The Sliding Hip Screw (SHS) is commonly used to treat trochanteric hip fractures. Fixation failure is a devastating complication requiring complex revision surgery. One mode of fixation failure is lag screw cut-out which is greatest in unstable fracture patterns and when the tip-apex distance of the lag screw is > 25 mm. The X-Bolt Dynamic Hip Plating System (X-Bolt Orthopaedics, Dublin, Ireland) is a new device which aims to reduce this risk of cut-out. However, some surgeons have reported difficulty minimising the tip-apex distance with subsequent concerns that this may lead to an increased risk of cut-out. We measured the tip-apex distance from the intra-operative radiographs of 93 unstable trochanteric hip fractures enrolled in a randomised controlled trial (Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation, WHiTE One trial). Participants were treated with either the sliding hip screw or the X-Bolt dynamic hip plating system. We also recorded the incidence of cut-out in both groups, at a median follow-up time of 17 months.Objectives
Patients and Methods
We conducted a study to determine whether radiological parameters
correlate with patient reported functional outcome, health-related
quality of life and physical measures of function in patients with
a fracture of the distal radius. The post-operative palmar tilt and ulnar variance at six weeks
and 12 months were correlated with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation,
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and EuroQol scores,
grip strength, pinch strength and range of movement at three, six
and 12 months for 50 patients (mean age 57 years; 26 to 85) having surgical
fixation, with either percutaneous pinning or reconstruction with
a volar plate, for a fracture of the distal radius.Aims
Patients and Methods
Traditionally, informed consent for clinical
research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information
Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time
as they need to discuss the study information with their friends
and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This
system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what
happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency? This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed
consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken
may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment
required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent
following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips
for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries
and emergencies. Cite this article:
The optimal treatment for independent patients with a displaced
intracapsular fracture of the hip remains controversial. The recognised
alternatives are hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. At
present there is no established standard of care, with both types
of arthroplasty being used in many centres. We conducted a feasibility study comparing the clinical effectiveness
of a dual mobility acetabular component compared with standard polyethylene
component in total hip arthroplasty for independent patients with
a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip, for a 12-month period
beginning in June 2013. The primary outcome was the risk of dislocation
one year post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol
5 Dimensions, ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people, Oxford
hip score, mortality and re-operation.Aims
Patients and Methods
The annual incidence of hip fracture is 620 000 in the European Union. The cost of this clinical problem has been estimated at 1.75 million disability-adjusted life years lost, equating to 1.4% of the total healthcare burden in established market economies. Recent guidance from The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) states that research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a treatment for hip fracture is a priority. We asked the question: can a trial investigating THA for hip fracture currently be delivered in the NHS? We performed a contemporaneous process evaluation that provides a context for the interpretation of the findings of WHiTE Two – a randomised study of THA for hip fracture. We developed a mixed methods approach to situate the trial centre within the context of wider United Kingdom clinical practice. We focused on fidelity, implementation, acceptability and feasibility of both the trial processes and interventions to stakeholder groups, such as healthcare providers and patients.Objectives
Methods
We aimed to determine whether there is evidence of improved patient
outcomes in Major Trauma Centres following the regionalisation of
trauma care in England. An observational study was undertaken using the Trauma Audit
and Research Network (TARN), Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and
national death registrations. The outcome measures were indicators
of the quality of trauma care, such as treatment by a senior doctor
and clinical outcomes, such as mortality in hospital.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to inform a definitive trial which
could determine the clinical effectiveness of the X-Bolt Dynamic
Hip Plating System compared with the sliding hip screw for patients
with complex pertrochanteric fragility fractures of the femur. This was a single centre, participant blinded, randomised, standard-of-care
controlled pilot trial. Patients aged 60 years and over with AO/ASIF
A2 and A3 type femoral pertrochanteric fractures were eligible.Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim, using English Hospital Episode Statistics data before
during and after the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial
(DRAFFT), was to assess whether the results of the trial affected
clinical practice. Data were grouped into six month intervals from July 2005 to
December 2014. All patient episodes in the National Health Service
involving emergency surgery for an isolated distal radial fracture
were included.Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study, we aimed to determine whether designation as a
major trauma centre (MTC) affects the quality of care for patients
with a fracture of the hip. All patients in the United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Database,
between April 2010 and December 2013, were included. The indicators
of quality that were recorded included the time to arrival on an
orthopaedic ward, to review by a geriatrician, and to operation.
The clinical outcomes were the development of a pressure sore, discharge
home, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and re-operation within
30 days. Aims
Patients and Methods
Approximately half of all hip fractures are displaced intracapsular fractures. The standard treatment for these fractures is either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on hip fracture management recommends the use of ‘proven’ cemented stem arthroplasty with an Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of at least 3B (97% survival at three years). The Thompsons prosthesis is currently lacking an ODEP rating despite over 50 years of clinical use, likely due to the paucity of implant survival data. Nationally, adherence to these guidelines is varied as there is debate as to which prosthesis optimises patient outcomes. This study design is a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, parallel, two arm, standard-of-care pragmatic randomised controlled trial. It will be embedded within the WHiTE Comprehensive Cohort Study (ISRCTN63982700). The main analysis is a two-way equivalence comparison between Hemi-Thompson and Hemi-Exeter polished taper with Unitrax head. Secondary outcomes will include radiological leg length discrepancy measured as per Bidwai and Willett, mortality, re-operation rate and indication for re-operation, length of index hospital stay and revision at four months. This study will be supplemented by the NHFD (National Hip Fracture Database) dataset.Background
Design
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
Hip fracture is a common injury associated with
high mortality, long-term disability and huge socio-economic burden.
Yet there has been relatively little research into best treatment,
and evidence that has been generated has often been criticised for
its poor quality. Here, we discuss the advances made towards overcoming
these criticisms and the future directions for hip fracture research:
how co-ordinating existing national infrastructures and use of now
established clinical research networks will likely go some way towards
overcoming the practical and financial challenges of conducting
large trials. We highlight the importance of large collaborative
pragmatic trials to inform decision/policy makers and the progress
made towards reaching a consensus on a core outcome set to facilitate data
pooling for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. These advances and future directions are a priority in order
to establish the high-quality evidence base required for this important
group of patients. Cite this article:
Subtotal or total meniscectomy in the medial or lateral compartment
of the knee results in a high risk of future osteoarthritis. Meniscal
allograft transplantation has been performed for over thirty years
with the scientifically plausible hypothesis that it functions in
a similar way to a native meniscus. It is thought that a meniscal
allograft transplant has a chondroprotective effect, reducing symptoms
and the long-term risk of osteoarthritis. However, this hypothesis has
never been tested in a high-quality study on human participants.
This study aims to address this shortfall by performing a pilot
randomised controlled trial within the context of a comprehensive
cohort study design. Patients will be randomised to receive either meniscal transplant
or a non-operative, personalised knee therapy program. MRIs will
be performed every four months for one year. The primary endpoint
is the mean change in cartilage volume in the weight-bearing area
of the knee at one year post intervention. Secondary outcome measures
include the mean change in cartilage thickness, T2 maps, patient-reported
outcome measures, health economics assessment and complications.Objectives
Methods
We conducted an observational radiographic study
to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification
of fractures of the distal radius. Plain posteroanterior and lateral
radiographs of 456 patients with an acute fracture of the distal
radius were classified by a consultant orthopaedic hand specialist
and two specialist trainees, and the k coefficient for the inter-
and intra-observer reliability of the type, group and subgroup classification
was calculated. Only the type of fracture (A, B or C) was found to provide substantial
intra-observer reliability (k type 0.65). The inclusion
of ‘group’ and ‘subgroup’ into the classification reduced the inter-observer
reliability to fair (kgroup 0.29, ksubgroup =
0.28) and the intra-observer reliability to moderate (kgroup 0.53,
ksubgroup 0.49). Disagreement was found to arise between
specific subgroups, which may be amenable to clarification. Cite this article:
The anatomy and microstructure of the menisci
allow the effective distribution of load across the knee. Meniscectomy
alters the biomechanical environment and is a potent risk factor
for osteoarthritis. Despite a trend towards meniscus-preserving
surgery, many tears are irreparable, and many repairs fail. Meniscal allograft transplantation has principally been carried
out for pain in patients who have had a meniscectomy. Numerous case
series have reported a significant improvement in patient-reported
outcomes after surgery, but randomised controlled trials have not
been undertaken. It is scientifically plausible that meniscal allograft transplantation
is protective of cartilage, but this has not been established clinically
to date. Cite this article:
The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon
rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish
what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’
views on proposed further research in this area. This study was
registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger
programme of research. We report an online survey of current practice in the United
Kingdom, approved by the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
and completed by 181 of its members. A total of ten of these respondents
were invited for a subsequent one-to-one interview to explore clinician
views on proposed further research in this area.Objectives
Methods
Hip fracture is a global public health problem.
The National Hip Fracture Database provides a framework for service evaluation
in this group of patients in the United Kingdom, but does not collect
patient-reported outcome data and is unable to provide meaningful
data about the recovery of quality of life. We report one-year patient-reported outcomes of a prospective
cohort of patients treated at a single major trauma centre in the
United Kingdom who sustained a hip fracture between January 2012
and March 2014. There was an initial marked decline in quality of life from baseline
measured using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions score (EQ-5D). It was followed
by a significant improvement to 120 days for all patients. Although
their quality of life improved during the year after the fracture,
it was still significantly lower than before injury irrespective
of age group or cognitive impairment (mean reduction EQ-5D 0.22;
95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.26). There was strong evidence
that quality of life was lower for patients with cognitive impairment.
There was a mean reduction in EQ-5D of 0.28 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.35)
in patients <
80 years of age. This difference was consistent
(and fixed) throughout follow-up. Quality of life does not improve
significantly during recovery from hip fracture in patients over
80 years of age (p = 0.928). Secondary measures of function showed
similar trends. Hip fracture marks a step down in the quality of life of a patient:
it accounts for approximately 0.22 disability adjusted life years
in the first year after fracture. This is equivalent to serious
neurological conditions for which extensive funding for research
and treatment is made available. Cite this article:
