The primary aim of this study was to determine the surgical team’s
learning curve for introducing robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) into routine surgical practice. The secondary
objective was to compare accuracy of implant positioning in conventional
jig-based UKA versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. This prospective single-surgeon cohort study included 60 consecutive
conventional jig-based UKAs compared with 60 consecutive robotic-arm
assisted UKAs for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Patients
undergoing conventional UKA and robotic-arm assisted UKA were well-matched
for baseline characteristics including a mean age of 65.5 years
(Aims
Patients and Methods
An evidence-based radiographic Decision Aid for meniscal-bearing
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been developed and
this study investigates its performance at an independent centre. Pre-operative radiographs, including stress views, from a consecutive
cohort of 550 knees undergoing arthroplasty (UKA or total knee arthroplasty;
TKA) by a single-surgeon were assessed. Suitability for UKA was
determined using the Decision Aid, with the assessor blinded to
treatment received, and compared with actual treatment received, which
was determined by an experienced UKA surgeon based on history, examination,
radiographic assessment including stress radiographs, and intra-operative
assessment in line with the recommended indications as described
in the literature.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in opioid use
after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), to identify predictors
of prolonged use and to compare the rates of opioid use after UKA,
total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). We identified 4205 patients who had undergone UKA between 2007
and 2015 from the Humana Inc. administrative claims database. Post-operative
opioid use for one year post-operatively was assessed using the
rates of monthly repeat prescription. These were then compared between
patients with and without a specific variable of interest and with
those of patients who had undergone TKA and THA.Aims
Materials and Methods
This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.Objectives
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been successfully
performed in the United States healthcare system on outpatients.
Despite differences in healthcare structure and financial environment,
we hypothesised that it would be feasible to replicate this success
and perform UKA with safe day of surgery discharge within the NHS,
in the United Kingdom. This has not been reported in any other United
Kingdom centres. We report our experience of implementing a pathway to allow safe
day of surgery discharge following UKA. Data were prospectively
collected on 72 patients who underwent UKA as a day case between
December 2011 and September 2015. Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Cruciate substituting
To compare the gait of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)
and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with healthy controls,
using a machine-learning approach. 145 participants (121 healthy controls, 12 patients with cruciate-retaining
TKA, and 12 with mobile-bearing medial UKA) were recruited. The
TKA and UKA patients were a minimum of 12 months post-operative,
and matched for pattern and severity of arthrosis, age, and body
mass index. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill until their
maximum walking speed was reached. Temporospatial gait parameters,
and vertical ground reaction force data, were captured at each speed.
Oxford knee scores (OKS) were also collected. An ensemble of trees
algorithm was used to analyse the data: 27 gait variables were used
to train classification trees for each speed, with a binary output
prediction of whether these variables were derived from a UKA or
TKA patient. Healthy control gait data was then tested by the decision
trees at each speed and a final classification (UKA or TKA) reached
for each subject in a majority voting manner over all gait cycles
and speeds. Top walking speed was also recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Whether to use total or unicompartmental knee
replacement (TKA/UKA) for end-stage knee osteoarthritis remains controversial.
Although UKA results in a faster recovery, lower rates of morbidity
and mortality and fewer complications, the long-term revision rate
is substantially higher than that for TKA. The effect of each intervention on
patient-reported outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study
was to determine whether six-month patient-reported outcome measures
(PROMs) are better in patients after TKA or UKA, using data from
a large national joint registry (NJR). We carried out a propensity score-matched cohort study which
compared six-month PROMs after TKA and UKA in patients enrolled
in the NJR for England and Wales, and the English national PROM
collection programme. A total of 3519 UKA patients were matched
to 10 557 TKAs. The mean six-month PROMs favoured UKA: the Oxford Knee Score
was 37.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 38.0) for UKA and
36.1 (95% CI 35.9 to 36.3) for TKA; the mean EuroQol EQ-5D index
was 0.772 (95% CI 0.764 to 0.780) for UKA and 0.751 (95% CI 0.747
to 0.756) for TKA. UKA patients were more likely to achieve excellent
results (odds ratio (OR) 1.59, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.72, p <
0.001)
and to be highly satisfied (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.39, p <
0.001), and
were less likely to report complications than those who had undergone
TKA. UKA gives better early patient-reported outcomes than TKA; these
differences are most marked for the very best outcomes. Complications
and readmission are more likely after TKA. Although the data presented
reflect the short-term outcome, they suggest that the high revision
rate for UKA may not be because of poorer clinical outcomes. These
factors should inform decision-making in patients eligible for either
procedure. Cite this article:
The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported
long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. We therefore identified a previously unreported cohort of 1084
knees in 947 patients who had a UKA inserted for anteromedial knee
arthritis by consultants and surgeons in training, at a tertiary
arthroplasty centre and performed survival analysis on the group
with revision as the endpoint.Aims
Patients and Methods
Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004, the Phase
III Oxford Medial Partial Knee is used to treat anteromedial osteoarthritis
(AMOA) in patients with an intact anterior cruciate ligament. This
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively new in the
United States, and therefore long-term American results are lacking. This is a single surgeon, retrospective study based on prospectively
collected data, analysing a consecutive series of primary UKAs using
the Phase III mobile-bearing Oxford Knee and Phase III instrumentation. Between July 2004 and December 2006, the senior author (RHE)
carried out a medial UKA in 173 patients (213 knees) for anteromedial
osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis (AVN). A total of 95 patients were men and 78 were women. Their mean
age at surgery was 67 years (38 to 89) and mean body mass index
29.87 kg/m2 (17 to 62). The mean follow-up was ten years (4 to 11).Aims
Patients and Methods
The treatment of bone loss in revision total
knee arthroplasty has evolved over the past decade. While the management
of small to moderate sized defects has demonstrated good results
with a variety of traditional techniques (cement and screws, small
metal augments, impaction bone grafting or modular stems), the treatment of
severe defects continues to be problematic. The use of a structural
allograft has declined in recent years due to an increased failure
rate with long-term follow-up and with the introduction of highly
porous metal augments that emphasise biological metaphyseal fixation.
Recently published mid-term results on the use of tantalum cones
in patients with severe bone loss has reaffirmed the success of
this treatment strategy. Cite this article:
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
We studied whether the presence of lateral osteophytes
on plain radiographs was a predictor for the quality of cartilage
in the lateral compartment of patients with varus osteoarthritic
of the knee (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 to 3). The baseline MRIs of 344 patients from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
(OAI) who had varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee on hip-knee-ankle
radiographs were reviewed. Patients were categorised using the Osteoarthritis
Research Society International (OARSI) osteophyte grading system
into 174 patients with grade 0 (no osteophytes), 128 grade 1 (mild
osteophytes), 28 grade 2 (moderate osteophytes) and 14 grade 3 (severe
osteophytes) in the lateral compartment (tibia). All patients had
Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3 arthritis of the medial compartment.
The thickness and volume of the lateral cartilage and the percentage
of full-thickness cartilage defects in the lateral compartment was
analysed. There was no difference in the cartilage thickness or cartilage
volume between knees with osteophyte grades 0 to 3. The percentage
of full-thickness cartilage defects on the tibial side increased
from <
2% for grade 0 and 1 to 10% for grade 3. The lateral compartment cartilage volume and thickness is not
influenced by the presence of lateral compartment osteophytes in
patients with varus OA of the knee. Large lateral compartment osteophytes
(grade 3) increase the likelihood of full-thickness cartilage defects
in the lateral compartment. Cite this article:
