The December 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Vitamin E infusion helpful in polyethylene; Hip replacement in fracture and arthritis; Non-surgical treatment for arthritis; Cost and approach in hip surgery; Who does well in FAI surgery?; AAOS Thromboembolism guidelines; Thromboprophylaxis and periprosthetic joint infection; Fluid collections not limited to metal-on-metal THR
The February 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: length of stay; cementless metaphyseal fixation; mortality trends in over 400,000 total hip replacements; antibiotics in hip fracture surgery; blood supply to the femoral head after dislocation; resurfacing and THR in metal-on-metal replacement; diabetes and hip replacement; bone remodelling over two decades following hip replacement; and whether bisphosphonates affect acetabular fixation.
The issues surrounding raised levels of metal
ions in the blood following large head metal-on-metal total hip replacement
(THR), such as cobalt and chromium, have been well documented. Despite
the national popularity of uncemented metal-on-polyethylene (MoP)
THR using a large-diameter femoral head, few papers have reported
the levels of metal ions in the blood following this combination.
Following an isolated failure of a 44 mm Trident–Accolade uncemented
THR associated with severe wear between the femoral head and the
trunnion in the presence of markedly elevated levels of cobalt ions
in the blood, we investigated the relationship between modular femoral head
diameter and the levels of cobalt and chromium ions in the blood
following this THR. A total of 69 patients received an uncemented Trident–Accolade
MoP THR in 2009. Of these, 43 patients (23 men and 20 women, mean
age 67.0 years) were recruited and had levels of cobalt and chromium
ions in the blood measured between May and June 2012. The patients
were then divided into three groups according to the diameter of
the femoral head used: 12 patients in the 28 mm group (controls),
18 patients in the 36 mm group and 13 patients in the 40 mm group.
A total of four patients had identical bilateral prostheses in situ
at phlebotomy: one each in the 28 mm and 36 mm groups and two in
the 40 mm group. There was a significant increase in the mean levels of cobalt
ions in the blood in those with a 36 mm diameter femoral head compared
with those with a 28 mm diameter head (p = 0.013). The levels of
cobalt ions in the blood were raised in those with a 40 mm diameter
head but there was no statistically significant difference between
this group and the control group (p = 0.152). The levels of chromium
ions in the blood were normal in all patients. The clinical significance of this finding is unclear, but we
have stopped using femoral heads with a diameter of ≤ 36 mm, and
await further larger studies to clarify whether, for instance, this
issue particularly affects this combination of components. Cite this article:
As adverse events related to metal on metal hip
arthroplasty have been better understood, there has been increased
interest in toxicity related to the high circulating levels of cobalt ions.
However, distinguishing true toxicity from benign elevations in
cobalt levels can be challenging. The purpose of this review is
to examine the use of cobalt alloys in total hip arthroplasty, to
review the methods of measuring circulating cobalt levels, to define
a level of cobalt which is considered pathological and to review
the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment of cobalt toxicity.
To the best of our knowledge, there are 18 published cases where
cobalt metal ion toxicity has been attributed to the use of cobalt-chromium
alloys in hip arthroplasty. Of these cases, the great majority reported
systemic toxic reactions at serum cobalt levels more than 100 μg/L.
This review highlights some of the clinical features of cobalt toxicity,
with the goal that early awareness may decrease the risk factors
for the development of cobalt toxicity and/or reduce its severity. Take home message: Severe adverse events can arise from the release
of cobalt from metal-on-metal arthroplasties, and as such, orthopaedic
surgeons should not only be aware of the presenting problems, but
also have the knowledge to treat appropriately. Cite this article:
The primary purpose of this study of metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip resurfacing was to compare the effect of using a cementless
or cemented femoral component on the subsequent bone mineral density
(BMD) of the femoral neck. This was a single-centre, prospective, double-blinded control
trial which randomised 120 patients (105 men and 15 women) with
a mean age of 49.4 years (21 to 68) to receive either a cemented
or cementless femoral component. Follow-up was to two years. Outcome
measures included total and six-point region-of-interest BMD of
the femoral neck, radiological measurements of acetabular inclination,
neck-shaft and stem-shaft angles, and functional outcome scores
including the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the University of California
at Los Angeles activity scale. In total, 17 patients were lost to follow-up leaving 103 patients
at two years. There were no revisions in the cementless group and
three revisions (5%) in the cemented group (two because of hip pain
and one for pseudotumour). The total BMD was significantly higher in the cementless group
at six months (p <
0.001) and one year (p = 0.01) than in the
cemented group, although there was a loss of statistical significance
in the difference at two years (p = 0.155). All patient outcomes improved significantly: there were no significant
differences between the two groups. The results show better preservation of femoral neck BMD with
a cementless femoral component after two years of follow-up. Further
investigation is needed to establish whether this translates into
improved survivorship. Cite this article:
Early failure associated with adverse reactions to metal debris is an emerging problem after hip resurfacing but the exact mechanism is unclear. We analysed our entire series of 660 metal-on-metal resurfacings (Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR)) and large-bearing ASR total hip replacements, to establish associations with metal debris-related failures. Clinical and radiological outcomes, metal ion levels, explant studies and lymphocyte transformation tests were performed. A total of 17 patients (3.4%) were identified (all ASR bearings) with adverse reactions to metal debris, for which revision was required. This group had significantly smaller components, significantly higher acetabular component anteversion, and significantly higher whole concentrations of blood and joint chromium and cobalt ions than asymptomatic patients did (all p <
0.001). Post-revision lymphocyte transformation tests on this group showed no reactivity to chromium or cobalt ions. Explants from these revisions had greater surface wear than retrievals for uncomplicated fractures. The absence of adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with well-positioned implants usually implies high component wear. Surgeons must consider implant design, expected component size and acetabular component positioning in order to reduce early failures when performing large-bearing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and replacement.
In this paper, we will consider the current role
of metal-on-metal bearings by looking at three subtypes of MoM hip
arthroplasty separately: Hip resurfacing, large head (>
36 mm) MoM
THA and MoM THA with traditional femoral head sizes.
The peri-prosthetic tissue response to wear debris
is complex and influenced by various factors including the size, area
and number of particles. We hypothesised that the ‘biologically
active area’ of all metal wear particles may predict the type of
peri-prosthetic tissue response. Peri-prosthetic tissue was sampled from 21 patients undergoing
revision of a small diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty
(THA) for aseptic loosening. An enzymatic protocol was used for
tissue digestion and scanning electron microscope was used to characterise
particles. Equivalent circle diameters and particle areas were calculated.
Histomorphometric analyses were performed on all tissue specimens.
Aspirates of synovial fluid were collected for analysis of the cytokine
profile analysis, and compared with a control group of patients
undergoing primary THA (n = 11) and revision of a failed ceramic-on-polyethylene
arthroplasty (n = 6). The overall distribution of the size and area of the particles
in both lymphocyte and
non-lymphocyte-dominated responses were similar; however, the subgroup
with lymphocyte-dominated peri-prosthetic tissue responses had a
significantly larger total number of particles. 14 cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10,
IL-13, IL-17, interferon (IFN)-γ, and IFN-gamma-inducible protein
10), chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α and MIP-1ß),
and growth factors (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor
(GM-CSF) and platelet derived growth factor) were detected at significantly higher
levels in patients with metal wear debris compared with the control
group. Significantly higher levels for IL-1ß, IL-5, IL-10 and GM-CSF
were found in the subgroup of tissues from failed MoM THAs with
a lymphocyte-dominated peri-prosthetic response compared with those
without this response. These results suggest that the ‘biologically active area’ predicts
the type of
peri-prosthetic tissue response. The cytokines IL-1ß, IL-5, IL-10,
and GM-CSF are associated with lymphocyte-dominated tissue responses
from failed small-diameter MoM THA. Cite this article:
The long term biological effects of wear products
following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear. However, the indications
for THA are expanding, with increasingly younger patients undergoing
the procedure. This prospective, randomised study compared two groups of patients
undergoing THA after being randomised to receive one of two different
bearing surfaces: metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) n = 22 and metal-on-metal
(MoM) n = 23. We investigated the relationship between three variables:
bearing surface (MoP Our results demonstrated significantly higher mean cobalt and
chromium (Co and Cr) blood levels in the MoM group at all follow-up
points following surgery (p <
0.01), but there were no significant
differences in the chromosomal aberration indices between MoM and
MoP at two or five years (two years: p = 0.56, p = 0.08, p = 0.91, p
= 0.51 and five years: p = 0.086, p = 0.73, p = 0.06, p = 0.34)
for translocations, breaks, loss and gain of chromosomes respectively.
Regression analysis showed a strong linear relationship between
Cr levels and the total chromosomal aberration indices in the MoM
group (R2 = 0.90016), but this was not as strong for
Co (R2 = 0.68991). In the MoP group, the analysis revealed
a poor relationship between Cr levels and the total chromosomal
aberration indices (R2 = 0.23908) but a slightly stronger
relationship for Co (R2 = 0.64292). Across both groups,
Spearman’s correlation detected no overall association between Co and Cr
levels and each of the studied chromosomal aberrations. There remains
no clear indication which THA bearing couple is the most biocompatible,
especially in young active patients. While THA continues to be very
successful at alleviating pain and restoring function, the long-term
biological implications of the procedure still require further scrutiny. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether concerns about the release of metal ions in metal-on-metal total hip replacements (THR) should be extended to patients with metal-bearing total disc replacements (TDR). Cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood and serum were measured in ten patients with a single-level TDR after a mean follow-up of 34.5 months (13 to 61) using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. These metal ion levels were compared with pre-operative control levels in 81 patients and with metal ion levels 12 months after metal-on-metal THR (n = 21) and resurfacing hip replacement (n = 36). Flexion-extension radiographs were used to verify movement of the TDR. Cobalt levels in whole blood and serum were significantly lower in the TDR group than in either the THR (p = 0.007) or the resurfacing group (p <
0.001). Both chromium levels were also significantly lower after TDR These results suggest that there is minimal cause for concern about high metal ion concentrations after TDR, as the levels appear to be only moderately elevated. However, spinal surgeons using a metal-on-metal TDR should still be aware of concerns expressed in the hip replacement literature about toxicity from elevated metal ion levels, and inform their patients appropriately.
We measured the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 53.4 years (30 to 74) who had undergone revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Three-dimensional CT was used to measure the inclination and version of the acetabular component, femoral version and the horizontal femoral offset, and the linear wear of the removed acetabular components was measured using a roundness machine. We found that acetabular version and combined version of the acetabular and femoral components were weakly positively correlated with the rate of wear. The acetabular inclination angle was strongly positively correlated with the rate of wear. Femoral version was weakly negatively correlated with the rate of wear. Application of a threshold of >
5 μm/year for the rate of wear in order to separate the revisions into low or high wearing groups showed that more high wearing components were implanted outside Lewinnek’s safe zone, but that this was mainly due to the inclination of the acetabular component, which was the only parameter that significantly differed between the groups. We were unable to show that excess version of the acetabular component alone or combined with femoral version was associated with an increase in the rate of wear based on our assessment of version using CT.
Tribocorrosion at the head–neck taper interface
– so-called ‘taperosis’ – may be a source of metal ions and particulate
debris in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (THA). We examined the effect of femoral head length on fretting and
corrosion in retrieved head–neck tapers Head length was observed to affect fretting (p = 0.03), with
28 mm + 8 mm femoral heads showing greater total fretting scores
than all other head lengths. The central zone of the femoral head
bore taper was subject to increased fretting damage (p = 0.01),
regardless of head length or stem offset. High-offset femoral stems
were associated with greater total fretting of the bore taper (p
= 0.04). Increased fretting damage is seen with longer head lengths and
high-offset femoral stems, and occurs within a central concentric
zone of the femoral head bore taper. Further investigation is required
to determine the effect of increased head size, and variations in
head–neck taper design. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ten-year
clinical and functional outcome of hip resurfacing and to compare it
with that of cementless hip arthroplasty in patients under the age
of 55 years. Between 1999 and 2002, 80 patients were enrolled into the study:
24 were randomised (11 to hip resurfacing, 13 to total hip arthroplasty),
18 refused hip resurfacing and chose cementless total hip arthroplasty
with a 32 mm bearing, and 38 insisted on resurfacing. The mean follow-up
for all patients was 12.1 years (10 to 14). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically at one year,
five years and ten years. Outcome measures included EuroQol EQ5D,
Oxford, Harris hip, University of California Los Angeles and University
College Hospital functional scores. No differences were seen between the two groups in the Oxford
or Harris hip scores or in the quality of life scores. Despite a
similar aspiration to activity pre-operatively, a higher proportion
of patients with a hip resurfacing were running and involved in
sport and heavy manual labour after ten years. We found significantly higher function scores in patients who
had undergone hip resurfacing than in those with a cementless hip
arthroplasty at ten years. This suggests a functional advantage
for hip resurfacing. There were no other attendant problems. Cite this article:
Despite the increasing interest and subsequent published literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, little is known about the prevalence of its complications and in particular the less common modes of failure. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and to analyse the reasons for it. From a multi-surgeon series (141 surgeons) of 5000 Birmingham hip resurfacings we have analysed the modes, prevalence, gender differences and times to failure of any hip requiring revision. To date 182 hips have been revised (3.6%). The most common cause for revision was a fracture of the neck of the femur (54 hips, prevalence 1.1%), followed by loosening of the acetabular component (32 hips, 0.6%), collapse of the femoral head/avascular necrosis (30 hips, 0.6%), loosening of the femoral component (19 hips, 0.4%), infection (17 hips, 0.3%), pain with aseptic lymphocytic vascular and associated lesions (ALVAL)/metallosis (15 hips, 0.3%), loosening of both components (five hips, 0.1%), dislocation (five hips, 0.1%) and malposition of the acetabular component (three hips, 0.1%). In two cases the cause of failure was unknown. Comparing men with women, we found the prevalence of revision to be significantly higher in women (women = 5.7%; men = 2.6%, p <
0.001). When analysing the individual modes of failure women had significantly more revisions for loosening of the acetabular component, dislocation, infection and pain/ALVAL/metallosis (p <
0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.008, p = 0.01 respectively). The mean time to failure was 2.9 years (0.003 to 11.0) for all causes, with revision for fracture of the neck of the femur occurring earlier than other causes (mean 1.5 years, 0.02 to 11.0). There was a significantly shorter time to failure in men (mean 2.1 years, 0.4 to 8.7) compared with women (mean 3.6 years, 0.003 to 11.0) (p <
0.001).
Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing was developed in the 1990s by surgeons in Birmingham, UK, as a surgical solution to the problem of osteoarthritis in younger, more active patients. Early results were promising and the procedure gained in popularity. However, adverse reports of soft-tissue reaction and failure started to appear from 2008 onwards. Surgeons may be asked to write medico-legal reports on the surgical aspects of an individual case for claimant lawyers or in defence for the NHSLA or indemnity insurers. The purpose of this article is to cover some of the aspects of the operation that may be considered in such medico-legal reports.
There is widespread concern regarding the incidence of adverse soft-tissue reactions after metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacement. Recent National Joint Registry data have shown clear differences in the rates of failure of different designs of hip resurfacing. Our aim was to update the failure rates related to metal debris for the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR). A total of 505 of these were implanted. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a failure rate of 25% at six years for the ASR resurfacing and of 48.8% for the ASR total hip replacement (THR). Of 257 patients with a minimum follow-up of two years, 67 (26.1%) had a serum cobalt concentration which was greater than 7 μg/l. Co-ordinate measuring machine analysis of revised components showed that all patients suffering adverse tissue reactions in the resurfacing group had abnormal wear of the bearing surfaces. Six THR patients had relatively low rates of articular wear, but were found to have considerable damage at the trunion-taper interface. Our results suggest that wear at the modular junction is an important factor in the development of adverse tissue reactions after implantation of a large-diameter MoM THR.
Nanotechnology is the study, production and controlled
manipulation of materials with a grain size <
100 nm. At this
level, the laws of classical mechanics fall away and those of quantum
mechanics take over, resulting in unique behaviour of matter in
terms of melting point, conductivity and reactivity. Additionally,
and likely more significant, as grain size decreases, the ratio
of surface area to volume drastically increases, allowing for greater interaction
between implants and the surrounding cellular environment. This
favourable increase in surface area plays an important role in mesenchymal
cell differentiation and ultimately bone–implant interactions. Basic science and translational research have revealed important
potential applications for nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery,
particularly with regard to improving the interaction between implants
and host bone. Nanophase materials more closely match the architecture
of native trabecular bone, thereby greatly improving the osseo-integration
of orthopaedic implants. Nanophase-coated prostheses can also reduce
bacterial adhesion more than conventionally surfaced prostheses.
Nanophase selenium has shown great promise when used for tumour
reconstructions, as has nanophase silver in the management of traumatic
wounds. Nanophase silver may significantly improve healing of peripheral
nerve injuries, and nanophase gold has powerful anti-inflammatory
effects on tendon inflammation. Considerable advances must be made in our understanding of the
potential health risks of production, implantation and wear patterns
of nanophase devices before they are approved for clinical use.
Their potential, however, is considerable, and is likely to benefit
us all in the future. Cite this article:
The June 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Modular femoral necks: early signs are not good; is corrosion to blame for modular neck failures; metal-on-metal is not quite a closed book; no excess failures in fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures; noise no problem in hip replacement; heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy: are NSAIDs the answer?; thrombotic and bleeding events surprisingly low in total joint replacement; and the elephant in the room: complications and surgical volume.
We review the history and literature of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Resurfacing and the science behind it continues to evolve. Recent results, particularly from the national arthroplasty registers, have spread disquiet among both surgeons and patients. A hip resurfacing arthroplasty is not a total hip replacement, but should perhaps be seen as a means of delaying it. The time when hip resurfacing is offered to a patient may be different from that for a total hip replacement. The same logic can apply to the timing of revision surgery. Consequently, the comparison of resurfacing with total hip replacement may be a false one. Nevertheless, the need for innovative solutions for young arthroplasty patients is clear. Total hip replacement can be usefully delayed in many of these patients by the use of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.