Because posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) resection makes flexion
gaps wider in total knee replacement (TKR), preserving or sacrificing
a PCL affects the gap equivalence; however, there are no criteria
for the PCL resection that consider gap situations of each knee.
This study aims to investigate gap characteristics of knees and
to consider the criteria for PCL resection. The extension and flexion gaps were measured, first with the
PCL preserved and subsequently with the PCL removed (in cases in
which posterior substitute components were selected). The PCL preservation
or sacrifice was solely determined by the gap measurement results,
without considering other functions of the PCL such as ‘roll back.’Objectives
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
effect of various non-operative modalities of treatment (transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); neuromuscular electrical stimulation
(NMES); insoles and bracing) on the pain of osteoarthritis (OA)
of the knee. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify
the therapeutic options which are commonly adopted for the management
of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The outcome measurement tools used in the different studies were
the visual analogue scale and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Arthritis Index pain index: all pain scores were converted to a
100-point scale. A total of 30 studies met our inclusion criteria: 13 on insoles,
seven on TENS, six on NMES, and four on bracing. The standardised
mean difference (SMD) in pain after treatment with TENS was 1.796,
which represented a significant reduction in pain. The significant
overall effect estimate for NMES on pain was similar to that of
TENS, with a SMD of 1.924. The overall effect estimate of insoles
on pain was a SMD of 0.992. The overall effect of bracing showed
a significant reduction in pain of 1.34. Overall, all four non-operative modalities of treatment were
found to have a significant effect on the reduction of pain in OA
of the knee. This study shows that non-operative physical modalities of treatment
are of benefit when treating OA of the knee. However, much of the
literature reviewed evaluates studies with follow-up of less than
six months: future work should aim to evaluate patients with longer
follow-up. Cite this article:
