Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 50 of 50
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 10 | Pages 600 - 601
1 Oct 2017
Ghert M


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 8 | Pages 134 - 136
1 Aug 2015
Ghert M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2014
Ollivere B



The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 147
1 Feb 2020
Ollivere B Metcalfe D Perry DC Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1407 - 1408
1 Nov 2018
Simpson AHRW Frost H Norrie J


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1136 - 1337
1 Sep 2018
Griffin XL McBride D Nnadi C Reed MR Rossiter ND


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1135
1 Sep 2018
Pairon P Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 5 | Pages 325 - 326
1 May 2018
Clement ND Deehan DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2017
Roberts LC Dowd JO Hlavsova A


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 194 - 195
1 Apr 2017
Simpson AHRW Howie CR Norrie J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2017
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 10 | Pages 490 - 491
1 Oct 2016
Ghert M McKee M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1011 - 1013
1 Aug 2016
Masters JPM Nanchahal J Costa ML


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2016
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 10 | Pages 520 - 522
1 Oct 2016
Simpson AHRW Murray IR Duckworth AD


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 417 - 418
1 Apr 2017
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1009 - 1010
1 Aug 2016
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 291 - 294
1 Mar 2017
Javaid MK Handley R Costa ML


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2016
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1425 - 1426
1 Nov 2016
Reed M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1297 - 1298
1 Oct 2016
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Aug 2016
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 12 | Pages 195 - 197
1 Dec 2015
Simpson AHRW Dave J Ghert M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 7 | Pages 865 - 866
1 Jul 2016
Haddad FS



Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2015
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2014
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1013 - 1014
1 Aug 2015
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 7 | Pages 117 - 119
1 Jul 2015
Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 5 | Pages 577 - 577
1 May 2015
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1443 - 1444
1 Nov 2013
Griffin XL Parsons N Carey Smith R Stengel D Costa ML

The importance for observing the intention-to-treat approach in clinical studies is explained.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1443–4.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2014
Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 146
1 Feb 2015
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2013
Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1285 - 1286
1 Oct 2014
Dunbar MJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1000 - 1001
1 Aug 2014
Griffin XL Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 8 | Pages 997 - 999
1 Aug 2014
Stahel PF Mauffrey C

We explore the limitations of complete reliance on evidence-based medicine which can be diminished by confounding issues and sampling bias. Other strategies which may be reasonably invoked are discussed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:997–9.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2014
Barrack RL


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Aug 2013
Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 5 | Pages 577 - 577
1 May 2013
Villar RN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2013
Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 3
1 Jan 2013
Costa ML Stengel D Griffin XL Carey Smith R Parsons N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1591 - 1592
1 Dec 2005
Tovey D Bognolo G


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1589 - 1590
1 Dec 2005
Horan FT


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 849 - 850
1 Jul 2007
Atkins RM

This editorial examines the influence of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the conduct of orthopaedic surgery. It proffers criticism and suggests ways of improvement.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1593 - 1594
1 Dec 2005
Carr AJ