This study reports the results of 38 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in 33 patients aged less than 50 years, using the JRI Furlong hydroxyapatite ceramic (HAC)-coated femoral component. We describe the survival, radiological, and functional outcomes of 33 patients (38 THAs) at a mean follow-up of 27 years (25 to 32) between 1988 and 2018.Aims
Methods
With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases. A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent PFA for non-neoplastic indications between January 2009 and December 2015 was undertaken. Their clinical and radiological outcome, complication rates, and survival were recorded. All patients had the Stanmore Implant – Modular Endo-prosthetic Tumour System (METS).Aims
Methods
This study reports the results of 38 total hip
arthroplasties (THAs) in 33 patients aged <
50 years, using the
JRI Furlong hydroxyapatite ceramic (HAC)-coated femoral component.
This represents an update of previous reports of the same cohort
at ten and 16 years, which were reported in 2004 and 2009, respectively.
We describe the survival, radiological and functional outcomes at
a mean follow-up of 21 years (17 to 25). Of the surviving 34 THAs,
one underwent femoral revision for peri-prosthetic fracture after
21 years, and one patient (one hip) was lost to follow-up. Using
aseptic loosening as the end-point, 12 hips (31.5%) needed acetabular
revision but none needed femoral revision, demonstrating 100% survival
(95% confidence interval 89 to 100). In young patients with high demands, the Furlong HAC–coated femoral
component gives excellent long-term results. Cite this article:
Hip replacement is a very successful operation and the outcome is usually excellent. There are recognised complications that seem increasingly to give rise to litigation. This paper briefly examines some common scenarios where litigation may be pursued against hip surgeons. With appropriate record keeping, consenting and surgical care, the claim can be successfully defended if not avoided. We hope this short summary will help to highlight some common pitfalls. There is extensive literature available for detailed study.