differentiation of muscle cells.
Materials and Methods
We seeded mouse skeletal muscle cells C2C12 on the hydroxyapatite/calcium sulphate biomaterial and the phenotype of the cells was analysed. To mimic surgical conditions with leakage of extra cellular matrix (ECM) proteins and growth factors, we cultured rat bone cells ROS 17/2.8 in a bioreactor and harvested the secreted proteins. The secretome was added to rat muscle cells L6. The phenotype of the muscle cells after treatment with the media was assessed using immunostaining and light microscopy.
Results
C2C12 cells differentiated into osteoblast-like cells expressing prominent bone markers after seeding on the biomaterial. The conditioned media of the ROS 17/2.8 contained bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2 8.4 ng/mg, standard deviation (sd) 0.8) and BMP-7 (50.6 ng/mg, sd 2.2). In vitro, this secretome induced differentiation of skeletal muscle cells L6 towards an osteogenic lineage.
Conclusion
Extra cellular matrix proteins and growth factors leaking from a bone cavity, along with a ceramic biomaterial, can synergistically enhance the process of ectopic ossification. The overlaying muscle acts as an osteoinductive niche, and provides the required cells for bone formation.
Cite this article: D. B. Raina, A. Gupta, M. M. Petersen, W. Hettwer, M. McNally, M. Tägil, M-H. Zheng, A. Kumar, L. Lidgren. Muscle as an osteoinductive niche for local bone formation with the use of a biphasic calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biomaterial. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:500–511. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0133.R1.
Article focus
-
Extra cellular matrix proteins and growth factors leaking from a bone cavity, along with a ceramic biomaterial, can synergistically enhance the process of ectopic ossification. The overlaying muscle acts as an osteoinductive niche, which provides the required cells to be used to transform into bone.
Key messages
-
A bone defect treated with a ceramic biomaterial undergoes local remodeling but can also lead to bone formation in the muscle immediately covering the biomaterial.
-
C2C12 muscle cells differentiate into bone-like cells when seeded on the biomaterial (calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite), demonstrating the osteoinductive behaviour of the material.
-
ROS 17/2.8 bone cells produce pro-osteogenic proteins BMP-2 and BMP-7, which can lead to differentiation of muscle cells.
Strengths and limitations
-
This study describes a possible molecular mechanism behind ectopic bone formation when a surgically operated bone defect is treated with a biomaterial covered with a free muscle flap.
-
In future, we would perform additional studies in a larger animal model to verify our findings.
Introduction
One of the major challenges in modern orthopaedic surgery is to replace and regenerate bone. There is an increasing demand for bone substitutes that can augment and repair bone defects following trauma, infection or tumour resection.1 The ideal bone graft should be non-immunogenic, osteoinductive, osteoconductive and osteogenic.2-8 Autologous bone fulfills these requirements but the availability is limited.1,4,9-12 Furthermore, surgery is required for its harvesting, which in turn is associated with donor site morbidity and in the worst case, infection. To overcome these drawbacks, synthetic bone grafts have been developed: mainly ceramic, polymeric or composite.1,13 Ideally, these materials should not just act as structural support but should also initiate and enhance tissue regeneration.12,14
Various studies have shown that the chemistry and surface geometry of the biomaterial in contact with mesenchymal cells play a crucial role in differentiating inducible cells from bone cells.15-20 Muscle cells such as C2C12 (murine skeletal myoblasts) have been used for studying this mechanism of differentiation.17,21 Additionally, bone matrix contains bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) that play an important role in the mineralisation of tissues, both ectopic and entopic.7,22,23 It is also known that muscle cells are capable of differentiating into osteogenic lineages when stimulated with signaling molecules or mineralised milieu.24
There is a clinical need for less invasive procedures with injectable materials that set in vivo, to reduce surgical invasiveness, enabling a shorter hospitalisation and quicker rehabilitation. Cerament (hydroxyapatite (HA)-calcium sulphate (CS)) (BoneSupport AB, Lund, Sweden) is an injectable composite biomaterial consisting of particles of HA and CS hemihydrates. This powder composite is mixed with a liquid solution that leads to the setting of a resorbable calcium sulphate dihydrate, embedding and binding the unreacted HA particles.25 Recently, the first antibiotic-containing injectable bone substitute, Cerament G (HA-CS-gentamicin (G)) (BoneSupport AB), was approved for clinical use in Europe. During the initial phase of clinical testing, rapid bone regeneration was observed when the hydroxyapatite/calcium sulphate biomaterial was used to fill cavities after excision of osteomyelitis or resected bone tumours. In a few cases, bone was also found in the overlaying muscle. We hypothesise that the biomaterial can induce muscle cells to differentiate into osteoblasts at the interface between the muscle and the biomaterial. We also hypothesise that the bone induction proteins harvested from bone cell cultures could induce differentiation of muscle into bone, thereby mimicking the clinical scenario in a controlled experimental environment.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Cerament (HA-CS) and Cerament G (HA-CS-G) were supplied by Bone Support AB, Lund, Sweden. 3-(4.5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2.5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Sigmafast p-Nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium - high glucose (DMEM - HG), foetal bovine serum (FBS), antibiotic cocktail (penicillin-streptomycin), TRIzol Reagent and primers for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri). Mouse monoclonal COLI, monoclonal OPN and rabbit polyclonal RunX2, polyclonal OCN, goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) and goat anti-mouse Cy3 secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Paso Robles, California) and Sigma Aldrich. Mouse monoclonal COLI, OCN and OPN and polyclonal bone sialoprotein (BSP) antibodies, DRAQ5, goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) were procured from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). RT-PCR reagents were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, Massachusetts). Rat BMP-2 and BMP-7 Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbance assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from Abnova Inc. (Taipei City, Taiwan and Qayee-Bio, Shanghai, China) respectively. All basic reagents (such as sodium chloride) were of high purity and purchased from recognised suppliers.
Clinical observations using HA-CS and HA-CS-G: uncontained bone defect after tumour resection
A 35-year-old man underwent wide resection of a low-grade periosteal chondrosarcoma (Fig. 1) from his right posterior distal femur in October 2013. Joint-preserving multiplanar femoral osteotomies and placement of a lateral locked plate (LISS, Synthes, West Chester, Pennsylvania), to stabilise the anterior cortical remnant, were performed with the help of intra-operative 3D CT-based computer navigation (O-arm and Medtronic Stealth, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). This was followed by bone defect reconstruction with 20 ml of demineralised bone matrix (20 ml, DBX, Synthes), fashioned into a shallow wall around the entire circumference of the resection area, before implantation of 30 ml HA – CS - G and 36 ml of HA-CS into the remaining bone defect. The hardened bone substitute was covered with collagen sponges (Spongostan, Ferrosan, Søborg, Denmark) and residual overlying musculature, before tight closure in layers over two deep drains.
Fig.
Chronic osteomyelitis
A 65-year-old woman, with well controlled epilepsy, asthma and eczema, who was a smoker, presented with a 44-year history of recurrent osteomyelitis after a closed distal tibial fracture, initially treated with internal fixation. The fracture healed but with a persistent sinus and a constant purulent discharge for more than 20 years (Fig. 2a). Two previous attempts to excise and eradicate the infection had been unsuccessful. MRI revealed a Cierny-Mader type 3B osteomyelitis,26 involving the medullary bone and adjacent cortex (Fig. 2b). In May 2013, the infected bone and the soft tissue were radically excised and 10 ml of HA-CS-G was implanted in the resected area (Fig. 2c). Soft-tissue reconstruction was carried out using a free gracilis muscle flap and skin graft.
Fig.
Material preparation for in vitro experiments
The two types of bone substitutes, HA-CS and HA-CS-G, were mixed as per supplier’s guidelines (Bone Support AB) to form a homogenous paste. The paste was poured into a disc-shaped mould, 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height, and allowed to set for 30 minutes. Thereafter, discs with the set material were taken out of the mould and were used for further analysis.
Cell culture
Mouse myoblast C2C12 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics. Cells were kept in an incubator with 95% air and 5% CO2. For the proliferation and functionality experiments, 1 × 105 cells were seeded onto the HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs, while for immunofluorescence staining and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT - PCR), 1 × 106 cells were seeded onto the HA-CS discs only. The rat skeletal muscle myoblast cell line L6 was cultured in DMEM with a high glucose (4500 mg/L) mixture supplemented with 10% by volume (v/v) FBS and 1% v/v antibiotic cocktail consisting of penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were passaged at 80% confluence and were used at second passage after revival. Cell viability before experiments was evaluated using the trypan blue exclusion method, where dead cells stain blue and are excluded from the count.
In order to mimic in vivo conditions that lead to bone formation in the muscle tissue, we harvested osteoblast cell-derived proteins from an expanded cell culture of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblastic cells. Cells were allowed to proliferate in culture flasks supplemented with complete medium and 5% v/v serum for a period of three days. The secreted bone active proteins in the medium were collected while the cells were passaged again to repeat the procedure.
To ensure differentiation of muscle cells into osteoblast-like cells, we used the rat muscle cell line L6. The cells were allowed to grow to 80% confluence, after which they were either supplied with low serum (5% v/v) complete medium or a mixture of complete medium (low serum) and harvested osteoblast cell medium in an equal ratio by volume. The cells were allowed to grow for a period of ten or 12 days and were analysed using different techniques outlined below to confirm a shift in their phenotype.
Microscopic analysis
Surface morphology of the materials and adherence of the C2C12 cells on the surface of HA-CS and HA–CS-G discs were analysed using scanning electron microscopy. Materials were dehydrated by gradient ethanol treatment, vacuum dried overnight and gold coated (Sputter Coater, Cressington Watford, United Kingdom). For analysing the cell adherence on the biomaterial surface, cells were seeded on both the materials i.e. HA-CS and HA–CS–G. The cells were allowed to grow for three days. Thereafter, glutaraldehyde (2.5 %) was used to fix all of the cells on the surface. Steps following fixation were the same as were used for sample preparation for surface morphology analysis as described above with an exception of gold coating. Furthermore, attachment of cells on the HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs was analysed using 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining.27
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation on both the materials was evaluated using MTT assay at regular time intervals. Briefly, the DMEM media in the wells was removed, and cell-seeded biomaterial discs were washed using phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Thereafter, DMEM media, without FBS, containing MTT (0.5 mg/ml) was added in the wells with an incubation time of five hours. Furthermore, this solution was removed and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added. The samples were incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C. The coloured solution formed was collected and absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 570 nm.28
Cell proliferation analysis in the cell medium experiments using L6 cells was done in a similar manner, and a cell density of 5 × 104 cells/well was used. The proliferation of myotubes was analysed by microscopy, and multinucleated and elongated cells were considered to be myotubes.
Alkaline phosphatase assay
Sigmafast para-Nitrophenylphosphate (pNPP) (Sigma Aldrich) tablets were used to prepare pNPP substrate solution, using the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The media were removed from the wells, and samples were washed using PBS buffer. The samples were then incubated with pNPP substrate solution for two hours in the CO2 incubator at 37°C, and absorbance was measured at 405 nm.28
Immunofluorescence staining for osteogenic markers
The osteoinductive potential of the HA-CS biomaterial was observed using immunofluorescence staining. The seeded cells were cultured in non-osteogenic medium for different time points and stained to detect the presence of different markers including runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin (OCN) and collagen type I (Col I) over the period of 21 days. To confirm the differentiation of L6 muscle cells into osteoblast-like cells, we immunostained cells in both groups for various osteoblastic markers Col I, OCN, OPN and bone sialoprotein (BSP). Cells were allowed to grow in culture flasks for a period of ten days in a complete medium with osteoblast-harvested bone active proteins or low serum. The cells were trypsinised and seeded on four-well chamber slides and allowed to proliferate with the same medium for a further 48 hours. On the day of staining (day 12), cells were fixed using 4% formaldehyde for ten minutes followed by membrane permeabilisation using 0.1% v/v triton x-100 for five minutes. Cells were immediately blocked using 5% goat serum for one hour and incubated with respective primary antibodies for two hours at room temperature. Slides were washed five times with phosphate buffer saline with tween-20 (PBST), followed by incubation in secondary antibody (labelled AF488) for one hour followed by five more washes. The slides were counterstained using DRAQ5 for five minutes and washed twice for five minutes each. After drying, the slides were cleared, mounted and allowed to dry overnight before analysis. The cells were analysed on a Zeiss confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) at different magnifications.
RNA extraction and RT-PCR
The discs of HA-CS were seeded with C2C12 cells at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/disc. The RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent, after in vitro culturing of cell-seeded discs for the time period of seven days and 21 days. Cell-seeded discs were transferred from multiwell plates to microtubes after adding 1 ml of TRIzol Reagent. Thereafter, RNA was isolated by following the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. Complimentary DNA (cDNA) was synthesised by incubating isolated RNA (20 µl) with 1 µl of oligo(dT) at 75°C for five minutes, followed by incubation in ice for five minutes. The cDNA mix, 4 µl of buff RT, 1 µl of RTase, 0.5 µl of RI (Rnase inhibitor) and 2 µl of dNTP mix were then added. RT-PCR was conducted to evaluate the expression of various genes of the osteogenic lineage such as RUNX2, Col I, BSP and OCN. The primer sequences of the genes are obtained from previous reports.29-31 As an endogenous control, expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was determined. A consecutive thermal cycle was used for DNA amplification. Products of RT-PCR were resolved on a 2.0% agarose gel stained using ethidium bromide.
Morphological changes using light microscopy and haematoxylin and eosin staining
The differentiation of muscle cells with the addition of osteoblast-harvested bone active proteins was analysed over a period of several days. Morphological analysis was performed using both light microscopy and Haemotoxylin and Eosin (H and E) staining. Culture flasks were directly monitored using a light microscope at different magnifications. In order to perform H and E staining, cells were grown in four-well chamber slides and were fixed with 4% (w/v) formaldehyde for ten minutes. Cells were hydrated with reducing ethanol gradient and stained with hematoxylin for five minutes. Excessive stain was washed off using running water, followed by counterstaining with eosin for two minutes. The slides were cleaned in xylene for five minutes, then mounted and dried overnight before imaging.
Osteoblast secretome composition
In an attempt to detect various pro-osteoblastic proteins in the ROS 17/2.8 cell factory, we dialysed the harvested cell media against ultrapure water for a period of 48 hours using an 8 kDa dialysis membrane. After dialysing, the proteins were concentrated using freeze-drying for a period of 48 hours. The dried protein fraction was later analysed using ELISA for the detection and measurement of two important bone active molecules BMP-2 and BMP-7.
Statistical analysis
Data from the MTT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay were analysed using unpaired t-test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Data from the MTT assay and myotube numbers were analysed using a non-parametric, multiple t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are shown in triplicate with mean and standard deviation (sd).
Results
Clinical observations using HA-CS and HA-CS-G: uncontained bone defect after tumour resection
The tumour was resected and filled with both HA-CS and HA-CS-G (Figs 1a to 1d). Post-operative recovery was protracted due to delayed wound healing in a small area in the popliteal fossa and transient peroneal nerve neuropraxia, which took six months to fully subside. Immediate post-operative radiographs demonstrated almost complete filling of the defect (Fig. 1d). A large radio-dense regenerate with a sclerotic rim and increasing lucency towards its centre had formed six weeks post-operatively (Fig. 1e). Gradual reduction in its overall size was observed at each subsequent follow-up radiograph, while the sclerotic rim intensified up to the three-month mark, before slowly regressing again over its central aspect (Fig. 1f). CT scans at three, five and ten months post-operatively showed increasing bone remodeling, most prominently in distal (Figs 1g and 1h) and medial femur (Figs 1i to 1l). Clinically, the patient had normal range of movement and was able to bear weight fully without pain 11 months post-operatively.
Chronic osteomyelitis
The patient with recurrent osteomyelitis was treated with the gentamicin-eluting bone substitute (HA-CS-G) (Figs 2a to 2c). After surgery, she recovered well with complete wound healing and rapid mobilisation. Bone cultures were positive for Enterobacter cloacae, sensitive to gentamicin. Intravenous ertapenem treatment was initiated for six weeks, followed by six weeks of oral trimethoprim. Post-operative radiographs (Fig. 2c) showed good initial filling of the bone cavity with HA-CS-G. At four weeks, opacity was observed in the muscle overlaying the tibia that appeared as a bone shell (Fig. 2d). The bone shell surrounding the muscle reduced in size by 13 weeks but became denser. The bone defect was fully remodeled and trabecular bone was observed in the tibial defect area as seen from the radiograph (Fig. 2e). The opacity in the muscle also disappeared after seven months (Fig. 2e). The wound healed well (Fig. 2f). At review, 13 months after surgery, the patient had recovered, had no leg pain and the wound had healed with no discharge.
Microscopic analysis
The surface morphology of HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs were analysed using scanning electron microscopy, and both materials showed microporous structure with the size of the pores at the material surface in the range of 1 µm to 10 µm (Figs 3a and 3b). Cells were present on the surface of the biomaterial discs after three days of seeding. The cells were attached and homogenously distributed on both discs of HA-CS and HA-CS-G (Figs 3c and 3d). This was further confirmed by staining of the cells with DAPI that revealed a similar type of distribution pattern where seeded cells had adhered to and were evenly distributed on the surface of material (Figs 3e and 3f).
Fig.
Cell proliferation
Cell proliferation on the HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs was analysed using MTT assay in order to assess the biocompatibility of the biomaterials and to evaluate whether the addition of gentamycin incurs toxicity in this model. Similar results were observed in both biomaterials with or without gentamicin (Fig. 4a). After the initial increase in the cell population until the seventh day, the cell proliferation was suppressed and a decrease in cell population was observed at the later time points. On the other hand, in the case of two-dimensional polystyrene tissue culture plates, taken as a control, an increase in cell proliferation was observed until the fourteenth day, and thereafter proliferation declined. Cells seeded on both the materials showed a similar profile of cell proliferation. No statistically significant difference in cell proliferation was found (p > 0.05). However, increased cell proliferation was found in the polystyrene tissue culture plate compared with HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs (p < 0.0001).
Fig.
Alkaline phosphate assay
The result of the ALP assay is shown in Figure 4b. The biomaterials (HA-CS and HA-CS-G) showed an increase in ALP by the 14th day of cell seeding. Thereafter, the values of ALP start decreasing with time. Within a time period of 14 days, cells seeded on both the HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterials showed an eightfold increase in ALP level when compared with polystyrene controls (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the level of ALP between the two materials (p > 0.05). However, the level of ALP in the cells seeded on the polystyrene plate was less than that in the cells seeded on both biomaterials.
Immunofluorescence staining and RT-PCR
The presence of markers of mature osteoblasts was studied over the whole time period (Fig. 5). Immunofluorescence staining showed the presence of RUNX2 by the seventh day of cell seeding on the HA-CS disc. The presence of other markers of mature osteoblasts OCN, Col I, and OPN (all Fig. 5a) were detected by the 21st day of cell seeding. Negative antibody controls are shown in Figure 5 (Isotype 1 and Isotype 2).
Fig.
Osteopromotive potential of HA-CS was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis of cells seeded on the material. Results showed the presence of RUNX2 by the seventh day (Fig. 5b) and the presence of other osteoblastic markers such as Col 1, BSP and OCN by the 21st day of cell seeding (Fig. 5c).
The differentiation of muscle cells into bone cells after the addition of the cell culture-produced bone active proteins was confirmed using immunofluorescent staining of cells in both groups for osteogenic markers such as Col I, OCN, OPN and BSP. Figure 6 (a to d) shows the immunopositive and transdifferentiated muscle cells transformed into osteoblast-like cells. The cells in the treated groups expressed osteogenic proteins such as Col I, OCN, OPN and BSP at day 12, while cells in the control group fused together to form myotubes and did not express osteogenic proteins.
Fig.
Morphological changes using light microscopy and hematoxylin and eosin staining
A time course morphological difference was observed in cells treated with bone active proteins and the control groups. The cells in the control groups (Figs 6e to 6g) can be seen as elongated from as early as day one until the end of the experiment when compared with cells in the treated groups (Figs 6h to 6j). H and E staining clearly illustrates the structural differences between the cells with and without treatment of growth factors (Figs 6g and 6j). In the case of controls, muscle cells differentiate into fused myotubes possessing a number of nuclei, while the cells in the group treated with growth factors remain uninucleated throughout the experiment. Moreover, the size of the cells is much smaller and possesses osteoblast-like morphology in the case of treated cells.
Cell viability and myotube number
No significant difference in proliferation profile of cells was observed (Fig. 7a). On the contrary, cells in the control groups fused to form myotubes with multiple nuclei. We also analysed the number of myotubes that could be observed over a period of seven days, as represented in Figure 7b. The number of myotubes in the control group increased over time (p < 0.05), however, in the treated group very few myotubes were observed on day 1 and the number reached zero after day 3, indicating complete suppression of myotube formation.
Fig.
Osteoblast cell factory composition
We confirmed the presence of two of the most common osteoinductive proteins, BMP-2 and BMP-7, responsible for osteogenic differentiation of various mesenchymal cells into osteoblastic lineages. The detection of osteogenic proteins was performed using ELISA and the respective concentrations of BMP-2 and BMP-7 in the cell media were 8.4 ng/mg (sd 0.8) and 50.6 ng/mg (sd 2.2) of the harvested protein fraction.
Discussion
We have observed that muscle tissue in direct contact with HA-CS and HA–CS-G biomaterials had shown significant bone formation in a few clinical cases. To establish whether the biomaterial contributed to this phenomenon of bone formation, we have set up in vitro models to mimic the biological situations. We showed that an osteopromotive niche is provided by both HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterials, contributing to the differentiation of muscle cells towards an osteogenic lineage in vitro. Simultaneously, we harvested bone active proteins from multiplying bone cells in vitro and used them to differentiate muscle cells into bone-like cells. In clinical studies, it has been reported that when HA-CS or HA-CS-G is used to fill a bone defect, new bone is formed locally.32 However, new bone formation in the muscle in direct contact with the biomaterials was unforeseen and led us to explore the material behaviour with muscle cells. We also considered the possibility of growth factors and extra cellular matrix proteins released from the underlying bone cavity and acting synergistically with HA-CS and HA-CS-G. The perivascular niche in the muscle has stem cells and their recruitment to the underlying bone and the biomaterial is highly likely.
We have observed clinically extensive bone formation in the muscle surrounding HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterial as early as six weeks after surgery. Hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds have been known to induce bone formation in the muscle when used alone in larger animal models, thus corroborating well with our observations.33 However, the amount of time required for mineralisation in ectopic sites has always been longer than that which we have observed in our clinical case. In our opinion, this is an additional effect observed due to the presence of a ceramic matrix and bone active proteins leaking out of the bone cavity. Moreover, we have also observed resorption of the bone formed in the muscle five months post-operatively when compared with six weeks as observed from the images in Figures 1e and 1f. This might be because muscle is unloaded when compared with bone which leads to resorption.34 A similar phenomenon has also been observed in the osteomyelitis case (Fig. 2).
Upon physiochemically characterising the biomaterials using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we verified the porous structure (Figs 3a and 3b). It has already been reported that heterotopic bone formation was induced in the presence of micropores in ceramic materials.35,36 Porous HA-CS and HA-CS-G scaffolds provide sufficient surface area for cellular attachment and also an efficient environment for exchange of nutrients, gases and other signalling molecules. Cells were uniformly distributed across the surface of the scaffold as observed from SEM and DAPI analysis (Figs 3c to 3f). One noteworthy observation is the morphology of C2C12 cells when seeded on HA-CS and HA-CS-G surfaces. We have, in our previous work, reported that when C2C12 myoblasts are seeded on elastic biomaterials, they tend to form elongated myotubes, which in the current scenario is not seen.37 This led us to consider other phenotyping methods to understand changes in the skeletal muscle cell line C2C12. The cellular proliferation was similar on both the scaffolds with and without gentamicin, indicating that the addition of gentamicin to the scaffold in our model does not cause toxicity in the cells (Fig. 4a). The scaffolds exhibited a gradual but suppressed proliferation of C2C12 muscle myoblasts when compared with tissue culture plates. However, this difference in the proliferation behaviour of cells on HA-CS and HA-CS-G discs and 2D tissue culture plate might be due to differentiation of myoblast C2C12 cells to osteoblast lineage. It has been shown that the proliferation of cells is arrested during its differentiation.36,38,39 ALP is an important osteogenic marker, and an eightfold increase in the ALP activity (Fig. 4b) in the cells seeded on the discs of HA-CS and HA-CS-G clearly demonstrated the osteopromotive behaviour of the material, irrespective of whether gentamicin was added. This was the result of the C2C12 cells that differentiated into osteoblasts, entering into maturation phase. ALP also acts as an osteogenic cell formation predictor.40-43 Cells seeded on a 2D polystyrene tissue culture plate showed lower values of ALP activity compared with that of the biomaterial discs (Fig. 4b). We observed the presence of prominent osteogenic markers such as RUNX2, Col 1, OCN and OPN in cells seeded on HA-CS discs. RUNX2 is reported as an osteoblast-specific transcription factor and a regulator of differentiation of osteoblasts.21,44,45 The presence of other markers of mature osteoblasts such as OCN, Col I and OPN (Fig. 5a) was detected by the 21st day of cell seeding. PCR results confirmed the gene expression of RUNX2, Col 1, OCN and BSP in the cells seeded on HA-CS, thus confirming the osteopromotive potential of HA-CS (Figs 5b and 5c).
Another important aspect of our study was to address whether leaking bone active proteins from an open bone defect could induce bone formation both locally and in the muscle, as we observed in clinical cases. To address this question, the in vitro model closely simulates the in vivo situation by harvesting bone active proteins from an osteoblast cell line ROS 17/2.8 and observing their effect on muscle myoblast cell line L6. By microscopic analysis (phase contrast and H and E staining), we observed uninuclear and round morphology of cells over the course of 12 days in the case of the treated cells while the cells in the controls fused together to form myotubes with a significantly higher number than in the experimental group (p < 0.05), a behaviour typical of myoblasts (Fig. 7b). Immunostaining of cells in the treated group confirmed the phenotype shift with cells positive for important osteoblastic markers such as Col 1, OCN, OPN and BSP (Figs 6a to 6d). The results are completely in accordance with earlier studies that establish the potential of BMP-2 and BMP-7 in differentiating skeletal muscle cells C2C12 towards osteoblastic lineage.46,47 Both BMP-2 and BMP-7 can induce differentiation of skeletal muscle cells into bone in a dose- and time-dependent manner. We confirmed the presence of these two pro-osteogenic proteins in the harvested cell factory using ELISA.
It has previously been reported that inflammatory factors such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) secreted from a fracture site leads to differentiation of muscle cells.48 Also TNF-α obtained from culturing fractured bone in vitro can lead to osteogenic differentiation of muscle cells. However, in our clinical observation, ectopic bone formation was uncommon in patients with regular surgical intervention and was specifically seen when the biomaterial was used. In this study we focused more on material properties and the role of leaking bone active proteins rather than looking at inflammatory factors and cytokines. Thus, we have demonstrated a possible mechanism for bone formation in the muscle synergistically mediated by bone active proteins leaking from a bone defect and enhanced by HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterials.
In conclusion, in vitro studies performed with HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterials and muscle cell line C2C12 clearly show the osteopromotive effect of the ceramic material. Strong resemblance to native bone (due to the hydroxyapatite mineral phase) and microporosity and surface topography leads to differentiation of muscle myoblast cells into osteogenic cells when in contact with the biomaterial. We have also confirmed that a cocktail of growth factors containing BMP-2, BMP-7 and other bone active proteins, derived from osteoblast cells, can be harvested and used in a facile manner. These harvested growth factors are also able to induce the differentiation of muscle cells into bone cells. The clinical observations suggest that HA-CS and HA-CS-G biomaterials can induce bone formation in an overlaying muscle due to the osteopromotive properties of the material. Bone active proteins leaking from a bone defect also have the potential for osteogenic differentiation. The biomaterial and the leaking growth factors can lead to recruitment and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells from the perivascular muscular niche to the material.
Funding Statement
Funding has been received from BoneSupport which is related to this article.
M. McNally reports funding received from Heraeus and Novartis, none of which is related to this article.
M. M. Peterson reports funding received from Pfizer Oncology and Zimmer Biomet which is not related to this article.
M. Tägil reports funding received from Surgacoll and Integra which is not related to this article.
M-H. Zheng reports funding received from Orthocell which is not related to this article.
ICMJE conflict of interest
None declared
References
1 Habibovic P , de GrootK. Osteoinductive biomaterials–properties and relevance in bone repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2007;1:25-32. Google Scholar
2 Coombes AG , MeikleMC. Resorbable synthetic polymers as replacements for bone graft. Clin Mater1994;17:35-67.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
3 Cornell CN , LaneJM. Current understanding of osteoconduction in bone regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res1998;355(Suppl):S267-S273.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
4 Damien CJ , ParsonsJR. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater1991;2:187-208.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
5 de Boer HH . The history of bone grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res1988;226:292-298.PubMed Google Scholar
6 Lane JM , TominE, BostromMP. Biosynthetic bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res1999;367(Suppl):S107-S117.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
7 Urist MR . Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science1965;150:893-899.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
8 Yaszemski MJ , PayneRG, HayesWC, et al.. Evolution of bone transplantation: molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone. Biomaterials1996;17:175-185.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
9 Laurie SW , KabanLB, MullikenJB, et al.. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg1984;73:933-938.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
10 LeGeros RZ . Calcium phosphate-based osteoinductive materials. Chem Rev2008;108:4742-4753.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
11 Leung HB , FokMW, ChowLC, YenCH. Cost comparison of femoral head banking versus bone substitutes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)2010;18:50-54.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
12 Yuan H , FernandesH, HabibovicP, et al.. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2010;107:13614-13619.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
13 Hutmacher DW , SchantzJT, LamCXF, et al.. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2007;1:245-260.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
14 Gupta A , BhatS, ChaudhariBP, et al.. Cell factory-derived bioactive molecules with polymeric cryogel scaffold enhance the repair of subchondral cartilage defect in rabbits. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2015July14. (Epub ahead of print)[[bibmisc]]CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
15 Fujibayashi S , NeoM, KimH-M, et al.. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials2004;25:443-450.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
16 Gosain AK , RiordanPA, SongL, et al.. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part II. Bioengineering implants to optimize bone replacement in reconstruction of cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg2004;114:1155-1163.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
17 Li X , van BlitterswijkCA, FengQ, et al.. The effect of calcium phosphate microstructure on bone-related cells in vitro. Biomaterials2008;29:3306-3316.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
18 Yuan H , De BruijnJD, LiY, et al.. Bone formation induced by calcium phosphate ceramics in soft tissue of dogs: a comparative study between porous α-TCP and β-TCP. J Mater Sci Mater Med2001;12:7-13. Google Scholar
19 Yuan H , De BruijnJ, ZhangX, et al.. Osteoinduction by porous alumina ceramic [abstract]. 16th European Conference on Biomaterials, 2001.[[bibmisc]] Google Scholar
20 Yuan H , Van Den DoelM, LiS, et al.. A comparison of the osteoinductive potential of two calcium phosphate ceramics implanted intramuscularly in goats. J Mater Sci Mater Med2002;13:1271-1275.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
21 Tan Y , WangG, FanH, et al.. Expression of core binding factor 1 and osteoblastic markers in C2C12 cells induced by calcium phosphate ceramics in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A2007;82:152-159.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
22 Wang EA , RosenV, D’AlessandroJS, et al.. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1990;87:2220-2224.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
23 Fillingham Y , JacobsJ. Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J2016;98-B:6-9.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
24 Asakura A , KomakiM, RudnickiM. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation2001;68:245-253.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
25 Alfotawi R , NaudiK, DalbyMJ, et al.. Assessment of cellular viability on calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite injectable scaffolds. J Tissue Eng2013;4:204.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
26 Calhoun JH , ManringMM, ShirtliffM. Osteomyelitis of the long bones. Semin Plast Surg2009;23:59-72.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
27 Gupta A , BhatS, JagdalePR, et al.. Evaluation of three-dimensional chitosan-agarose-gelatin cryogel scaffold for the repair of subchondral cartilage defects: an in vivo study in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part A2014;20:3101-3111.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
28 Mishra R , KumarA. Osteocompatibility and osteoinductive potential of supermacroporous polyvinyl alcohol-TEOS-agarose-CaCl2 (PTAgC) biocomposite cryogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med2014;25:1327-1337.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
29 Ehara A , OgataK, ImazatoS, et al.. Effects of α-TCP and TetCP on MC3T3-E1 proliferation, differentiation and mineralization. Biomaterials2003;24:831-836. Google Scholar
30 Hu S-Y , TaiC-C, LiY-H, et al.. Progranulin compensates for blocked IGF-1 signaling to promote myotube hypertrophy in C2C12 myoblasts via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. FEBS Lett2012;586:3485-3492.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
31 Shen Y , WangW, LiX, et al.. Mitigative effect of erythromycin on PMMA challenged preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Sci World J2014;2014:107196.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
32 Abramo A , GeijerM, KopylovP, et al.. Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2010;92:281-286.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
33 Wang H , ZhiW, LuX, et al.. Comparative studies on ectopic bone formation in porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with complementary pore structures. Acta Biomater2013;9:8413-8421.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
34 Aguirre JI , PlotkinLI, StewartSA, et al.. Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss. J Bone Miner Res2006;21:605-615.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
35 Yamasaki H , SakaiH. Osteogenic response to porous hydroxyapatite ceramics under the skin of dogs. Biomaterials1992;13:308-312.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
36 Zhang J , BarbieriD, ten HoopenH, et al.. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics driving osteogenesis through surface architecture. J Biomed Mater Res A2015;103:1188-1199.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
37 Singh D , NayakV, KumarA. Proliferation of myoblast skeletal cells on three-dimensional supermacroporous cryogels. Int J Biol Sci2010;6:371-381.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
38 Scott RE , HoerlBJ, WilleJJJr, et al.. Coupling of proadipocyte growth arrest and differentiation. II. A cell cycle model for the physiological control of cell proliferation. J Cell Biol1982;94:400-405.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
39 Xia K , XueH, DongD, et al.. Identification of the proliferation/differentiation switch in the cellular network of multicellular organisms. PLoS Comput Biol2006;2:e145.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
40 Escudero N , MandalunisP. Histochemical evaluation of alkaline phosphatase in subchondral bone of olpadronate-treated animals. Bone2007;40:S7. Google Scholar
41 Gomez B Jr , ArdakaniS, JuJ, et al.. Monoclonal antibody assay for measuring bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity in serum. Clin Chem1995;41:1560-1566.PubMed Google Scholar
42 Havill LM , RogersJ, CoxLA, et al.. QTL with pleiotropic effects on serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin maps to the baboon ortholog of human chromosome 6p23-21.3. J Bone Miner Res2006;21:1888-1896.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
43 Van Hoof VO , De BroeME. Interpretation and clinical significance of alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme patterns. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci1994;31:197-293.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
44 Ducy P , ZhangR, GeoffroyV, et al.. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell1997;89:747-754.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
45 Komori T , KishimotoT. Cbfa1 in bone development. Curr Opin Genet Dev1998;8:494-499.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
46 Katagiri T , YamaguchiA, KomakiM, et al.. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol1994;127:1755-1766.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
47 Yeh LCC , TsaiAD, LeeJC. Osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1, BMP-7) induces osteoblastic cell differentiation of the pluripotent mesenchymal cell line C2C12. J Cell Biochem2002;87:292-304.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
48 Glass GE , ChanJK, FreidinA, et al.. TNF-α promotes fracture repair by augmenting the recruitment and differentiation of muscle-derived stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2011;108:1585-1590. Google Scholar