Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
is one of the most devastating and frequent injuries of the knee. Surgical
reconstruction is the current standard of care for treatment of
ACL injuries in active patients. The widespread adoption of ACL
reconstruction over primary repair was based on early perception
of the limited healing capacity of the ACL. Although the majority
of ACL reconstruction surgeries successfully restore gross joint stability,
post-traumatic osteoarthritis is commonplace following these injuries,
even with ACL reconstruction. The development of new techniques
to limit the long-term clinical sequelae associated with ACL reconstruction
has been the main focus of research over the past decades. The improved
knowledge of healing, along with recent advances in tissue engineering
and regenerative medicine, has resulted in the discovery of novel
biologically augmented ACL-repair techniques that have satisfactory
outcomes in preclinical studies. This instructional review provides
a summary of the latest advances made in ACL repair. Cite this article:
We explored the literature surrounding whether
allergy and hypersensitivity has a clinical basis for implant selection
in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In error, the terms hypersensitivity
and allergy are often used synonymously. Although a relationship
is present, we could not find any evidence of implant failure due
to allergy. There is however increasing
Cartilage repair in terms of replacement, or
regeneration of damaged or diseased articular cartilage with functional tissue,
is the ‘holy grail’ of joint surgery. A wide spectrum of strategies
for cartilage repair currently exists and several of these techniques
have been reported to be associated with successful clinical outcomes
for appropriately selected indications. However, based on respective
advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, no single strategy, or
even combination of strategies, provides surgeons with viable options
for attaining successful long-term outcomes in the majority of patients.
As such, development of novel techniques and optimisation of current techniques
need to be, and are, the focus of a great deal of research from
the
This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology. Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.Aims
Methods
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process involving multiple cytokine pathways, leading to articular cartilage degeneration. Intra-articular therapies using pharmaceutical or autologous anti-inflammatory factors offer potential non-surgical treatment options. Autologous protein solution (APS) is one such product that uses the patient’s blood to produce a concentrate of cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines. This study evaluated the effect of a specific APS intra-articular injection (nSTRIDE) on patient-reported outcome measures compared to saline in moderate knee OA. A parallel, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted, where patients with unilateral moderate knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) received either nSTRIDE or saline (placebo) injection to their symptomatic knee. The primary outcome was the difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score at 12 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC component scores, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at all follow-up timepoints (three, six, and 12 months).Aims
Methods
Substantial healthcare resources have been devoted
to computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation systems
that improve the reproducibility with which neutral mechanical alignment
can be achieved following total knee replacement (TKR). This choice of
alignment is based on the long-held tenet that the alignment of
the limb post-operatively should be within 3° of a neutral mechanical
axis. Several recent studies have demonstrated no significant difference
in survivorship when comparing well aligned Review of the literature suggests that a neutral mechanical axis
remains the optimal guide to alignment. Cite this article:
