The April 2015 Research Roundup360 looks at: MCID in grip strength and distal radial fracture; Experiencing rehab in a trial setting; Electrical stimulation and nerve recovery; Molecular diagnosis of TB?; Acetabular orientation: component and arthritis; Analgesia after knee arthroplasty; Bisphosphonate-associated femoral fractures
Clinicians are often asked by patients, “When
can I drive again?” after lower limb injury or surgery. This question
is difficult to answer in the absence of any guidelines. This review
aims to collate the currently available evidence and discuss the
factors that influence the decision to allow a patient to return
to driving. There is currently insufficient evidence for any authoritative
body to determine fitness to drive. The lack of guidance could result
in patients being withheld from driving for longer than is necessary,
or returning to driving while still unsafe. Cite this article:
Although it is clear that opening-wedge high
tibial osteotomy (HTO) changes alignment in the coronal plane, which is
its objective, it is not clear how this procedure affects knee kinematics
throughout the range of joint movement and in other planes. Our research question was: how does opening-wedge HTO change
three-dimensional tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in
loaded flexion in patients with varus deformity?Three-dimensional
kinematics were assessed over 0° to 60° of loaded flexion using
an MRI method before and after opening-wedge HTO in a cohort of
13 men (14 knees). Results obtained from an iterative statistical
model found that at six and 12 months after operation, opening-wedge
HTO caused increased anterior translation of the tibia (mean 2.6
mm, p <
0.001), decreased proximal translation of the patella
(mean –2.2 mm, p <
0.001), decreased patellar spin (mean –1.4°,
p <
0.05), increased patellar tilt (mean 2.2°, p <
0.05) and
changed three other parameters. The mean Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Arthritis Index improved significantly (p <
0.001)
from 49.6 (standard deviation ( The three-dimensional kinematic changes found may be important
in explaining inconsistency in clinical outcomes, and suggest that
measures in addition to coronal plane alignment should be considered. Cite this article:
Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been used to reduce
blood loss during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but its use could increase
the risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Several studies
have reported that TXA does not increase the prevalence of deep
vein thrombosis (DVT), but most of those used routine chemical thromboprophylaxis,
thereby masking the potential increased risk of TXA on VTE. We wished
to ascertain whether TXA increases the prevalence of VTE in patients
undergoing THA without routine chemical thromboprophylaxis. We carried
out a retrospective case-control study in 254 patients who underwent
a primary THA, 127 of whom received TXA (1 g given pre-operatively)
and a control group of 127 who did not. All patients had mechanical
but no chemical thomboprophylaxis. Each patient was examined for
DVT by bilateral ultrasonography pre-operatively and on post-operative
days 1 and 7. TXA was found to statistically significantly increase
the incidence of total DVT on post-operative day 7 compared with
the control group (24 (18.9%) and 12 (9.4%), respectively; p <
0.05) but most cases of DVT were isolated distal DVT, with the exception
of one patient with proximal DVT in each group. One patient in the control
group developed a non-fatal symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE).
The use of TXA did not appear to affect the prevalence of either
proximal DVT or PE. Cite this article:
Ankle replacements have improved significantly since the first reported attempt at resurfacing of the talar dome in 1962. We are now at a stage where ankle replacement offers a viable option in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. As the procedure becomes more successful, it is important to reflect and review the current surgical outcomes. This allows us to guide our patients in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. What is the better surgical treatment – arthrodesis or replacement?
Revision knee arthroplasty presents a number
of challenges, not least of which is obtaining solid primary fixation
of implants into host bone. Three anatomical zones exist within
both femur and tibia which can be used to support revision implants.
These consist of the joint surface or epiphysis, the metaphysis
and the diaphysis. The methods by which fixation in each zone can
be obtained are discussed. The authors suggest that solid fixation
should be obtained in at least two of the three zones and emphasise
the importance of pre-operative planning and implant selection. Cite this article:
We determined the efficacy of a devitalised autograft
(n = 13) and allograft (n = 16) cortical strut bone graft combined
with long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction in the treatment of
massive tumours of the lower limb. A total of 29 patients (18 men:11
women, mean age 20.1 years (12 to 45) with a ratio of length of
resection to that of the whole prosthesis of >
50% were treated
between May 2003 and May 2012. The mean follow-up was 47 months
(15 to 132). The stem of the prosthesis was introduced through bone
graft struts filled with cement, then cemented into the residual
bone. Bone healing was achieved in 23 patients (86%). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumour Society functional score was 85% (57 to 97). The five-year
survival rate of the endoprostheses was 81% (95% confidence intervals
67.3 to 92.3). The mean length of devitalised autografts and allografts
was 8.6 cm (5 to 15), which increased the ratio of the the length
of the stem of the prosthesis to that of the whole length of the
prosthesis from a theoretical 35% to an actual 55%. Cortical strut bone grafting and long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction
is an option for treating massive segmental defects following resection
of a tumour in the lower limb. Patients can regain good function
with a low incidence of aseptic loosening. The strut graft and the
residual bone together serve as a satisfactory bony environment
for a revision prosthesis, if required, once union is achieved. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to compare the operating
time, length of stay (LOS), adverse events and rate of re-admission
for elderly patients with a fracture of the hip treated using either
general or spinal anaesthesia. Patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent
surgery for a fracture of the hip between 2010 and 2012 were identified
from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality
Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Of the 9842 patients who
met the inclusion criteria, 7253 (73.7%) were treated with general
anaesthesia and 2589 (26.3%) with spinal anaesthesia. On propensity-adjusted
multivariate analysis, general anaesthesia was associated with slightly increased
operating time (+5 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) +4 to +6,
p <
0.001) and post-operative time in the operating room (+5
minutes, 95% CI +2 to +8, p <
0.001) compared with spinal anaesthesia.
General anaesthesia was associated with a shorter LOS (hazard ratio
(HR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.34, p <
0.001). Any adverse event
(odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.32, p <
0.001), thromboembolic
events (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.89, p = 0.003), any minor adverse
event (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.32, p <
0.001), and blood transfusion
(OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.49, p <
0.001) were associated with
general anaesthesia. General anaesthesia was associated with decreased
rates of urinary tract infection (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.87,
p <
0.001). There was no clear overall advantage of one type
of anaesthesia over the other, and surgeons should be aware of the
specific risks and benefits associated with each type. Cite this article:
The February 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Hip arthroplasty in Down syndrome; Bulk femoral autograft successful in acetabular reconstruction; Arthroplasty follow-up: is the internet the solution?; Total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture; Salvage arthroplasty following failed hip internal fixation; Bone banking sensible financially and clinically; Allogenic blood transfusion in arthroplasty.
Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management
of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce
serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either
alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are
not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently
issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states
must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication. In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative
focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives
in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating
Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation
of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted
the importance of informing and educating clinicians. Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications
in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical
care. Cite this article:
The April 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at: scientific writing needed in orthopaedic papers; antiseptics and osteoblasts; thromboembolic management in orthopaedic patients; nicotine and obesity in post-operative complications; defining the “Patient Acceptable Symptom State”; and cheap and nasty implants of poor quality.
The aim of this study was to assess the role
of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic
hip infection. We prospectively collected synovial fluid from 89
patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and measured synovial
CRP, serum CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), synovial white
blood cell (WBC) count and synovial percentages of polymorphonuclear
neutrophils (PMN). Patients were classified as septic or aseptic
by means of clinical, microbiological, serum and synovial fluid
findings. The high viscosity of the synovial fluid precluded the
analyses in nine patients permitting the results in 80 patients
to be studied. There was a significant difference in synovial CRP
levels between the septic (n = 21) and the aseptic (n = 59) cohort.
According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, a synovial
CRP threshold of 2.5 mg/l had a sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity
of 93.3%. The area under the curve was 0.96. Compared with serum
CRP and ESR, synovial CRP showed a high diagnostic value. According
to these preliminary results, synovial CRP may be a useful parameter
in diagnosing chronic periprosthetic hip infection. Cite this article:
Ensuring correct rotation of the femoral component
is a challenging aspect of patellofemoral replacement surgery. Rotation
equal to the epicondylar axis or marginally more external rotation
is acceptable. Internal rotation is associated with poor outcomes.
This paper comprises two studies evaluating the use of the medial
malleolus as a landmark to guide rotation. We used 100 lower-leg anteroposterior radiographs to evaluate
the reliability of the medial malleolus as a landmark. Assessment
was made of the angle between the tibial shaft and a line from the
intramedullary rod entry site to the medial malleolus. The femoral
cut was made in ten cadaver knees using the inferior tip of the
medial malleolus as a landmark for rotation. Rotation of the cut
relative to the anatomical epicondylar axis was assessed using CT.
The study of radiographs found the position of the medial malleolus
relative to the tibial axis is consistent. Using the inferior tip
of the medial malleolus in the cadaver study produced a mean external
rotation of 1.6° (0.1° to 3.7°) from the anatomical epicondylar
axis. Using the inferior tip of the medial malleolus to guide the
femoral cutting jig avoids internal rotation and introduces an acceptable
amount of external rotation of the femoral component.
The treatment of osteochondral lesions is of
great interest to orthopaedic surgeons because most lesions do not heal
spontaneously. We present the short-term clinical outcome and MRI
findings of a cell-free scaffold used for the treatment of these
lesions in the knee. A total of 38 patients were prospectively evaluated
clinically for two years following treatment with an osteochondral
nanostructured biomimetic scaffold. There were 23 men and 15 women; the
mean age of the patients was 30.5 years (15 to 64). Clinical outcome
was assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
(KOOS), the Tegner activity scale and a Visual Analgue scale for
pain. MRI data were analysed based on the Magnetic Resonance Observation
of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system at three, 12
and 24 months post-operatively. There was a continuous significant
clinical improvement after surgery. In two patients, the scaffold
treatment failed (5.3%) There was a statistically significant improvement
in the MOCART precentage scores. The repair tissue filled most of
the defect sufficiently. We found subchondral laminar changes in all
patients. Intralesional osteophytes were found in two patients (5.3%).
We conclude that this one-step scaffold-based technique can be used
for osteochondral repair. The surgical technique is straightforward,
and the clinical results are promising. The MRI aspects of the repair
tissue continue to evolve during the first two years after surgery.
However, the subchondral laminar and bone changes are a concern. Cite this article:
This conversation represents an attempt by several
arthroplasty surgeons to critique several abstracts presented over
the last year as well as to use them as a jumping off point for trying
to figure out where they fit in into our current understanding of
multiple issues in modern hip and knee arthroplasty.
The outcome after total hip replacement has improved
with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management
and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways
require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education,
multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic
climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while
minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals
to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter
admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common
interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education,
pre-emptive analgesia, local infiltration analgesia, pre-operative
nutrition, the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields, peri-operative
rehabilitation, wound dressings, different surgical techniques, minimally
invasive surgery and fast-track joint replacement units. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine if a change
in antibiotic prophylaxis for routine hip and knee replacement was
associated with an increased risk of acute renal impairment. We identified 238 patients (128 knees and 110 hips) who had received
a single prophylactic dose of 1.5 g cefuroxime before joint replacement.
We compared them with prospectively collected data from 254 patients
(117 knees and 137 hips) who received a single prophylactic dose
of 2 g flucloxacillin and a height- and gender-determined dose of
gentamicin. The primary outcome measure was any new renal impairment
as graded by clinically validated criteria. We identified four patients (1.69%) in the cefuroxime group who
developed renal impairment. All four had mild impairment and all
renal function was normal by the third post-operative day. The incidence
of new-onset renal impairment was significantly higher in the flucloxacillin-and-gentamicin
group at 9.45% (24 patients) (p <
0.001). Three of these patients
remained with acute renal impairment after a week, although the
serum creatinine levels in all subsequently returned to normal. Cite this article:
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial
component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains
controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement
and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence
large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational
studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant
migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the
most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of
several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown
to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects
of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR. Cite this article:
Third-body wear is believed to be one trigger for adverse results
with metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings. Impingement and subluxation
may release metal particles from MOM replacements. We therefore
challenged MOM bearings with relevant debris types of cobalt–chrome
alloy (CoCr), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and polymethylmethacrylate
bone cement (PMMA). Cement flakes (PMMA), CoCr and Ti6Al4V particles (size range
5 µm to 400 µm) were run in a MOM wear simulation. Debris allotments
(5 mg) were inserted at ten intervals during the five million cycle
(5 Mc) test. Objectives
Methods
Stems may improve fixation and stability of components
during revision total knee replacement. However, the choice between
cemented and cementless stems is not a clear one. Cemented stems
offer several advantages in terms of versatility, mechanical stability, surgical
technique and clinical outcome over their cementless counterpart. Cite this article: