Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 15 of 15
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1328 - 1330
1 Aug 2021
Gwilym SE Perry DC Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 5 | Pages 807 - 808
1 May 2021
Rossiter ND Chesser TJS Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1434
1 Nov 2020
Trompeter AJ Furness H Kanakaris NK Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1123 - 1124
1 Sep 2017
Parsons NR Perry DC Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 5 | Pages 563 - 565
1 May 2017
Perry DC Griffin XL Dritsaki M Costa ML Parsons N


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 419 - 420
1 Apr 2017
Costa ML Griffin XL Parsons N Dritsaki M Perry D


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 291 - 294
1 Mar 2017
Javaid MK Handley R Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1011 - 1013
1 Aug 2016
Masters JPM Nanchahal J Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 7 | Pages 853 - 854
1 Jul 2014
Parsons N Griffin XL Stengel D Carey Smith R Perry DC Costa ML

The Bone & Joint Journal provides the latest evidence to guide the clinical practice of orthopaedic surgeons. The benefits of one intervention compared with another are presented using outcome measures; some may be specific to a limb or joint and some are more general health-related quality of life measures. Readers will be familiar with many of these outcome measures and will be able to judge the relative benefits of different interventions when measured using the same outcome tool; for example, different treatments for pain in the knee measured using a particular knee score. But, how should readers compare outcomes between different clinical areas using different outcome measures? This article explores the use of standardised effect sizes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:853–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1443 - 1444
1 Nov 2013
Griffin XL Parsons N Carey Smith R Stengel D Costa ML

The importance for observing the intention-to-treat approach in clinical studies is explained.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1443–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1156 - 1157
1 Sep 2013
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The variation in surgical performance, both between centres and individual surgeons, has recently been of significant political, media and public interest. Within the United Kingdom, a government agenda to increase accountability amongst surgeons has led to the online publication of ‘surgeon-level’ data. Surgeons, journalists and the public need to understand these data if they are to be useful in driving up standards of surgical care. This Editorial describes the use of Funnel Plots, which are the common means by which such data are presented, and discusses how the plots are generated.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1156–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 7 | Pages 866 - 867
1 Jul 2013
Parsons N Carey Smith R Griffin XL Stengel D Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 3
1 Jan 2013
Costa ML Stengel D Griffin XL Carey Smith R Parsons N