In this study we evaluated whether pre-operative
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
scores can predict satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty
(THA). Prospective data for a cohort of patients undergoing THA
from two large academic centres were collected, and pre-operative
and one-year post-operative WOMAC scores and a 25-point satisfaction
questionnaire were obtained for 446 patients. Satisfaction scores
were dichotomised into either improvement or deterioration. Scatter
plots and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used to describe
the association between pre-operative WOMAC and one-year post-operative WOMAC
scores and patient satisfaction. Satisfaction was compared using
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis against pre-operative,
post-operative and δ WOMAC scores. We found no relationship between pre-operative WOMAC scores and
one-year post-operative WOMAC or satisfaction scores, with Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficients of 0.16 and –0.05, respectively. The
ROC analysis showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.54 (pre-operative
WOMAC), 0.67 (post-operative WOMAC) and 0.43 (δ WOMAC), respectively,
for an improvement in satisfaction. We conclude that the pre-operative WOMAC score does not predict
the post-operative WOMAC score or patient satisfaction after THA,
and that WOMAC scores can therefore not be used to prioritise patient
care. Cite this article:
Aims. The aim of this study was to report our experience at 3.5 years with outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. In this prospective cohort study, we included all patients who were planned to receive primary THA through the anterior approach between 1 April 2014 and 1 October 2017. Patient-related data and surgical information were recorded.
The aims of the study were to report for a cohort aged younger than 40 years: 1) indications for HRA; 2) patient-reported outcomes in terms of the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS); 3) dislocation rate; and 4) revision rate. This retrospective analysis identified 267 hips from 224 patients who underwent an hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) from a single fellowship-trained surgeon using the direct lateral approach between 2007 and 2019. Inclusion criteria was minimum two-year follow-up, and age younger than 40 years. Patients were followed using a prospectively maintained institutional database.Aims
Methods
Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR). In this prospective trial, 219 hips in 190 patients were randomized to either the CS (n = 104) or CR (n = 115) cohort. In the CS cohort, a medial based anterior flap was created and sutured back in place at the end of the procedure. The anterior capsule was resected in the CR cohort. Primary outcome was defined as the difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one year. PROMs (Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36)) were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Radiological parameters were analyzed to assess implant positioning and implant ingrowth. Adverse events were monitored.Aims
Methods
To compare the in vivo long-term fixation achieved by two acetabular components with different porous ingrowth surfaces using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). This was a minimum ten-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial of 62 hips with two different porous ingrowth acetabular components. RSA exams had previously been acquired through two years of follow-up. Patients returned for RSA examination at a minimum of ten years. In addition, radiological appearance of these acetabular components was analyzed, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) obtained.Aims
Methods
Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs.Aims
Methods
This study compared multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who underwent
primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a matched cohort. Specifically,
we evaluated: 1) implant survivorship; 2) functional outcomes (modified
Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome
Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and modified Multiple Sclerosis
Impact Scale (mMSIS) scores (with the MS cohort also evaluated based
on the disease phenotype)); 3) physical therapy duration and return
to function; 4) radiographic outcomes; and 5) complications. We reviewed our institution’s database to identify MS patients
who underwent THA between January 2008 and June 2016. A total of
34 MS patients (41 hips) were matched in a 1:2 ratio to a cohort
of THA patients who did not have MS, based on age, body mass index
(BMI), and Charlson/Deyo score. Patient records were reviewed for complications,
and their functional outcomes and radiographs were reviewed at their
most recent follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of the study were to review and analyse the reported
series of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR)
in the management of infected total hip arthroplasties (THAs) to
establish the overall success and the influencing factors. Using a standardised recognised study protocol, meta-analysis
of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines, a comprehensive
review and analysis of the literature was performed. The primary
outcome measure was the success of treatment. The search strategy
and inclusion criteria which involved an assessment of quality yielded
39 articles for analysis, which included 1296 patients.Aims
Patients and methods
The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of previous
lumbar surgery in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and to investigate their patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year
post-operatively. Data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish
Spine Register gathered from 2002 to 2013 were merged to identify
a group of patients who had undergone lumbar surgery before THA
(n = 997) and a carefully matched one-to-one control group. We investigated
differences in the one-year post-operative PROMs between the groups.
Linear regression analyses were used to explore the associations
between previous lumbar surgery and these PROMs following THA. The
prevalence of prior lumbar surgery was calculated as the ratio of
patients identified with previous lumbar surgery between 2002 and
2012, and divided by the total number of patients who underwent
a THA in 2012.Aims
Patients and Methods
The objective of this five-year prospective, blinded, randomised
controlled trial (RCT) was to compare femoral head penetration into
a vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner
with penetration into a medium cross-linked polyethylene control
liner using radiostereometric analysis. Patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomised
to receive either the study E1 (32 patients) or the control ArComXL
polyethylene (35 patients). The median age (range) of the overall
cohort was 66 years (40 to 76).Aims
Patients and Methods
High failure rates of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty implants have highlighted the need for more careful introduction and monitoring of new implants and for the evaluation of the safety of medical devices. The National Joint Registry and other regulatory services are unable to detect failing implants at an early enough stage. We aimed to identify validated surrogate markers of long-term outcome in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating surrogate markers for predicting long-term outcome in primary THA. Long-term outcome was defined as revision rate of an implant at ten years according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines. We conducted a search of Medline and Embase (OVID) databases. Separate search strategies were devised for the Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Each search was performed to include articles from the date of their inception to June 8, 2015.Objectives
Methods
There is little evidence on the cost effectiveness
of different brands of hip prostheses. We compared lifetime cost effectiveness
of frequently used brands within types of prosthesis including cemented
(Exeter V40 Contemporary, Exeter V40 Duration and Exeter V40 Elite
Plus Ogee), cementless (Corail Pinnacle, Accolade Trident, and Taperloc Exceed)
and hybrid (Exeter V40 Trilogy, Exeter V40 Trident, and CPT Trilogy).
We used data from three linked English national databases to estimate
the lifetime risk of revision, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
and cost. For women with osteoarthritis aged 70 years, the Exeter V40 Elite
Plus Ogee had the lowest risk of revision (5.9% revision risk, 9.0
QALYs) and the CPT Trilogy had the highest QALYs (10.9% revision
risk, 9.3 QALYs). Compared with the Corail Pinnacle (9.3% revision
risk, 9.22 QALYs), the most commonly used brand, and assuming a
willingness-to-pay of £20 000 per QALY gain, the CPT Trilogy is
most cost effective, with an incremental net monetary benefit of £876.
Differences in cost effectiveness between the hybrid CPT Trilogy
and Exeter V40 Trident and the cementless Corail Pinnacle and Taperloc
Exceed were small, and a cautious interpretation is required, given
the limitations of the available information. However, it is unlikely that cemented brands are among the most
cost effective. Similar patterns of results were observed for men
and other ages. The gain in quality of life after total hip arthroplasty,
rather than the risk of revision, was the main driver of cost effectiveness. Cite this article:
