Recently, the use of metal-on-metal articulations
in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to an increase in adverse
events owing to local soft-tissue reactions from metal ions and
wear debris. While the majority of these implants perform well,
it has been increasingly recognised that a small proportion of patients
may develop complications secondary to systemic cobalt toxicity
when these implants fail. However, distinguishing true toxicity
from benign elevations in cobalt ion levels can be challenging. The purpose of this two part series is to review the use of cobalt
alloys in THA and to highlight the following related topics of interest:
mechanisms of cobalt ion release and their measurement, definitions
of pathological cobalt ion levels, and the pathophysiology, risk factors
and treatment of cobalt toxicity. Historically, these metal-on-metal
arthroplasties are composed of a chromium-cobalt articulation. The release of cobalt is due to the mechanical and oxidative
stresses placed on the prosthetic joint. It exerts its pathological
effects through direct cellular toxicity. This manuscript will highlight the pathophysiology of cobalt
toxicity in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Take home message: Patients with new or evolving hip symptoms
with a prior history of THA warrant orthopaedic surgical evaluation.
Increased awareness of the range of systemic symptoms associated
with cobalt toxicity, coupled with prompt orthopaedic intervention, may
forestall the development of further complications. Cite this article:
T-cells are considered to play an important role in the inflammatory response causing arthroplasty failure. The study objectives were to investigate the composition and distribution of CD4+ T-cell phenotypes in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of patients undergoing revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hip arthroplasties, and in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty. In this prospective case-control study, PB and SF were obtained from 22 patients (23 hips) undergoing revision of MoM (n = 14) and MoP (n = 9) hip arthroplasties, with eight controls provided from primary hip osteoarthritis cases awaiting arthroplasty. Lymphocyte subtypes in samples were analysed using flow cytometry.Objectives
Methods
In this study we evaluated whether pre-operative
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
scores can predict satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty
(THA). Prospective data for a cohort of patients undergoing THA
from two large academic centres were collected, and pre-operative
and one-year post-operative WOMAC scores and a 25-point satisfaction
questionnaire were obtained for 446 patients. Satisfaction scores
were dichotomised into either improvement or deterioration. Scatter
plots and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used to describe
the association between pre-operative WOMAC and one-year post-operative WOMAC
scores and patient satisfaction. Satisfaction was compared using
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis against pre-operative,
post-operative and δ WOMAC scores. We found no relationship between pre-operative WOMAC scores and
one-year post-operative WOMAC or satisfaction scores, with Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficients of 0.16 and –0.05, respectively. The
ROC analysis showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.54 (pre-operative
WOMAC), 0.67 (post-operative WOMAC) and 0.43 (δ WOMAC), respectively,
for an improvement in satisfaction. We conclude that the pre-operative WOMAC score does not predict
the post-operative WOMAC score or patient satisfaction after THA,
and that WOMAC scores can therefore not be used to prioritise patient
care. Cite this article:
The August 2012 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: whether cemented hip replacement might be bad for your health; highly cross-linked polyethylene; iHOT-33 - a new hip outcome measure; hamstring injuries; total hip replacement; stemmed metal-on-metal THR; bipolar hemiarthroplasty, neuromuscular disease and dislocation; the high risk of secondary hemiarthroplasty; and whether we have to repair the labrum after all?
The April 2012 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at osteoporotic hip fractures, retrotrochanteric pain, fibrin adhesive and reattachment of articular cartilage, autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells and avascular necrosis, bearing surfaces, stability after THR, digital templating, pelvic tilt after THR, custom-made sockets for DDH, and dogs and THR
Ceramic-on-metal (CoM) is a relatively new bearing
combination for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with few reported outcomes.
A total of 287 CoM THAs were carried out in 271 patients (mean age
55.6 years (20 to 77), 150 THAs in female patients, 137 in male)
under the care of a single surgeon between October 2007 and October
2009. With the issues surrounding metal-on-metal bearings the decision
was taken to review these patients between March and November 2011,
at a mean follow-up of 34 months (23 to 45) and to record pain,
outcome scores, radiological analysis and blood ion levels. The
mean Oxford Hip Score was 19.2 (12 to 53), 254 patients with 268
hips (95%) had mild/very mild/no pain, the mean angle of inclination
of the acetabular component was 44.8o (28o to
63o), 82 stems (29%) had evidence of radiolucent lines
of >
1 mm in at least one Gruen zone and the median levels of cobalt
and chromium ions in the blood were 0.83 μg/L (0.24 μg/L to 27.56 μg/L)
and 0.78 μg/L (0.21 μg/L to 8.84 μg/L), respectively. The five-year
survival rate is 96.9% (95% confidence interval 94.7% to 99%). Due to the presence of radiolucent lines and the higher than
expected levels of metal ions in the blood, we would not recommend
the use of CoM THA without further long-term follow-up. We plan
to monitor all these patients regularly. Cite this article:
A high radiographic inclination angle (RI) contributes
to accelerated wear and has been associated with dislocation after
total hip arthroplasty (THA). With freehand positioning of the acetabular
component there is a lack of accuracy, with a trend towards a high
radiographic inclination angle. The aim of this study was to investigate
whether the use of a digital protractor to measure the operative
inclination angle (OI) could improve the positioning of the acetabular
component in relation to a ‘safe zone’. We measured the radiographic inclination angles of 200 consecutive
uncemented primary THAs. In the first 100 the component was introduced
freehand and in the second 100 a digital protractor was used to
measure the operative inclination angle. The mean difference between the operative and the radiographic
inclination angles
(∆RI–OI) in the second cohort was 12.3° (3.8° to 19.8°). There was
a strong correlation between the circumference of the hip and ∆RI–OI.
The number of RI outliers was significantly reduced in the protractor
group (p = 0.002). Adjusting the OI, using a digital protractor and taking into
account the circumference of the patient’s hip, improves the RI
significantly (p <
0.001) and does not require additional operating
time. Cite this article:
Many different designs of total hip arthroplasty
(THA) with varying performance and cost are available. The identification
of those which are the most cost-effective could allow significant
cost-savings. We used an established Markov model to examine the
cost effectiveness of five frequently used categories of THA which differed
according to bearing surface and mode of fixation, using data from
the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Kaplan–Meier
analyses of rates of revision for men and women were modelled with
parametric distributions. Costs of devices were provided by the
NHS Supply Chain and associated costs were taken from existing studies.
Lifetime costs, lifetime quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) and
the probability of a device being cost effective at a willingness
to pay £20 000/QALY were included in the models. The differences in QALYs between different categories of implant
were extremely small (<
0.0039 QALYs for men or women over the
patient’s lifetime) and differences in cost were also marginal (£2500
to £3000 in the same time period). As a result, the probability
of any particular device being the most cost effective was very
sensitive to small, plausible changes in quality of life estimates
and cost. Our results suggest that available evidence does not support
recommending a particular device on cost effectiveness grounds alone.
We would recommend that the choice of prosthesis should be determined
by the rate of revision, local costs and the preferences of the
surgeon and patient. Cite this article:
We compared the rate of revision for instability
after total hip replacement (THR) when lipped and non-lipped acetabular
liners were used. We hypothesised that the use of a lipped liner
in a modular uncemented acetabular component reduces the risk of
revision for instability after primary THR. Using data from the
New Zealand Joint Registry, we found that the use of a lipped liner
was associated with a significantly decreased rate of revision for instability
and for all other indications. Adjusting for the size of the femoral
head, the surgical approach and the age and gender of the patient,
this difference remained strongly significant (p <
0.001). We conclude that evidence from the New Zealand registry suggests
that the use of lipped liners with modular uncemented acetabular
components is associated with a decreased rate of revision for instability
after primary THR. Cite this article:
We describe the clinical and radiological results
of cementless primary total hip replacement (THR) in 25 patients
(18 women and seven men; 30 THRs) with severe developmental dysplasia
of the hip (DDH). Their mean age at surgery was 47 years (23 to
89). In all, 21 hips had Crowe type III dysplasia and nine had Crowe
type IV. Cementless acetabular components with standard polyethylene
liners were introduced as close to the level of the true acetabulum
as possible. The modular cementless S-ROM femoral component was
used with a low resection of the femoral neck. A total of 21 patients (25 THRs) were available for review at
a mean follow-up of 18.7 years (15.8 to 21.8). The mean modified
Harris hip score improved from 46 points pre-operatively to 90 at
final follow up (p <
0.001). A total of 15 patients (17 THRs; 57%) underwent revision of the
acetabular component at a mean of 14.6 years (7 to 20.8), all for
osteolysis. Two patients (two THRs) had symptomatic loosening. No
patient underwent femoral revision. Survival with revision of either
component for any indication was 81% at 15 years (95% CI 60.1 to
92.3), with 21 patients at risk. This technique may reduce the need for femoral osteotomy in severe
DDH, while providing a good long-term functional result. Cite this article:
This review examines the future of total hip arthroplasty, aiming to avoid past mistakes
Third-body wear is believed to be one trigger for adverse results
with metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings. Impingement and subluxation
may release metal particles from MOM replacements. We therefore
challenged MOM bearings with relevant debris types of cobalt–chrome
alloy (CoCr), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and polymethylmethacrylate
bone cement (PMMA). Cement flakes (PMMA), CoCr and Ti6Al4V particles (size range
5 µm to 400 µm) were run in a MOM wear simulation. Debris allotments
(5 mg) were inserted at ten intervals during the five million cycle
(5 Mc) test. Objectives
Methods
The December 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: national guidance on arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis is effective; unicompartmental knee replacement has the edge in terms of short-term complications; stiff knees, timing and manipulation; neuropathic pain and total knee replacement; synovial fluid α-defensin and CRP: a new gold standard in joint infection diagnosis?; how to assess anterior knee pain?; where is the evidence? Five new implants under the spotlight; and a fresh look at ACL reconstruction
Giant cell tumour is the most common aggressive
benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system and has a high rate of
local recurrence. When it occurs in proximity to the hip, reconstruction
of the joint is a challenge. Options for reconstruction after wide
resection include the use of a megaprosthesis or an allograft-prosthesis
composite. We performed a clinical and radiological study to evaluate
the functional results of a proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis
composite in the treatment of proximal femoral giant cell tumour
after wide resection. This was an observational study, between 2006
and 2012, of 18 patients with a mean age of 32 years (28 to 42)
and a mean follow-up of 54 months (18 to 79). We achieved excellent
outcomes using Harris Hip Score in 13 patients and a good outcome
in five. All allografts united. There were no complications such
as infection, failure, fracture or resorption of the graft, or recurrent
tumour. Resection and reconstruction of giant cell tumours with
proximal femoral allograft–prosthesis composite is a better option
than using a prosthesis considering preservation of bone stock and excellent
restoration of function. A good result requires demanding bone banking techniques, effective
measures to prevent infection and stability at the allograft-host
junction. Cite this article:
We reviewed the results of 84 total hip replacements performed with a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomical cementless femoral component in 84 unselected consecutive patients with a mean age of 78.9 years (70 to 88). The mean follow-up was 4.6 years (4 to 5). The mean pre-operative Harris hip score was 26 points (0 to 56), which improved to 89 (61 to 100) at the final follow-up. No patient had thigh pain. The mean pre-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index score was 61 points (48 to 75), which improved to 21 (6 to 46). The mean University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 5.5 points (3 to 7) at the final follow-up. Osseointegration was seen in all femoral and acetabular components. All hips had grade 1 stress shielding of the proximal femur. No acetabular or femoral osteolysis was identified. These results demonstrate that a short metaphyseal-fitting femoral component achieves optimal fixation without diaphyseal anchorage in elderly patients.
The June 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Modular femoral necks: early signs are not good; is corrosion to blame for modular neck failures; metal-on-metal is not quite a closed book; no excess failures in fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures; noise no problem in hip replacement; heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy: are NSAIDs the answer?; thrombotic and bleeding events surprisingly low in total joint replacement; and the elephant in the room: complications and surgical volume.
We measured the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 53.4 years (30 to 74) who had undergone revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Three-dimensional CT was used to measure the inclination and version of the acetabular component, femoral version and the horizontal femoral offset, and the linear wear of the removed acetabular components was measured using a roundness machine. We found that acetabular version and combined version of the acetabular and femoral components were weakly positively correlated with the rate of wear. The acetabular inclination angle was strongly positively correlated with the rate of wear. Femoral version was weakly negatively correlated with the rate of wear. Application of a threshold of >
5 μm/year for the rate of wear in order to separate the revisions into low or high wearing groups showed that more high wearing components were implanted outside Lewinnek’s safe zone, but that this was mainly due to the inclination of the acetabular component, which was the only parameter that significantly differed between the groups. We were unable to show that excess version of the acetabular component alone or combined with femoral version was associated with an increase in the rate of wear based on our assessment of version using CT.