Aims. Arthrodesis is rarely used as a salvage procedure for patients with a chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and little information is available about the outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, durability, and safety of this procedure as the definitive treatment for complex, chronically infected TKA, in a current series of patients. Methods. We retrospectively identified 41 patients (41 TKAs) with a complex infected TKA, who were treated between 2002 and 2016 using a deliberate, two-stage knee arthrodesis. Their mean age was 64 years (34 to 88) and their mean body mass index (BMI) was 39 kg/m. 2. (25 to 79). The mean follow-up was four years (2 to 9). The extensor mechanism (EM) was deficient in 27 patients (66%) and flap cover was required in 14 (34%). Most patients were host grade B (56%) or C (29%), and limb grade 3 (71%), according to the classification of McPherson et al. A total of 12 patients (29%) had polymicrobial infections and 20 (49%) had multi-drug resistant organisms; fixation involved an intramedullary nail in 25 (61%), an external fixator in ten (24%), and dual plates in six (15%). Results. Survivorship free from amputation, persistent infection, and reoperation, other than removal of an external fixator, at five years was 95% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89% to 100%), 85% (95% CI 75% to 95%), and 64% (95% CI 46% to 82%), respectively. Reoperation, other than removal of an external fixator, occurred in 13 patients (32%). After the initial treatment, radiological nonunion developed in ten knees (24%). Nonunion was significantly correlated with persistent infection (p = 0.006) and external fixation (p = 0.005). Of those patients who achieved
Aims. The integrity of the soft tissue envelope is crucial for successful treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of
Although the vast majority of patients that undergo
total knee replacement have satisfactory outcomes with a generally
low complication rate, occasionally a patient will be encountered
that has had multiple failed surgeries, and now reaches a crossroad
as to whether
Endoprosthetic reconstruction with a distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) can be used to treat distal femoral bone loss from oncological and non-oncological causes. This study reports the short-term implant survivorship, complications, and risk factors for patients who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications. We performed a retrospective review of 75 patients from a single institution who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications, including aseptic loosening or mechanical failure of a previous prosthesis (n = 25), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 23), and native or periprosthetic distal femur fracture or nonunion (n = 27). Patients with less than 24 months’ follow-up were excluded. We collected patient demographic data, complications, and reoperations. Reoperation for implant failure was used to calculate implant survivorship.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two-stage revision has traditionally been considered the gold standard of treatment for established infection, but increasing evidence is emerging in support of one-stage exchange for selected patients. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of single-stage revision TKA for PJI, with mid-term follow-up. A total of 84 patients, with a mean age of 68 years (36 to 92), underwent single-stage revision TKA for confirmed PJI at a single institution between 2006 and 2016. In all, 37 patients (44%) were treated for an infected primary TKA, while the majority presented with infected revisions: 31 had undergone one previous revision (36.9%) and 16 had multiple prior revisions (19.1%). Contraindications to single-stage exchange included systemic sepsis, extensive bone or soft-tissue loss, extensor mechanism failure, or if primary wound closure was unlikely to be achievable. Patients were not excluded for culture-negative PJI or the presence of a sinus.Aims
Methods
We have investigated iatrogenic popliteal artery
injuries (PAI) during non arthroplasty knee surgery regarding mechanism
of injury, treatment and outcomes, and to identify successful strategies
when injury occurs. In all, 21 iatrogenic popliteal artery injuries in 21 patients
during knee surgery other than knee arthroplasty were identified
from the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) between 1987 and 2011.
Prospective registry data were supplemented with case-records, including
long-term follow-up. In total, 13 patients suffered PAI during elective surgery
and eight during urgent surgery such as fracture fixation or tumour
resection. Nine injuries were detected intra-operatively, five within
12 to 48 hours and seven >
48 hours post-operatively (two days to
23 years). There were 19 open vascular and two endovascular surgical repairs.
Two patients died within six months of surgery. One patient required
amputation. Only six patients had a complete recovery of whom had
the vascular injury detected at time of injury and repaired by a
vascular surgeon. Patients sustaining vascular injury during elective
procedures are more likely to litigate (p = 0.029). We conclude that outcomes are poorer when there is a delay of
diagnosis and treatment, and that orthopaedic surgeons should develop
strategies to detect PAI early and ensure rapid access to vascular
surgical support. Cite this article:
Popliteal artery injury (PAI) is a feared complication
during knee replacement. Our aim was to investigate those injuries
that occurred in association with knee replacement in terms of the
type of injury, treatment and outcomes. From our national vascular registry (Swedvasc) and the Swedish
Patient Insurance databases a total of 32 cases were identified.
Prospective data from the registries was supplemented with case-records,
including long-term follow-up. We estimated the incidence during 1998 to 2010 to be 0.017%.
In our series of 32 patients with PAI occurring between 1987 and
2011, 25 (78%) were due to penetrating trauma and seven were caused
by blunt trauma. The patients presented in three ways: bleeding
(14), ischaemia (7) and false aneurysm formation (11), and five
occurred during revision surgery. A total of 12 injuries were detected
intra-operatively, eight within 24 hours (3 to 24) and 12 at more
than 24 hours post-operatively (2 to 90 days). Treatment comprised
open surgery in 28 patients. Patency of the vascular repair at 30
days was 97% (31 of 32, one amputation). At the time of follow-up
(median 546 days, mean 677 days (24 to 1251)), 25 patients had residual
symptoms. Of seven patients with a complete recovery, six had had
an early diagnosis of the PAI during the procedure, and were treated
by a vascular surgeon in the same hospital. PAI is a rare adverse event during knee replacement surgery.
The outcome following such events is often adversely affected by
diagnostic and therapeutic delay. Bleeding and false aneurysm were
the most common clinical presentations. Cite this article:
Most problems encountered in complex revision
total knee arthroplasty can be managed with the wide range of implant
systems currently available. Modular metaphyseal sleeves, metallic
augments and cones provide stability even with significant bone
loss. Hinged designs substitute for significant ligamentous deficiencies.
Catastrophic failure that precludes successful reconstruction can
be encountered. The alternatives to arthroplasty in such drastic
situations include knee arthrodesis, resection arthroplasty and
amputation. The relative indications for the selection of these
alternatives are recurrent deep infection, immunocompromised host,
and extensive non-reconstructible bone or soft-tissue defects.