Biochemical markers of bone-turnover have long been used to complement the radiological assessment of patients with metabolic bone disease. Their implementation in daily clinical practice has been helpful in the understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, the selection of the optimal dose and the understanding of the progression of the onset and resolution of treatment. Since they are derived from both cortical and trabecular bone, they reflect the metabolic activity of the entire skeleton rather than that of individual cells or the process of mineralisation.

Quantitative changes in skeletal-turnover can be assessed easily and non-invasively by the measurement of bone-turnover markers. They are commonly subdivided into three categories; 1) bone-resorption markers, 2) osteoclast regulatory proteins and 3) bone-formation markers. Because of the rapidly accumulating new knowledge of bone matrix biochemistry, attempts have been made to use them in the interpretation and characterisation of various stages of the healing of fractures. Early knowledge of the individual progress of a fracture could help to avoid delayed or nonunion by enabling modification of the host’s biological response.

The levels of bone-turnover markers vary throughout the course of fracture repair with their rates of change being dependent on the size of the fracture and the time that it will take to heal. However, their short-term biological variability, the relatively low bone specificity exerted, given that the production and destruction of collagen is not limited to bone, as well as the influence of the host’s metabolism on their concentration, produce considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in their interpretation. Despite this, the possible role of bone-turnover markers in the assessment of progression to union, the risks of delayed or nonunion and the impact of innovations to accelerate fracture healing must not be ignored.

Heterotopic ossification occurring after the use of commercially available bone morphogenetic proteins has not been widely reported. We describe four cases of heterotopic ossification in patients treated with either recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 or recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 7. We found that while some patients were asymptomatic, heterotopic ossification which had occurred around a joint often required operative excision with good results.

The multifunctional adhesion molecule CD44 is a major cell-surface receptor for hyaluronic acid (HUA). Recent data suggest that it may also bind the ubiquitous bone-matrix protein, osteopontin (OPN). Because OPN has been shown to be a potentially important protein in bone remodelling, we investigated the hypothesis that OPN interactions with the CD44 receptor on bone cells participate in the regulation of the healing of fractures. We examined the spatial and temporal patterns of expression of OPN and CD44 in healing fractures of rat femora by in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. We also localised HUA in the fracture callus using biotinylated HUA-binding protein.

OPN was expressed in remodelling areas of the hard callus and was found in osteocytes, osteoclasts and osteoprogenitor cells, but not in cuboidal osteoblasts which were otherwise shown to express osteocalcin. The OPN signal in osteocytes was not uniformly distributed, but was restricted to specific regions near sites where OPN mRNA-positive osteoclasts were attached to bone surfaces. In the remodelling callus, intense immunostaining for CD44 was detected in osteocyte lacunae, along canaliculi, and on the basolateral plasma membrane of osteoclasts, but not in the cuboidal osteoblasts. HUA staining was detected in fibrous tissues but little was observed in areas of hard callus where bone remodelling was progressing.

Our findings suggest that OPN, rather than HUA, is the major ligand for CD44 on bone cells in the remodelling phase of healing of fractures. They also raise the possibility that such interactions may be involved in the communication of osteocytes with each other and with osteoclasts on bone surfaces. The interactions between CD44 and OPN may have important clinical implications in the repair of skeletal tissues.

We have reviewed the results of 30 operations performed on 23 patients with Ficat stage-III or stage-IV osteonecrosis of the femoral head in which autogenous cortical and cancellous bone grafting had been performed through a so-called trapdoor made in the femoral head.

At a mean of 56 months (30 to 60) after operation 20 of 24 stage-III hips (83%) had a good or excellent result as determined by the Harris hip-scoring system. Two of six stage-IV hips (33%) had good or excellent results. Eighteen of 21 hips (86%) with a combined necrotic angle of 200° had good or excellent clinical results compared with only four of nine hips (44%) with a combined necrotic angle of more than 200°. Six of the eight hips which had fair or poor results were in patients who had received corticosteroids; five of these six hips had lesions with a combined necrotic angle of greater than 200° or were in a late stage (stage IV). There were no perioperative complications.

Our results suggest that the trapdoor procedure with autogenous cancellous and cortical bone grafting can be successful in Ficat and Arlet stage-III osteonecrosis of the hip in patients with small- to medium-sized lesions.