Clinical studies of patients with bone sarcomas have been challenged
by insufficient numbers at individual centres to draw valid conclusions.
Our objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive
multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether
a five-day regimen of post-operative antibiotics, in comparison
to a
24-hour regimen, decreases surgical site infections in patients
undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity primary
bone tumours. We performed a pilot international multi-centre RCT. We used
central randomisation to conceal treatment allocation and sham antibiotics
to blind participants, surgeons, and data collectors. We determined
feasibility by measuring patient enrolment, completeness of follow-up,
and protocol deviations for the antibiotic regimens. Objective
Methods
We evaluated the construct validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating scale (Enneking score) as a functional measure for patients with sarcoma involving the upper limb. We compared the Enneking score by examining the correlation between two patient-derived outcome measures, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) as indicators of functional status in 40 patients with malignant or aggressive benign bone and soft-tissue tumours of the upper limb who had undergone surgical treatment. The frequency distributions were similar among the three scoring systems. As for the validity, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of the Enneking score to the DASH questionnaire was −0.79 and that of the Enneking to the SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.38 to 0.60. Despite being a measure from the surgeon’s perspective, the Enneking score was shown to be a valid indicator of physical disability in patients with malignant or aggressive benign tumours of the upper limb and reflected their opinion.
